Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

If these Nevada Caucuses don't go off without a hitch today, the Democratic Party might explode. It's a powder keg just begging to go off.
How bad did New Hampshire go for those not willing to sift through that thread? I just picked up that it looks to be another Bootyedge/Sanders split conveniently due to how close both are.

I did notice Iowa IS STILL NOT DECIDED APPARENTLY though.
 
How bad did New Hampshire go for those not willing to sift through that thread? I just picked up that it looks to be another Bootyedge/Sanders split conveniently due to how close both are.

I did notice Iowa IS STILL NOT DECIDED APPARENTLY though.

According to google looks like split between papa comunism and the butt. Seems like nothing really exciting happened like Iowa but Nevada seems to be turning into a shit show, early votes haven't been counted yet.

CandidateDelegatesPercentCount

1582393972002.jpeg
Bernie Sanders
925.7%76,324

1582393972051.jpeg
Pete Buttigieg
924.4%72,457

1582393972098.jpeg
Amy Klobuchar
619.8%58,796

1582393972141.jpeg
Elizabeth Warren
09.2%27,387
 
Democrats: Trump isn't the real president, because Hilary got more votes
Also Democrats: who cares who got the most votes lol

1f283b67162b4444bdd1058ae91a2fff-imagejpeg.jpg


edit: wrong picture
 
Last edited:
Democrats: Trump isn't the real president, because Hilary got more votes
Also Democrats: who cares who got the most votes lol

View attachment 1156642
Because I can totally believe the two "front runners" who barely got a quarter of a state's votes two times in a row can win this one. Seriously, what a shitshow.
 
View attachment 1156721
Found in /r/worldpolitics

The same people who spout lines like this now are usually also the ones that chastised people for celebrating Bin Laden's death, and I can guarantee you they've called every time Trump's killed a terrorist leader an "assassination".
 
I hope one day the common public sees the Russia as the new "LITERALLY HITLER" since there are already three candidates called Russian puppets that all happen to be against the Democratic Establishment.
The public doesn't even see "literally hitler" as the subversive forced meme it is. I have low expectation.
 
How bad did New Hampshire go for those not willing to sift through that thread? I just picked up that it looks to be another Bootyedge/Sanders split conveniently due to how close both are.

I did notice Iowa IS STILL NOT DECIDED APPARENTLY though.
The damage was already done with Iowa, nobody got the momentum. DNC is prepped for the contested nomination.
 
View attachment 1156904

Yeah, that's the plan. It took you that long to realize it? You're welcome to resign if it bothers you so much.
At least they're admitting it. All of their policies are top-down. Nobody wants them, and the courts work only to enforce their will on the plebs. Without the courts bent to their will there's no gay marriage, no abortion, none of the social policies leftists love.
 
View attachment 1156531

Alex Jones got de-platformed for pushing conspiracies less insane than this shit. At least Alex was funny. This is just mental illness.

You want some real historical irony? Back when the modern conservative movement was being organized in the late 1950's by Buckley and his friends, there was something like this on the right. The Birchers, members of the John Birch Society, were influential Republicans who thought that Communists had infiltrated the federal government so deeply that even President Eisenhower was a Russian tool, accusing him of treason.

Buckley spent the first few years of his new political movement denouncing the Birchers, losing sponsors and allies, getting hate mail and death threats from them. He eventually won, pushing them out of the mainstream, and the New Right conservatives earned the reputation of intellectual honesty for calling out its own fringe elements and conspiracy theorists. (A lesson the alt-right should have learned if they wanted to go strong.)

The modern left is not only unwilling to call out its own conspiracy theory crackpots, it puts them on TV as the face of their party. The progressives aren't going to build a lasting intellectual movement if they don't control their own fringe wackos. It can only last until your mainstream constituency notices you're celebrating and promoting the crazies.
 
You want some real historical irony? Back when the modern conservative movement was being organized in the late 1950's by Buckley and his friends, there was something like this on the right. The Birchers, members of the John Birch Society, were influential Republicans who thought that Communists had infiltrated the federal government so deeply that even President Eisenhower was a Russian tool, accusing him of treason.

Buckley spent the first few years of his new political movement denouncing the Birchers, losing sponsors and allies, getting hate mail and death threats from them. He eventually won, pushing them out of the mainstream, and the New Right conservatives earned the reputation of intellectual honesty for calling out its own fringe elements and conspiracy theorists. (A lesson the alt-right should have learned if they wanted to go strong.)

The modern left is not only unwilling to call out its own conspiracy theory crackpots, it puts them on TV as the face of their party. The progressives aren't going to build a lasting intellectual movement if they don't control their own fringe wackos. It can only last until your mainstream constituency notices you're celebrating and promoting the crazies.
The only difference is that the Birchers were later proved right. The Soviet Union was using liaisons between American and Russian academics and financial connections with the World Jewish Congress and SPLC to do a "march through the institutions" to make their values taught in every school in the nation and to hold as many judgeships and congress seats as possible.

It might not have led to a total victory for Stalin, but it fundamentally changed America into something the average man from that time would find utterly repulsive.
 
Also, I love how they seem to honestly think that kicking people off social media won't create a subclass of very angry people who are going to be primed to vote against them.... they seem to think that banning a person off their platform deletes them like Thanos from the real world too...... like, you know that person you just pissed off still exists, right? And is looking to fuck you over now? Right?

Even if their plan to make criticizing anything the Dems do "works" , HOW do they expect that to translate into gains at the polls?
They hope that low-info voters will suddenly around election time seek to become informed, and start looking up political shit online. If all they see in this quest is wall-to-wall Breadtubers and Neolib talking points, most will side with the Neolibs, some will be entranced by the Breadtubers, and the vast majority will be pushed towards voting for whoever the Dems run. Same thing for any teenagers who suddenly get interested in politics.

It's not as if most people form their political views by philosophizing from a set of first principles, or by analysing impartial accounts of history and determining which policies work best for each situation, they do it by reading or listening to other's opinions and gravitate towards what sounds the best. Thankfully this effect works slowly, otherwise Carl Benjamin would be in Parliament by now (but that might just be because the vast majority of his fans live nowhere near him and the UK uses First Past the Post).
You want some real historical irony? Back when the modern conservative movement was being organized in the late 1950's by Buckley and his friends, there was something like this on the right. The Birchers, members of the John Birch Society, were influential Republicans who thought that Communists had infiltrated the federal government so deeply that even President Eisenhower was a Russian tool, accusing him of treason.

Buckley spent the first few years of his new political movement denouncing the Birchers, losing sponsors and allies, getting hate mail and death threats from them. He eventually won, pushing them out of the mainstream, and the New Right conservatives earned the reputation of intellectual honesty for calling out its own fringe elements and conspiracy theorists. (A lesson the alt-right should have learned if they wanted to go strong.)

The modern left is not only unwilling to call out its own conspiracy theory crackpots, it puts them on TV as the face of their party. The progressives aren't going to build a lasting intellectual movement if they don't control their own fringe wackos. It can only last until your mainstream constituency notices you're celebrating and promoting the crazies.
And what has this approach of "denouncing the crazies" gotten against the other side, who embraced the energy of these "crazies" and harnessed their obsessiveness to to secure every available advantage? Absolute cultural control ceded to the left, and the Republicans can only barely eke out surface-level electoral victories by pretending to be what the left was 10-20 years ago and shrewdly gaming an electoral system which was deliberately rigged in their favour to prevent another Robespierre.
 
Last edited:
Back