Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Found this from a subrreddit called r/enoughtrumpspam
View attachment 1156930
As much as I'd hate to say this, but the Millennial obsession with "doggos" and how if one isn't a dog person that they're fundamentally bad people makes me almost hate dogs. The modern Left is so infantile.

As for the revival of "Muh Russia" for the umpteen thousandth time, I suspect that this will be used to discredit Bernie Sanders within the DNC.

Imagine it: Bernie has a plurality of delegates, and maybe even a majority of the popular vote. However, the "drip-drip-drip" of "Russian interference" on behalf of the Sanders campaign will given those that run the DNC the cover to take the nomination away from him with some bullshit excuse that "we can't be sure" or something like that. I guarantee you, Russia will be used to justify robbing Bernie the nomination.
 
They hope that low-info voters will suddenly around election time seek to become informed, and start looking up political shit online. If all they see in this quest is wall-to-wall Breadtubers and Neolib talking points, most will side with the Neolibs, some will be entranced by the Breadtubers, and the vast majority will be pushed towards voting for whoever the Dems run. Same thing for any teenagers who suddenly get interested in politics.

Nailed it. In a normal life, no one has time for politics. You get your ballot notification, so you pay attention to the next political story shared on Facebook, or you google "who supports better health care", or you watch cable news for the first time in 2 years...

I personally have people in my life who are highly educated, highly intelligent, and highly successful, who will text me the day before an election and ask "did Trump really say all Mexicans are rapists?" They aren't stupid or brainwashed, they're just busy. They stopped Liking their cousin's baby pictures long enough to click on whatever political ad the algorithm showed them that day.

In the hate-filled contentious "most important election of our lifetime!!!!!!!!", only 55% of voters cast a vote. 45% of the American populace cared about politics so little, they didn't even bother to mail in a form. A significant portion of the 55% who did bother to vote are those low-information voters who can be swayed by hiding contrary information.

Those low-information voters have been getting targeted by political parties for at least a decade. Big Tech censoring the "open, free, democratic" Internet narrative is just another way to manipulate them.
 
As much as I'd hate to say this, but the Millennial obsession with "doggos" and how if one isn't a dog person that they're fundamentally bad people makes me almost hate dogs. The modern Left is so infantile.

As for the revival of "Muh Russia" for the umpteen thousandth time, I suspect that this will be used to discredit Bernie Sanders within the DNC.

Imagine it: Bernie has a plurality of delegates, and maybe even a majority of the popular vote. However, the "drip-drip-drip" of "Russian interference" on behalf of the Sanders campaign will given those that run the DNC the cover to take the nomination away from him with some bullshit excuse that "we can't be sure" or something like that. I guarantee you, Russia will be used to justify robbing Bernie the nomination.
Or they can make Bernie Sanders "die" of "natural causes".

While I'm not that big on conspiracy theories, something tells me that Hillary Clinton has Bernie Sanders next on her hit list too.
 
Or they can make Bernie Sanders "die" of "natural causes".

While I'm not that big on conspiracy theories, something tells me that Hillary Clinton has Bernie Sanders next on her hit list too.
They already got him with the heart-attack gun and missed. That fucking guy is immortal.
 
You want some real historical irony? Back when the modern conservative movement was being organized in the late 1950's by Buckley and his friends, there was something like this on the right. The Birchers, members of the John Birch Society, were influential Republicans who thought that Communists had infiltrated the federal government so deeply that even President Eisenhower was a Russian tool, accusing him of treason.

Buckley spent the first few years of his new political movement denouncing the Birchers, losing sponsors and allies, getting hate mail and death threats from them. He eventually won, pushing them out of the mainstream, and the New Right conservatives earned the reputation of intellectual honesty for calling out its own fringe elements and conspiracy theorists. (A lesson the alt-right should have learned if they wanted to go strong.)

The modern left is not only unwilling to call out its own conspiracy theory crackpots, it puts them on TV as the face of their party. The progressives aren't going to build a lasting intellectual movement if they don't control their own fringe wackos. It can only last until your mainstream constituency notices you're celebrating and promoting the crazies.
It's just like how the GOP used to be in the 1990's and the 2000's where they did nothing but preaching 'War on Terrorism good because terrorism bad', the times when they kept shilling for nutjob religious social conservatives, and even covering up for their buddies until the cracks began to show and revealed to everyone why they are a bunch of shitheads (see the Enron scandal where George W. Bush covered up for them until it was too late).

So going what you said with the alt-right, the reason why the alt-right is now pretty much dead is because as you said the movement originally started as a counter to traditional right-wing ideals only for it to get flooded with Neo-Nazis, /pol/acks, skinheads, the Ku Klux Klan, and other white supremacist groups and when they refused to denounce them and let people like Richard Spencer do what they want they just gave news media plenty of ammo to work with for why they are a joke.

The same can be said with left-wing movements such as Occupy Wall Street. Remember Occupy Wall Street? It started as a movement over with the concern of big money making things more unfair and big money having a huge influence in politics too. And for a while the mainstream news media for days on end kept shilling for it that is until more and more misfits and and idiots showed up and even the news media that supported them began to bail on them and the whole thing imploded.

When it comes to these types of modern day poltical movevements I'm usually hesitant to support them because I don't know if they're really that genuine and mean what they mean or if they're going to someday end up being featured on a Kiwi Farms thread.
 
Last edited:
90

This illustration from a politico article is killing me. For decades the left has used this type of imagery of a small person using a megaphone to have their voice heard. When it involves Trump it's a bad thing though I guess.
tt-000turning%2Btables%2Bmission.jpg

images

2019_0911_ElisVoice_CoverDraft3.jpg
 
View attachment 1156904

Yeah, that's the plan. It took you that long to realize it? You're welcome to resign if it bothers you so much.

Reading this article made my blood boil. This affirmative action hire uses 50,000 words to say "I don't like that the government doesn't just adhere to what the courts in LA and Hawaii said." Bitch, no one gives a fuck that your Mexican granny wants to move here and immediately get on section 8, welfare and medicare dialysis, it's not my fucking problem, no you aren't entitled to use my tax money to steal food from my daughter's mouth because your fucking granny wants a free ride. Goddamn, communists aren't people.
 
90

This illustration from a politico article is killing me. For decades the left has used this type of imagery of a small person using a megaphone to have their voice heard. When it involves Trump it's a bad thing though I guess.
tt-000turning%2Btables%2Bmission.jpg

images

2019_0911_ElisVoice_CoverDraft3.jpg
I like the implication in this article that the president isn’t supposed to listen to the public’s desires and act on them. The author then goes on to diagnose himself with social autism by treating the ability to read a room as black magic. Then gives the mans life history to, I assume his intention was to impugn his character for this, show that he takes ideas that work from various sources. Really this just reminded me of that absurdly pretentious review of the Cheesecake Factory from ages back. The one where the guy was far more interested in showing off words he’d memorized than stating something.
 
And if we're going to talk about dual citizenship then it's only fair that Israel isn't singled out too because people from other counties such as India do take advantage of dual citizenship in the United States too.

If there were dozens of Indian dual citizens prominent in leadership roles in federal politics, you can be absolutely sure that people would be yelling about it.
 
If there were dozens of Indian dual citizens prominent in leadership roles in federal politics, you can be absolutely sure that people would be yelling about it.
Israel is not unique in treating America like a client kingdom of their nation through their lobbying and political interference in America’s political leaders listening to the American public. It’s all shitty but the costal urban faggot is a lot more influential and invasive than the actual Israeli government. You only get the alt-right influence numbers if you count New York pseudo-Jews in media as Jews in general and not as costal urban faggots.
 
Back