Sincere congratulations for all of the time and effort you have painstakingly spent on this, one of the most idiotic, deluded and poorly drawn things I have seen in a very long time.
I mean goddamn, not only that, but the basic fact that good science examines the data (and all the data, not just a limited handful of it) and makes a conclusion based on that - not makes a conclusion first, then searches for anything that could be construed as supporting it while ignoring the rest.
Like DNA.
This guy has ignored the existence of DNA in its entirety seemingly this whole thread. C'mon man.
I didn't ignore DNA. I clearly explained why DNA analysis is a bias-confirming pseudo-science. This is because it is analyzed using principle component analysis, which is a flawed technique that makes little sense from a mathematical standpoint. Through one of my jobs, I had access to a large number of facial measurements of dozens of individuals. I ran a PCA plot on this data to see what would happen, and spent many hours analyzing the data and results. If you tried this yourself, you would understand why the technique is so flawed. By selecting which components you display on the graph, you can spin the data in more or less any way you wish.
Do you sterilize the stuff you shove up your nose,
@Amud? It's not just uppity medical professionals who recommend it.
I do not need to sterilize it, because of my strong Neanderthal immune system. Whatever pathetic little germs would find themselves on my finger cot wouldn't stand a chance against my turbo-powered white blood cells. If you get sick from such practices, you probably have AIDS or some other immune-compromising disease, or you have a pathetically weak constitution.
1. You just stated you made the term "nobilid" up, so you don't really have any business naming it as a phenotype. I will read your elaborations on it after class, but I still wholeheartedly encourage you to enter the sciences and contribute your belief system. If you take this so seriously, why don't you make a career out of it? At the moment you only seem to limit your ambitions to entertaining lolcow afficionados. Have dignity, follow your dream!
2. I wrote that post horribly in retrospect (mostly a flaw in my ability to articulate disagreement I'm happy to admit and continue to work on), and was actually referring to the term "Borreby" which is still incredibly questionable. Your archaic terms still seem to only be supported on white supremacist forums, and I still have the Borresby/Hellenic posts on Stormfront bookmarked. You can maintain your coinage of nobilid/ignobilid though, it's all yours.
3. Engaging with this surreal level of logic is like pulling teeth: impeding the progress of society is an incredibly subjective concept. There are people who believe welfare and social work impedes the progress of society, and there are those who think progress is stalled through discrimination. So what are these destructive "ignobilid" people doing? Having kids? Tagging buildings? I get the impression most low-income poorly educated "ignobilids" get little to no chance to damage society since they are barely seen as participants to begin with.
1. Okay, so just because I came up with something, that makes it wrong? See my comic. I am a scientist and I am contributing my belief system, not just on this forum. However, you are correct in saying that my theories are not written on OFFICIAL SCIENMAJISTIKAL PAPERZ.
2. Borreby is a city in Denmark. I'm sure the people who live in Borreby use the term frequently. Are you implying that they are all Nazis?
3. You're right. In my society, we would have to devote some extensive time toward creating these rules and definitions. This has yet to be done.
@Amud , if I invented my own system of facial classification that designated your facial shape as the most inferior, how would you falsify it without also falsifying your own system?
I would demonstrate that there are many individuals with skull and facial structures similar to mine who are not inferior.
@Amud
I know I said some snarky, shitty things in this thread in the past, but I would like to get past my mistakes and try and start a new page with you. With that in mind, would you mind answering a couple of questions for me?
1) What is you view of the current state of American politics? Do you have any politicians you like? What do you think of our president and how he has done?
2) What are your favorite books? Do you read a lot? If so, what genres and authors do you enjoy?
3) Do you play Sonic the Hedgehog, Call of Duty or any other video games?
4) I know you have mentioned you idea society before. Have you ever discussed this with anyone else or tried to get a movement going around this system?
I hope you know I am asking you these things in an open and friendly way. I do not want to mock you anymore. I want to be friends since I have read your work and have come to respect it.
Thank you for the kind words. I am happy to answer your questions.
1. I don't like the state of it, but let's be honest, my ideals will probably never be implemented. Failing that, I'm not too picky about political details. Democracy? Fascism? Communism? Capitalism? Aristocracy? Socialism? Whatever. All that stuff could potentially work, if it's done right. The problem is that it's never done right. This is because of inbred psychopathic bankers and corrupt, incompetent political leaders. If we get rid of these people, just about any political system has the potential to work reasonably well.
2. I do not read a lot. Actually, I pretty much never read. I'd like to. Reading is one of those things that I know I should be doing, but never really get around to it.
3. No, I don't play video games.
4. Do I look like I'm trying to end up on some kind of watch list?
