Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rio said:
You keep saying that rigid lines of thoughts are a sign of autism, but then you say things like this without a hint of irony. Attraction isn't that rigid. My ex, while not unattractive, wasn't anything like the underwear models you keep posting, nor was he particularly wealthy or popular, but we were still together for some 2 years.

Physical attractiveness is a factor for many girls and guys alike (saying that it's just a factor for girls is absolutely ridiculous by the way), but it's not as significant as you guys make it out to be. Not by a long shot. You seem to base your assumption of how long-term relationships are shaped based on things you see happening in discos and nightclubs when girls get picked up by charismatic handsome fellows for one night stands, but one night stands actually pretty much never turn into long-term relationships. Those require a lot more than physical attractiveness. As for one night stands themselves, I can't really judge how those work since I'm not interested in them.

Also, take it from a girl that the way in which sluthate measures physical attractiveness is profoundly autistic. Attractiveness cannot be measured in ratios and numbers. There's plenty of guys that look nothing like your picture of ideal masculinity that are considered among the most handsome people in the mainstream. I wouldn't trade the likes of Vic Fuentes or Ville Valo for all the Kelvin Klein models in the world. Physical attractiveness depends a lot on someone's charm, wit, style, attitude and countless other factors. Again, this is a point where you guys religiously worship the same rigidity that you criticize us for having.
Click to expand...
See, this I mostly agree with.
Yes, the breakdown of Looks/Money/Status is pretty rigid, and real life is more organic than that.
Those are still the three most important things for men getting sex, though. For (good) relationships personality matters, yes.
And there is a degree (not a large one) of subjectivity to looks. And people do generally aim for their own league. All things I agree with.
 
  • Dumb
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Ti-99/4A, Scribbler, Eddy84 and 2 others
ne enenen said:
Women don't like admitting they're not more "evolved" than men, even to themselves.
But actually, there are studies about this, not just sluthate's collection of anecdotes.
http://www.itworld.com/article/2721...earch-proves-just-how-shallow-women-are-.html
(it's a blog post, summarizing/linking the actual study)
Click to expand...
The main results of the Zentner and Mitura study did not hold up to reanalysis. You can follow the citation trail through NCBI if you would like to verify this for yourself. This information is publicly available.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Weirder Feet, Scribbler, Meowthkip and 6 others
ne enenen said:
See, this I mostly agree with.
Yes, the breakdown of Looks/Money/Status is pretty rigid, and real life is more organic than that.
Those are still the three most important things for men getting sex, though. For (good) relationships personality matters, yes.
And there is a degree (not a large one) of subjectivity to looks. And people do generally aim for their own league. All things I agree with.
Click to expand...

And do you have any of these high-standards? Do you think they're a little bit too unfair?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, BOLDYSPICY! and Sanic
ne enenen said:
yes, about twenty girls. not attractive looking ones, not by a long shot
nobody is claiming to be a freaking casanova here
Click to expand...
11035469_1169553796401011_8578790348925061812_n.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse, Scribbler, Meowthkip and 2 others
ne enenen said:
fucking like twenty mediocre-ish girls is not bragging, guys
I'd be pretty embarrassed to be seen with any of them

the point was that I have (some) experience, not that I'm some kind of "God"
Click to expand...

Then why are doling out 'advice' to us then?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Scribbler
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back