Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

I never got the logic behind people paying for porn, never mind paying so much for it.
Is there some sort of psychological rush to it?
Maybe it's a similar to the concept of gratification when earning something (ie you take care of your house more when you've bought it, an album sounds better when you've purchased it type of thing) in a creepyier, more pathetic, simp-like fashion.

Maybe it just makes them feel like rich bois.
 
Maybe it's a similar to the concept of gratification when earning something (ie you take care of your house more when you've bought it, an album sounds better when you've purchased it type of thing) in a creepyier, more pathetic, simp-like fashion.

Maybe it just makes them feel like rich bois.
Nah... It’s just findom kink.
 
castrobootlicker.png
 
What a strange article. Or maybe not strange for San Fran?


LOCAL
What’s white, male and 5 feet wide? Bay Area’s bike lanes

Phil Matier | on February 26, 2020
https://sneed.hdnux.com/photos/01/07/16/33/18671348/11/375x250.jpg
Photo: Gabrielle Lurie / The Chronicle 2019
IMAGE 1 OF 2
Male bike commuters outnumber female riders by a 2-to-1 ratio in San Francisco, census data show.
https://sneed.hdnux.com/photos/01/10/64/23/19088631/5/375x250.jpg
Photo: Jessica Christian / The Chronicle
IMAGE 2 OF 2
About 13,500 men bike to work in San Francisco, compared to 5,800 women, according to a survey.



When it comes to exclusivity, one would be hard-pressed to beat San Francisco’s bike lanes, where most regular riders are male, affluent, white “bike bros,” with 1 in 4 making $250,000 or more a year, according to the most recent U.S. census data.
And it’s not just in San Francisco.

“Bicycle commuting is mostly the province of wealthier white men all across the Bay Area,” Metropolitan Transportation Commission spokesman John Goodwin said.
Just look at the numbers.
Male bike commuters outnumber female bike commuters by at least a 2-to-1 ratio in all nine Bay Area counties, according to the 2014-2018 American Community Survey taken by the U.S. Census Bureau.
In San Francisco women accounted for only 5,800 of the morning bike commuters compared to 13,500 men who pedal to work each day. In Marin, women make up about 600 of the 1,500 daily bike commuters.

And they tend to be white.
RELATED STORIES
Across the Bay Area, white riders represented 61% of the bike commuters, followed by Hispanics at 17%, Asians at 15% and African Americans at 2.4%.

In San Francisco, the white percentage was even higher — 65% of regular riders — followed by Asians and Hispanics at 14% each and African Americans at just over 1% of regular San Francisco bike commuters. How do those numbers compare to the city’s population as a whole? Whites: 40%; Asian: 34%; Hispanic: 15%; African American: 5%.

As for age, about 7 out of 10 bike commuters in San Francisco are between 20 and 40 years old, a trend replicated in other Bay Area counties, except for Marin, Napa, Solano and Sonoma, where the lion’s share of bike commuters are in their 50s.

The Census Bureau’s American Community Survey data is collected through a combination of mail, telephone and in-person surveys, with results then adjusted to reflect the population of each Bay Area county.

“Given the state of San Francisco’s streets, the demographic numbers are about what I would expect,” newly installed San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency General Manager Jeffrey Tumlin said. “The ethnic and income breakdown from the census survey is fairly consistent with the demographics of the neighborhoods served by our current network.”

In other words, the city’s bike lanes tend to be in more affluent areas, easily accessible to downtown.
“For many neighborhoods, a protected bikeway to downtown is not their highest priority — getting kids safely to school may be more important,” Tumlin said

There may be other factors at play as well.

“We Latinos like our cars,” SFMTA board member Art Torres said. “But seriously, this is something that needs to be talked about. We are spending a lot of money on bike programs that are used by people who live and work in San Francisco and can bike to work.

“At the same time, a lot of lower-income people use Muni, which needs money as well,” Torres said. “And we may need to figure out how to get more people on their bikes.”

Overall, bike commuting has grown to about 20,000 riders a day in San Francisco —that’s an increase of about 1,000 workday riders since 2017.

To speed them along, the city installed more than 106 miles of bike lanes between 2006 and 2018, and there’s another 20 miles in the pipeline. The city has also added 2,676 bike racks in the past five years and plans to add 1,200 more this year. The most recent push to attract more pedal power was closing Market Street downtown to private cars.

Torres’ fellow board member Cheryl Brinkman sees a sign of progress, however, in attracting a more diverse crowd of riders.

“I see the gender gap every time I bike. I also see that protected bike lanes are helping to add more cyclists who identify as female,” Brinkman said.

San Francisco Bicycle Coalition Executive Director Brian Wiedenmeier thinks his organization is helping in that effort.

“We’ve seen some success recently when it comes to closing the gender gap in biking,” he said. “Our Women Bike SF program, which serves to create community for women, trans and femme people who are interested in biking, continues to grow.

“And most recently we hosted our first women, trans, femme Community Repair Night as part of our Bike It Forward program that distributes free bicycles to individuals who wouldn’t otherwise have access,” he added.

For now, however, the roads are ruled by the bike bros.
San Francisco Chronicle columnist Phil Matier appears Sundays and Wednesdays. Matier can be seen on the KGO-TV morning and evening news and can also be heard on KCBS radio Monday through Friday at 7:50 a.m. and 5:50 p.m. Got a tip? Call 415-777-8815, or email pmatier@sfchronicle.com. Twitter: @philmatier
 
What a strange article. Or maybe not strange for San Fran?

You know, it's funny how the left can always find something trivial to find racist and rant about it on their media/social networking platform. However, leftists states are failing to the point the residents able to move are doing so in large numbers. Can't blame them. When you have multiple homeless camping everywhere you look, you began to question whether you're doing yourself any favors living in a liberal state that won't address the homeless problem but will speak out at white guys riding bicycles.
 
Cuba was also such a massive authoritarian shithole that thousands of people had to flee the country to the US on makeshift rafts. But apparently that's totally okay so long as everyone is able to read.
Wonder if this dude would actually have the balls to say this in public in, let’s say, Miami. Because I’m pretty sure a few people there would disagree with his statements.
 
What a strange article. Or maybe not strange for San Fran?


What a shocker that white males would be the ones who constitute a majority of people doing something socially responsible and healthy.

I suppose they should be shooting up heroin and pozzing people up barebacking and shitting in the streets.
 
Apparently, the people most at risk in the "Donald Trump World" shouldn't have the capacity for self-defense -
View attachment 1160824
View attachment 1160825
How do these dumb fucks manage to say "Donald Trump is an imminent, existential threat to minorities!" one second, then immediately deny that those same minorities should have the capacity to resist the exact tyranny they've proposed is definitely about to happen, any second not, pinky swear, the apocalypse is absolutely coming, the end is nigh! without immediately exploding from the insanity?

I have no idea who this dumbfuck is, but I have (((suspicions))), and I'm really not the sort that goes in for that kind of (((conspiracy))), normally -
View attachment 1160829
View attachment 1160830
View attachment 1160831
Oh, look, he's a fucking commie -
View attachment 1160833

In case anyone is wondering, Teck Mine was a massive oilsands project that's been scuppered, because the federal gov't has apparently decided that encouraging environmental innovation in resource extraction and transport is less important that caving in to the native groups that are blockading projects. The really juicy irony is that the native groups all get their treaty payments from the federal gov't, which gets the money to pay those payments from tax revenue, and the oilsands is a massive revenue generator. Even better is the fact that the Wet'suwe'ten group that's protesting is made up of "Ancestral Chiefs", who are basically pissed that the "Elected Chiefs" signed an agreement on allowing the Trans-Mountain pipeline to go through their "unceded lands"*; essentially, the "Hereditary Chiefs" are mad that they aren't the ones in control of the forthcoming slush fund, and they're livid that they're probably going to be cut out of the graft and nepotism.

* - "Unceded lands", from what I can gather, amount to lands that aren't officially covered by treaties between 1st Nations groups and the federal gov't. The lands in question are part of historical group territories, but were not granted to the treaty group during the negotiations, but are also not "Crown Land", which is territory specifically owned by the federal gov't. Basically, the Wet'suwe'ten protesters are not only bitching that their cut out of the graft, but that the pipeline is running through their "ancestral territory", but not actually through any territory they control or govern. That means they don't actually have any control over access rights, and can't hold an eventually functional pipeline hostage, because they have access to various valve points.

At any rate, apparently Quebec is down to less than 2 weeks worth of propane and natural gas, as a result of the blockades and transport interruptions, and the industrial dairy and livestock farming there is heavily dependent on both to heat barns, equipment, and run a ton of stuff. Quebec is also a massive part of Trudeau's power base, so if they start losing assets, because the Natives are blockading shit, he's in immediate political danger, and Quebec is being hit by the bow wave of a massive winter storm, one that's probably going to dump a couple feet of snow, and see temperatures as low as -30c. If there's not enough propane, there's going to be a lot of dead animals, really quickly.

/americahatsperg.
Settler pride continent-wide! /sneed

Incidentally the blockades make a great argument for pipelines. They can get away with blocking railways or roads, and hide behind some bullshit about "educating the settlers on what it feels like to be powerless", but blowing up pipelines lapses into outright terrorist shit and might provoke a stronger response. It demonstrates how easy those modes of transport are to disrupt, and why we need a greater variety of methods available.
 
1D0CE48D-D01D-413B-8D79-1A25BDE03618.jpeg
Hijras aren’t the most respected group in Indian society. They are relegated to being “spiritual leaders”, but prevented from being hired at most jobs. Also, Hijras aren’t really trans, they are seen more as cross dressers. Finally, what does colonialism have to do with the Miss Indian World pageant?
013359EB-94EC-4CB3-9C6C-5F7A1813204B.jpeg
We’ve seen this many times. Also, stuff like this isn’t really helpful when the definitions of “sexism”, “racism”, and “transphobia” are being changed all the time.
 
Finally, what does colonialism have to do with the Miss Indian World pageant?
I’m guessing it’s a reference to how India was colonized by Britain but let’s not kid ourselves; it’s just their go to buzzword after Black Panther made it hip and trendy. They probably couldn’t even give you a proper definition of it on the spot.
From the way colonialism is thrown around so much, you’d think that the British crown was still occupying India for spices and copper.
 
What a strange article. Or maybe not strange for San Fran?

When it comes to exclusivity, one would be hard-pressed to beat San Francisco’s bike lanes, where most regular riders are male, affluent, white “bike bros,” with 1 in 4 making $250,000 or more a year, according to the most recent U.S. census data.
And it’s not just in San Francisco.
And the other 3 in 4 making $250 a year and sleeping in the park.
 
Back