- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Personally, I would extrapolate the doctrine of Universal Precautions to not only include the idea that you should treat all patients/samples as though they may be infected, but to also include the idea that you should treat all infections as if they had the most contagious source of pathogen. IOW, assume it's coronavirus until you know otherwise.
The problem is economic realities start to kick in. Not just money, but every other type of cost. This is one of the worst features of Government Bureaucracies. They demand 'Best Practices!" without ever actually dealing with the messy realities of life. You can't treat every patient as the absolute worst case, because you simply do not have the amount of storage space to carry or stockpile the vast amounts of needed disposables in order to do that. You can't assume every single patient has Ebola because it would make normal health care delivery impossible. You make trade offs and accept certain informed risks to deliver care. Look at China today. That is what the worst case disease assumption looks like. A complete paralysis of the society. As a specific disease threat ramps up, you alter practices to deal with it.