- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
take your dirty communism somewhere else
I was being facetious. And it's dirty Strasserism , thank you very much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
take your dirty communism somewhere else
Did she have any fappening leaks? We got absolutely grotesque nudes of big stars from that, so I almost guarantee a woman like her has photos or video out there.
But you probably don't want to see them. I mean, getting a look at what J-Law looks like passed out drunk and high was awful. The richer, more high-society-born hollywood sluts are probably doing way grosser stuff than getting blackout drunk and being cummed on by their boyfriends.
Damn dude. She's the only one in those leaks who looks good.Yes of course. It was a huge deal at the time. Scarlett even commented on it. She tells Vanity Fair, "(those nudes) were sent to my husband. There's nothing wrong with that. It’s not like I was shooting a porno - although there's nothing wrong with that either."
Damn dude. She's the only one in those leaks who looks good.
What really sucked for her was that those leaks were off her husband's phone and she wasn't the only girl in them. Must have been an uncomfortable conversation when those pics became public.I'm convinced those leaks ruined Kate Upton's career. She was the death rattle for general interest for big boobs in the media before the current booty trend we're in now.
And I don't understand why - she has a great figure and her tits look normal. It's it that she doesn't look like in her glamour shots in those pictures, and like a normal woman? None of those hoes do.I'm convinced those leaks ruined Kate Upton's career. She was the death rattle for general interest for big boobs in the media before the current booty trend we're in now.
It's like the Belle Delphine/e-girl rule: Teasing sells. Once you take off the bra the allure and mystery is gone. You can only reignite the interest by taking it all the way, usually by straight up doing porn. Most don't go down that route and that leads to disinterest and a decline. Remember: titties usually look better in a simple tank top than they do unleashed and in the open.And I don't understand why - she has a great figure and her tits look normal. It's it that she doesn't look like in her glamour shots in those pictures, and like a normal woman? None of those hoes do.
You're probably right on both counts. I thought Kate Upton actually did something aside from slaking beta thirst.It's like the Belle Delphine/e-girl rule: Teasing sells. Once you take off the bra the allure and mystery is gone. You can only reignite the interest by taking it all the way, usually by straight up doing porn. Most don't go down that route and that leads to disinterest and a decline. Remember: titties usually look better in a simple tank top than they do unleashed and in the open.
You'd think people by now would understand the Streisand effect. Had the dad just ignored it, she would have been forgotten like the literal thousands, if not more, girls that do some porn, regret it and then disappear.Isn't this the story of like 50% of pornstars? A young girl wants to rebel against her parents so she does the most extreme thing she can do, and does some hardcore porn. This happens more than you would think. Of course her father is going to try to scrub the videos off the internet. While a fascinating story I'm not particularly sure if this is lolcow material though, it's kinda sad; the motivations though misguided are entirely understandable. In the old days they would just round up all the tapes and destroy them.
The thing is though, if I was cuck Kev I would have taken the videos down like he did (assuming I had the money) but what I wouldn't do is send a meritless DMCA to the biggest hornet's nest on the Internet nine years later. Don't forget that this is what started this thread in the first place.But I guess it's hard to know that your daughter that you raised to be a productive member of society will mostly be remembered as cum bucket and their videos are legally viewable on pornsites across the internet. Honestly, if I was in the same situation I would probably done the same,even if I knew the futility in it.
I don't think it matters how long ago it was, everytime those videos shows up it probably feels like it was yesterday, and all the anger and shame come back.The thing is though, if I was cuck Kev I would have taken the videos down like he did (assuming I had the money) but what I wouldn't do is send a meritless DMCA to the biggest hornet's nest on the Internet nine years later. Don't forget that this is what started this thread in the first place.
That happens with trademarks but not with works, and what almost certainly happened is that Kev bought the copyright of the videos which is why they are hard to find. The problem with that is that while you can prevent the work itself being shared, you cant stop people from saying it exists. I suppose in this case the superlawyer thought it was possible to take the entire page down by complaining about the screenshot (lmao fair use) but obviously that didn't go to plan.I don't think it matters how long ago it was, everytime those videos shows up it probably feels like it was yesterday, and all the anger and shame come back.
I also don't know if individual videos are treated as a copyright, trademark or whatever, in that they must enforce it, otherwise they set a precedent. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can chime in on that.
Although it's probably the thought of a video of his daughters "misstep" getting around that fuels his endless crusade. A flare in popularity, and the video finding it's way to the right people might affect her career and/or her reputation in their social circle, which in turn will affect him. That he is adding fuel to the fire probably doesn't even cross his mind.
In Spielberg's case yes, she probably fucked up (pun intended), since there are almost enough Spielberg kids to fill a team in any sport, so any money intended for her has probably already been divided among the good kids, but is not Kelly the Baltazar's only kid? Not only that, she has atleast the common decency to distance herself from her little rebellion and pretend it never happened, not talking to the media about it.She should do a video with Steven Spielberg's daughter. They can set fire to stacks of cash to symbolize all the inheritance money they lost.
Kelly not only got Daddy's money, but he bought her a cushy career in art criticism and gallery sales.In Spielberg's case yes, she probably fucked up (pun intended), since there are almost enough Spielberg kids to fill a team in any sport, so any money intended for her has probably already been divided among the good kids, but is not Kelly the Baltazar's only kid? Not only that, she has atleast the common decency to distance herself from her little rebellion and pretend it never happened, not talking to the media about it.
Which is probably what she wanted all along, at least the money part.Kelly not only got Daddy's money, but he bought her a cushy career in art criticism and gallery sales.
In Spielberg's case yes, she probably fucked up (pun intended), since there are almost enough Spielberg kids to fill a team in any sport, so any money intended for her has probably already been divided among the good kids, but is not Kelly the Baltazar's only kid? Not only that, she has atleast the common decency to distance herself from her little rebellion and pretend it never happened, not talking to the media about it.
Wouldn't he have to divorce his old wife whose eggs are all dried up? Probably more expensive to do that than pay off his whore kid to keep a low profile.She'd better hope that he doesn't have another kid.
Wouldn't he have to divorce his old wife whose eggs are all dried up? Probably more expensive to do that than pay off his whore kid to keep a low profile.
Although if the old man's will leaves everything to a secret love child when he dies, I'll LOL. That would be epic revenge.![]()