Can you imagine boldly proclaiming your name is something only an edgy emo child would be proud of? Not to mention, considering that one quick search on the web shows such beautiful archives on what that 'name' is attached to, which includes but is not limited to:
-grooming children to the point of being banned from the site she groomed children on by her own parents
-wanting to fuck serial killers and uwu-ifying them
-lust for smol birbs
-stalking, death threats
-the fact that she's in her 30s, has an actual Degree, still lives with her parents + refuses to get a job
-the things she's done to peetie and her parents

-being the "may your womb be barren" twitter witch
-THE BROWN
If someone I met gladly introduced themselves with a name as loaded as Sapphire Crimson Claw, I'd just run for the hills.
I can't figure this one out. If you put a warning for homophobia, only gay people are allowed to skip reading it? If The Straights skip it too they're being evil?
Agreed. CW stands for "content warning", right? Wouldn't a negative experience count as something potentially triggering? Regardless of marginalisation it'd still be common courtesy to put a warning for stuff.
Also, isn't this just another case of Steph trying to be oppressed again? Ironic since she applies to both: especially since THE BROWN incident.