Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

[Dirt Farm]

arent all furries zoophiles to some extent though. Lets not kid ourselves here.

No. Just like not every weeb is into loli, tentacle porn, and real life Asians. Every fandom has a large chunk of people that take it to the extreme and want to apply their weird fantasies to real life. But there's also people who are just flat out into the weird shit and attach themselves to fandoms as an outlet thinking they can find people with similar interests. For example people into zoo seeking out shady looking furry groups hoping for some leads on some real zoo to get off to. But there's also a large number of people in various fandoms who don't want anything to do with those extremes and think they're disgusting.

On the other hand, what you said is sort of true because if you're a furry you find animal traits sexually appealing. However there's a vast difference between sexual attraction to a dog from a video game and sexual attraction to your actual dog. It's a gray area but I wouldn't go as far as calling it zoo in most cases. Just like you wouldn't call all weebs into hentai rapists to some extent. Many enjoy weird tentacle rape porn but I'm sure a great majority of them think it would be pretty gross to apply that to real life.

Anyone attracted to underage anything is a pedo though. Unlike with that crap, you can't rape someone with sentient tentacles or fuck a catgirl or animal person in real life. And yes I'm applying that to weird underage hentai shit too. If you're into kids, fantasy or not, you belong behind bars.

 

[Piss Bear]

arent all furries zoophiles to some extent though. Lets not kid ourselves here.

This point has been repeated to death in this thread, if you had read through it even a little bit you would see that. You aren’t adding anything new to the discussion. If you wanna talk shit on furries maybe bring it to the general furry discussion thread? This really isn’t the place for it.

And to answer your question, no. A lot of furries are drawn into the fandom because they had a fascination with anthropomorphic animals in cartoons. It usually begins with cartoons like Tom & Jerry, Looney Toons, Disney movies, or basically anything with a talking animal character. It doesn’t begin because you see a real life dog and think it’s hot. And no, fascination doesn’t always mean there’s a sexual attraction. Do you think all people who animate cartoons are attracted to the characters they draw? Real life attractions and furry attractions can be completely separate. If the person is only sexually interested in anthro stuff? I’d say they aren’t a zoophile. If you see them gaining a sexual interest in feral characters? Then the line is a bit more blurred.

Some zoophiles aren’t furries, some furries aren’t zoophiles. Of course there is some overlap between those communities, but it isn’t nearly as big as you think.

 

[PirateLordRidley]

I believe there's a difference between someone who actively identifies themselves as a part of the furry fandom and participates in it publically, especially cons or exceedingly large group chats; and someone who would outwardly appear to be a furry, but doesn't participate in public events, just using it to make to some friends and wank to anthro animal people.

The latter seems far more likely to see this kinda bullshit for what it is, and the former seems more likely to embrace it.

End of the day, they're all degenerates, but at least some of them have enough brain cells to know that and keep it to themselves and their friends. Also, not to rape animals. That part's important too.

 

[Dirt Farm]

Some zoophiles aren’t furries, some furries aren’t zoophiles. Of course there is some overlap between those communities, but it isn’t nearly as big as you think.

I'd go as far as to say the majority of zoophiles aren't furries. Out of the over one thousand accounts in the file I posted on the last page I'd say maybe ~5% of them are furries. The overlap is tiny. Most of the time you're one or the other. And because of a loud minority you get accused of being both. Everyone hears when a furry gets busted getting fucked by a horse in their fursuit. Nobody hears or pays attention when it was another furry who called the cops. That's just how it is. It doesn't take much to tarnish the reputation of a fandom. Just look at the brony fandom and the disgusting Rainbow Dash semen jar shit. The actions of few paint a bad picture for everyone. That's just how it is. I find bronies very dodgy because of that jar shit, but I still know the vast majority of them would look at that and disapprove. But it happened, so that's what they're associated with now.

 

[Pukebucket]

I'm still working on updating the lists, just got dragged out of town for other shit and it's going to be a while before I can sit down and get back at it.

To echo what everyone is saying above in the meantime; making the false statement that all furries are zoos and visa versa only serves to muddy the water, making it easier for active zoophiles to crouch in the furry fandom and hide behind the party line of "don't judge me for my kinks, ALL furries are freaks!", which results in normie furs getting called dogfuckers because they think Legosi from Beastars is hot. Psychologically speaking, there's a fairly broad mental disconnect between someone wanting to fuck a character like Bugs Bunny vs. someone who wants to fuck their sister's actual living dog.

Additionally, while the list of zoophiles grows daily it's also worth noting that so does the furry fandom itself; as Wigglecat mentioned, the furry fandom is so colossal that, while the extensive list of creeps who are down with fucking IRL animals looks big, it's a miniscule percentage of the furry fandom at large. I'd even go so far as to state that well over half of the people on Furaffinity who like and favorite obvious "feral" porn that looks a little too realistic probably aren't zoos themselves, or at least probably aren't practicing their fetish on animals.

 

[Mangcho]

Additionally, while the list of zoophiles grows daily it's also worth noting that so does the furry fandom itself; as Wigglecat mentioned, the furry fandom is so colossal that, while the extensive list of creeps who are down with fucking IRL animals looks big, it's a miniscule percentage of the furry fandom at large. I'd even go so far as to state that well over half of the people on Furaffinity who like and favorite obvious "feral" porn that looks a little too realistic probably aren't zoos themselves, or at least probably aren't practicing their fetish on animals.

It's true. Those deviants who fixate on quadrupeds probably aren't actually going to hurt real animals. Probably.

To prove my point, let's look at one of them now, along with his Telegram group. Maybe you can help my friends and I uncover more Normie Furries. :^)

 

[s0mbra]

No. Just like not every weeb is into loli, tentacle porn, and real life Asians. Every fandom has a large chunk of people that take it to the extreme and want to apply their weird fantasies to real life. But there's also people who are just flat out into the weird shit and attach themselves to fandoms as an outlet thinking they can find people with similar interests. For example people into zoo seeking out shady looking furry groups hoping for some leads on some real zoo to get off to. But there's also a large number of people in various fandoms who don't want anything to do with those extremes and think they're disgusting.

On the other hand, what you said is sort of true because if you're a furry you find animal traits sexually appealing. However there's a vast difference between sexual attraction to a dog from a video game and sexual attraction to your actual dog. It's a gray area but I wouldn't go as far as calling it zoo in most cases. Just like you wouldn't call all weebs into hentai rapists to some extent. Many enjoy weird tentacle rape porn but I'm sure a great majority of them think it would be pretty gross to apply that to real life.

Anyone attracted to underage anything is a pedo though. Unlike with that crap, you can't rape someone with sentient tentacles or fuck a catgirl or animal person in real life. And yes I'm applying that to weird underage hentai shit too. If you're into kids, fantasy or not, you belong behind bars.

I'm not gunna try to derail the thread but "being sexually attracted to a dog in a Vidya doesn't make you a zoo uwu" then turning around and saying "being into Loli makes you a pedo" has to be the biggest 180 I've ever seen.
"People can be into weird shit but think it's gross to apply it to real life... except this one thing bc I don't like it "

And while I'd be highly suspicious of someone with so much knowledge about zoophiles and their inner workings, pretty sure a zoo leaked all this info and normal speds started digging. Plus a lot of these people are fucking open about it anyway. At least that's what I'm going to tell myself as long as we shed light on these sick fucks.

 

[Mangcho]

a lot of these people are fucking open about it anyway. At least that's what I'm going to tell myself as long as we shed light on these sick fucks.

Absolutely true. When you believe the abuse is natural, healthy and normal, your desire to hide it disappears.

 

[Piss Bear]

I'm not gunna try to derail the thread but "being sexually attracted to a dog in a Vidya doesn't make you a zoo uwu" then turning around and saying "being into Loli makes you a pedo" has to be the biggest 180 I've ever seen.
"People can be into weird shit but think it's gross to apply it to real life... except this one thing bc I don't like it "

And while I'd be highly suspicious of someone with so much knowledge about zoophiles and their inner workings, pretty sure a zoo leaked all this info and normal speds started digging. Plus a lot of these people are fucking open about it anyway. At least that's what I'm going to tell myself as long as we shed light on these sick fucks.

Yeah, I was in agreement with his post up until that point too. Being into hentai and being into loli are very different things. It can be compared to being into furry porn and being into feral. Being into furry porn is harmless for the most part, being into feral is where the line begins to be blurred... with loli and feral porn, real life images of children and animals being abused sexually are being used as references in some cases. Therefore the morality of jerking off to porn like that is... questionable. So I completely understand anyone’s contempt with it as far as feral porn or loli porn goes.

Probably not all people jacking off to loli are harming children irl. Same with feral. But that doesn’t mean we need to respect people who use that as spankbank material.

It's true. Those deviants who fixate on quadrupeds probably aren't actually going to hurt real animals. Probably.

To prove my point, let's look at one of them now, along with his Telegram group. Maybe you can help my friends and I uncover more Normie Furries. :^)

Archive yo shit.

Zoophilia ring 'Ordychat' run by Ordinon, Matt Pembroke of Chicago - …

archived 4 Mar 2020 20:28:16 UTC

archive.li

 

[Dirt Farm]

I'm not gunna try to derail the thread but "being sexually attracted to a dog in a Vidya doesn't make you a zoo uwu" then turning around and saying "being into Loli makes you a pedo" has to be the biggest 180 I've ever seen.
"People can be into weird shit but think it's gross to apply it to real life... except this one thing bc I don't like it "

And while I'd be highly suspicious of someone with so much knowledge about zoophiles and their inner workings, pretty sure a zoo leaked all this info and normal speds started digging. Plus a lot of these people are fucking open about it anyway. At least that's what I'm going to tell myself as long as we shed light on these sick fucks.

No, they aren't the same at all. Some anthro dog character from a video game is not real and never will be. There are magnitudes of difference between that and a real dog. But loli on the other hand is something that can happen in real life. That's sexual attraction to human minors. There is no defending that. A drawing of a minor and an actual minor are the same thing visually. There is no impossibility factor of being part sentient animal. It's disgusting and it can be directly reproduced in real life.

Yeah, I was in agreement with his post up until that point too. Being into hentai and being into loli are very different things. It can be compared to being into furry porn and being into feral. Being into furry porn is harmless for the most part, being into feral is where the line begins to be blurred... with loli and feral porn, real life images of children and animals being abused sexually are being used as references in some cases. Therefore the morality of jerking off to porn like that is... questionable. So I completely understand anyone’s contempt with it as far as feral porn or loli porn goes.

Probably not all people jacking off to loli are harming children irl. Same with feral. But that doesn’t mean we need to respect people who use that as spankbank material.

I personally see no difference morally between feral or anthro. It's the same thing, they're both dogs. The feral just has more legs. Either way you slice it you're into it because of the animal traits, otherwise you'd be fapping to regular porn. It doesn't change anything when you add two more legs. It's still the dog traits that you find appealing. A dog with two legs is still a dog.

That ties into what I said above too. There's no sentient feral dogs in real life that beg you to fuck them, and there's no two legged humanoid dogs either. For the most part it's fantasy. But when it comes to loli shit it's literally a child. Those do exist. Your fantasy land toddler is reproducible in real life whereas a furry's feral or anthro whatever begging you to fuck it silly isn't.

 

[Mangcho]

Yeah, I was in agreement with his post up until that point too. Being into hentai and being into loli are very different things. It can be compared to being into furry porn and being into feral. Being into furry porn is harmless for the most part, being into feral is where the line begins to be blurred... with loli and feral porn, real life images of children and animals being abused sexually are being used as references in some cases. Therefore the morality of jerking off to porn like that is... questionable. So I completely understand anyone’s contempt with it as far as feral porn or loli porn goes.

Probably not all people jacking off to loli are harming children irl. Same with feral. But that doesn’t mean we need to respect people who use that as spankbank material.

You are not far from the kingdom of heaven, brutalpoodle. But there is a greater commandment than this.

View attachment 1173483

 

[Dirt Farm]

It's true. Those deviants who fixate on quadrupeds probably aren't actually going to hurt real animals. Probably.

To prove my point, let's look at one of them now, along with his Telegram group. Maybe you can help my friends and I uncover more Normie Furries. :^)

Take anything you find there with a boulder of salt. Len has close ties with simba from FV and posts whatever simba asks him to there whether it's true or not. Do your own research before you jump to conclusions. That's not to say everything there is completely false, but actually verify things. If you want some info as to why that place isn't a good source Len has his own thread here.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

Take anything you find there with a boulder of salt. Len has close ties with simba from FV and posts whatever simba asks him to there whether it's true or not. Do your own research before you jump to conclusions. That's not to say everything there is completely false, but actually verify things. If you want some info as to why that place isn't a good source Len has his own thread here.

Most people here ignore Mangcho due to his connections with Alt Furry. He's been on the radar for a while and the idea kept getting kicked back and forth whether or not he was thread worthy. Pretty sure this isn't his 1st account on the Farms either.

 

[Mangcho]

Take anything you find there with a boulder of salt. Len has close ties with simba from FV and posts whatever simba asks him to there whether it's true or not. Do your own research before you jump to conclusions. That's not to say everything there is completely false, but actually verify things. If you want some info as to why that place isn't a good source Len has his own thread here.

Okay I'll be sure to do my own research on those images I personally screencapped and sent to Len

 

[Dirt Farm]

Okay I'll be sure to do my own research on those images I personally screencapped and sent to Len

What lead you to make that decision rather than posting them here?

 

[Mangcho]

What lead you to make that decision rather than posting them here?

Smaller nets are easier to wield.

Once the fish scatter, that's when wider nets can be used. Otherwise the fish slip through.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

Smaller nets are easier to wield.

Once the fish scatter, that's when wider nets can be used. Otherwise the fish slip through.

What kinda gay ass shit is that? Speak English. We don't do riddles here.

 

[Mangcho]

You don't do much of anything, clearly

There are two kinds of people in this: the ones who think they're important and the ones who are actually useful

Wring your hands over politics or get some work done. Or don't, your call

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

You don't do much of anything, clearly

There are two kinds of people in this: the ones who think they're important and the ones who are actually useful

Wring your hands over politics or get some work done. Or don't, your call

People here have been in talks with law enforcement (myself included) over the numerous sex pests outed here. What does your retarded Nazi LARPing fan club do aside from jerk each other off while they pretend they don't do the same ass shit as the people here?

Oh that's right.

They get arrested on child grooming charges.

Stfu with your moralfagging, rat fucker.

Also nice job not quoting me, coward.

 

[Mangcho]

In the same way I don't need to provide you with intel about evil people I'm exposing, I don't need to make sure your feelings aren't hurt by quoting your very special posts.

You're really not that important.