US Super Tuesday discussion and results


Live voting results: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/03/us/elections/live-analysis-super-tuesday.html

Polls close in Vermont and Virginia at 4pm PST/7pm EST, North Carolina at 4:30pm PST/7:30pm EST, Tennessee, Maine, Texas, Alabama, Massachusetts, and Oklahoma at 5pm PST/8pm EST, and in Arkansas at 5:30pm PST/8:30pm EST. Polls close in Colorado and Minnesota at 6pm PST/9pm EST, in Utah at 7pm EST/10pm EST, and in California at 8pm PST/11 p.m. ET.

Joe Biden
1582582155486.jpg

Bernie Sanders
1579043026074.jpg

Michael Bloomberg
1582647669172.jpg

Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth_Warren,_official_portrait,_114th_Congress.jpg


The first day of the Democratic contest that really matters for the cold, hard delegate math — Super Tuesday — is almost here.

Tuesday, March 3, will be enormously important because it’s the first day that a lot of the delegates necessary to win the nomination are at stake, and the biggest delegate day overall. A total of 14 states and one territory — including California and Texas, the two most populous states in the country — will hold their primaries or caucuses.

Candidates are competing for about a third of the overall delegates at stake. Those 1,344 delegates allocated on Super Tuesday could effectively settle the race, if one candidate locks down a gigantic lead that will be nearly impossible for anyone else to overcome. The candidate with the best chance of doing that is Sen. Bernie Sanders — his current lead in the polls indicates he can theoretically rack up enough plurality wins in a crowded field to clean up in delegates.

But it’s also possible that Super Tuesday’s delegate haul ends up split among several candidates, with no one having gotten anywhere close to being on track for a majority. That may well mean Democrats are headed to a contested convention.

Whether we’re headed for one of these outcomes (or something in between) depends to a significant extent on Democrats’ complicated delegate allocation rules.


Broadly, delegates are allotted proportionally based on candidates’ performance — the better you do, the more delegates you get. But quirks in the rules mean relatively small differences in the exact split of the votes can lead to large differences in delegates.

We’ll get into the nitty-gritty below. The big picture is that if one person ends up with a commanding lead and gets nearly half the delegates, that candidate will become the overwhelming favorite for the nomination. But if the delegate leader has a narrow edge and is well below half of the delegates, a long, close-fought contest will likely ensue.

1) Why is Super Tuesday a big deal?
It’s simple: There are a whole lot of delegates at stake.

The way to win the Democratic nomination is by winning delegates — specifically, winning 1,991 out of 3,979 pledged delegates, enough for a majority to get the nomination at the Democratic National Convention. And there are 1,344 delegates — one-third of the total — up for grabs in Super Tuesday’s contests.

Though there will be several more months of primaries remaining, it’s possible that Super Tuesday can settle the nomination contest. It’s not mathematically possible to reach the “magic number” of delegates yet — but Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004 won so convincingly on Super Tuesday that their opponents quit shortly afterward.

Yet Super Tuesday can also pave the way for a very long race. In 2008, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama ended up nearly tied after an early February Super Tuesday, and they battled it out through four months of remaining contests. In 2016, Clinton locked in a solid advantage over Sanders on Super Tuesday that she never relinquished — but it wasn’t such an overwhelmingly dominant performance as to drive Sanders to quit the race, so he stayed in.

2) Why is there a Super Tuesday?
No one person or group dictates the primary calendar from the top down. The national Democratic and Republican parties have declared that the month of February is reserved only for the four early states — Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South Carolina. But after that, it’s just up to states to schedule primaries whenever they want between March and June.

Many states that want to influence the outcome of the nomination have calculated that the best way to do that is to go as early as possible: on the first Tuesday in March. (This dynamic has been called “frontloading.”)

Super Tuesday actually began as a plot to help President Jimmy Carter stave off a primary challenge from Ted Kennedy in 1980, as Carter’s strategists got three large Southern states where he was expected to do well to schedule their primaries early. From 1984 through 1992, other Southern states joined in an attempt to give their region more influence (as did a few non-Southern states).

super_tuesday_delegate_board_fix.jpg


Eventually, big states from elsewhere in the country wanted in, and the first Super Tuesday that truly spanned the nation took place in 2000. That’s been the norm ever since, though the exact lineup varies from cycle to cycle as states move their nominating contests around. (Super Tuesday 2008 is still the record-holder for the number of states and the proportion of the total delegates at stake.)

3) What are this year’s Super Tuesday states?
From most delegates at stake to least, they are:
  • California (415 delegates)
  • Texas (228 delegates)
  • North Carolina (110 delegates)
  • Virginia (99 delegates)
  • Massachusetts (91 delegates)
  • Minnesota (75 delegates)
  • Colorado (67 delegates)
  • Tennessee (64 delegates)
  • Alabama (52 delegates)
  • Oklahoma (37 delegates)
  • Arkansas (31 delegates)
  • Utah (29 delegates)
  • Maine (24 delegates)
  • Vermont (16 delegates)
  • American Samoa (6 delegates)
Another contest, involving “Democrats Abroad” — Democratic voters living overseas — will begin on Super Tuesday, but won’t end until March 10. So it’s those 14 states and one territory that will have their voting conclude on Super Tuesday, with 1,344 delegates at stake overall.

That’s a lot to get your head around, so it can be helpful to break down the lineup into groups:

  • California (31 percent of Super Tuesday delegates): The biggest single prize.
  • Seven Southern states (46 percent of the day’s delegates): Like Super Tuesdays of old, this year’s map is skewed toward the South, though it’s a grab bag of very different states from that region — most notably Texas, but also North Carolina, Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, Alabama, and Oklahoma.
  • The rest (23 percent of delegates): There’s a trio of New England states, Minnesota from the Midwest, Colorado and Utah from the West, and American Samoa.
Finally, it’s worth remembering that even though Super Tuesday is just one day, several of the states involved began early voting or mail balloting weeks ago. So a chunk of the vote will have been locked in before Tuesday itself.

4) How does someone win Super Tuesday?
In one sense, the way to ensure Super Tuesday delegate dominance is simple — win by a lot, in a lot of places. If Sanders or anyone else manages to do that, they’ll end up with a big delegate lead.

But if most outcomes are closer or if the results are mixed, the delegate situation will be highly contingent on the exact breakdown of the vote, because of Democrats’ complex delegate allocation rules.
Democrats have no “winner-take-all states” (where whoever comes in first place gets all that state’s delegates) — instead, they allot delegates proportionally based on each contest’s results.

That means winning isn’t all that matters: The margin of victory is crucial. A narrow win will barely provide an advantage in the delegate count, because proportional rules mean the second-place finisher usually gets close to the same amount of delegates. But winning in a landslide will provide a big delegate edge.

Beyond that, the devil is in the details, particularly when the field is as large as this one is.

5) Why is the devil in the details?
First off, there’s the threshold: Candidates need to get 15 percent of the vote somewhere to get any delegates there. Those below 15 percent are nonviable and get nothing.

Second, it’s not quite so simple as “30 percent of the vote gets you 30 percent of delegates.” Instead, it’s your percentage of the viable candidates’ vote that matters. Basically, votes for any candidate who’s below 15 percent are excluded, and your percentage of whatever’s left determines your share of delegates.

So let’s say you get 30 percent of the vote, but there are three other viable candidates, getting 25 percent, 20 percent, and 15 percent of the vote. The viable vote adds up to 90 percent, and your 30 percent is one-third of that — so you get one-third of the delegates. Here’s how it would play out under a sample scenario, if there were 10 delegates at stake. (Note: Former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg and Sen. Amy Klobuchar dropped out of the race just before Super Tuesday.)
steps_1_3_vox_tag.jpg


A very different situation transpires if you get 30 percent of the vote and only one other candidate is viable, getting 20 percent, with the rest of the vote split among several others. The viable vote would then add up to 50 percent. Your 30 percent is three-fifths of that — so you get many more of the delegates at stake.
steps_1_3_copy_80.jpg

This means a great deal can depend on the exact breakdown of the vote — particularly in big states with many delegates at stake.

Finally, as if all this wasn’t enough, a candidate’s statewide performance is not all that matters for delegates. The majority of the Super Tuesday delegates (about 65 percent) are in fact allotted based on results in individual districts (mostly congressional districts, except for Texas, which uses state senate districts instead).

Proportional allocation with a 15 percent threshold applies separately in all these districts. That means that if you do well in a state overall but are at 14 percent in a district there, you’ll get zero of that district’s delegates.

Take California. There are 415 total delegates at stake there. But only 144 of them will be awarded proportionally based on statewide results. The other 271 are divvied out according to the proportional results in California’s 53 congressional districts (with 4-7 delegates at stake in each district).

It’s all quite complicated. But all in all, Super Tuesday is a contest to top 15 percent by as much as possible in as many places (states and districts) as possible. Every time candidates get zeroed out by falling below the threshold is bad news for them.

6) So if you get the most delegates, you win, right?
Well, technically, you don’t win the Democratic nomination just by winning more delegates than anyone else. The party’s rules state that you need an outright majority of the 3,979 pledged delegates to win the nomination on the first ballot.

So another key thing to watch for in the Super Tuesday results is whether the delegate leader is on track for an actual majority — or, if not, just how far off track they are from it.

Again, Democrats’ lack of winner-take-all states makes this question very important.

  • If a candidate finishes Super Tuesday with 40 percent of delegates so far, he or she needs to win 56 percent of the remaining delegates for a majority.
  • If the top candidate has 35 percent of delegates after Super Tuesday, he or she needs to win 59 percent of the remaining delegates.
  • If the post-Super Tuesday leader has 30 percent of delegates so far, he or she needs to win 62 percent of the remainder.
The problem is that those proportional delegate allocation rules make it difficult to rack up large delegate advantages. Again, narrow wins in states result in the delegates being split. To gain the upper hand, you can’t just win states — you have to win big.

So if the leading candidate is significantly off track from a majority after the Super Tuesday delegate haul is locked in, he or she may never get back on track for one — paving the way to a contested convention in which no candidate wins the majority on the first ballot (something that’s never occurred in the modern nomination system).

That’s the theory, anyway. Many believe that in practice, Democrats would face enormous pressure to give the nomination to whoever wins the most delegates, even if that person is short of a majority. The specifics could depend on just how big that first-place person’s lead is, and how close to a majority they end up — which shows why, again, the delegate details of Super Tuesday are crucial.

7) What will happen on Super Tuesday this time around?
Overall, despite all the drama in the Democratic contest so far, it’s important to remember that barely any delegates (just 4 percent of the total) will have been allotted before Super Tuesday.

So while the expectation now is that Bernie Sanders is the frontrunner, and polls appear to back that up, this won’t really be set in stone until we see how he — and everyone else — does on Super Tuesday.

Sanders could, as many now expect, win most states by significant margins and build a sizable delegate lead that will carry him to the nomination. But if there’s a late swing to another candidate — such as Biden, who just won big in South Carolina on Saturday — Sanders could also lose his frontrunner status quite quickly.

For the other candidates who have had more mixed outcomes or little success, Super Tuesday is really do or die. If you don’t get a significant chunk of the Super Tuesday delegates, it becomes all but impossible to get a pledged delegate majority.

Super Tuesday is also the first electoral test for former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who has spent half a billion dollars on advertising across the country but skipped the four early states. Bloomberg rose in national polls and in polls of Super Tuesday states over the past month, but scrutiny of his past and his rocky performance in the Democratic Las Vegas debate have lately sent his numbers in the other direction.

But the crowded field this year means that, depending on how the ball bounces on March 3, there are several possible outcomes with very different implications for the race. Here are the main ones:

  • One candidate emerges with a large delegate lead and on track for the majority: This would mean they’re a commanding favorite to win the nomination.
  • One candidate emerges with a large delegate plurality in a split field but is not on track for a majority: This means that person is the favorite to get the nomination eventually, but one or more of their rivals could continue campaigning to try and deprive them of the majority and make things interesting at the convention.
  • Two candidates split almost all the delegates: This would likely mean a two-person race going forward, with the outcome up in the air, but likely to be settled before the convention (since it’s extremely likely, in a two-candidate race, that one person ends up with a majority).
  • Three or more candidates split delegates, and no one’s on track for a majority: This is the scenario where a contested convention would be most likely.
Finally, it’s entirely possible that we won’t actually know the Super Tuesday outcome on Super Tuesday. For instance, California takes a famously long time to count votes (due to the need to verify late-arriving mailed ballots), and the exact vote shares and margins both statewide and in its 53 congressional districts could be important.

If one candidate does end up winning almost everywhere, that might not be such a big deal. But in this nomination contest so far, it’s usually prudent to expect that things could get messy

------------------------
Super Tuesday looks to be interesting with Klob and Mayor Pete dropping out, I imagine Biden and Bloomberg will pickup most of those delegates. Looks to be lots of fun.


Polls: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/democratic_nomination_polls/

CNN interviews with all the candidates from last night:
Michael Bloomberg

Elizabeth Warren:

Bernie Sanders:

Joe Biden:

My super tuesday choices:
Alabama(Biden), Arkansas(Biden), California(Bernie), Colorado(Bernie), Democrats Abroad(Biden), Maine(Biden), Massachusetts(Biden), Minnesota(Biden), North Carolina(Biden), Oklahoma(Biden), Tennessee(Biden), Texas(Bernie), Utah(Bernie), Vermont(Bernie), and Virginia(Biden)

Update: All but Texas I got correct, based. I forgot American Samoa but that's tribes of people and my guess is as good as any. Democrats abroad takes a week to trickle in.
 
Last edited:
Is this really a “hot” take? Biden was always the establishment pick who could safely be assumed to be in the DNC’s pocket.
Yep, locked it up ages ago when this whole Ukraine story broke. Post of mine from a few months ago:

That being said, Biden is a lock for the nominee. Why? Trumps impeachment process targeted Biden, the entire thing resting on the basis that trump is manipulating the election. If Biden doesnt make it past the first round then their argument has a lot less impact. If he is the nominee and trump is trying to pull shit, then its suddenly a huge deal.
 
Arizona is Trump country. I don't think there's much of a worry there.

Bernie is holding a rally here tonight. Be interesting to see the turnout, but I guarantee it will be nothing like the rallies Trump holds here. A last chance for the Bernie Bros to plead their case? They really can't "stupid nigga-nigga" here in AZ -- the Black population here is only 4.1%. Hispanics are a different story at 31%, so Bernie better brush up on his Si habla Español a wee bit.

And the next Dem Debate shitshow will be here in PHX on March 15. So it will be Bernie, Biden and if she's still standing by then, Warren. Shame the DNC shitfucked Tulsi by raising that arbitrary bar yet again. Would love to see her slay all three of the other candidates just for shits and giggles!
Arizona voted in a senator with a stripper name like Kyrsten Sinema.
 
Arizona voted in a senator with a stripper name like Kyrsten Sinema.

You can thank McSally for that. Spoilered, as not really relevant to this thread, but an interesting read to those that may care.

The McSally vs. Sinema race here in AZ was a great example of how NOT to run a political campaign. Jeff Flake resigned and his Senate seat became open (Flake was a flake, enough said on him). McSally had already served two terms in Congress and as most know, was a commander of a Warthog wing in the Air Force at Davis-Monthan in Tucson. She should have been an easy shoe-in over Sinema, who had also served two terms in the House, but had a long history of being a liberal idiot and member of the Green Party. So, what happened?

McSally immediately got deep into the mud and was slinging shit faster and further than a pig trying to find a truffle. Instead of basing her campaign on her accomplishments, she went solid attack ads against Sinema. I'm talking 24/7; you couldn't turn on the TV, radio, anything without hearing how bad a socialist Sinema was. Even a terrorist. Pictures of Sinema in a pink tuu-tuu supporting liberal shit (the pics were real, by the way). Oh, the salt mines were emptied.

1155968404_5825873084001_5825869607001-vs.jpg



Sinema, on the other hand, took the high road. She doubled-down on what she had down for the community, her work supporting Veterans groups and causes (her brother is a Vet) and insisted she was the one that could work across the aisle. Her ads were positive and upbeat. Surprisingly enough, she also had some very good endorsements.

By Election Day, the voting public was fed up with the absolute negativity of the whole race from McSally. It was truly gutter level shit and probably the most ugly race I've ever seen in my life. Personally, I felt that if this is the future politics is going to become -- not telling me what your plans are or how you are going to accomplish them, but instead just spew an endless stream of shit about your opponent -- stop the world. I want off.

Apparently I wasn't the only one feeling that way. I held my nose and voted for McSally, but a lot of Arizona didn't and sent her a strong bitch slap by voting for Sinema. Sinema won by 50% to 48% for McSally. To this day, I honestly believe if McSally had simply run a heads up, here's why I'm better campaign, she would have won.

When John Kyl (a truly good Senator) resigned in 2018, Ducey appointed McSally to Kyl's seat. So, she backdoored her way into the Senate as the state's Junior Senator. However, she's going to have to run for it if she wants to keep it this year and she's got a VERY strong Dem opponent - Mark Kelly, also a former fighter pilot, commander of the space shuttle on two missions and bonus woke points for being the husband of Gabby Giffords, a former Congress woman who was shot in the head by a deranged fuck in Tucson, but survived.

So, it will be interesting to see if McSally learned anything from Sinema. She'll have a really, really tough time trying to play dirty with Kelly because the man has more cred than her by a longshot, other than he wants to take our guns.

I'll close with this -- I've lived in several states, been here in AZ for nearly 40 years. AZ politics are never boring! To me, it's interesting how they so often end up with national implications.
 
I'd love to see a bunch of trust fund brats riot. The national guard and riot police should get a raise and be allowed to show no mercy

That reminds me of the Pasolini line about how when the students fought with the police he sympathized with the police who were 'the children of the poor' over the bourgeoise, preening, students.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pier_Paolo_Pasolini#1968_protests

The main source regarding Pasolini's views of the student movement is his poem "Il PCI ai giovani" ("The PCI to Young People"), written after the Battle of Valle Giulia. Addressing the students, he tells them that, unlike the international news media which has been reporting on them, he will not flatter them. He points out that they are the children of the bourgeoisie ("Avete facce di figli di papà / Vi odio come odio i vostri papà" – "You have the faces of daddy's boys / I hate you like I hate your dads"), before stating "Quando ieri a Valle Giulia avete fatto a botte coi poliziotti / io simpatizzavo coi poliziotti" ("When you and the policemen were throwing punches yesterday at Valle Giulia / I was sympathising with the policemen"). He explained that this sympathy was because the policemen were "figli di poveri" ("children of the poor").
 
I'm not 100% sure that Trump will have an easy go this time round.

Sure Biden is a doddering senile old fool but the democrats will vote for anyone blue, hell that's their election tag-line; "anyone is better then Trump!"

Trump got lucky in some key races last time around and hubris going into 2020 could lead to a reverse Hillary.

I hope Trump and his team take this election seriously because if the democrats can somehow muster enuff voter turn-out then it doesn't matter if they run Biden, Bernie or a clump of steaming manure cuz "vote blue no matter who" is this elections rallying cry.

The Republicans will turn out like always but the moderate democrats are the wildcard this time around and you can forget the "progressive youth" block. They couldn't even be bothered to put down Twitter long enuff to go vote for their savior Bernie so I doubt they'll bother to turn out for Blind-Joe.

I don't think the Democrats will make the same mistake twice and ignore the key moderate states so Trump will have to work to offer them something more then gimme-dats.
 
Predictit jumped up from below 20 to 40 now for biden while Trump still hovers around the 54 to 57 range. Before super Tuesday, Sanders was around 30. Biden looks to be a tougher cookie than Sanders and doesn't even know about it.
 
I'm not 100% sure that Trump will have an easy go this time round.

Sure Biden is a doddering senile old fool but the democrats will vote for anyone blue, hell that's their election tag-line; "anyone is better then Trump!"

Trump got lucky in some key races last time around and hubris going into 2020 could lead to a reverse Hillary.

I hope Trump and his team take this election seriously because if the democrats can somehow muster enuff voter turn-out then it doesn't matter if they run Biden, Bernie or a clump of steaming manure cuz "vote blue no matter who" is this elections rallying cry.

The Republicans will turn out like always but the moderate democrats are the wildcard this time around and you can forget the "progressive youth" block. They couldn't even be bothered to put down Twitter long enuff to go vote for their savior Bernie so I doubt they'll bother to turn out for Blind-Joe.

I don't think the Democrats will make the same mistake twice and ignore the key moderate states so Trump will have to work to offer them something more then gimme-dats.
Of course Trump is actually going to have put forward a good faith effort to win the election, obviously. But take a look at the the turnout comparisons between the Democratic primary, and the basically optional to vote in Republican primary and consider what this means for turnout in the general. Moreover, you yourself point out that the Dems are going to have turnout problems this year, the people who voted for Sanders are probably going to not vote for Biden in the same numbers in the general and that alone could well be enough to swing it in Trump's favor.
 
Who does Pocahontas endorse?
She'll hitch her wagon to who ever she thinks will win. Her ideology is very fluid. She was a republican but then switched to Democrat because thats what it took to win in MA. When she was running for reelection she said she had no plans to run for POTUS. Once she got in she instantly started running for POTUS and has been MIA from her post in state. Rather then working with her fellow senators to "bring home the bacon" for her constituents, she instead spits in their face for WOKE soundbites she can use for her potus campaign. There is a reason she came in 3rd in that state. She doesn't even pretend to care about the massholes.


Sure Biden is a doddering senile old fool but the democrats will vote for anyone blue, hell that's their election tag-line; "anyone is better then Trump!"
I don't think Biden will be the nominee. IMO he is just a pawn to block Sanders from taking over the party. Once the spot light is on Joe and he is gets the stage all to himself people will see his brain is shot. The campaign trail has been taking a big toll on him and the rate of deterioration has been increasing.
Joe will have some stumbles and not make it to 1991 delegates. Then DNC will pick who they want at convention. And since they let the primary play out (((naturally))) no one can say they ratfucked Bernie.
 
She'll hitch her wagon to who ever she thinks will win. Her ideology is very fluid. She was a republican but then switched to Democrat because thats what it took to win in MA. When she was running for reelection she said she had no plans to run for POTUS. Once she got in she instantly started running for POTUS and has been MIA from her post in state. Rather then working with her fellow senators to "bring home the bacon" for her constituents, she instead spits in their face for WOKE soundbites she can use for her potus campaign. There is a reason she came in 3rd in that state. She doesn't even pretend to care about the massholes.



I don't think Biden will be the nominee. IMO he is just a pawn to block Sanders from taking over the party. Once the spot light is on Joe and he is gets the stage all to him self people will he his brain is shot its all done.
Joe will have some stumbles and not make it to 1991 delegates. The DNC will pick who they want at convention. And since the let the primary play out (((naturally))) no one can say they ratfucked Bernie.
Tbf it was a little bit of ratfucking and more of a lazy young voter base who are unlikely to actually go out to vote.
 
what killed the religious right on the pleb baptist side was the popularity kf feel good christianity like hillsong, joel olsteen and pentacostalism.

for the intellectual protestant it was the NT wrights and psuedo eastern orthodoxy.

both led to a "judge not lest ye be judged" move and the gay issue was drowned in pastoral care.

The toughest church I've ever been in was a Pentecostal one. Can't say as I see the popularity feel-good idea there.
 


Joe Biden wasted no time following his Super Tuesday anointment as the Democratic establishment’s favorite candidate by hitting the Hollywood fundraising circuit, rubbing elbows with the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio, Sony Pictures Entertainment honcho Tom Rothman, and former California Governor Gray Davis.

Playing to the elite crowd, Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE) tore into President Donald Trump by saying his administration lacks “decency and honor” and may one day be viewed as a “historical aberration.”

“Folks, you all know as well as I do, this is the most important election you ever voted in, not because of Joe Biden, and I mean that. I’m not talking about me,” he reportedly said at the event, which was held at former Paramount boss Sherry Lansing’s Bel Air home.

“It’s because if we find someone who can defeat Trump and reestablish some regular order in this country and some decency and honor, your kids and grandkids will read about this period of our history as a historical aberration,

Biden added: “If he’s elected to four more years, I promise you we will see this society change in a fundamental way for at least a generation or two.”

The Hollywood Reporter noted that ticket prices for the swanky fundraiser ranged from $1,000 to $2,800.

Joe Biden also joked about the on-stage drama that occurred the day before at a campaign rally in Los Angeles when a vegan activists rushed the stage, prompting Jill Biden to physically block one of the protesters from reaching her husband.

“Whoa, you don’t screw around with a Philly girl, I’ll tell you what,” Biden, 77, reportedly said. “I tell you what man, I married way above my station.”

------------------------------------------------------------------



During a special Fox News town hall with President Trump Thursday, the commander in chief confessed he was "mentally" set to face Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in the 2020 general election this November before former Vice President Joe Biden's resurgence Tuesday.

"I was all set for Bernie because I thought it was gonna happen," Trump said, responding to co-host Bret Baier. "You know, we get ready for things, right? So mentally, I'm all set for Bernie ... Communist, I had everything down."

Shortly before Super Tuesday, Sanders took criticism for praising deceased Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and his reading initiative, prompting criticism from all sides. However, Biden's strong showing Tuesday, winning multiple states and taking the delegate lead has made him the frontrunner once again.

Trump mocked Biden's gaffes that surrounded Super Tuesday.

"And then we have this crazy thing that happened right on Tuesday, which [Biden] thought was Thursday," Trump said, making the crowd laugh. "But he also said 150 million people were killed with guns and he was running for the United States Senate. 'Support me, I'm running for the United States.' There's something going on there."

The president attributed Sanders' loss in Texas to Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who dropped out of the race Thursday. Trump compared both Sanders and Biden, saying Sanders would pose more of a threat because of his base but that it would be difficult for him to rebound from Tuesday's elections.

"Two very different people. I think it a certain way, Bernie, would be tougher because he's got a base," Trump said. "It's a much smaller base than my base. I think a lot of my people are here because I did nothing to do that. But we have a lot of support in Pennsylvania. I think we have a lot of support if you look at the rallies."

"I was all set for Bernie, I was ready to go in, then I say, you know, I don't think I'm running against Bernie," Trump added. "I think it's going to be very hard for him to come back."

------------------------------------------------------------------

Joe Biden living it high in Tinsel Town. Proof that at this point, no one cares about money in politics anymore.

And Trump is now bracing to face this demented fuck knowing it will be harder. After all it was 4 years ago when people said the same about him and many Republicans are getting smug about beating Biden.
 
They should run an ad including the letter found during the raid on Osama Bin Laden.


Bowden quotes from a letter bin Laden sent to Atiyah Abd al-Rahman, his third in command, in which he calls on al Qaeda to target Obama or Petraeus during their visits to Afghanistan and Pakistan, but urges them not to target Biden — because if Obama were killed, Biden would be thrust into the presidency and “Biden is totally unprepared for that post.”

Bin Laden wrote:

“I asked Sheik Sa’id, Allah have mercy on his soul, to task brother Ilyas to prepare two groups—one in Pakistan and the other in the Bagram area of Afghanistan—with the mission of anticipating and spotting the visits of Obama or Petraeus to Afghanistan or Pakistan to target the aircraft of either one of them… They are not to target visits by U.S. Vice President Biden, Secretary of Defense [Robert] Gates, Joint Chiefs of Staff (Chairman) [Michael] Mullen, or the Special Envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan [Richard] Holbrooke. The groups will remain on the lookout for Obama or Petraeus. The reason for concentrating on them is that Obama is the head of infidelity and killing him will automatically make Biden take over the presidency for the remainder of the term, as it is the norm over there. Biden is totally unprepared for that post, which will lead the United States into a crisis” (emphasis added).
 
Back