Megathread Insane Parents of "Transgender" Kids - Parents who push a transgender identity on their children

[NoSpiceLife]

It's really damaging in these communities. I get frustrated when being 'inclusive' to one tiny minority group means potentially alienating/confusing/misleading other, much bigger groups who are generally more disadvantaged and face more barriers to health care in the first place...

As you've proven, it's not potentially, it is damaging many other communities, from the gay communities to immigrant communities, and to 50% of the population, when females are no longer listened to because men have completely railroaded everyone into, letting them do whatever the fuck they feel like.

Not to mention when these kids all grow up, and their brains hopefully hit maturity, they realise they are actually gay (or in fact straight and were coerced by their parents), and they are left with little to no future, and a lifetime of medication to survive; they will be seeing death as the only solution.

No, I think it has to do with hormones in the mılk and high fructose corn syrup. And perhaps social instability. Or pressuring her to grow up faster.

We spoke about this before, and findings that are showing, living with non-related males is one of the big precursors bringing on early puberty. It's purely a biological reaction to what our bodies are designed to do.

Louis Theroux - Transgender Kids

One of the torrent sites have it, I just downloaded it (about 10 minutes), and it works, if anyone wants the link.

 

[Non-Expert!]

I don't know how everyone got so obsessed with gender so quickly. Not even 10 years ago, you had emo and scene boys wearing make-up and floppy dyed hair and girls wearing shaved hair and flannel shirts, some were gay and lesbian, some were straight. Yeah, it looked stupid, teenage fashions always do, but they had fun with it and weren't stressing out over their identity or wanting to damage their bodies beyond getting some piercings that they could just take out again.
It's the same with younger kids, toy adverts used to show boys and girls playing together with the toy, or there'd be a bunch of different Lego sets that had male and female minifigs and a mix of stereotypes (like a farm set would have a pony and a tractor, but it didn't explicitly say it was for a girl or a boy). Now even Lego sets are really strictly gendered, you get Lego for boys and Lego Friends for girls. It used to be okay to be a tomboy or a sissy, or at least if it wasn't okay it was a lot more tolerated. They'd get picked on, sure, but they'd have friends and their parents would just think they were a bit weird, they wouldn't tell them their bodies were wrong or they needed Lupron.

It's a shame the autogynephilic troons have chased all the old butch lesbians and camp gay dudes out of the LGBT movement, they could teach them a few things about gender nonconformity being okay.

As for gendered Lego sets, it is because they sell more Lego that way. God forbid, a boy touches a pink Lego brick. He could catch Gay from that Lego set, especially if he makes a pink and pastel purple tower. So if there is an older sister, boy needs his own legos. If there is a younger sister, we know what to get her to complement her brother's Lego set. In essence, this is about money, sales and marketing,

It is the same with children's clothes. Manufacturers make it so that little boy pants have a very different seam line from little girl's pants. And tee shirts are pretty much made so that there is always a print on it, of a gendered cartoon character. And girls stuff is so unmistakably feminine, that it makes it socially questionable to repurpose it for a younger male sibling. The end result, for people like me and my husband, is having bins full of kid's clothes, preemie - 7, with both monster trucks or princesses indelibly stamped on them.

This is all about making money but for the end user, it amounts to complicating your life ... a lot. Especially having to take a special effort to match Frozen II-themed Christmas socks for a 3 year old, along side grinch-themed ones for boys. And summer is around the corner and we live in Southern California.

So I hope that I have addressed your question, about this uptick in assigning gender to everything.

It becomes relevant to parents, as they sort through batches of hand-me-down gendered socks and flouncy onesie blouses for newborn baby girls ... not that parents aren't aware that their daughter is a girl ...

This is my general approach to the issue. We are expecting a baby boy. We have a 5 year old boy and a 2 year old girl ... if somebody gives us hand-me downs, from here until eternity, I will accept them. But otherwise, Baby Sister can wear a gender-neutral outfit and we can pierce her ears and put a matching ribbon in her hair to not be accused of trooning her out. Unfortunately I only have Preemie and Newborn in floral prints, so he can come home in a baby blanket with cars on it or something so people don't think we are weird.

If ever invited to a baby shower, F.Y.I. Gerber makes neutral colored onesies. Children's socks come in neutral colors too. Although people might think that they want pink sequined newborn socks or whatever, when you are actually taking care of children, and not dressing dolls, a pack of neutral colored socks in two sizes too large helps you get out the door in the morning.

So personally I think that we have ushered in a new era in which we have both the leisure and the cheap manufacturing capacity to create this culture of childhood individualism. I am not that old, but when I was born (1970's) they did not have ultrasound. They also did not have Chinese sweatshops. Not everybody had consistent access to a washer and a dryer. So vintage baby clothes have a less specialized look.

Also, chances are, it does not occur to a lot of parents, to simplify their kid's wardrobes to shorts, denim or Khaki skinny-jeans, BVD's and Hanes tube socks.

 

[Jarolleon]

As for gendered Lego sets, it is because they sell more Lego that way. God forbid, a boy touches a pink Lego brick. He could catch Gay from that Lego set, especially if he makes a pink and pastel purple tower. So if there is an older sister, boy needs his own legos. If there is a younger sister, we know what to get her to complement her brother's Lego set. In essence, this is about money, sales and marketing,

It is the same with children's clothes. Manufacturers make it so that little boy pants have a very different seam line from little girl's pants. And tee shirts are pretty much made so that there is always a print on it, of a gendered cartoon character. And girls stuff is so unmistakably feminine, that it makes it socially questionable to repurpose it for a younger male sibling. The end result, for people like me and my husband, is having bins full of kid's clothes, preemie - 7, with both monster trucks or princesses indelibly stamped on them.

This is all about making money but for the end user, it amounts to complicating your life ... a lot. Especially having to take a special effort to match Frozen II-themed Christmas socks for a 3 year old, along side grinch-themed ones for boys. And summer is around the corner and we live in Southern California.

So I hope that I have addressed your question, about this uptick in assigning gender to everything.

It becomes relevant to parents, as they sort through batches of hand-me-down gendered socks and flouncy onesie blouses for newborn baby girls ... not that parents aren't aware that their daughter is a girl ...

This is my general approach to the issue. We are expecting a baby boy. We have a 5 year old boy and a 2 year old girl ... if somebody gives us hand-me downs, from here until eternity, I will accept them. But otherwise, Baby Sister can wear a gender-neutral outfit and we can pierce her ears and put a matching ribbon in her hair to not be accused of trooning her out. Unfortunately I only have Preemie and Newborn in floral prints, so he can come home in a baby blanket with cars on it or something so people don't think we are weird.

If ever invited to a baby shower, F.Y.I. Gerber makes neutral colored onesies. Children's socks come in neutral colors too. Although people might think that they want pink sequined newborn socks or whatever, when you are actually taking care of children, and not dressing dolls, a pack of neutral colored socks in two sizes too large helps you get out the door in the morning.

So personally I think that we have ushered in a new era in which we have both the leisure and the cheap manufacturing capacity to create this culture of childhood individualism. I am not that old, but when I was born (1970's) they did not have ultrasound. They also did not have Chinese sweatshops. Not everybody had consistent access to a washer and a dryer. So vintage baby clothes have a less specialized look.

Also, chances are, it does not occur to a lot of parents, to simplify their kid's wardrobes to shorts, denim or Khaki skinny-jeans, BVD's and Hanes tube socks.

So all this genderspecial lunacy is a reaction to toy and clothing companies trying to squeeze more money out of parents by ramping up the gender distinctions to absurd levels? Explains why most of them claim to be communists at least.

 

[Parthenos]

So all this genderspecial lunacy is a reaction to toy and clothing companies trying to squeeze more money out of parents by ramping up the gender distinctions to absurd levels? Explains why most of them claim to be communists at least.

It's not a good reaction, though. Back in the day (and there still is to a degree) there was a lot of backlash against gendering toys and such. There still is a subset of people who want more unisex clothing in general, and I can see why - it often tends to be more practical as well, which can be nice.

What we have here, though is people who have bought into these extreme gender representations hook, line, and sinker, and go on to think that if Timmy likes plastic fairy wings or Sally likes monster trucks then that's all the reason they need to troon them out. And once they do, they continue the consumerism of "specific gender" because that just affirms their new gender.

It's literally the opposite of railing against corporate genderism - it's using it as a pretext for transitioning. Because god forbid we have a kid that doesn't conform to the consumer stereotype!

 

[eternal dog mongler]

So personally I think that we have ushered in a new era in which we have both the leisure and the cheap manufacturing capacity to create this culture of childhood individualism. I am not that old, but when I was born (1970's) they did not have ultrasound. They also did not have Chinese sweatshops. Not everybody had consistent access to a washer and a dryer. So vintage baby clothes have a less specialized look.

Yep.

I'm slightly older than you. I grew up in a rural area and wore my older brothers' hand-me-downs. Nobody ever gave me shit about it or thought I was a lesbian or trans or whatever. It was just something that people did since we were all poor as hell.

Everything has to be gendered now. Ribbons, dolling your little girl up in princess dresses, hot pink youth rifles (wtf I learned to shoot with my dad's Winchester, it's not a fashion accessory.)

Girls wear this, boys wear that, girls do this, boys do that. It's like we've somehow transported the 1950s into the modern era.

 

[IceGray]

1950s with a mad science bent is what I'd call this insane worship of gender roles.

Even lesbianism has to be soft, sweet, and super frilly.

Did everyone lose their eyesight so bad they need cartoonishly obvious gender cues?

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Looks like Charles/Janet Mock hasn't been mentioned here yet. He's been saying that child prostitution is empowering for trans youth.

Janet Mock on the “Underground Railroad” into Child Prostitution for Transgender Youth- and why he thinks that’s a good thing.

“A sense of community, sisterhood, resiliency, resources, strength. It was like our underground railroad of resources to navigate a system not built for us. And for me that’s what sex work gave me....

web.archive.org

***
I was 15 the first time I visited Merchant Street, what some would call “the stroll” for trans women involved in street-based sex work. At the time, I had just begun medically transitioning and it was where younger girls, like my friends and myself, would go to hang out, flirt and fool around with guys and socialize with older trans women, the legends of our community.

The majority of the women I idolized engaged in the sex trades at some time or another – some dabbled in video cam work and pornography, others chose street-based work and dancing at strip clubs (an option reserved for those most often perceived as cis). These women were the first trans women I met, and I quickly correlated trans womanhood and sex work.

I perceived the sex trades as a rite of passage, something a trans girl had to do in order to make the money necessary to support herself. I had also learned (from media, our laws and pop culture) that sex work is shameful and degrading.

Sex work is heavily stigmatized, whether one goes into it by choice, coercion or circumstance. Sex workers are often dismissed, causing even the most liberal folk, to dehumanize, devalue and demean women who are engaged in the sex trades. This pervasive dehumanization of women in the sex trades leads many to ignore the silencing, brutality, policing, criminalization and violence sex workers face, even blaming them for being utterly damaged, promiscuous, and unworthy.

So because I learned that sex work is shameful, and I correlated trans womanhood and sex work, I was taught that trans womanhood is shameful. This belief system served as the base of my understanding of self as a trans girl, and I couldn’t separate it from my own body image issues, my sense of self, my internalized shame about being trans, brown, poor, young, woman.

Though I yearned to be among women like myself, I also judged them for doing work that I swore at 15 I could never do. The work and those women didn’t fit my pedestal perched Clair Huxtable portrait of womanhood.

Yet my economic hurdles were real and urgent, and I couldn’t deny that witnessing the women of Merchant Street take their lives into their own hands, empowered me. Watching these women every weekend gathered in sisterhood and community, I learned firsthand about body autonomy, about resilience and agency, about learning to do for yourself in a world that is hostile about your existence.

These women taught me that nothing was wrong with me or my body and that if I wanted they would show me the way, and it was this underground railroad of resources created by low-income, marginalized women, that enabled me when I was 16 to jump in a car with my first regular and choose a pathway to my survival and liberation.”

 

[Maggots on a Train v2]

Another case of Munchausens mom 'fixing' her three daughters into two girls and a boy.

This woman needs to be locked up in the nut house.

‘It’s just how you really are inside’: 9-year-old shares transgender journey

Fourth grader Jacob Lemay knew he was a boy before he could properly pronounce the word “transgender.” His whole family now advocates for trans rights.

www.nbcnews.com

No surprise she's met with Loopy Liz Warren.

Here's bonus content of Dwayne Wade on Ellen Degenerate on trooning out his son with the help of his new girlfriend.

Dwyane Wade’s Candid Talk About Supporting His 12-Year-Old's Gender Identity

Dwyane Wade candidly chatted with Ellen about embracing his 12-year-old's gender identity, and how he and his wife Gabrielle Union made it a priority to educ...

www.youtube.com

Plus https://www.instagram.com/p/B8b5kq4pM4Z/

No insult to the other kids, who are blameless in this, but the mother definitely chose the prettiest daughter to troon out.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Yep.

I'm slightly older than you. I grew up in a rural area and wore my older brothers' hand-me-downs. Nobody ever gave me shit about it or thought I was a lesbian or trans or whatever. It was just something that people did since we were all poor as hell.

The posibility that the practical little girl wearing pants, could be a lesbian, probably never crossed anybody's mind.

There was something of a taboo, attached to assigning sexual orientation to children.

People may have used metaphors like "she is a bit tomboyish" but jumping to conclusions about sexuality, was, and continues to be perverse.

I think people noticed it a bit more with boys but even then, it was like "he is a bit unusual ..." or "he is not very interested in sports ... "

People were just a bit more discreet with their concerns.

Maybe I am old school but the idea of assigning another gender identity to a small child, to me, is irreconcilable with my world view.

 

[qt farmer :)]

Looks like the parents of non-binary kids are just as little about the well-being of their tykes as their trans counterparts.
View attachment 1171014

"I am just me," and then proceeds to take drugs to stop a natural bodily process.
just another day in fucking Clown World.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Looks like Charles/Janet Mock hasn't been mentioned here yet. He's been saying that child prostitution is empowering for trans youth.

Janet Mock on the “Underground Railroad” into Child Prostitution for Transgender Youth- and why he thinks that’s a good thing.

“A sense of community, sisterhood, resiliency, resources, strength. It was like our underground railroad of resources to navigate a system not built for us. And for me that’s what sex work gave me....

web.archive.org

Sex workers have always been around. The serve a purpose. They are basically tolerated at some level, in every society known to man. This lifestyle has always been regarded as marginal and disease-ridden. And wayward. There is nothing new about any of this, and encouraging youth (any kind of youth) to avail themselves for sexual exploitation, is the Devil's work, for lack of a better term.

This is also a dangerous profession. There is nothing empowering about the posibility of some John strangling you to death before, or after, enjoying having his **** release, in your mouth or your rectum.

Then, the body of the empowered child prostitute is discovered in a dumpster, in an alley somewhere, decomposed almost beyond recognition.

There is no pretty way of saying it.

 

[lololololagain]

Sex workers have always been around. The serve a purpose. They are basically tolerated at some level, in every society known to man. This lifestyle has always been regarded as marginal and disease-ridden. And wayward. There is nothing new about any of this, and encouraging youth (any kind of youth) to avail themselves for sexual exploitation, is the Devil's work, for lack of a better term.

This is also a dangerous profession. There is nothing empowering about the posibility of some John strangling you to death before, or after, enjoying having his **** release, in your mouth or your rectum.

Then, the body of the empowered child prostitute is discovered in a dumpster, in an alley somewhere, decomposed almost beyond recognition.

There is no pretty way of saying it.

Ugh, i remember hearing about this, I guess we should YAASSS Qween him huh? I think this person has kids btw. Whta kind of fucking sicko says this shit? I really am starting to believe trans "childern" is going to be the start of people saying kids can consent to sex or "trans age" being taken seriously so adults can be with children. In what world is it okay to say this shit? I guess it's okay when you are a trans person. It reminds me of that trans weirdo going, "you should never call a transwoman a pedophile!" the shit these people come with and the shit people will eat up is crazy.

 

[Non-Expert!]

Ugh, i remember hearing about this, I guess we should YAASSS Qween him huh? I think this person has kids btw. Whta kind of fucking sicko says this shit? I really am starting to believe trans "childern" is going to be the start of people saying kids can consent to sex or "trans age" being taken seriously so adults can be with children. In what world is it okay to say this shit? I guess it's okay when you are a trans person. It reminds me of that trans weirdo going, "you should never call a transwoman a pedophile!" the shit these people come with and the shit people will eat up is crazy.

What kind of sicko even "goes there?"

<----- these kinds

Satan's minions.

 

[trannyfucker]

We already have Packer Peckers and Binders for girls who want to play at being boys, now there's tucker swimsuits for boys to hide their penises.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/swimwear-bathing-suits-transgender-rubies-1.5493054

Jamie Alexander came up with the idea for the company Rubies when he and his daughter Ruby, who is transgender, were getting ready for a trip to Panama and he wanted to shield her from any possible hurtful reactions.

She was 11 at the time and had already identified as female for a few years. But going to the beach presented a different challenge.

"In the early days, when she socially transitioned, we put her in boys' clothing for gym and swimming," said Alexander, who lives in Toronto. "She was reluctantly going along with us.

Then last May, before a camping trip with family friends, Ruby said she wanted to wear a bikini.

"No one cared, no one really said anything about it," said Alexander of the fitted girls' bathing suit bottoms, but that was in a group of trusted friends and he worried about what might happen months later, on their upcoming trip to Panama.

He presented his idea to Ryerson's Fashion Zone, a business incubator bringing together fashion and technology, pairing entrepreneurs with industry advisers.

He decided to start a small, focused business, with basic swimwear bottoms for trans girls offering smoothing compression technology, in addition to t-shirts with the slogan "Every Girl Deserves to Shine."

Alexander's company doesn't even make bathing suit tops, since he wanted to spend his time and resources tackling a problem.

Trans girls, he said, can buy a separate bathing suit top to combine with the plain-coloured bottoms. At first, he only made the bottoms in black, though has since added some pairs in a sparkly pink.

He said his swimsuit bottoms are already on their 10th iteration, with changes made along the way based on the opinions from a group of 25 transgender girls testing the bathing suits. The girls live in Canada, the U.S. and Australia.

The suits are being sewn at a local company and aren't cheap, at $62 for a pair of bottoms.

But Alexander doesn't want the price to be a barrier for kids who might be encountering difficulties.

"I want to send a thousand pairs for free to kids who can't afford them," he explained. He's funding that through the t-shirt profits.

Lol WTF. He makes $62 bathing suits (sorry HALF bathing suits) which aren't necessary seeing as girls don't have to wear bikinis but can wear something like this

and then he spends all his profits giving them away.

And then they don't even match, so you have your dick-hiding bikini bottoms in austere black, and then just to make it obvious that you're packing, a completely non-matching bikini top from another brand.

I mean it's good that these kids are going to get castrated and stink ditches installed, because I guess otherwise tight bathing suits will give them ball cancer.

 

[GenociderSyo]

Found this list of non-binary and transgender inclusive picture books for schools:

https://assets2.hrc.org/welcoming-schools/documents/WS_Diverse_Picture_Books_Transgender_Non-Binary.pdf

It's from:

Great Diverse Books for Developing a Welcoming School | Welcoming Schools

HRC Foundation's Welcoming Schools is the nation's premier professional development program providing training and resources to elementary school educators to embrace all families, create LGBTQ and gender inclusive schools, prevent bias-based bullying, and support transgender and non-binary...

www.welcomingschools.org

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

Found this list of non-binary and transgender inclusive picture books for schools:

https://assets2.hrc.org/welcoming-schools/documents/WS_Diverse_Picture_Books_Transgender_Non-Binary.pdf

It's from:

Great Diverse Books for Developing a Welcoming School | Welcoming Schools

HRC Foundation's Welcoming Schools is the nation's premier professional development program providing training and resources to elementary school educators to embrace all families, create LGBTQ and gender inclusive schools, prevent bias-based bullying, and support transgender and non-binary...

www.welcomingschools.org

Several of these seems to imply that clothing preference means you're trans. I weep for the kids being taught that not following gender roles means you're sick and the only cure is genital surgery.

Edit: Annie's plaid shirt actually seems to promote gender nonconformity without implying the little girl is trans. 10,000 dresses, however, calls Bailey she.

 

[eternal dog mongler]

Found this list of non-binary and transgender inclusive picture books for schools:

https://assets2.hrc.org/welcoming-schools/documents/WS_Diverse_Picture_Books_Transgender_Non-Binary.pdf

It's from:

Great Diverse Books for Developing a Welcoming School | Welcoming Schools

HRC Foundation's Welcoming Schools is the nation's premier professional development program providing training and resources to elementary school educators to embrace all families, create LGBTQ and gender inclusive schools, prevent bias-based bullying, and support transgender and non-binary...

www.welcomingschools.org

I've read a bunch of these, unfortunately. Vincent the Vixen gets my vote for the book most likely to cause kids to grow up to be weird fetishists.

I dislike how celebratory these books are. The local school board tossed them around as part of an anti-bullying campaign. Obviously I don't want, say, a six year old boy to be bullied because he thinks he's trans. At that age, that's on his parents.

But also I don't want kids to think that being trans is somehow better than not being trans, which these books really fail at.

 

[Parthenos]

We already have Packer Peckers and Binders for girls who want to play at being boys, now there's tucker swimsuits for boys to hide their penises.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/swimwear-bathing-suits-transgender-rubies-1.5493054

Lol WTF. He makes $62 bathing suits (sorry HALF bathing suits) which aren't necessary seeing as girls don't have to wear bikinis but can wear something like this

View attachment 1183261

and then he spends all his profits giving them away.

And then they don't even match, so you have your dick-hiding bikini bottoms in austere black, and then just to make it obvious that you're packing, a completely non-matching bikini top from another brand.

I mean it's good that these kids are going to get castrated and stink ditches installed, because I guess otherwise tight bathing suits will give them ball cancer.

What's hilarious is that these fucking things look like burkinis, only without some features. Of course, please bear in mind that no matter what people say, a burka in any form represents the treatment of women as second-class citizens:

Seeing as the guy is from Canada, I'm willing to bet he was "inspired" by these things.

 

[💗Freddie Freaker💗]

We already have Packer Peckers and Binders for girls who want to play at being boys, now there's tucker swimsuits for boys to hide their penises.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/swimwear-bathing-suits-transgender-rubies-1.5493054

Lol WTF. He makes $62 bathing suits (sorry HALF bathing suits) which aren't necessary seeing as girls don't have to wear bikinis but can wear something like this

View attachment 1183261

and then he spends all his profits giving them away.

And then they don't even match, so you have your dick-hiding bikini bottoms in austere black, and then just to make it obvious that you're packing, a completely non-matching bikini top from another brand.

I mean it's good that these kids are going to get castrated and stink ditches installed, because I guess otherwise tight bathing suits will give them ball cancer.

Interesting that he made bikini bottoms rather than one piece swimsuits like most little girls wear. Bikinis are much less comfortable than one pieces. I think he's just trying to get his son "Ruby" to wear skimpy clothes.

I've been looking at more kid's books from the list previously posted and something I noticed is that they never explain what it means to feel a gender. In books promoting tranny stuff rather than gender nonconformity, the trans characters always follow gender stereotypes. For example here's a book about a FTM toddler:


Vincent the Vixen seems to be the worst, though. According to the following review, Vincent is brainwashed by an old trannybadger into thinking he's a girl because he likes pretending to be one.

Alice Reeves’ Vincent the Vixen

archived 12 Mar 2020 06:55:05 UTC

archive.is

It begins with several foxes playing together. The foxes, identified as siblings, are seen without any identifying gender markers, such as clothes. They’re shown playing hide-and-seek, swimming, and annoying a grumpy cat. None of these activities are particularly gendered, so at the text’s opening gender is inserted as a non-issue. This changes when the fox cubs go to Betty the Badger’s house.

Betty lets the young foxes play with a box of her old dresses. The foxes are depicted laughing while wearing Betty’s brightly colored, out-of-style, but very fun clothes. The text reads: “Vincent loved dressing up more than anything in the world, because he could use his imagination to be anything he wanted to be.” Vincent is seen pretending to be a queen and a witch, two images of strong, powerful femininity. In fact, Vincent always pretends to be a girl, a point his brothers and sisters eventually bring up. Vincent is not sure how to respond when asked why he prefers girlish costumes. He goes off by himself to think about it.

While reflecting deeply about his gender identity he realizes he is happiest when he can look and act girlish.

He does not immediately share his thoughts with anyone, but the next day Betty the Badger is able to coax him into conversation and he confides that he thinks he is a girl. Betty calmly nods and shares a story with him. Her story begins: “‘When I was a young badger I loved playing make-believe with my sisters, just like you. I was also a boy badger, just like you.’” An image of a young Betty the Badger in too-big heels reminds the reader of Vincent the Vixen’s dress play. Betty also explains that she felt like a girl, just like Vincent. She says that when she told her siblings they were confused at first but grew to understand. Even more, Betty tells Vincent that she was and is happy with her decision.

Later that night, Vincent tells his parents that when he dresses-up he is not really playing make-believe, he is not pretending to be a girl, he just is one. Like Betty’s siblings, Vincent’s family is confused at first, but they quickly accept that she is a girl.

 

[lololololagain]

I've been looking at more kid's books from the list previously posted and something I noticed is that they never explain what it means to feel a gender

I mean adults troons can't even explain this shit without going down the, "I liked stereotypical things that the opposite sex likes, Long hair, short hair, pants, dresses, pink, blue, I felt "wrong", I had BD thats 100% going to be fixed with breasts/neo vag/claydoh dick/being called "She/he""
I can't describe how it feels to be a woman, so how the fuck can a child or a man?