- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
....very longtime lurker here... I just thought this was a bit funny and wanted to share.
LOL
View attachment 1179808
http://archive.li/DdW8u
It took less than a week for this tweet to age poorly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
....very longtime lurker here... I just thought this was a bit funny and wanted to share.
LOL
View attachment 1179808
http://archive.li/DdW8u
Maza: "Rich asshole. Rich man bad. Eat the rich. This person is rich, their opinion doesn't count."....very longtime lurker here... I just thought this was a bit funny and wanted to share.
LOL
View attachment 1179808
http://archive.li/DdW8u
He's currently been on a Bernie Sanders sperging streak. Unless it was mentioned in passing on one of his full length segments, I don't think he's said anything about the Maza expose. Hopefully he does a bit on it so Maza can get triggered and throw a huge tantrum. That's the cat fight this thread exists for.Has that closeted homosexual Stephen Crowder said anything about this yet?
....very longtime lurker here... I just thought this was a bit funny and wanted to share.
LOL
View attachment 1179808
http://archive.li/DdW8u
Also...why am I not surprise this dude is such an insane narcissist that he makes gay fantasy videos for breadtube where he ships himself?
View attachment 1179809
http://archive.vn/sC5KP
The reply tweets archived are also Islamic content............
Not to mention him posting Carville's house and not being shut down for itMaza: "Rich asshole. Rich man bad. Eat the rich. This person is rich, their opinion doesn't count."
Someone who bothered to look into Maza's finances for five seconds: "You're rich, and you didn't even work for it."
Maza: "Oh wow. I can't believe someone would attack my family like this. How slimy and hateful and vile."
This is interesting. Levine’s Twitter was unlocked this morning saying they screwed up.
Now Twitter has locked him again.
The first time the feature forcing you to to delete a tweet to unlock your account appeared in public, it was used against a girl for posting screen shots of Randi Harper (who was marketing herself as an anti internet harassment activist at the time) siccing twitter mobs on her enemies. A twitter engineer at the time claimed it was a "glitch", but in hindsight, one of Harper's buddies at Twitter fucked up and outed a work in progress censorship feature months before it became a regular feature while trying to cover her ass. So yes, twitter employees can go "rogue" but Dorsey/twitter clearly don't care because they haven't done anything to prevent abuse of these features as long as the targets are on the "wrong side of history".This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?
This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?
Yeah basically. Twitter moderation is staffed with activists who are comically biased when they think they can get away with it, which is 90% of the time.The first time the feature forcing you to to delete a tweet to unlock your account appeared in public, it was used against a girl for posting screen shots of Randi Harper (who was marketing herself as an anti internet harassment activist at the time) siccing twitter mobs on her enemies. A twitter engineer at the time claimed it was a "glitch", but in hindsight, one of Harper's buddies at Twitter fucked up and outed a work in progress censorship feature months before it became a regular feature while trying to cover her ass. So yes, twitter employees can go "rogue" but Dorsey/twitter clearly don't care because they haven't done anything to prevent abuse of these features as long as the targets are on the "wrong side of history".
At the rate this douchebag is going, we're going to see another Jussie Smollet incident.
Of course the editors at Wikipedia are m’ladying the faggot to make sure nothing bad gets posted about him.
He did it so he could try to frame revealing this information or talking about it at all as doxing and bullying his family. Maza is a crybully in the truest sense of the word, and he was clearly coming at this looking to spin it to make himself the victim and demand Levine be censored. Twitter even gave him a tiny bit of acknowledgement in that department, but not nearly enough to actually suppress the story, much like how things went with him and Crowder.I'm trying to not to cross the line from laughing my ass off into MOTI territory. What the shit is happening anymore?!
Maza, Mr. Suck a Dick and Be a Socialist, has been LARPing as a disenfranchised minority in america. But instead of taking the big reveal of his grossly privileged lifestyle with some kind of pride, he spills the beans himself because....WHY??? What made him think revealing his billionaire parents before some reporter got to do it made this ANY better for him? If he could get the dude banned off Twitter, why didn't he bribe him to bury the story like all billionaires do?
It's OVER, man. Game OVER! You are the very thing that your gay/trans/queer brothers and sisters have been angry at for the past few years: an over-privileged pissant who could fund things to help them but instead watched RENT too many times and thought that having aids and struggling to live is deep, fun and cool.
The sad thing is people probably wouldn't have cared if he didn't fuck with the bottom line of youtubers. Now people know he's rich, now people will try to harass his home and family like he cheered when it happened to Tucker Carlson, and like all lolcows, he'll blame everyone and everything before he blames himself. Another day, another protestor who protested too much.
This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?
IIRC he didn't know about the story until it was about to be published (and sperged on Twitter to damage control prior to it's release) as far as Levine doing it on the downlow so Marza couldn't circle the wagons.
Also, Marza couldn't spike the story because at this point, TPTB are trying their fucking damnest to get Biden elected and faggots like Marza (who represent the sort of evil shit social climbing jealousy fag who hates on the rich because, at the end of the day, his family is "lower upper class" and not landed gentry 1%er upper class plus a spic who can't get into the really WASPy circles among the super fucking rich and see communism/socialism as the means to destroy the elites above him socially in the upper class and take their places and money) are fair game to out as frauds. Because the 1%ers who Marza envies and wants to get rid of because of jealousy over how they can buy and sell his spic family with pocket change, don't want Marza and his ilk to get power via Bernie and bring about the Commie "Great Leap Forward" that is outlined in stuff like the Green New Deal. And given the rumors that Marza's vendetta against Crowder/Youtube was being used as cover for other evil shit (damage the Vox name/kill any under the table deals Vox had with Youtube to promote their videos to force Vox to cave to the Vox writers unions' demands to be unfirable and replacing upper Vox management with minorities who would be hand picked by the union so they could rubber stamp every evil thing the union did), the mainstream media probably doesn't want to give Marza any publicity other than the bare minimum needed for virtue signalling purposes.
The sheer volume of this kind of behavior by twitter staff re: the appeals process suggests to me that technical incompetence must play a role, since to do this manually as much as the site's users claim it happens would require a lot of manpower and a work environment consisting of everyone constantly overriding everyone else's decisions. I've heard bad things about twitter from coworkers, but not that bad. A couple ideologues trying to manipulate infrastructure to fight their internet battles for them seems a more likely way to arrive at this state of affairs.This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?