No no no, you're still going about this all wrong. For starters, the hundreds of penis selfies I sent to Zoe Quinn was an obvious shitpost that got somebody in Britain so riled he wrote a blog post on it and took my penis selfies to the police to cry about me, and everyone here finds that hilarious. For seconds, I dropped a penis selfie the second you asked for one ; so even if I had harassed Zoe Quinn with penis selfies do I seem like the kind of person who'd be the slightest embarrassed or remorseful about that?
The rest of the stuff, chemo-dick, mentally ill failure, rapist sans initiative, drinking bleach, that's all okay. But it's generic, not personal. If you had dox showing I had cancer or baited a suicide or have a mental illness these would be vicious burns, but since none of them are remotely true it's just scattershot. Don't get me wrong, that kind of stuff is fine for set-dressing but you need to use it to couch something a lot harsher and personally embarrassing to me or all it accomplishes is making you look like you're really mad.
You need to start coming at us from angles that will legitimately upset and shame us. The communal sense of morality here is clearly very different from the one you're used to, because the angles of attack you're choosing are things that we either don't care about or are actively proud of. You can't shame Josh with media articles about him being a pedo because he's proud of standing his ground against baseless media smears, and we're all proud of him for it too. This kind of attack does nothing but fluff up his ego and add to his celebrity here. You can't shame Karl de Grosse by inferring he's a racist for playing the CSA in some strategy game because not only is that a ridiculous stretch of logic, nobody here cares if he's a racist or not.
You need to figure out what will actually hurt people like us and then hammer us on those weak spots.