Carlos Maza / @gaywonk versus Steven Blake Crowder / @scrowder (#VoxAdpocalypse) - Twitter war between a Canadian in nationality and a Canadian in behavior

....very longtime lurker here... I just thought this was a bit funny and wanted to share.

LOL
View attachment 1179808
http://archive.li/DdW8u
Maza: "Rich asshole. Rich man bad. Eat the rich. This person is rich, their opinion doesn't count."

Someone who bothered to look into Maza's finances for five seconds: "You're rich, and you didn't even work for it."

Maza: "Oh wow. I can't believe someone would attack my family like this. How slimy and hateful and vile."
 
Has that closeted homosexual Stephen Crowder said anything about this yet?
He's currently been on a Bernie Sanders sperging streak. Unless it was mentioned in passing on one of his full length segments, I don't think he's said anything about the Maza expose. Hopefully he does a bit on it so Maza can get triggered and throw a huge tantrum. That's the cat fight this thread exists for.
 
....very longtime lurker here... I just thought this was a bit funny and wanted to share.

LOL
View attachment 1179808
http://archive.li/DdW8u

Also...why am I not surprise this dude is such an insane narcissist that he makes gay fantasy videos for breadtube where he ships himself?
View attachment 1179809
http://archive.vn/sC5KP

The reply tweets archived are also Islamic content............

Ryan at screen rant does it pretty regularly.
Maza: "Rich asshole. Rich man bad. Eat the rich. This person is rich, their opinion doesn't count."

Someone who bothered to look into Maza's finances for five seconds: "You're rich, and you didn't even work for it."

Maza: "Oh wow. I can't believe someone would attack my family like this. How slimy and hateful and vile."
Not to mention him posting Carville's house and not being shut down for it
 
This is interesting. Levine’s Twitter was unlocked this morning saying they screwed up.

Now Twitter has locked him again.

This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?
 
This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?
The first time the feature forcing you to to delete a tweet to unlock your account appeared in public, it was used against a girl for posting screen shots of Randi Harper (who was marketing herself as an anti internet harassment activist at the time) siccing twitter mobs on her enemies. A twitter engineer at the time claimed it was a "glitch", but in hindsight, one of Harper's buddies at Twitter fucked up and outed a work in progress censorship feature months before it became a regular feature while trying to cover her ass. So yes, twitter employees can go "rogue" but Dorsey/twitter clearly don't care because they haven't done anything to prevent abuse of these features as long as the targets are on the "wrong side of history".
 
This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?
The first time the feature forcing you to to delete a tweet to unlock your account appeared in public, it was used against a girl for posting screen shots of Randi Harper (who was marketing herself as an anti internet harassment activist at the time) siccing twitter mobs on her enemies. A twitter engineer at the time claimed it was a "glitch", but in hindsight, one of Harper's buddies at Twitter fucked up and outed a work in progress censorship feature months before it became a regular feature while trying to cover her ass. So yes, twitter employees can go "rogue" but Dorsey/twitter clearly don't care because they haven't done anything to prevent abuse of these features as long as the targets are on the "wrong side of history".
Yeah basically. Twitter moderation is staffed with activists who are comically biased when they think they can get away with it, which is 90% of the time.

Anyway, I find it funny that Levine did this big investigative report on Maza being a spoiled rich brat when we all knew it and took it as a matter of course ever since his initial drama with Crowder put him on our radar. We were calling him a champagne socialist from page 2. We didn't need to look into it, it was self evident from his behavior. Still, it's good to have it as a matter of official record.
 
I'm trying to not to cross the line from laughing my ass off into MOTI territory. What the shit is happening anymore?!

Maza, Mr. Suck a Dick and Be a Socialist, has been LARPing as a disenfranchised minority in america. But instead of taking the big reveal of his grossly privileged lifestyle with some kind of pride, he spills the beans himself because....WHY??? What made him think revealing his billionaire parents before some reporter got to do it made this ANY better for him? If he could get the dude banned off Twitter, why didn't he bribe him to bury the story like all billionaires do?

It's OVER, man. Game OVER! You are the very thing that your gay/trans/queer brothers and sisters have been angry at for the past few years: an over-privileged pissant who could fund things to help them but instead watched RENT too many times and thought that having aids and struggling to live is deep, fun and cool.

The sad thing is people probably wouldn't have cared if he didn't fuck with the bottom line of youtubers. Now people know he's rich, now people will try to harass his home and family like he cheered when it happened to Tucker Carlson, and like all lolcows, he'll blame everyone and everything before he blames himself. Another day, another protestor who protested too much.
 
I'm trying to not to cross the line from laughing my ass off into MOTI territory. What the shit is happening anymore?!

Maza, Mr. Suck a Dick and Be a Socialist, has been LARPing as a disenfranchised minority in america. But instead of taking the big reveal of his grossly privileged lifestyle with some kind of pride, he spills the beans himself because....WHY??? What made him think revealing his billionaire parents before some reporter got to do it made this ANY better for him? If he could get the dude banned off Twitter, why didn't he bribe him to bury the story like all billionaires do?

It's OVER, man. Game OVER! You are the very thing that your gay/trans/queer brothers and sisters have been angry at for the past few years: an over-privileged pissant who could fund things to help them but instead watched RENT too many times and thought that having aids and struggling to live is deep, fun and cool.

The sad thing is people probably wouldn't have cared if he didn't fuck with the bottom line of youtubers. Now people know he's rich, now people will try to harass his home and family like he cheered when it happened to Tucker Carlson, and like all lolcows, he'll blame everyone and everything before he blames himself. Another day, another protestor who protested too much.
He did it so he could try to frame revealing this information or talking about it at all as doxing and bullying his family. Maza is a crybully in the truest sense of the word, and he was clearly coming at this looking to spin it to make himself the victim and demand Levine be censored. Twitter even gave him a tiny bit of acknowledgement in that department, but not nearly enough to actually suppress the story, much like how things went with him and Crowder.

I rated you optimistic though, because I doubt he's going to lose many of his donors. Maza isn't what these people hate, they are him. Most of them are wealthy champagne socialist larpers themselves. These are the same fucks listening to and donating to Hasan Piker. Clearly they have no hang ups about paying very rich brats with no credentials to tell them what they want to hear. They're hypocrites to the core, and learning that Maza is a fellow hypocrite (as if it wasn't already obvious) will likely just make them relate to him more. It might limit his ability to grow and gain more influence, but expect his core fan base to stick around.

The lispy queer cries in pain as he stabs you.
 
This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?

IIRC he didn't know about the story until it was about to be published (and sperged on Twitter to damage control prior to it's release) as far as Levine doing it on the downlow so Marza couldn't circle the wagons.

Also, Marza couldn't spike the story because at this point, TPTB are trying their fucking damnest to get Biden elected and faggots like Marza (who represent the sort of evil shit social climbing jealousy fag who hates on the rich because, at the end of the day, his family is "lower upper class" and not landed gentry 1%er upper class plus a spic who can't get into the really WASPy circles among the super fucking rich and see communism/socialism as the means to destroy the elites above him socially in the upper class and take their places and money) are fair game to out as frauds. Because the 1%ers who Marza envies and wants to get rid of because of jealousy over how they can buy and sell his spic family with pocket change, don't want Marza and his ilk to get power via Bernie and bring about the Commie "Great Leap Forward" that is outlined in stuff like the Green New Deal. And given the rumors that Marza's vendetta against Crowder/Youtube was being used as cover for other evil shit (damage the Vox name/kill any under the table deals Vox had with Youtube to promote their videos to force Vox to cave to the Vox writers unions' demands to be unfirable and replacing upper Vox management with minorities who would be hand picked by the union so they could rubber stamp every evil thing the union did), the mainstream media probably doesn't want to give Marza any publicity other than the bare minimum needed for virtue signalling purposes.
 
IIRC he didn't know about the story until it was about to be published (and sperged on Twitter to damage control prior to it's release) as far as Levine doing it on the downlow so Marza couldn't circle the wagons.

Also, Marza couldn't spike the story because at this point, TPTB are trying their fucking damnest to get Biden elected and faggots like Marza (who represent the sort of evil shit social climbing jealousy fag who hates on the rich because, at the end of the day, his family is "lower upper class" and not landed gentry 1%er upper class plus a spic who can't get into the really WASPy circles among the super fucking rich and see communism/socialism as the means to destroy the elites above him socially in the upper class and take their places and money) are fair game to out as frauds. Because the 1%ers who Marza envies and wants to get rid of because of jealousy over how they can buy and sell his spic family with pocket change, don't want Marza and his ilk to get power via Bernie and bring about the Commie "Great Leap Forward" that is outlined in stuff like the Green New Deal. And given the rumors that Marza's vendetta against Crowder/Youtube was being used as cover for other evil shit (damage the Vox name/kill any under the table deals Vox had with Youtube to promote their videos to force Vox to cave to the Vox writers unions' demands to be unfirable and replacing upper Vox management with minorities who would be hand picked by the union so they could rubber stamp every evil thing the union did), the mainstream media probably doesn't want to give Marza any publicity other than the bare minimum needed for virtue signalling purposes.

Nigga you gotta stop putting half of your entire post in brackets.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Wilhelm Bittrich
It's funny how white men like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Bill Gates built billion dollar companies from the ground up and donate tons of money to good causes, but get vilified by people like Maza and his buddies.

Meanwhile, dude does nothing but bitch online and lives in a swanky place that has to be bankrolled by Mommy (since journalists don't make enough to afford even a week at a place like his), and yet all his fellow pseudo-commie trust fund babies circle the wagons and act like he's the one making a real difference.
 
This kind of shit really makes me wonder how the ban system works twitter side.
is there one salty employee banning people they don't like, and even when someone else repeals the ban, they take it as an excuse just to ban again?
The sheer volume of this kind of behavior by twitter staff re: the appeals process suggests to me that technical incompetence must play a role, since to do this manually as much as the site's users claim it happens would require a lot of manpower and a work environment consisting of everyone constantly overriding everyone else's decisions. I've heard bad things about twitter from coworkers, but not that bad. A couple ideologues trying to manipulate infrastructure to fight their internet battles for them seems a more likely way to arrive at this state of affairs.
Which leads me to guess it's a combination of multiple internal services using different metrics to trigger an account lock, possibly relying on user-fed white/black lists from twitter staff, that's running over each other. That would explain one case getting reviewed and then another opening in short succession. The account wasn't locked and re-locked so much as locked for one reason (that passed review) and then locked for another reason (that twitter doesn't disclose to you, the end user, naturally). From twitter's account security perspective that's two different incidents, even if it's the same general topic/thread, even if it's the same tweet.
Or maybe they really are run by orangutans and the bots have equal user permissions with support techs and keep accidentally overriding their resolutions, which makes for a funnier mental image.
 
Last edited:
Back