Post Ratings Discussion

[Spooky Bones]

I had no idea that was a negative rating, how do you figure that out with the new forum software? Just looking at how your reaction score changes? Is there a place to find exactly what each rating's value is?

I just remember it being negative from the post discussing it

I added another negative rating: Lunacy

 

[s0mbra]

I want a rating something fierce

 

[Ashley Lynne Coulter]

Yeah, I definitely want a bait react. Make it happen, @Null

 

[Borax Bozo]

Not so much a "ratings" issue as a "notifs about ratings" issue:
Could we have it so that multiple reactions to a single post generate a combined notification in your feed? So if you have 20 reactions to one post since your last visit, then 5 to another post, and one guy quotes a post of yours, you get 3 notifications instead of 26.
You can, of course, turn react notifications off, but I thought consolidation would be better.

 

[ManateeHunter]

I think we should inflate the amount of points Semper Fi gives out from +1 to +3, while also adding a new Mega-Dumb (or something more cleverly named) rating that deducts 3 points. I like variety as much as the next person, but I believe having an option to give/take away more points would be nice.

 

[AnOminous]

I think we should inflate the amount of points Semper Fi gives out from +1 to +3, while also adding a new Mega-Dumb (or something more cleverly named) rating that deducts 3 points. I like variety as much as the next person, but I believe having an option to give/take away more points would be nice.

Make it a gacha game and charge for points with discounts for huge purchases of points. Then laugh at anyone who buys them and uses them.

 

[Adamska]

I think we should inflate the amount of points Semper Fi gives out from +1 to +3, while also adding a new Mega-Dumb (or something more cleverly named) rating that deducts 3 points. I like variety as much as the next person, but I believe having an option to give/take away more points would be nice.

I think we should make Dumbtistic a real rating too.

 

[Spooky Bones]

I think we should inflate the amount of points Semper Fi gives out from +1 to +3, while also adding a new Mega-Dumb (or something more cleverly named) rating that deducts 3 points. I like variety as much as the next person, but I believe having an option to give/take away more points would be nice.

Mega dumb. That'd be autistic, right? But which is worse, autistic or dumb?

 

[AnOminous]

Semper dumb.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Semper dumb.

Semper Retardinum

 

[Scarlett Johansson]

Semper Sperg

 

[Grotesque Bushes]

Is there a primer on how ratings work somewhere? I have the Semper Fi and Deviant ratings on my bar, but the forum throws an error message when i try to give them out. At this point I'm not sure if it's working as designed and I've missed something, or is it fucked.

 

[Pineapple Fox]

Is there a primer on how ratings work somewhere? I have the Semper Fi and Deviant ratings on my bar, but the forum throws an error message when i try to give them out. At this point I'm not sure if it's working as designed and I've missed something, or is it fucked.

You have to be a True and Honest Fan to use those ratings and the DRINK! one, they’re just showing up for everyone for some reason, server issues perhaps. Send Null $20USD for the tag.

 

[Grotesque Bushes]

You have to be a True and Honest Fan to use those ratings and the DRINK! one, they’re just showing up for everyone for some reason, server issues perhaps. Send Null $20USD for the tag.

For the life of me I could swear I was able to use them before. But i guess a previous fuckup caused my current confusion, while the current fuckup isn't a fuckup - it's working as designed.

 

[Mesh Gear Fox]

For the life of me I could swear I was able to use them before.

I'm pretty sure there was a time when everyone could use those ratings. There was some sort of problem that Null fixed within a few days.

 

[Itu aru kamusu tugeza]

Can we just get a snoozefest reaction or something? It’s tiring having to wade through gimmickposters and people that keep regurgitating the same boring opinions without reading the last few pages.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Here's my ratings criteria:

Like: I don't exactly agree with what you said, but I agree with the sentiment or I liked your joke a little bit.
Dislike: I pretty much dislike what you said.
Agree: I agree mostly or completely with what you said.
Disagree: I disagree mostly or completely with what you said.
Winner: You made me laugh and/or you had a good analysis or takedown of something.
Semper Fidelis: TOP KEK
Deviant: You're a degenerate.
Informative: Your post contains some information I didn't know about already.
Thoughtful: Your post is not a post I agree or disagree with, but it makes me think.
Feels: Your post makes me say "awwwwwww" in a heartfelt way.
Islamic Content: Either when something pro-Islam is posted or something so degenerate that it might as well be pro-Islam.
Drink!: You said something stupid, but you made me laugh.
Lunacy: Utter nonsense.
Autistic: Focusing on way too many unimportant details or you say something that reeks of a whiner.
Horrifying: Your post disturbed me in some sort of way.
Optimistic: Your post is a bit out there in terms of your assumption of whether something is like
TMI (or Powerlevel): You reveal your personal details to the Farms and they are embarrassing.
Late: Your post was late.
Dumb: Your post is dumb.
MOTI: You sound like you're mad.

Highlight and bookmark this post so newfags can get sort of the feel for this place.

 

[Manah]

I don’t think people are using it wrong, but I think it should be a neutral rating. I’ve rarely seen it used to rate the content of actual user’s posts as crazy, it’s usually used for screenshots of people saying crazy shit. So it shouldn’t negatively affect user’s scores. Islamic Content being negative makes sense. It’s a one-up to horrifying. (At least from what I’ve seen.)

I’ve seen negatively rated posts being highlighted, so I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make about that.

So is Lunacy supposed to be a negative rating referring to the poster, or not if they're quoting an article or something?

 

[Haffhart]

So is Lunacy supposed to be a negative rating referring to the poster, or not if they're quoting an article or something?

Lunacy was intended to mean "This poster is crazy" but now it often means "this content is crazy good job collecting it!"

 

[Adamska]

Lunacy was intended to mean "This poster is crazy" but now it often means "this content is crazy good job collecting it!"

I see it used more as "what you found was crazy. Keep finding crazy".

I prefer using it for when schizo or tinfoil posting is done tho.