Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Anonymus Fluhre]

My degree was already doxxed on this site. Do your homework properly.

Of course I wouldn't doxx my publisher on here. This site is trash, it's unprofessional.

You boast that I should doxx my publisher but you won't even put your name. You hide behind fake names like cowards. At least I have the dignity and courage to own my name and my beliefs publicly.

IN FACT, I just got a new name from my wonderful husband to celebrate the renewal of our Covenant and renewal of our individual lives through our lives together. And I own that one publicly too.

The Excel spreadsheet and it's contents are not to be shared under any circumstances until it's ready to be used for it's intended purpose. I gave my word.

You can judge me "Cluster B" but you lack the facts and credentials to make that count worth anything. PASS

You're just making more excuses for your failures. Is your life that damn pathetic? You're not published by anyone because no one would be arsed to publish any drivel you spew on a page. At best you would have to self publish which you don't have the money to do so. You're just trying to boost your damaged ego.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

IN FACT, I just got a new name from my wonderful husband to celebrate the renewal of our Covenant and renewal of our individual lives through our lives together. And I own that one publicly too.

That's nice and all, but I'll bet you still haven't bothered informing the state you live in that you and Marshall are married. Lol, What am I saying? Of course you haven't, your government benefits would go down and you certainly couldn't have that.

Also, double lol about the name change. You know who's really fond of changing their names and going by a bunch of different aliases?
Petty criminals and grifters. You're certainly one of the two and likely both. Did you know that not reporting the payments you got from Andrew to the many different agencies you collect benefits from is considered criminal fraud?

 

[break these cuffs]

That's nice and all, but I'll bet you still haven't bothered informing the state you live in that you and Marshall are married. Lol, What am I saying? Of course you haven't, your government benefits would go down and you certainly couldn't have that.

Also, double lol about the name change. You know who's really fond of changing their names and going by a bunch of different aliases?
Petty criminals and grifters. You're certainly one of the two and likely both. Did you know that not reporting the payments you got from Andrew to the many different agencies you collect benefits from is considered criminal fraud?

Troons also change their names often. They're often petty criminals and griters as well, but not always. I'm looking forward to meeting Melvin Leigh Scott some time in 2021!

 

[LoverofPi]

My degree was already doxxed on this site. Do your homework properly.

I'm not bored enough to go looking through 200 pages for your diploma, especially since it's irrelevant to your purported academic field.

Of course I wouldn't doxx my publisher on here. This site is trash, it's unprofessional.

You can't dox a publisher. Published books and papers are public record.

You boast that I should doxx my publisher but you won't even put your name. You hide behind fake names like cowards. At least I have the dignity and courage to own my name and my beliefs publicly.

Why should we reveal our identities where vexatious litigants can find them? We don't need that hassle. Also you should reveal who your publisher is or what your published works are if you want your claims of being an academic to mean anything.

IN FACT, I just got a new name from my wonderful husband to celebrate the renewal of our Covenant and renewal of our individual lives through our lives together. And I own that one publicly too.

Enjoy your new nickname, Melinda. I mean, that's all it is.

The Excel spreadsheet and it's contents are not to be shared under any circumstances until it's ready to be used for it's intended purpose. I gave my word.

I never said the whole sheet, I just said my IP. Show you got some teeth.

You can judge me "Cluster B" but you lack the facts and credentials to make that count worth anything. PASS

It counts enough to make you visibly mad. You're very easy to read, did you know that? Very obvious tells.

 

[ScrappyLobsterchu]

...we have email groups and social media groups discussing you. We are slowly collecting your IP addresses in an Excel spreadsheet

You've been exposed.

And when they don't get back to you or tell you they cant help you are you going to sue them as well?

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

And when they don't get back to you or tell you they cant help you are you going to sue them as well?

I like to know how she's getting such information, it's not like she can right click on a name and get an IP Address and I doubt Null would give them to her. Even if she did have them it's not going to do her any good. All that's going to give her is a city maybe and ISP's horde that information. Hell, you wont even be able to get anything from a foreign ISP.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

That's nice and all, but I'll bet you still haven't bothered informing the state you live in that you and Marshall are married. Lol, What am I saying? Of course you haven't, your government benefits would go down and you certainly couldn't have that.

Also, double lol about the name change. You know who's really fond of changing their names and going by a bunch of different aliases?
Petty criminals and grifters. You're certainly one of the two and likely both. Did you know that not reporting the payments you got from Andrew to the many different agencies you collect benefits from is considered criminal fraud?

Are you that ignorant that you would ask someone who has years of legal experience and been to law school whether or not they know what is illegal? Pa--lease, get a life loser. Every dollar that has ever passed through my hands has been reported appropriately. And I stated that many many pages ago on this thread. Do your homework properly.

I'm not afraid of your empty loser threats. This is about the 5th time on this thread that you've tried to insinuate and intimidate with this statement. I'm not trippin' over your robot spewed parrot talk. You just repeat the same damn nonsense over and over like a pre-programmed robot.

I'm not bored enough to go looking through 200 pages for your diploma, especially since it's irrelevant to your purported academic field.



You can't dox a publisher. Published books and papers are public record.



Why should we reveal our identities where vexatious litigants can find them? We don't need that hassle. Also you should reveal who your publisher is or what your published works are if you want your claims of being an academic to mean anything.



Enjoy your new nickname, Melinda. I mean, that's all it is.



I never said the whole sheet, I just said my IP. Show you got some teeth.



It counts enough to make you visibly mad. You're very easy to read, did you know that? Very obvious tells.

Considering that this forum is text based only, with no emotion, and a limited scope into someone's life, *y-o-u-r* thoughts are nothing more than the fairytales in your head thinking you can "read" me.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Are you that ignorant that you would ask someone who has years of legal experience and been to law school whether or not they know what is illegal?

Never stopped you from flinging baseless lawsuits at a website owner because you thought someone hurting your delicate feelings was against the law.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Never stopped you from flinging baseless lawsuits at a website owner because you thought someone hurting your delicate feelings was against the law.

"Delicate feelings" is a fairytale in your head.

If they were baseless than the judge would not have filed them. And the judges on the appeals court never properly wrote an opinion proving that it wasn't against the law. They misquoted my appeal, for one. Didn't apply their own laws and rules, for two. IE Judicial Corruption.

And the only reason I didn't report the 3 of those judges to the judicial review committee for not following their own laws and rules is....well, that's between Marshall and I

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

"Delicate feelings" is a fairytale in your head.

If they were baseless than the judge would not have filed them. And the judges on the appeals court never properly wrote an opinion proving that it wasn't against the law. They misquoted my appeal, for one. Didn't apply their own laws and rules, for two. IE Judicial Corruption.

And the only reason I didn't report the 3 of those judges to the judicial review committee for not following their own laws and rules is....well, that's between Marshall and I

Are you actually this stupid that you don't know how the court system works? No wonder your children don't know what a middle finger is if their mother is this mentally challenged.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Are you actually this stupid that you don't know how the court system works? No wonder your children don't know what a middle finger is if their mother is this mentally challenged.

I just told you how the court system in the US works....lots of corruption. No respect for pro-se litigants in many places. contrary to the published rules. What's your confusion?

 

[Deadpool]

, *y-o-u-r*

Why do you keep typing your like that? It makes you look retarded.

 

[LoverofPi]

Are you that ignorant that you would ask someone who has years of legal experience and been to law school whether or not they know what is illegal? Pa--lease, get a life loser. Every dollar that has ever passed through my hands has been reported appropriately. And I stated that many many pages ago on this thread. Do your homework properly.

Your "years of experience" are you being a vexatious litigant. Hardly impressive, considering your track record.

I'm not afraid of your empty loser threats. This is about the 5th time on this thread that you've tried to insinuate and intimidate with this statement. I'm not trippin' over your robot spewed parrot talk. You just repeat the same damn nonsense over and over like a pre-programmed robot.

This comment, so deliciously ironic considering the source.

Considering that this forum is text based only, with no emotion, and a limited scope into someone's life, *y-o-u-r* thoughts are nothing more than the fairytales in your head thinking you can "read" me.

Tells can be written as well as verbal and gestural, Melinda. Repeated phrasings, sentence construction, typos, all of these things give a picture into the mind of the writer. Your repeated use of "PASS" for example. It tells us you're uncomfortable with a given topic and want to veto it's discussion, even though you have no authority or respect to do so.

"Delicate feelings" is a fairytale in your head.

Another repeated phrase you think sounds a lot more impressive than it does.

And the only reason I didn't report the 3 of those judges to the judicial review committee for not following their own laws and rules is....well, that's between Marshall and I

I know you think this makes you sound cool and aloof and that you have a long term overarching plan, but it doesn't. And you don't.

I just told you how the court system in the US works....lots of corruption. No respect for pro-se litigants in many places. contrary to the published rules. What's your confusion?

Actually Pro-Se litigants are usually given considerably more leeway than people filing with a lawyer because a lawyer is expected to know how the law system works. In many cases judges will bend over backwards to give pro-se litigants additional chances to amend and refile. If you did not get that chance your filings must be especially terrible.

Why do you keep typing your like that? It makes you look retarded.

She got embarassed that she and/or her phone's autocorrect kept changing your to you're and she blamed it on a word filter that somehow affects only her.
Or to put it another way, she's retarded.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Kiwi Farms doesn't exist to study anything. It's a trashy gossip site on the likes of Enquirer. Nothing Academic about it at all. Sites like this are the subject of journalists who gawk at it.

Guess what? You don’t get to make that determination. Your opinion is that it isn’t. We think your time here isn’t academic either, so there’s that.

So, in closing, you’re a moron.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I just told you how the court system in the US works....lots of corruption. No respect for pro-se litigants in many places. contrary to the published rules. What's your confusion?

No, that's how you think it works just because you couldn't throw a tantrum and have your way in the adult world.

Why do you keep typing your like that? It makes you look retarded.

Because she is.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Your "years of experience" are you being a vexatious litigant. Hardly impressive, considering your track record.



This comment, so deliciously ironic considering the source.



Tells can be written as well as verbal and gestural, Melinda. Repeated phrasings, sentence construction, typos, all of these things give a picture into the mind of the writer. Your repeated use of "PASS" for example. It tells us you're uncomfortable with a given topic and want to veto it's discussion, even though you have no authority or respect to do so.



Another repeated phrase you think sounds a lot more impressive than it does.



I know you think this makes you sound cool and aloof and that you have a long term overarching plan, but it doesn't. And you don't.



Actually Pro-Se litigants are usually given considerably more leeway than people filing with a lawyer because a lawyer is expected to know how the law system works. In many cases judges will bend over backwards to give pro-se litigants additional chances to amend and refile. If you did not get that chance your filings must be especially terrible.



She got embarassed that she and/or her phone's autocorrect kept changing your to you're and she blamed it on a word filter that somehow affects only her.
Or to put it another way, she's exceptional.

There's nothing in the court record indicating that. Again you make up stuff -- like trying to tell others how they feel -- out of thin air as a form of control.

The current scholarship doesn't support your theory of how pro-se litigants are treated and widespread judicial corruption. Get some education lady.

Bribery on the Bench: A Look at Judicial Corruption

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice: Sidney Powell: 9781612541495: Amazon.com: Books

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice [Sidney Powell] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice

www.amazon.com

Corrupt justice: what happens when judges' bias taints a case?

Divorced Long Island mother Margaret Besen tells her five-year struggle to get justice, just one story in the hundreds of judicial transgressions revealed in a Guardian and Contently Foundation for Investigative Reporting a collaboration

www.google.com

Posner: Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time'

Judge Richard Posner cites boredom with judging as well as rebuffed efforts to aid pro se litigants in a new interview explaining his decision to suddenly retire from the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

www.abajournal.com

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

So what? You think Null has tens of thousands of dollars to bribe a judge? Just when I think you can't be any more stupid you continue to post.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

There's nothing in the court record indicating that. Again you make up stuff -- like trying to tell others how they feel -- out of thin air as a form of control.

The current scholarship doesn't support your theory of how pro-se litigants are treated and widespread judicial corruption. Get some education lady.

Bribery on the Bench: A Look at Judicial Corruption

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice: Sidney Powell: 9781612541495: Amazon.com: Books

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice [Sidney Powell] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice

www.amazon.com

Corrupt justice: what happens when judges' bias taints a case?

Divorced Long Island mother Margaret Besen tells her five-year struggle to get justice, just one story in the hundreds of judicial transgressions revealed in a Guardian and Contently Foundation for Investigative Reporting a collaboration

www.google.com

Posner: Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time'

Judge Richard Posner cites boredom with judging as well as rebuffed efforts to aid pro se litigants in a new interview explaining his decision to suddenly retire from the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

www.abajournal.com

I won't deny court corruption exists, but how are you going to claim that the court is corrupt if your case never made it? If someone can see right off the bat that you're fucking insane and your case has no grounds, a judge would likely throw the case out with no problems. The court may be corrupt, but you're also so fucking incompetent that you couldn't hold up a case in court, biased or not.

 

[Adamska]

There is a format and method to issuing complaints and stating cases; yours was so slapdash and poorly thought out that the clerk looked at it and said "the fuck bitch?" and chucked it. Lawyers actually do have a free consultation, so you probably could have gotten tips on how to actually frame an argument. Not that it'd matter since you'd lose anyway due to the very low bar for defamation that exists. But hey, narcissism and no life experience will do that to a person.

It's amazing that a person who allegedly passed college, which has formatting for essays they MUST follow, can't understand that the same applies to law.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

There is a format and method to issuing complaints and stating cases; yours was so slapdash and poorly thought out that the clerk looked at it and said "the fuck bitch?" and chucked it. Lawyers actually do have a free consultation, so you probably could have gotten tips on how to actually frame an argument. Not that it'd matter since you'd lose anyway due to the very low bar for defamation that exists. But hey, narcissism and no life experience will do that to a person.

It's amazing that a person who allegedly passed college, which has formatting for essays they MUST follow, can't understand that the same applies to law.

Really shows you how bad George Mason University is.