Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[LoverofPi]

There's nothing in the court record indicating that. Again you make up stuff -- like trying to tell others how they feel -- out of thin air as a form of control.

The what, five failed lawsuits all thrown out for failure to competently state claim don't indicate you're a vexatious litigant? You suing someone because your names got mentioned on a website don't indicate you as a vexatious litigant? You know, it would really help to respond directly to parts of my posts rather than quote it as a big chunk and respond to tiny parts of it.

But that's probably too difficult for you.
And there's "out of thin air." You keep saying I make stuff up and yet you also keep showing those tells.

The current scholarship doesn't support your theory of how pro-se litigants are treated and widespread judicial corruption. Get some education lady.

I didn't say anything in particular about judicial corruption. I guess you couldn't find much on Pro-se litigation so you had to widen the net, a bit?
Also, why do you assume I'm a lady? Could it be you're assuming I'm a particular lady?

Bribery on the Bench: A Look at Judicial Corruption

Article behind a paywall about how to organize the judiciary to prevent corruption.

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice: Sidney Powell: 9781612541495: Amazon.com: Books

Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice [Sidney Powell] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice

www.amazon.com

Link to a book that claims to expose corruption...

Corrupt justice: what happens when judges' bias taints a case?

Divorced Long Island mother Margaret Besen tells her five-year struggle to get justice, just one story in the hundreds of judicial transgressions revealed in a Guardian and Contently Foundation for Investigative Reporting a collaboration

www.google.com

Guardian article about possible biases in judges, okay...

Posner: Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time'

Judge Richard Posner cites boredom with judging as well as rebuffed efforts to aid pro se litigants in a new interview explaining his decision to suddenly retire from the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

www.abajournal.com

Oh, hey, the one relevent article to what I was talking about, and it's a single Chicago judge who thinks other chicago judges don't review pro-se cases enough on their own.
Also, "most pro-se filings are trash" and "judges give a lot of leeway to pro-se filings" are not mutually exclusive concepts, Melinda. They kinda do go hand in hand.

Oh, and the PDF you couldn't even manage to actually link to.

So, that's five articles you listed, only one of which is relevant to the topic I brought up, four of which are relevant to your brain bug, and none of which help validate your specific claim that your cases were thrown out due to judicial corruption and bias against pro-se litigants.

Say, Melinda, did you search for these on your own or grab them from a singular online source?

 

[redcent]

You've got the roles reversed. Those of us you've tried to call "lolcows" here (ie *Y-O-U-R* little collection of Scapegoats that challenge *Y-O-U-R* Anglo Patriarchal worldview that you try to mock in order to preserve your dying Anglo Patriarchal dominion) ...we have email groups and social media groups discussing you. We are slowly collecting your IP addresses in an Excel spreadsheet

You've been exposed.

So spill already. Still waiting on mine. Your threat makes little credit and from what I can see you're all bark and no bite

And in the off chance (and a small chance that is) you have my dox, so fucking what. You planning on travelling to another country to do your little "boo"?

So what? You think Null has tens of thousands of dollars to bribe a judge? Just when I think you can't be any more stupid you continue to post.

Didn't you know? Null is in cahoots with the masons who aren't old uncles who go to some hall to have tea and biscuits but a group of conspiracists who are taking over world. Null gets that much money from them to bribe the judges and Melinda is scared

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Are you that ignorant that you would ask someone who has years of legal experience and been to law school whether or not they know what is illegal? Pa--lease, get a life loser. Every dollar that has ever passed through my hands has been reported appropriately. And I stated that many many pages ago on this thread. Do your homework properly.

I'm not afraid of your empty loser threats. This is about the 5th time on this thread that you've tried to insinuate and intimidate with this statement. I'm not trippin' over your robot spewed parrot talk. You just repeat the same damn nonsense over and over like a pre-programmed robot.

I keep insinuating it because it's most likely true. Have you reported your "marriage" to your state? Or are you claiming benefits as a single, no income mother despite effectively living in a married situation? A simple yes or no answer is all that's required.

See, when you grift in one situation, as in the thousands of dollars you received from Andrew, it's pretty likely that you're willing to be financially dishonest in other areas of your life, especially when it's in your clear financial interest to do so. It's called building a reputation, and your reputation is pretty bad.

As for your legal knowledge, well, . It's been proved pretty conclusively that your legal knowledge is laughable. Oh, but you only have every lawsuit you file laughed out of court because the judges are all corrupt! "Do your homework properly" says the woman you has never done her legal homework before filing one of her lolsuits.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

The only way Melinda's court documents would be less of a joke is if they were written in crayon and if she made hearts above every "i".

 

[break these cuffs]

The only way Melinda's court documents would be less of a joke is if they were written in crayon and if she made hearts above every "i".

What about if she spelled out your as *Y-O-U-R* every time?

 

[Papa Adolfo's Take'n'Bake]

Are you that ignorant that you would ask someone who has years of legal experience and been to law school whether or not they know what is illegal?

I've posted this elsewhere but holy shit is it relevant here:

Law School Applications Increase Upon Realization That Any Fucking Idiot Can Be Lawyer

The Onion brings you all of the latest news, stories, photos, videos and more from America's finest news source.

www.theonion.com

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I keep insinuating it because it's most likely true. Have you reported your "marriage" to your state? Or are you claiming benefits as a single, no income mother despite effectively living in a married situation? A simple yes or no answer is all that's required.

See, when you grift in one situation, as in the thousands of dollars you received from Andrew, it's pretty likely that you're willing to be financially dishonest in other areas of your life, especially when it's in your clear financial interest to do so. It's called building a reputation, and your reputation is pretty bad.

As for your legal knowledge, well, . It's been proved pretty conclusively that your legal knowledge is laughable. Oh, but you only have every lawsuit you file laughed out of court because the judges are all corrupt! "Do your homework properly" says the woman you has never done her legal homework before filing one of her lolsuits.

Actually, I have a 75-85% success rate in state court. So *y-o-u-r* information is inaccurate.

My reputation on Kiwi Farms is scarcely a cause for alarm. I'm not losing anything from a bunch of uneducated pagans having a bonfire around my name. Big deal, I could care less. I'm not a co-dependent. And I wouldn't even care if I was the only person in the world that loved and respected myself. It's called self partnering. But I'm not sure a moral ingrate like yourself could even fathom that concept.

*Y-o-u-r* beliefs about income are also incorrect. The State of Virginia has no "common law" marriage. You are either (1) "cohabitating" (not legally married and (a) both names on a lease or (b) one person on the lease and the other person lives there longer than 2 weeks and the relationship is implied romantic) or (2) you are legally married with the same legal residence/lease or (3) you are legally married but legally separated by having two leases.

As already stated, Marshall and I have been legally married from before living together so that he could legally adopt the children that were living in my house before we married. We have two separate leases (as has already been mentioned -- remember, do your homework carefully, it's not my job to coddle *y-o-u-r* ignorance). Under the law any income he makes and holds in a bank account is none of my legal business, nor my legal obligation to claim.

There is also an exception in the law for the spouse who lives in the same house as their spouse BUT has no access to their spouse's money, but since we have no shared lease, that doesn't apply. You have to get a PO for that to work.

Nice attempt at virtual boxing, but you struck out again

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

What about if she spelled out your as *Y-O-U-R* every time?

That would bring it back down to being exceptional.

Actually, I have a 75-85% success rate in state court. So *y-o-u-r* information is inaccurate.

My reputation on Kiwi Farms is scarcely a cause for alarm. I'm not losing anything from a bunch of uneducated pagans having a bonfire around my name. Big deal, I could care less. I'm not a co-dependent. And I wouldn't even care if I was the only person in the world that loved and respected myself. It's called self partnering. But I'm not sure a moral ingrate like yourself could even fathom that concept.

*Y-o-u-r* beliefs about income are also incorrect. The State of Virginia has no "common law" marriage. You are either (1) "cohabitating" (not legally married and (a) both names on a lease or (b) one person on the lease and the other person lives there longer than 2 weeks and the relationship is implied romantic) or (2) you are legally married with the same legal residence/lease or (3) you are legally married but legally separated by having two leases.

As already stated, Marshall and I have been legally married from before living together so that he could legally adopt the children that were living in my house before we married. We have two separate leases (as has already been mentioned -- remember, do your homework carefully, it's not my job to coddle *y-o-u-r* ignorance). Under the law any income he makes and holds in a bank account is none of my legal business, nor my legal obligation to claim.

There is also an exception in the law for the spouse who lives in the same house as their spouse BUT has no access to their spouse's money, but since we have no shared lease, that doesn't apply. You have to get a PO for that to work.

Nice attempt at virtual boxing, but you struck out again

FAIL TO SECURE CHILD Why are you bad at parenting? Dismissed
FAIL TO CARRY/EXHIBIT REG CARD You should carry that with you at all times you know. You're lucky it's just an $28 fine. Guilty In Absentia
FAIL TO CARRY/EXHIBIT LICENSE Again, carry that with you. A poor person such as yourself can't keep paying these $28 fines. Guilty in Absentia.
FAIL TO HAVE VEHICLE INSPECTED So you drove around in a death trap in 2017. Again, great parenting. You should have also showed up for that.
So many wins!
Also
Hey! Your birthday is in 79 days! Happy early birthday!

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

FAIL TO SECURE CHILD Why are you bad at parenting? Guilty In Absentia
FAIL TO CARRY/EXHIBIT REG CARD You should carry that with you at all times you know. You're lucky it's just an $28 fine. Guilty In Absentia
FAIL TO CARRY/EXHIBIT LICENSE Again, carry that with you. A poor person such as yourself can't keep paying these $28 fines. Guilty in Absentia.
FAIL TO HAVE VEHICLE INSPECTED So you drove around in a death trap in 2017. Again, great parenting. You should have also showed up for that.
So many wins!

FAILURE TO SECURE CHILD was dismissed because the legally illiterate cop who didn't know the law wrote me a ticket for something that wasn't against the law. *Y-O-U'V-E* misquoted the outcome. IT WAS DISMISSED DUMMY....because of my wonderful pleading writing and legal skills.

FAILURE TO CARRY REG CARD, LICENSE, and INSPECTED -- big deal, I didn't have paperwork on me. What a tragedy. The fines were paid, life goes on.

I've been involved in 30 other court cases. Where's the rest of your list? And don't think relying on some bullshit The Stalker whips out in counties I haven't even lived in is going to save you. Morons.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

FAILURE TO SECURE CHILD was dismissed because the legally illiterate cop who didn't know the law wrote me a ticket for something that wasn't against the law. *Y-O-U'V-E* misquoted the outcome. IT WAS DISMISSED DUMMY....because of my wonderful pleading writing and legal skills.

FAILURE TO CARRY REG CARD, LICENSE, and INSPECTED -- big deal, I didn't have paperwork on me. What a tragedy. The fines were paid, life goes on.

I've been involved in 30 other court cases. Where's the rest of your list? And don't think relying on some bullshit The Stalker whips out in counties I haven't even lived in is going to save you. Morons.

I was just looking into Wise county. Good to know you break the law throughout your State.

Two cases of speeding, and another registration card. This time in Lee County.

 

[redcent]

30? Who the fuck goes to court 30 times? Unless their job required it most people I know haven't been to court once

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

30? Who the fuck goes to court 30 times? Unless their job required it most people I know haven't been to court once

She seems to have a problem with breaking the law.

 

[Spergichu]

30? Who the fuck goes to court 30 times? Unless their job required it most people I know haven't been to court once

Is this Melinda's DIRTY CRAPPED BRIEFS moment?

 

[Deadpool]

Nice attempt at virtual boxing, but you struck out again

You don't strike out in boxing, that's baseball you dumb skank. You really don't know anything about anything do you?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

30? Who the fuck goes to court 30 times? Unless their job required it most people I know haven't been to court once

Lots of people do. Especially when you are female or single female parent (where a lot of discrimination is aimed at), or have children or have enough intelligence to understand your legal "injuries" and do something about it. Lots of people simply suffer legal injuries with no clue as to their rights and just "take the hit".

Add to that a divorce, custody issues, or having children and you'll find yourself in court very easily.

For example...

Court appearances as a child

1. 1996 - I testified in a child sexual abuse case on behalf of a friend in which the man got jail time
2. 1999 - I had to appear in a foster care case

Pro-se cases as an adult

1. 2010 - I defended myself against a PO. Case was dismissed, in my favor.
2. 2011 - I finalized my divorce successfully, including $300/alimony a month
3. 2011 - Visitation battle, ruled in my favor
4. 2012 - I protected my children by filing for the termination of my ex's vistiation rights, outcome in my favor
5. 2014 - Another custody battle, fought pro-se, outcome in my favor
6. MOST IMPORTANT LEGAL VICTORY EVER: 2014 - I sued my University financial aid office for discrimination, outcome in my favor ($5,000)
7. 2014 - Sued a guy for a PO, ruled in my favor
8. 2015 - Got a ticket for speeding (paid the fine, moved on with life)
9. 2015 - (Federal) Sued The Stalker under a criminal statute; dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
10. 2015 - Sued a landlord for fraud, ruled in my favor ($450)
11. 2015 - Sued a hotel for bed bugs, rule in my favor ($2,000)
12. 2015 - Sued by an electric company, I owed the money so I just paid and didn't show up to court
13. 2016 - Sued a landlord for unlawful diminuition of services, ruled in my favor, judge issued an order to restore services
14. 2016 - Sued by a landlord, ruled in my favor
15. 2016 - Sued by a landlord; default judgment for the landlord because I didn't show up to court/didn't get notice/I abandoned the property due to unsafe hornets/didn't appeal
16. 2017 - Sued the Stalker for a PO, ruled in my favor
17. 2017 - (Federal) sued the Stalker for copyright violation; dismissed for lack of registration (but the legal gain here was my case set a precedent for the 4th district. Prior to me there was no case law and my case was cited by others)
18. 2017 - (Federal) Sued Medicaid for discrimination; Judge gave them sovereign immunity
19. 2017 - (Federal) Sued CPS for discrimination; judge gave the sovereign immunity (but the legal gain here was my case set a precedent for the 4th district. Prior to me there was no case law)
20. 2017 - Petition to purge malicious CPS records - ruled in my favor in the first hearing but then dismissed because I withdrew the case for lack of time to continue it
21. 2017 - (Federal) Sued for injunction and extradition of warrant; dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
22. 2017 - Sued a landlord for fraud; dismissed because I was ...20 minutes...late!
23. 2018 - Filed for name change for minor children, had to overcome major service issues and due to my knowledge of service requirements, ruled in my favor
24. 2018 - filed for a PO against a neighbor, ruled in my favor
25. 2018 - Sued under telephone law and it was dismissed because my pleading stated my legal knowledge that: it was past the statute of limitations
26. 2019 - filed for a PO against a neighbor, ruled in my favor
27. 2017-2019 - (Federal) Cases against Kiwi Farms; dismissed
28. 2019 - Traffic ticket ("Failure to secure") - due to my legal knowledge and pleading skills, ruled in my favor
29. 2020 - Sued by landlord; Pending in The Supreme Court of Virginia

I think there may have been another federal case? Just can't remember at the moment. All these experiences have added to my legal education. Learn from one case and it helps be successful in another

I was just looking into Wise county. Good to know you break the law throughout your State.

Two cases of speeding, and another registration card. This time in Lee County.

2 speeding tickets in 17 years of driving. Not bad.
And forgetting to carry paperwork? Big deal, don't care.

 

[Trombonista]

2 speeding tickets in 17 years of driving. Not bad.

I've never gotten a speeding ticket.

 

[Spergichu]

Lots of people do. Especially when you are female or single female parent (where a lot of discrimination is aimed at), or have children or have enough intelligence to understand your legal "injuries" and do something about it. Lots of people simply suffer legal injuries with no clue as to their rights and just "take the hit".

Plenty of people who fit these criteria don't have to go to court over 30 fucking times, even single mothers fighting for custody of their kids like you said. From what you listed, all I'm getting from this is how much of a fucking Karen you are. Who the fuck sues someone over a couple thousand? Did you go on fucking Judge Mathis or some other daytime Court Drama TV show? Why couldn't you afford to pay these companies you were being sued by? Is it because you don't have a fucking job?

And forgetting to carry paperwork? Big deal, don't care.

It is a very big deal if you're planning on defending yourself pro se in court you dumb hole.

 

[redcent]

Lots of people do. Especially when you are female or single female parent

No

 

[cjöcker]

Lots of people do.

I'd like to see a source.

 

[Cedric_Eff]

All baseless accusations based on something called "availability bias" (displayed by you).

Like I said, at this point, the lack of education in your brain makes this a waste of my time. I have more intellectually stimulating opportunities elsewhere.

Lmao where? Going to an library and expanding on your 500 IQ soup brain?