Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Take your own advice, Melinda, and do some research. Research outside of your silly cult.

That would require effort which is beyond her capabilities as we've seen. When things are just handed to her, it's easier to just come up with bullshit because she expects people to agree with it.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

That's not what sexual repression is at all. Sexual repression is the denial of urges or preferences, usually feeling guilt of shame for their own desires. Admitting one's desires and managing them with self stimulation is the opposite of repression.
You know, this is becoming a recurring theme, Melinda. We have a conversation, you say something, we respond, you respond and in the course of your response you reveal you literally don't know what you're talking about.

Take your own advice, Melinda, and do some research. Research outside of your silly cult.

The only recurring theme here is you trying to make statements as facts and then when I prove you wrong you try an ad hominem attack. You tried this with the clerk's legal notes/rules of Sup. Court of Va and then you tried again with another subject. You are simply trying to project right now with an ad hominem attack.

Sexual repression is WAY MORE than "the denial of urges".

Masturbation IS denial of urges toward others. Hello, how dense could be? Bragging about masturbation as some "higher road" is like trying to brag that you live off of bread and water when a clearly more nutritional balance is gains, fruits, veggies and meat.

If you have no desire to even pursue marriage for frequent sex and live off of masturbation than you are sexually repressed.

That would require effort which is beyond her capabilities as we've seen. When things are just handed to her, it's easier to just come up with bullshit because she expects people to agree with it.

I don't expect you to agree with anything I say. I'm not here to convert you to my thinking. This is a debate, in which you continue to expose your own folly.

Haven't you been divorced and remarried several times, of which you likely fucked regularly seeigg as you pop out piglets quickly. If we're going of you're logic, you're also sexually repressed

Really? You have lurked this thread non-stop and I have to start at square one again. Seriously?

I've been married twice, divorce once. I've had other Covenant partners in between. I lived in a matriarchal family set up before I got married. Now I am married and can express my sexuality in a healthy, monogamous relationship. That's far from sexual repression.

 

[redcent]

Obviously there is something wrong with you if no man is pursuing you for marriage or you aren't out pursuing marriage (in which you would actually express your sexuality in healthy manner).

I was going to mention masturbation but burmesericefarmer ninja'ed me

And I don't think pushing for marriages is right. That's how you get failed marriages and if kids get involved it's terrible for all. Someone I know has experience with this thus I know to take my time.

Besides why would I push for marriage, rush it, find myself in relationship I hate then get a divorce over and over when I can look after myself? At least this way no kids lives are fucked up. I was taught this was called being a responsible adult

And in this little false fantasy of being a "virgin", in which you have ZERO life experience in the realm of romance, marriage and children, you somehow see yourself qualified as being able to comment on the lives of others who have actual life experience in those areas. That's called DELUSIONAL.

you don't need to be a mathematician to know what 2+2 is and you don't need to have experience to know what you are doing to your family

But hey if you don't want to take my word for it I'm sure there are plenty of family folk here who can tell you the same

Your entire statement is a contradiction. You are describing sexual repression IE living off of masturbation IS sexual repression. So is not pursuing marriage to have frequent sex. If your sex drive is so repressed that you don't need to get married/in a Covenant to fill your sexual needs, than something is wrong with you.

You should educate yourself on what sexual repression is before you try to speak about it

How is it repression? What's so repressing about it?

Edit:

masturbation Is the denial of sexual desires towards others

that sound really creepy. Why would I push for "sexual desires toward others"
It'd creep everyone out

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I don't expect you to agree with anything I say. I'm not here to convert you to my thinking. This is a debate, in which you continue to expose your own folly.

If this was a debate you would have been laughed out of the club. If this was a debate, we all would have agreed on the terms and format of the debate. Obviously you never did this in school.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

".... I was taught this was called being a responsible adult"

That's social programming code for "sexual repression" ...of women mostly.

There is nothing wrong with divorce or raising children as a single parent. Divorce doesn't mess children up, neither does being raised by a single dad/mom. Lots of fucked up people come from two parent homes where the parents were together 25...30...55 years.

If this was a debate you would have been laughed out of the club. If this was a debate, we all would have agreed on the terms and format of the debate. Obviously you never did this in school.

The only "we" debating me here is a bunch of uneducated pagans who frequent this site in order to protect patriarchy and it's daughter, sexual repression of women. Hardly a cause for me to be surprised. I'm well studied on this issue.

There are billions of people on this earth who don't think the way the Kiwi Farm club does. Might be time for you to expand your horizons.

Is Female Sexuality Really Repressed?

And are men truly run by their dicks? An essay on western sexual narratives that maintain the dehumanizing socialization of fear, shame…

blog.usejournal.com

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

That's social programming code for "sexual repression" ...of women mostly.

There is nothing wrong with divorce or raising children as a single parent. Divorce doesn't mess children up, neither does being raised by a single dad/mom. Lots of fucked up people come from two parent homes where the parents were together 25...30...55 years.




The only "we" debating me here is a bunch of uneducated pagans who frequent this site in order to protect patriarchy and it's daughter, sexual repression of women. Hardly a cause for me to be surprised. I'm well studied on this issue.

There are billions of people on this earth who don't think the way the Kiwi Farm club does. Might be time for you to expand your horizons.

Is Female Sexuality Really Repressed?

And are men truly run by their dicks? An essay on western sexual narratives that maintain the dehumanizing socialization of fear, shame…

blog.usejournal.com

Actually, there are billions of people who don't believe in the same cult bullshit as you. After all, you pretend to be Jewish when you're not. You pretend to be intelligent when in reality you're a special needs person in her mid 30's. Picking up a book or typing in a search engine doesn't make you "well read" in anything. That just shows people in academia that you don't know what you're talking about. That's as bad as someone linking a Wikipedia page in an argument or worse, quoting it. I hate to break it to you, you're not an intelligent woman. If you were, you'd have have some success to your name instead of well documented failures.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Actually, there are billions of people who don't believe in the same cult bullshit as you. After all, you pretend to be Trump's Chosen when you're not. You pretend to be intelligent when in reality you're a special needs person in her mid 30's. Picking up a book or typing in a search engine doesn't make you "well read" in anything. That just shows people in academia that you don't know what you're talking about. That's as bad as someone linking a Wikipedia page in an argument or worse, quoting it. I hate to break it to you, you're not an intelligent woman. If you were, you'd have have some success to your name instead of well documented failures.

I never said there weren't billions of people who think differently than me. YOU are the one speaking as if Kiwi Farms represents all of humankind.

My entire series of life choices SHOWS my intelligence. I don't do things like the dumb - masses because I SEE clearer. You have your facts deluded because you are socially programmed.

Wow, you must have been a really shitty husband that your ex would rather be a single mother of 4 children than stay around to deal with you. Judging by the way you talk, I can see why!

 

[redcent]

That's social programming code for "sexual repression" ...of women mostly.

There is nothing wrong with divorce or raising children as a single parent. Divorce doesn't mess children up, neither does being raised by a single dad/mom. Lots of fucked up people come from two parent homes where the parents were together 25...30...55 years.

it messed up my mum's life

I'm sure there are families raised by single parents who's kids can end up well adjusted but going through a divorce can impact the kids.

It'd also impact yourself. You went through a bad relationship and had a bad time, and for what? You can say no instead, treat yourself and have a good time instead. Why be stuck having a bad time with a guy you don't like when you can go out and gave fun on your own?

The only "we" debating me here is a bunch of uneducated pagans who frequent this site in order to protect patriarchy and it's daughter, sexual repression of women. Hardly a cause for me to be surprised. I'm well studied on this issue.

There are billions of people on this earth who don't think the way the Kiwi Farm club does. Might be time for you to expand your horizons.

Is Female Sexuality Really Repressed?

And are men truly run by their dicks? An essay on western sexual narratives that maintain the dehumanizing socialization of fear, shame…

blog.usejournal.com

You do realise the ability to masturbate is something feminism fights for among all the rights

Especially in third world countries. Female sexuality has been looked down in for ages and only lately have women been allowed to have a bit of fun. Not that they didn't before, but if course it was looked down upon. In middle east it's so bad kids get snipped. Barbaric if you ask me.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

o
I've had covenant partners in between.

So you've admitted to being a slut under Jewish covenant

classy

 

[Logical Fallacies]

My entire series of life choices SHOWS my intelligence. I don't do things like the dumb - masses because I SEE clearer. You have your facts deluded because you are socially programmed.

Your arrogance is only surpassed by your stupidity.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I never said there weren't billions of people who think differently than me. YOU are the one speaking as if Kiwi Farms represents all of humankind.

My entire series of life choices SHOWS my intelligence. I don't do things like the dumb - masses because I SEE clearer. You have your facts deluded because you are socially programmed.

Wow, you must have been a really shitty husband that your ex would rather be a single mother of 4 children than stay around to deal with you. Judging by the way you talk, I can see why!

I am a better parent than you will ever be or hope to be. I made sure to get custody of my children, something your man can't do even if he had the money to pay a lawyer to help him out, and all he had to do is not be a violent criminal to have a chance and up to $125k to gain full custody on just one child. I have never been married before so I never had to worry about paying alimony or paying for a divorce anytime I was with someone. It seems you're reflecting your failures on to others. Despite any of my exes failings in life, at least they weren't you and trust me, that says a lot.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

it messed up my mum's life

I'm sure there are families raised by single parents who's kids can end up well adjusted but going through a divorce can impact the kids.

It'd also impact yourself. You went through a bad relationship and had a bad time, and for what? You can say no instead, treat yourself and have a good time instead. Why be stuck having a bad time with a guy you don't like when you can go out and gave fun on your own?


You do realise the ability to masturbate is something feminism fights for among all the rights

Especially in third world countries. Female sexuality has been looked down in for ages and only lately have women been allowed to have a bit of fun. Not that they didn't before, but if course it was looked down upon. In middle east it's so bad kids get snipped. Barbaric if you ask me.

Because getting in a monogamous relationship to be connected to another person and express your sexuality is a completely normal healthy process. You can't control or garuntee the experience no matter how many "red flags" you look for or questions you ask.

Extreme fear of relationships which causes someone to retreat into a lifestyle of masturbating is symptomatic of PTSD, which is not a sign of being in a healthy state.

So you've admitted to being a slut under Trump's Chosen covenant

classy

Under The Torah, serial Monogamy and having multiple partners doesn't make a man or a woman a "slut".

Your entire comment is another example of sexual repression

You arrogance is only surpassed by your stupidity.

Confidence and taking the path less chosen is not arrogance, it's confidence and taking the path less chosen.

I am a better parent than you will ever be or hope to be. I made sure to get custody of my children, something your man can't do even if he had the money to pay a lawyer to help him out, and all he had to do is not be a violent criminal to have a chance and up to $125k to gain full custody on just one child. I have never been married before so I never had to worry about paying alimony or paying for a divorce anytime I was with someone. It seems you're reflecting your failures on to others. Despite any of my exes failings in life, at least they weren't you and trust me, that says a lot.

4 children with the same woman and she left you ...IS what I said.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

4 children with the same woman and she left you ...IS what I said.

My children have different mothers and they left us. Made it easy to gain custody of them when the woman abandons their children. Still had to go through them court system to gain custody of them and all of the bullshit that entails, but since I have no criminal record, have never been arrested for anything, have no vices, a stable job, I had an easy time of it. Seems even the government thinks I'm a good parent as men usually aren't given custody of their children. Not everyone can be a shitty parent like you Melinda.

 

[redcent]

Because getting in a monogamous relationship to be connected to another person and express your sexuality is a completely normal healthy process.

never said it wasn't

Monogamous relationships isn't anything wrong. Rushing into one or getting into one because of some obligation "just to be married" or being in a relationship where you don't love each other is where the problem lies

You can't control or garuntee the experience no matter how many "red flags" you look for or questions you ask.

not always no. But rushing into things is a sure fire way to miss at least some signs you could have noticed and gotten out.

You can't notice every red flag. Mistakes do happen. But rushing into things makes it all worse.

Extreme fear of relationships which causes someone to retreat into a lifestyle of masturbating is symptomatic of PTSD, which is not a sign of being in a healthy state.

What, I'm a ptsd victim now?

You know you've been lecturing kiwi farmers on how they can't diagnose you as a narcissist because they're not qualified shrinks. What about your qualifications? How come you get to "diagnose" others but you cant be called a narcissist?

Like, fuck, I know I'm crazy in a lot of ways, but having a happy time isn't part of that.

 

[LoverofPi]

The only recurring theme here is you trying to make statements as facts and then when I prove you wrong you try an ad hominem attack. You tried this with the clerk's legal notes/rules of Sup. Court of Va and then you tried again with another subject. You are simply trying to project right now with an ad hominem attack.

I did not speak with you about the clerk's legal notes, Melinda. Are you confusing me with someone else?

Sexual repression is WAY MORE than "the denial of urges".

It is also shame and guilt, I said that.

Masturbation IS denial of urges toward others.

This logic does not follow. Masturbation is not a denial of urges, it is acting on those urges in a safe and healthy way. Yes, sex is amazing, but masturbation is a healthy alternative when your partner is not available. It is not repression by any stretch of the imagination.
Now, one could feel shame about masturbation, and THAT would be repression. Is that what you're thinking of? If it is, that's a you problem.

Hello, how dense could be? Bragging about masturbation as some "higher road" is like trying to brag that you live off of bread and water when a clearly more nutritional balance is gains, fruits, veggies and meat.

While this is a bizarre metaphor in general, to follow it along, eating bread and water is preferable to never eating, and should not be mistaken for anorexia or bulemia, which is honestly what your description of masturbation reminds me of.

If you have no desire to even pursue marriage for frequent sex and live off of masturbation than you are sexually repressed.

Again, no. While "living off masturbation" is not something I think anyone should do, pursuing marriage for frequent sex isn't something I think someone should do either. And that's just getting into people with standard sex drives, never mind people with lessened to none for whatever reason.

I don't expect you to agree with anything I say. I'm not here to convert you to my thinking. This is a debate, in which you continue to expose your own folly.

While this is far from a proper debate, if it were, and the strength of the argument judged according to a group of observers, I have every faith that the panel would side with my arguments over yours. I can define the words I use, for starters.

Really? You have lurked this thread non-stop and I have to start at square one again. Seriously?

I've been married twice, divorce once. I've had other Covenant partners in between. I lived in a matriarchal family set up before I got married. Now I am married and can express my sexuality in a healthy, monogamous relationship. That's far from sexual repression.

So what you are saying is you were fucking around outside of marriage but when you do it it's okay because of reasons.
Quelle surprise.

That's social programming code for "sexual repression" ...of women mostly.

Making sure you're emotionally and sexually compatible with someone before marriage is sexual repression now? Having sex outside of marriage is sexual repression? Are you seriously arguing that right now?

There is nothing wrong with divorce or raising children as a single parent. Divorce doesn't mess children up, neither does being raised by a single dad/mom. Lots of fucked up people come from two parent homes where the parents were together 25...30...55 years.

There's also nothing wrong with having sex outside of marriage, or not having sex. Divorces and sex can both be very messy and taxing, so a lot of people don't want to do one, the other, or either if they can help it.

The only "we" debating me here is a bunch of uneducated pagans who frequent this site in order to protect patriarchy and it's daughter, sexual repression of women. Hardly a cause for me to be surprised. I'm well studied on this issue.

Considering your general familiarity with the other subjects on which you have deigned to comment on in the recent past (EG: Phrenology) I strongly doubt that. Also wow the projection.

There are billions of people on this earth who don't think the way the Kiwi Farm club does. Might be time for you to expand your horizons.

I would hypothesize that more people of those billions of people would disagree with your particular views about sex and intimacy than would disagree with the views posted by the other farmers in the thread.

Because getting in a monogamous relationship to be connected to another person and express your sexuality is a completely normal healthy process. You can't control or garuntee the experience no matter how many "red flags" you look for or questions you ask.

So why do you take so much issue when other women decide to do it?

Extreme fear of relationships which causes someone to retreat into a lifestyle of masturbating is symptomatic of PTSD, which is not a sign of being in a healthy state.

This is just a word salad. PTSD and chronic masturbation have basically no causal link with each other.

Under The Torah, serial Monogamy and having multiple partners doesn't make a man or a woman a "slut".

So why have you been making a big deal about the individual you thought Redcent was sleeping with multiple partners?

Confidence and taking the path less chosen is not arrogance, it's confidence and taking the path less chosen.

This is a tautology and a distraction. You are arrogant.

You know you've been lecturing kiwi farmers on how they can't diagnose you as a narcissist because they're not qualified shrinks. What about your qualifications? How come you get to "diagnose" others but you cant be called a narcissist?

Like, fuck, I know I'm crazy in a lot of ways, but having a happy time isn't part of that.

Melinda thinks she can judge people because she's "chosen" near as I can figure. She thinks no one can judge her in return because they haven't had her specific circumstances.

It's pretty standard Narc shielding, really.

 

[Spergichu]

My children have different mothers and they left us. Made it easy to gain custody of them when the woman abandons their children. Still had to go through them court system to gain custody of them and all of the bullshit that entails, but since I have no criminal record, have never been arrested for anything, have no vices, a stable job, I had an easy time of it. Seems even the government thinks I'm a good parent as men usually aren't given custody of their children. Not everyone can be a shitty parent like you Melinda.

Oh please, we all know you used your Mason connections that every Kiwi has (Praise Josh) to pull strings with the court to get custody of your kids from those hard-working, sexually expressive and empowered women.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Oh please, we all know you used your Mason connections that every Kiwi has (Praise Josh) to pull strings with the court to get custody of your kids from those hard-working, sexually expressive and empowered women.

Yes totally! It's why I wasn't charged the maximum amount in expenses!
@LoverofPi didn't the Nazi's use Phrenology to help discredit certain races are part of their whole scientific racism shtick they had? I know Neo Nazi's today use it. Hell, I think Mikemikev uses it. I wonder how he feels about a supposed Jewish woman using it.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Your entire comment is another example of sexual repression

Yes, me not having multiple partners for the sole purpose of sex is sexual repression
Honestly I just think you don't know what repression is and never learned what it is, hopping on any erect cock in your presence

Also, congrats on getting more neg-ratings than your stalker lmao, imagine being hated more than an insane Je,w who fucks cats and stalked a redneck, kinda seems like it'd be an accurate representation of the respect you get IRL if you ever went outside

 

[Logical Fallacies]

Confidence and taking the path less chosen is not arrogance, it's confidence and taking the path less chosen.

1)
(Self-)confidence also means you can acknowledge your weaknesses and mistakes, because you are sure of your strengths and sure that this will not damage your feelings of self-worth. You have shown by your posts that you can do neither. You think you don't have any weaknesses, think are above everyone in this forum and failed to admit mistakes or any flaws you might have. You have been arrogant, haughty and condescending instead of open and engaging. The moment you found out about this forum, you overreacted and freaked out and you haven't stopped yet.
2)
I'm assuming you're using the common idiom and are not referring to Robert Frost's poem, because then you'd have the meaning wrong. People think the meaning of the idiom is the same as the poem, which is not true. Anyways, here's the thing, just because it is less chosen, doesn't mean it's the better/smarter path to take.

take the path less chosen

Definition of take the path less chosen in the Idioms Dictionary by The Free Dictionary

idioms.thefreedictionary.com

You don't have confidence, you have an inflated ego which is meant to hide your insecurities and low feelings of self-worth. And just because your lifestyle is less mainstream, doesn't mean it's better or that you're better for choosing it.
I know you won't agree with this assessment but that is fine. I don't expect you or Marshal to make sense, anyways.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

...insert stupid mooing here...

Jesus H. Christ are you a fucking moron! My sides hurt from laughing so much at your replies. You’re like a petulant child who basically replies “Oh yeah? YOU’RE A POOPY HEAD!!” when someone says something you don’t want to hear (which is basically anything logical or intelligent).

I have to believe that you‘re just trolling us at this point. Nobody could be this fucking stupid.