Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

I'm not mad at all. That's your own fairytale perception, something you do a lot of. You do realize that telling others how they feel and making up fairytales like that is symptomatic of the very mental illness you claim not to have (NPD)? Since I don't believe in pagan psychology, I'll just call it what it is: UNEDUCATED. You are HIGHLY UNEDUCATED. I've clearly demonstrated how to find Point A and differentiate terms and you still just don't get it. A saying comes to mind with you: "YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID" (<<---Marshall, hahaha, remember what we were talking about earlier?)

I'm not even going to address your inane comments about the publisher. It's so moronic it doesn't even deserve a response.

Protest that you're not mad all you like, it doesn't change the clear signs of rage in your posting history, your word choice, your sentence construction, your all capitalized rant, it's a big neon sign saying "MELINDA IS ANGRY."

I must have seriously lowballed how much they've bilked you, then.

Am I qualified to judge you under The Torah? YES
"Why you ask?" Because I have 14 years of walking this walk, and more than a decade of research and study of The Torah under my belt

Are you qualified to judge me under The Torah? NO
"Why you ask?" Because you are a pagan

I already asked about 40 pages ago whether you were a Torah follower or not and you answered NO.

Oh, your judgements are inherently meaningless, Melinda. That's the real rub of all this. You use your status as a "Scholar" of the Torah to judge others and feel superior but really it makes you look petty and childish.

Actually, let me rephrase that. It makes you petty and childish.

Proof that I am a narcissist?

All your posts in this thread, all the symptoms you exhibit. It's pretty obvious. Kind of amazing you didn't pick up on it. You must not be very observant, Melinda.
 
Saying you're a follower of a religion doesn't inherently make you a proper or respectable follower in the community. Sucking off scriptures you twist into malice isn't being a real follower, it's justifying ignorance and hatred under the cover of religious belief.



You contain a lot of the traits of a narcissist. You can't accept failure and try to twist it as some kind of victory to make yourself feel better, you're deluded to feel that you are a superior person, your inherent pseudointellectualism, your lack of empathy and understanding of how people work outside of yourself and the small group around like yourself, how easily angered you are by insults from randos on the internet, you project your failures and mistakes onto others often fabricating lies, you have no will to self improve, etc.

That's not proof. That's a bunch of conclusions.
I SAID PROOF. Where's your EVIDENCE?
 
Melinda/Ruth, why are you so afraid of admitting you have flaws? It's not a Christian thing, it's a human thing. Everyone from atheists to hindus or whatever can admit a flaw when someone points them out, that's life for like 99% people.

When someone points out a flaw in you you get into a tizzy and try to throw some words around and say it totes isn't a flaw

Explain it to me please, without referring to your religious texts. If the torah is logical, you can explain the reasoning behind your fear of having someone see you have a flaw.
 
Protest that you're not mad all you like, it doesn't change the clear signs of rage in your posting history, your word choice, your sentence construction, your all capitalized rant, it's a big neon sign saying "MELINDA IS ANGRY."

I must have seriously lowballed how much they've bilked you, then.



Oh, your judgements are inherently meaningless, Melinda. That's the real rub of all this. You use your status as a "Scholar" of the Torah to judge others and feel superior but really it makes you look petty and childish.

Actually, let me rephrase that. It makes you petty and childish.



All your posts in this thread, all the symptoms you exhibit. It's pretty obvious. Kind of amazing you didn't pick up on it. You must not be very observant, Melinda.

Again, you are operating off of fairytales. Not surprised.

Again, those aren't FACTS. It's conclusions without EVIDENCE. Still waiting for your proof....

Melinda/Ruth, why are you so afraid of admitting you have flaws? It's not a Christian thing, it's a human thing. Everyone from atheists to hindus or whatever can admit a flaw when someone points them out, that's life for like 99% people.

When someone points out a flaw in you you get into a tizzy and try to throw some words around and say it totes isn't a flaw

Explain it to me please, without referring to your religious texts. If the torah is logical, you can explain the reasoning behind your fear of having someone see you have a flaw.

Where did I say I had a "fear" of such things?

You do realize that telling someone what they feel is a symptom of the very mental illness you claim someone else has (NPD)?

Prove that "admitting you have flaws" makes someone morally superior. Go ahead, I'm waiting.
 
For a self-proclaimed intellectual and educated person, she sure doesn't present a long of intelligent thought

Almost like she thinks she's a hell of a lot smarter than she really is.

That's not proof. That's a bunch of conclusions.
I SAID PROOF. Where's your EVIDENCE?

You're posting in it.

Melinda/Ruth, why are you so afraid of admitting you have flaws? It's not a Christian thing, it's a human thing. Everyone from atheists to hindus or whatever can admit a flaw when someone points them out, that's life for like 99% people.

When someone points out a flaw in you you get into a tizzy and try to throw some words around and say it totes isn't a flaw

Explain it to me please, without referring to your religious texts. If the torah is logical, you can explain the reasoning behind your fear of having someone see you have a flaw.

I can explain it, but Melinda doesn't like the terms I use. They rhyme with Barcissism and Fluster B.

Again, you are operating off of fairytales. Not surprised.

Again, those aren't FACTS. It's conclusions without EVIDENCE. Still waiting for your proof....

We're on page 237 of that proof right now. With supplemental sources elsewhere.
Every time you don't like what we say, you call it a fairy tale.

Where did I say I had a "fear" of such things?

You do realize that telling someone what they feel is a symptom of the very mental illness you claim someone else has (NPD)?

Prove that "admitting you have flaws" makes someone morally superior. Go ahead, I'm waiting.

Well, it means that someone is a well adjusted human being who has accepted that they are not perfect, and will work to improve on the areas they are deficient in and treat the deficiencies of others with patience and understanding.
 
That's not proof. That's a bunch of conclusions.
I SAID PROOF. Where's your EVIDENCE?

Why should I present proof when:

A. Anyone can scroll up or go back a few pages and know I'm fuckin right
and
B. You don't present proof yourself lmao, because believe it or not, citing a passage of the Torah you pulled off of the first page of Google doesn't count as proof
 
Almost like she thinks she's a hell of a lot smarter than she really is.



You're posting in it.



I can explain it, but Melinda doesn't like the terms I use. They rhyme with Barcissism and Fluster B.



We're on page 237 of that proof right now. With supplemental sources elsewhere.
Every time you don't like what we say, you call it a fairy tale.



Well, it means that someone is a well adjusted human being who has accepted that they are not perfect, and will work to improve on the areas they are deficient in and treat the deficiencies of others with patience and understanding.

Exactly my point. You arbitrarily point to something and say "that's proof" without displaying any form of facts, evidence, or line up of analysis. That's called confirmation bias. It proves NOTHING.
 
Where did I say I had a "fear" of such things?

You do realize that telling someone what they feel is a symptom of the very mental illness you claim someone else has (NPD)?

Prove that "admitting you have flaws" makes someone morally superior. Go ahead, I'm waiting.
Well if you weren't afraid you'd admit it. You can't even admit you are mad even though you clearly are. And there's no shame in being mad, just how you handle it. And you're not handling it very well, it's clear as crystal

I don't want to go ranting about "moral superiority" that's dumb talk. Everyone has flaws, admitting it just shows you're willing to learn and grow. If you deny it, you never learn.
 
Exactly my point. You arbitrarily point to something and say "that's proof" without displaying any form of facts, evidence, or line up of analysis. That's called confirmation bias. It proves NOTHING.

Wouldn't you have your own bias as well? I mean, you are defending yourself, so you're gonna wanna try and make yourself look good, or at the very least prove you're correct (which you do a shit job at), seems like a bias towards yourself to me.
 
Why should I present proof when:

A. Anyone can scroll up or go back a few pages and know I'm fuckin right
and
B. You don't present proof yourself lmao, because believe it or not, citing a passage of the Torah you pulled off of the first page of Google doesn't count as proof

I'd have to double check, but I am pretty sure she's twisting those out of their intended meaning as well.

Exactly my point. You arbitrarily point to something and say "that's proof" without displaying any form of facts, evidence, or line up of analysis. That's called confirmation bias. It proves NOTHING.

I'm not arbitrarily pointing to anything. Everything I point to is because it's a very clear sign of a personality disorder. There's your explosive rage, blatant hypocrisy, literal double standards, arguing in the face of the evidence, even evidence you provided, refusal to admit responsibility or error, the entire thread is full of this.

For but a singular example, we can turn to the flipping the bird debacle, wherin you refused, for pages and pages, to admit your son had used the wrong finger to flip us the bird. And examples like it are found on every page of this thread.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: TamarYaelBatYah
I don't want to go ranting about "moral superiority" that's dumb talk. Everyone has flaws, admitting it just shows you're willing to learn and grow. If you deny it, you never learn.

You already presented the postulate that "admitting you have flaws" makes you morally superior and not admitting it makes you narcissistic/morally inferior. So where did you get that idea from? PROVE IT.

You say "everyone has flaws" as if it is a moral absolute. PROVE IT.

You want to judge me as morally inferior because I supposedly wont "admit to flaws", then PROVE IT. Go ahead, I'm waiting.

I'd have to double check, but I am pretty sure she's twisting those out of their intended meaning as well.



I'm not arbitrarily pointing to anything. Everything I point to is because it's a very clear sign of a personality disorder. There's your explosive rage, blatant hypocrisy, literal double standards, arguing in the face of the evidence, even evidence you provided, refusal to admit responsibility or error, the entire thread is full of this.

For but a singular example, we can turn to the flipping the bird debacle, wherin you refused, for pages and pages, to admit your son had used the wrong finger to flip us the bird. And examples like it are found on every page of this thread.

Again, those are not facts, those are conclusions, not supported by analysis or evidence.

Do you have any proof that my son was holding up the wrong finger? WHERE YOU THERE?
 
You already presented the postulate that "admitting you have flaws" makes you morally superior and not admitting it makes you narcissistic/morally inferior. So where did you get that idea from? PROVE IT.

You say "everyone has flaws" as if it is a moral absolute. PROVE IT.

You want to judge me as morally inferior because I supposedly wont "admit to flaws", then PROVE IT. Go ahead, I'm waiting.

Prove anything you've ever said.

You said you have a publisher that you're publishing under. PROVE IT.

You talk as if Judaism is the one true superior religion and that paganism is bad. PROVE IT.

You want to judge Kiwis as lacking intellectualism, humanity, and as being incapable of functioning in society, then PROVE IT.

Go ahead, I'm waiting. :biggrin:

Aaaaand as for the proof your dumb shitlet stuck up the wrong finger...
20200212_131610.png
 
Last edited:
You use your status as a "Scholar" of the Torah to judge others and feel superior but really it makes you look petty and childish.

My knowledge of The Torah and education level exceeds yours, yet you feel that you can stand in judgment of my qualifications as a "Scholar"? That's called delusional.

You don't have any knowledge of The Torah and your education level is lower than mine, but you want to stand in judgment of my qualifications? That's also called delusional.
 
You already presented the postulate that "admitting you have flaws" makes you morally superior and not admitting it makes you narcissistic/morally inferior. So where did you get that idea from? PROVE IT.

You say "everyone has flaws" as if it is a moral absolute. PROVE IT.

You want to judge me as morally inferior because I supposedly wont "admit to flaws", then PROVE IT. Go ahead, I'm waiting.
.. What?

It doesn't make you "morally superior" what the fuck.

And I guess this is why you don't like the narcissist label, it's "morally inferior", well it wouldn't be a bad thing if you got help

I don't want to judge you as morally inferior. Laugh, maybe lecture a bit, be shocked, be outraged, learn and think.

But from what I have learned is that you have a problem, and what I do want is to help you change for the better. It might help you a lot, with both the people commenting on this thread, maybe even how you deal with life if you can admit you're human like the rest of us
 
My knowledge of The Torah and education level exceeds yours, yet you feel that you can stand in judgment of my qualifications as a "Scholar"? That's called delusional.

You don't have any knowledge of The Torah and your education level is lower than mine, but you want to stand in judgment of my qualifications? That's also called delusional.

A. You have no real knowledge of the Torah

B. You have no proof that all of us are less educated than you are, quite a few of us have higher education, and seeing as you got into a pretty shit university, you don't have much bragging room

I see that narcisstic superiority complex is really shining through
 
Prove anything you've ever said.

You said you have a publisher that you're publishing under. PROVE IT.

You talk as if Judaism is the one true superior religion and that paganism is bad. PROVE IT.

You want to judge Kiwis as lacking intellectualism, humanity, and as being incapable of functioning in society, then PROVE IT.

Go ahead, I'm waiting. :biggrin:

I don't owe you proof of my publisher, that's not a moral philosophy argument that I'm pushing on you to judge you. It's apples and oranges.

Proof that Judaism is superior and paganism is bad. Here it is:


Proof that Kiwi Farms is lacking humanity, intellectualism and incapable of functioning a good purpose in society:



A. You have no real knowledge of the Torah

B. You have no proof that all of us are less educated than you are, quite a few of us have higher education, and seeing as you got into a pretty shit university, you don't have much bragging room

I see that narcisstic superiority complex is really shining through

I asked for copies of your educational credentials awhile back and no one would supply them.

My knowledge of The Torah is evident in my writings, your claim is so inane, it's bizarre.
 
I don't owe you proof of my publisher, that's not a moral philosophy argument that I'm pushing on you to judge you. It's apples and oranges.

Proof that Judaism is superior and paganism is bad. Here it is:


Proof that Kiwi Farms is lacking humanity, intellectualism and incapable of functioning a good purpose in society:



Looks like you've failed to prove all 3, seeing as none of these are credible, objectively correct sources, especially since one is just a shitty essay you wrote

Also, here's the difference between you and I, Melinda.
I'm not a dumbfuck who's embarrassed herself on the internet to an incredibly large audience. Why would we feel the need to not only make our information public to a retard, but to also present it to someone who will likely claim falsification on our behalf.
You, however, have nothing to lose. You're a fucking laughingstock, if you present literally anything you say as objectively correct, you'll seem more intelligent that you present yourself as now.
 
.. What?

It doesn't make you "morally superior" what the fuck.

And I guess this is why you don't like the narcissist label, it's "morally inferior", well it wouldn't be a bad thing if you got help

I don't want to judge you as morally inferior. Laugh, maybe lecture a bit, be shocked, be outraged, learn and think.

But from what I have learned is that you have a problem, and what I do want is to help you change for the better. It might help you a lot, with both the people commenting on this thread, maybe even how you deal with life if you can admit you're human like the rest of us

Hun, you have no life experience in anything yet want to lecture me? Get a real life outside of masturbation and then maybe you will show a HINT of having any life experience to stand on.
 
Back