Disaster Andrew Gillum found at scene of suspected drug overdose in Miami hotel room - gay meth orgy

Mariposa Electrique · Mar 22, 2020

I bet they used hamsters.

AnOminous · Mar 22, 2020

Gillum is claiming some form of invasion of privacy and in Florida, such a tort is recognized in three forms. Hulk Hogan prevailed on one of these when his private sexual behavior was videotaped by a third party and then, without his permission, anonymously sent to Gawker, who published it along with their usual style of "journalism."

So the claim was public disclosure of private facts and, as we recall, Hogan won. The elements of that tort, which the jury clearly found to exist, are:

publication
of private facts
that are offensive
and are not of public concern.

The jury found all these. Gawker clearly published the material. Bollea's sexual behavior in his own private residence was a private fact. It wasn't misconduct or illegal behavior. Having such graphic private material disclosed is fairly obviously offensive to a reasonable person. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, there was no public concern that this publication answered. In the language used by Gillum, it was "merely an appeal to prurient interests, and serves no legitimate news-related purpose."

It's fairly easy to see that the Gillum photo doesn't satisfy all four of these elements.

We definitely have publication, but it is not of private facts. In fact, the photographs were clearly generated during some form of law enforcement activity. Florida has among the strongest of public disclosure laws, so however these pictures ended up public, they may very well have been legally subject to disclosure in any event. Regardless of that, though, and even if they might have been unprotected under Florida's "Sunshine Law" (as for instance autopsy pictures of Dale Earnhardt were found to be), these were not private facts.

They were facts discovered pursuant to an investigation by an executive agency, the police.

Just that alone would be fatal to the claim.

I'd grant the "offensive" element here, as it is a naked man, clearly unconscious or in an altered state of consciousness, in a stupor and with his head on a pillow covered in what is obviously vomit.

However, Gillum's status as a politician makes nearly anything he does, and certainly anything of this sort, a matter of public concern, even if he might not be currently running for office. Arrests and investigations and scandalous behavior by politicians is almost inherently of public concern.

So the differences between Hulk Hogan, whose rights were violated, and Gillum, who can go pound sand, in my opinion.

Hogan's sex tape was entirely private behavior, as the tort requires, while Gillum's illegal behavior impacted the public to the point the police had to become involved, and someone literally nearly died. Further, Hogan privately having sex in his own home is not of public concern, while violations of the law by political figures is nearly inherently of public concern.

So while Hogan won, Gillum can't.

Scarlett Johansson · Mar 23, 2020

FL DOH MQA Search Portal | License Verification For Practitioner Details

Looks like the status of his license is marked "voluntary withdrawal"

Dr. Sexbot · Mar 24, 2020

jellycar said:
FL DOH MQA Search Portal | License Verification For Practitioner Details

Looks like the status of his license is marked "voluntary withdrawal"

That is incredibly generous of the licensing committee.

I'll bet he relocates to NY/CA/DC within the year, easily gets a new license, then resumes party-n-play courtesy of the unlocked crash carts. His OnlyFans will get him by in the meantime, don't worry.

I wouldn't be worried about this dude having diseases (he does work in a hospital after all, you risk exposure to anything) as much as I'd be worried about him stealing from the patients and supply cabinets to support his nasty habits.

Not Really Here · Mar 25, 2020

AnOminous said:
Gillum is claiming some form of invasion of privacy and in Florida, such a tort is recognized in three forms. Hulk Hogan prevailed on one of these when his private sexual behavior was videotaped by a third party and then, without his permission, anonymously sent to Gawker, who published it along with their usual style of "journalism."

So the claim was public disclosure of private facts and, as we recall, Hogan won. The elements of that tort, which the jury clearly found to exist, are:

publication

of private facts

that are offensive

and are not of public concern.

The jury found all these. Gawker clearly published the material. Bollea's sexual behavior in his own private residence was a private fact. It wasn't misconduct or illegal behavior. Having such graphic private material disclosed is fairly obviously offensive to a reasonable person. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, there was no public concern that this publication answered. In the language used by Gillum, it was "merely an appeal to prurient interests, and serves no legitimate news-related purpose."

It's fairly easy to see that the Gillum photo doesn't satisfy all four of these elements.

We definitely have publication, but it is not of private facts. In fact, the photographs were clearly generated during some form of law enforcement activity. Florida has among the strongest of public disclosure laws, so however these pictures ended up public, they may very well have been legally subject to disclosure in any event. Regardless of that, though, and even if they might have been unprotected under Florida's "Sunshine Law" (as for instance autopsy pictures of Dale Earnhardt were found to be), these were not private facts.

They were facts discovered pursuant to an investigation by an executive agency, the police.

Just that alone would be fatal to the claim.

I'd grant the "offensive" element here, as it is a naked man, clearly unconscious or in an altered state of consciousness, in a stupor and with his head on a pillow covered in what is obviously vomit.

However, Gillum's status as a politician makes nearly anything he does, and certainly anything of this sort, a matter of public concern, even if he might not be currently running for office. Arrests and investigations and scandalous behavior by politicians is almost inherently of public concern.

So the differences between Hulk Hogan, whose rights were violated, and Gillum, who can go pound sand, in my opinion.

Hogan's sex tape was entirely private behavior, as the tort requires, while Gillum's illegal behavior impacted the public to the point the police had to become involved, and someone literally nearly died. Further, Hogan privately having sex in his own home is not of public concern, while violations of the law by political figures is nearly inherently of public concern.

So while Hogan won, Gillum can't.

For those interested Florida has some of the most expansive open records laws in the world, starting in 1967 and becoming part of the State Constitution in 1992.

Freedom of information legislation (Florida) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Open records
The Florida Public Records Law states,

it is the policy of this state that all state, county, and municipal records shall at all times be open for a personal inspection by any person.

— Fla. Stat. sec. 119.01(1) (1995)
The statute expansively defines "public record" to include all

documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of physical form, characteristics or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any agency.

— Fla. Stat. sec. 119.011(1) (1995)
With equal breadth, the law defines "agency" as

any state, county district, authority, or municipal officer, department division, board, bureau, commission, or other separate unit of government created or established by law ... and any other public or private agency, partnership, corporation, or business entity acting on behalf of any public agency.

— Fla. Stat. sec. 119.001(2) (1995).
A "public record" of an agency is subject to a broad legislated public right of inspection:

[e]very person who has custody of a public record shall permit the record to be inspected and examined by any person desiring to do so, at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the custodian of the public record or the custodian's designee. The custodian shall furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record upon payment of the fee prescribed by law ...

— Section 119.07(1)(a)
Furthermore, Sunshine Review notes that,

Going back to 1905, before the law was formalized, Florida courts have held that it is not up to the government to determine the use to which a person might put public documents once copies are received. [State ex rel. Davis v. McMillan]

Exemptions
The Florida Supreme Court has held that only statutory exemptions from the inspections provision of Chapter 119 may be recognized, Wait v. Florida Power & Light;[3] although courts must give effect to competing constitutional rights where inspection would otherwise compromise them. Florida Freedom Newspapers v. McCrary.

The exact number of statutory exemptions to the open records law is hard to assess, but estimates exceed 200. In response to criticisms that Florida's public records law had been undermined by the many exemptions, the Florida Legislature enacted the Open Government Sunset Review Act of 1995. Fla. Stat. § 119.15. This "Sunset" law provides for the periodic repeal of all exemptions, and mandates periodic review of the specific criteria which should be considered when reviewing the exemptions.

Unless the legislative review demonstrates a compelling interest in retaining a particular exemption that has been enacted and the legislature reenacts the exemption, it is repealed automatically.

The 1995 Sunshine Review Act incorporates the provisions of Section 119.15 as the criteria by which legislators should review Sunshine Law exemptions. Fla. Stat. § 286.0111. Under the 1995 Act, an exemption must fit within one of three categories of identifiable public purposes, and must be seen as compelling enough to override the strong presumption of openness articulated in Fla. Stat. § 119.15(2).

Since the Sunshine Review Act, the legislature has exhibited a resolve to streamline exemptions, allowing confidentiality only to the extent necessary to protect important competing values.

Open meetings
Florida's Government in the Sunshine Law, passed in 1967, requires that all meetings of any state, county, or municipal board or commission be open to the public, and mandates that any official action taken at the closed meeting not be binding. Fla. Stat. sec. 286.011 (1995). "Meeting" is construed broadly, and is not confined to "formal" assemblages at which a ritualistic vote takes place. Times Publishing Co. v. Williams. The legislature intended to make open the entire decision-making process by the enactment of the Sunshine Law.

Exemptions to the Sunshine Law are not nearly so numerous as exemptions to the public records law. The Sunshine Review Act also applies to the open meeting statute; exemptions to open meeting requirements are reviewed in the same manner as discussed above in reference to open records exemptions. sec. 286.0111, Fla. Stat. (1995).

Mariposa Electrique · Mar 25, 2020

yahooligan said:
I wouldn't be worried about this dude having diseases (he does work in a hospital after all, you risk exposure to anything) as much as I'd be worried about him stealing from the patients and supply cabinets to support his nasty habits.

He was videotaped ramming and taking it up the ass with out a condom. He's also an escort. Just because he worked in a hospital doesn't make him socially or emotionally intelligent.

AnOminous · Mar 25, 2020

yahooligan said:
I wouldn't be worried about this dude having diseases (he does work in a hospital after all, you risk exposure to anything) as much as I'd be worried about him stealing from the patients and supply cabinets to support his nasty habits.

I'd worry about all of those fucking things. The guy is a filthy sleazeball, a sex degenerate, and a criminal prostitute and drug dealer. He'd do fucking anything, probably even pigs and dogs if you paid him. I'd fully expect him to be HIV positive, have every conceivable STD, and tons of stolen drugs from wherever he worked.

Dr. Sexbot · Mar 25, 2020

Mariposa Electrique said:
He was videotaped ramming and taking it up the ass with out a condom. He's also an escort. Just because he worked in a hospital doesn't make him socially or emotionally intelligent.

AnOminous said:
I'd worry about all of those fucking things. The guy is a filthy sleazeball, a sex degenerate, and a criminal prostitute and drug dealer. He'd do fucking anything, probably even pigs and dogs if you paid him. I'd fully expect him to be HIV positive, have every conceivable STD, and tons of stolen drugs from wherever he worked.

You guys aren't wrong, but if I'm hiring a nurse, I can't discriminate on the basis of what diseases this dude probably has. I can, however, refuse to hire him if I'm worried he's a high risk of medication diversion or has a reputation for stealing from patients. He might be fucked as far as future jobs in nursing go, even if he can get his license in another state.

Mariposa Electrique · Mar 25, 2020

yahooligan said:
You guys aren't wrong, but if I'm hiring a nurse, I can't discriminate on the basis of what diseases this dude probably has. I can, however, refuse to hire him if I'm worried he's a high risk of medication diversion or has a reputation for stealing from patients. He might be fucked as far as future jobs in nursing go, even if he can get his license in another state.

LOL, you totally can, you just don't say anything and pretend there are more qualified applicants. I've done it before.

AnOminous said:
I'd worry about all of those fucking things. The guy is a filthy sleazeball, a sex degenerate, and a criminal prostitute and drug dealer. He'd do fucking anything, probably even pigs and dogs if you paid him. I'd fully expect him to be HIV positive, have every conceivable STD, and tons of stolen drugs from wherever he worked.

I bet women pay to fuck him too, and he raw dogs them as well from time to time.

Scarlett Johansson · Mar 26, 2020

His husband put his insta back up but apparently is deleting any comments about travis.

LV (@thelv) • Instagram photos and videos

40.8k Followers, 3,658 Following, 1,835 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from LV (@the__lv__)

www.instagram.com

He posted this though. I wonder.....

spiritofamermaid · Mar 26, 2020

Not Really Here said:
For those interested Florida has some of the most expansive open records laws in the world, starting in 1967 and becoming part of the State Constitution in 1992.

Freedom of information legislation (Florida) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Open records
The Florida Public Records Law states,

it is the policy of this state that all state, county, and municipal records shall at all times be open for a personal inspection by any person.

— Fla. Stat. sec. 119.01(1) (1995)
The statute expansively defines "public record" to include all

documents, papers, letters, maps, books, tapes, photographs, films, sound recordings, data processing software, or other material, regardless of physical form, characteristics or means of transmission, made or received pursuant to law or ordinance or in connection with the transaction of official business by any agency.

— Fla. Stat. sec. 119.011(1) (1995)
With equal breadth, the law defines "agency" as

any state, county district, authority, or municipal officer, department division, board, bureau, commission, or other separate unit of government created or established by law ... and any other public or private agency, partnership, corporation, or business entity acting on behalf of any public agency.

— Fla. Stat. sec. 119.001(2) (1995).
A "public record" of an agency is subject to a broad legislated public right of inspection:

[e]very person who has custody of a public record shall permit the record to be inspected and examined by any person desiring to do so, at any reasonable time, under reasonable conditions, and under supervision by the custodian of the public record or the custodian's designee. The custodian shall furnish a copy or a certified copy of the record upon payment of the fee prescribed by law ...

— Section 119.07(1)(a)
Furthermore, Sunshine Review notes that,

Going back to 1905, before the law was formalized, Florida courts have held that it is not up to the government to determine the use to which a person might put public documents once copies are received. [State ex rel. Davis v. McMillan]

Exemptions
The Florida Supreme Court has held that only statutory exemptions from the inspections provision of Chapter 119 may be recognized, Wait v. Florida Power & Light;[3] although courts must give effect to competing constitutional rights where inspection would otherwise compromise them. Florida Freedom Newspapers v. McCrary.

The exact number of statutory exemptions to the open records law is hard to assess, but estimates exceed 200. In response to criticisms that Florida's public records law had been undermined by the many exemptions, the Florida Legislature enacted the Open Government Sunset Review Act of 1995. Fla. Stat. § 119.15. This "Sunset" law provides for the periodic repeal of all exemptions, and mandates periodic review of the specific criteria which should be considered when reviewing the exemptions.

Unless the legislative review demonstrates a compelling interest in retaining a particular exemption that has been enacted and the legislature reenacts the exemption, it is repealed automatically.

The 1995 Sunshine Review Act incorporates the provisions of Section 119.15 as the criteria by which legislators should review Sunshine Law exemptions. Fla. Stat. § 286.0111. Under the 1995 Act, an exemption must fit within one of three categories of identifiable public purposes, and must be seen as compelling enough to override the strong presumption of openness articulated in Fla. Stat. § 119.15(2).

Since the Sunshine Review Act, the legislature has exhibited a resolve to streamline exemptions, allowing confidentiality only to the extent necessary to protect important competing values.

Open meetings
Florida's Government in the Sunshine Law, passed in 1967, requires that all meetings of any state, county, or municipal board or commission be open to the public, and mandates that any official action taken at the closed meeting not be binding. Fla. Stat. sec. 286.011 (1995). "Meeting" is construed broadly, and is not confined to "formal" assemblages at which a ritualistic vote takes place. Times Publishing Co. v. Williams. The legislature intended to make open the entire decision-making process by the enactment of the Sunshine Law.

Exemptions to the Sunshine Law are not nearly so numerous as exemptions to the public records law. The Sunshine Review Act also applies to the open meeting statute; exemptions to open meeting requirements are reviewed in the same manner as discussed above in reference to open records exemptions. sec. 286.0111, Fla. Stat. (1995).

Is there a reason why you WOULDN'T want this to be true for every state? Why was Florida alone (if it is) when it comes to this public disclosure law?

Not Really Here · Mar 26, 2020

spiritofamermaid said:
Is there a reason why you WOULDN'T want this to be true for every state? Why was Florida alone (if it is) when it comes to this public disclosure law?

For good or ill Floridaman gets shit done.

AnOminous · Mar 26, 2020

spiritofamermaid said:
Is there a reason why you WOULDN'T want this to be true for every state? Why was Florida alone (if it is) when it comes to this public disclosure law?

Every state should have this and more. Florida's is just the gold standard. It's even better than the federal FOIA which is nearly a joke lately, although still better than what most individual states have.

Mariposa Electrique · Mar 26, 2020

Not Really Here said:
For good or ill Floridaman gets shit done.

Or shit pounded

Scarlett Johansson · Mar 27, 2020

Mariposa Electrique said:
Or shit pounded

Shame we'll never know what happens to Travis

Spiteful Crow · Mar 28, 2020

This is a great video! I'm having so much fun watching Bernie's movement fall apart.

As pointed out earlier, Bernie Sanders enthusiastically endorsed this criminal faggot so insane tub of shit Cenk Uygur will lie for him. He's relentless! Cenk Uygur believes that Andy Gillum is innocent and he will shriek, sob and cry until you agree.

AnOminous · Mar 28, 2020

Spiteful Crow said:
This is a great video! I'm having so much fun watching Bernie's movement fall apart.

As pointed out earlier, Bernie Sanders enthusiastically endorsed this criminal faggot so insane tub of shit Cenk Uygur will lie for him. He's relentless! Cenk Uygur believes that Andy Gillum is innocent and he will shriek, sob and cry until you agree.

But there are literally naked pictures of him passed out in vomit, maybe his, maybe someone else's, at a gay meth orgy where someone OD'd and nearly died. He's even filed a lolsuit where he admits that yep, it's him passed out naked in vomit.

He could certainly weather this with some massive Jesus shit and redemption arc his way out of it but pretending that picture doesn't exist isn't any part of that shit.

Troonologist PhD · Mar 28, 2020

jellycar said:
Shame we'll never know what happens to Travis

Check the obituaries?

Scarlett Johansson · Mar 29, 2020

Apparently it isnt bothering him? What a narcissist faggot whore.

Mariposa Electrique · Mar 29, 2020

jellycar said:
Apparently it isnt bothering him? What a narcissist faggot whore.

I bet he's going to raw dog those whores then fuck a dog.

Disaster Andrew Gillum found at scene of suspected drug overdose in Miami hotel room - gay meth orgy

October 4-18, Chris Will Be Happy!

SOMEBODY SET UP US THE BOMB

Always Shelley Duvall. Always.

The Positronic Pimp

October 4-18, Chris Will Be Happy!

SOMEBODY SET UP US THE BOMB

The Positronic Pimp

October 4-18, Chris Will Be Happy!

Always Shelley Duvall. Always.

what a privilege it is to love

SOMEBODY SET UP US THE BOMB

October 4-18, Chris Will Be Happy!

Always Shelley Duvall. Always.

第六天の魔王

SOMEBODY SET UP US THE BOMB

Be happy

Always Shelley Duvall. Always.

October 4-18, Chris Will Be Happy!