The Mysterious Mr. Enter / Jonathan Rozanski's "Growing Around" - IndieGoGo Campaign Failed, John going off the deep end, "Turning Red" is ignorant about 9/11 (later retracted)

  • Thread starter Thread starter LN 910
  • Start date Start date
This dude needs to learn to prioritize. His health is a sinking ship but he's worried about trying to force a half-baked series.

Mr. Enter, my guy my man my dude. I do sometimes enjoy the interesting insights you give into shows, which deviate from most reviews which tend to be the same thing. The thing is, if you took care of your own health, your art would organically improve and reviews would be less neurotic and nitpicky. An unwell, stressed creator is a poor creator.

Dude's autistic, medical weed might do him good. If not fly off the handle more lol.
 
Last edited:
This dude needs to learn to prioritize. His health is a sinking ship but he's worried about trying to force a half-baked series.

Mr. Enter, my guy my man my dude. I do sometimes enjoy the interesting insights you give into shows, which deviate from most reviews which tend to be the same thing. The thing is, if you took care of your own health, your art would organically improve and reviews would be less neurotic and nitpicky. An unwell, stressed creator is a poor creator.

Dude's autistic, medical weed might do him good.
The ideas he comes up with are weird and nonsensical already, I don't think he needs weed.
 
Chapter four:
GAPP-51-52.jpg

GAPP-53-54.jpg
GAPP-55-56.jpg

GAPP-57-58.jpg

GAPP-59-60.jpg

GAPP-61-62.jpg
GAPP-63-64.jpg

GAPP-65-66.jpg
GAPP-67-68.jpg
GAPP-69-70.jpg
 
Enter said:
So, right now there's been a lot of discussion and a lot of buzz over one particular topic - the economy in how it relates to what's going on with the pandemic and various quarantines. I've been reading a lot of shit on the internet, a big mistake I know. But it's... aggravating how a lot of people are saying "fuck the economy if it means no one dies"... not understanding that if the economy gets fucked a lot of people will die. Many people don't understand economics, or think it's only important to the rich.

No... economics determine whether you have a job, can afford your rent, insurance, food, etc. It's important to every single person within the economy. But let's take this out of an abstract concept. Let's put it in terms of water.

Let's assume that there is this town with a water shortage. If they keep using water willy nilly they'll be out of it before long because droughts have been very bad over the past couple of years. However, during this pandemic they're encouraged to wash their hands thoroughly several times a day. If they keep doing this, they will be out of water long before the pandemic is over. What should they do?

What you're looking at is a choice with no right answer. And this kind of contradicts the internet's mentality of "I'm/my side is always right." People are still going to fight and battle and argue as if they're absolutely right, and I guess they might possibly take the blame for the horrible side effect of what they're arguing for. I'm hoping too much. Today, in the US, more unemployment claims were filed than any other point in US history. One thing that's been repeatedly stated about any argued stimulus package here is "it's not enough."

There is only so much a system like unemployment can handle. Some people put projected unemployment at 30%, which is nearly a third. A society cannot function with a third of their people out of work. In terms of unemployment, there's only so much money to go around. The same with any social plan. There is only so much stimulus we're able to throw around.

When people become unemployed and can't get any sort of social support network, because that social safety net has broken, they become homeless. They start starving to death. They are unable to get any kind of medical attention. Or they might end the process early and commit suicide.

I want to make this clear, I am not advocating ending quarantine, especially this early on. But let's be clear here, the economy is a discussion that we need to have. There is only so much strain that it can take before the damage becomes something like we have never seen before. And just throwing it to the wind or considering it a "rich people problem" might end up with more death and human misery than the pandemic alone could create.

Where the line is, I don't know. I feel very much like we're in the middle of a rock and a hard place. I feel that there is no answer here that isn't a bad one, and that's not a good place to be. End quarantine early and many people will die; the medical systems will get incredibly overwhelmed. Stay in quarantine until the the curve is flattened, and the economy will have taken a significant pounding. Many people will be out of a job. Many corporations wouldn't have the funds to keep themselves going throughout the months, and then many more people would be out of a job.

I don't like asking things of the internet, but can we please stop assuming that anyone who wants to talk about the economy is an evil rich person who wants your grandma to die so they can stay rich? Like, let me put it this way. Some people's grandparents - mine included - are or were very close to retirement, and the economic side effects are going to hamper or even destroy what they put into retirement.

I'm sorry to be pessimistic. It's just... very frustrating to see all of this bickering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Decimator
Yes because someone who has no actual job experience and thought that $350,000 would be a good crowdfunding goal is the best person to speak about economics
And he spent half a grand on an editor for his book who can't even construct a sentence properly in email correspondences.
 
That one actually makes sense. If your book has numerous POV's from childen, hire an editor with the mental capacity of a child.

This actually brings up an interesting point, has Enter ever tried getting feedback from the actual target audience of this thing? Because I’d imagine that even they would be confused as to half the shit that’s going on in the scripts.
 
This actually brings up an interesting point, has Enter ever tried getting feedback from the actual target audience of this thing? Because I’d imagine that even they would be confused as to half the shit that’s going on in the scripts.

I doubt it. He's stated that he's talked to multiple kids and how they're scared of growing up, but nothing about Growing Around directly. He'd probably make up some excuse as to not do that like, "On YouTube, it's easy to fake your age, so I don't know who's seriously a kid and who's just trying to mess with me."
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Shokew
This actually brings up an interesting point, has Enter ever tried getting feedback from the actual target audience of this thing? Because I’d imagine that even they would be confused as to half the shit that’s going on in the scripts.

There's a one star review on the Amazon page for the book that is from a user named "stephanie" that says she read it to her child cousin Jace. Here it is.

Let's just say, it didn't go to well.

Screenshot (28).png

Screenshot (31).png

Screenshot (32).png
 
This actually brings up an interesting point, has Enter ever tried getting feedback from the actual target audience of this thing? Because I’d imagine that even they would be confused as to half the shit that’s going on in the scripts.
This brings up something I wanted to talk about. Imagine that you don’t know anything about Enter and are unaware of what he posts online. You’ve never seen any of the blogposts or art for Growing Around, but you see the book on Amazon and get it.

This is how any actual child would come across GA since they wouldn’t be watching a manchild cuss out Seth MacFarlane on YouTube. They wouldn’t know anything about GA going in.

Now look at the synopsis on the book’s back cover. It doesn’t outright state the role reversal concept. The closest it gets is still very vague “Kids rule, and adults get schooled.” Likely too vague for a kid Sally’s age to 100 percent guess what it’s getting at.

The first chapter of the novel also doesn’t really establish that it’s a world where the roles are just switched. It begins with kids going to space, setting it up like more of a sci fi world, then a bunch of scenes of kids just playing about as if adults are non-existent. This still gives off a vibe like it’s a sci-fi setting about a planet of children. (The “not so typical world” line on the cover would also make you think this is the case.) It’s not until the very end that we get the stuff about the child-teacher meeting for the adult students and the fundamental concept is really introduced.

I can see a kid with no prior knowledge of the series being pretty confused with what’s going on, and with a kid’s attention span, they probably won’t hang around for the nineteen pages it takes for the concept to be kind of shown. He intended for this book to be a good starting point for people to get into the series but it does a very poor job of introducing the world and its rules to you.

The cover illustration also does nothing to explain the concept. Sally is standing in a spotlight surrounded by a shadowy crowd. It looks like something for a book about the main character overcoming stage fright for a talent show, not a book about parent-child role reversal.

Compare this to Harry Potter. Even if you’ve never heard of the series before, the back cover gives you enough information to know it’s going to be about a kid with magical powers having an adventure at a school for wizards. You aren’t going to be confused and wondering what the book is even ABOUT for the entire first chapter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Decimator
I love it when people who never encountered Enter tears his book a new one that it deserves.
"I feel this is not an appropriate book to be aimed towards children because it keeps giving me this weird underlining pedophilic vibe from it the more the world and the actions of the "children" are described and it becomes really creepy really fast."

Oh honey, you have no idea.
 
"I feel this is not an appropriate book to be aimed towards children because it keeps giving me this weird underlining pedophilic vibe from it the more the world and the actions of the "children" are described and it becomes really creepy really fast."

Oh honey, you have no idea.
Now that you mention it, there has been a surprising lack of crossdressing in the book so far. Granted, the male kids have barely appeared in general, though.

This is another issue with the book. We're over a quarter into the novel that's supposed to introduce you to the series, and we've hardly seen Timmy/Max at all, and he's supposed to be the other main character of the series. He's been mentioned as just being, well, there in some scenes but he's contributed nothing. Even Linda/Autumn and Robert have participated a little in the story so far. Going back to the Harry Potter comparison, this would be like if Hermione and Ron spent most of their time in the first book just kinda standing around while Harry occasionally notices that they exist.
 
Now that you mention it, there has been a surprising lack of crossdressing in the book so far.
This is what I was getting at.

If people are already feeling the pedophilic undertones from one of the tamest books in the series, just imagine what they're gonna think when they find out about all the fucking crossdressing in the other ones.

If I had pick something that definitely destroys any chance that GA has of ever becoming an actual TV series, (besides all of Enter's other unprofessional fuck ups) it would be the sheer amount crossdressing, and other fetishistic shit in it. Maybe I'm being naive, but even if by some miracle it got past the meeting pitch, I don't think it would ever get past the censors.
 
Back