Secret Gamer Girl / SecretGamerGrrl / Googleshng / "Violet Hargrave" / Jacob Lawrence (Jake) Alley / Violet Cassandra Ocean - Delusional Zoe Quinn Stalker, Libelous Tweeter, Thirsty Gnome, Faux-Tranny Neckbeard Incel, Micropenis, "Known Troubled Person", Creator of "Massive vs the Masses", Self-Described "Noise Making Thing"; Lives in Niantic, CT

hes pretty knowledgeable about the game actually, even if hes died a few times. but if this keeps him off twitter then it's a win. images are kill but he has a busty red headed version of Link as his background because of course he fucking does. he's fairly desperate and keeps saying things like "ask me about the art or about the game. if you're watching say hello, so I know I'm not talking to the walls." nobody has said anything yet. but honestly 3 viewers seems par for the course for zelda random streamers.

edit: after a quiet bang he complained about his desk falling apart and had to stop to fix it. probably gonna be the highlight.
one text Jake-ism that transfers into his spoken word is “... for some reason.”
 
Last edited:
Jake's got a "weekly schedule" up on his Twitch now:
https://www.twitch.tv/secretgamergrrl/

Mo-
Tu-
We-
ThSpontaneous Zelda
Fr8 PM : Zelda. 6 AM : ???
Sa8 PM til LATE: Open to suggestions!
Su5 AM til LATE Suggestions!

If anyone is in the mood to corrective rape him, that's when you know you'll have an audience.

This is the most NEET\Neckbeard schedule I've ever seen.
 
He's on playing Legend of Zelda. The schedule has already changed. Subtract 4 hours from the previous start times. It looks like he started at 4pm EST.
The schedule he posted is in UTC, so I think he's actually following it.
Wouldn't want to narrow it down to any particular time zone, because as we all know, Violet has never been doxed.
 
The schedule he posted is in UTC, so I think he's actually following it.
Wouldn't want to narrow it down to any particular time zone, because as we all know, Violet has never been doxed.
He's using some kind of app or extension for the viewers timezone. I didn't see it before. I thought he originally wrote it in Greenwich and then realized he probably wasn't going to have an audience in the UK/Europe.
 
Looks like the time his stream starts can be tied to when he wakes up.
gnometwitching1.JPG
 
View attachment 1205170

Totally not because no one would watch you stream. Totes.

LOL. Jake learned nothing from when he tried to worm his way into Hbombercuck's Mermaids stream. Now he's trying to hitch his stream to TLL's latest cash grab charity.

What a shameless gnome.
 
It's a tonic to watch Jake struggle with the simplest things after a hard days work. His streaming saga in five parts.

Part 1: it begins
jakez1.png

Part 2: the grind
"OK, took me a little more time than expected to get up and running today but here we go"
jakez2.png

Part 3: the strain
"I mean... I DO have a good couple thousand games that AREN'T Zelda Randomizer I could play for people too, but..."
jakez3.png

Part 4: mounting troubles
"OK. I clearly am going to need someone to sit down with me for some OBS troubleshooting."
jakez4.png

Part 5: crash & burn
"I'm also not hitting start until I see one active viewer in the chat"
jakez5.png
 
LOL. Jake is acting like his usual manchild self. He thinks that he should get....nay, DESERVES a giant audience show up at his stream despite being boring as shit, having an annoying voice, and a terrible streaming schedule.

PewDiePie and Ninja didn't get their audience overnight. They earned it by keeping a constant schedule, building a connection with viewers, and working at their craft. If Jake can't be fucking bothered to write articles to fulfill his Patreon promises, he sure as fuck isn't going to put in the work those guys did.
 
Nearly 39 year old man who has never worked has strong opinion on establishing workers rights:
1585365232288.png


He spent two hours writing about hormones and science and shit that someone could screencap if they wanted but I just copy/pasted because dear god: https://twitter.com/SecretGamerGrrl/status/1243708112030199808
archive needed two parts to get it: https://archive.ph/GF7nz https://archive.ph/5zvQA
Violet Cassandra Ocean said:
This is something that really isn't discussed nearly often enough, and it's also something the majority of medical professionals you might have to deal with aren't consciously aware of, but if we're specifically looking at gender through an explicitly medical lens? Hormones > All

Bigots are constantly putting out blatantly false information on this front, because they just really really desperately need gender to be some sort of rigid unchangeable thing and their response to reality constantly contradicting them is to just bury the truth in enough lies that they never have to look at it, and people who know better largely try to avoid putting too much stress on any of what I'm going to say past here, since another flavor of horrible bigot out there hyper-fixate on the medical end of things to do some weird messed up gatekeeping about who is and isn't "really trans" based on whatever standard they can find that let's them play the "oh no I'm real and valid, not like all those fakers you hate who really are lying or deluded," and screw those people too.

But if we're actually talking about real medical stuff that you want to be aware of purely for the sake of staying healthy and avoiding medical complicatons then... you should really seek out an actual medical professional with specialization, experience, and good discipline about staying up to date on all the latest studies, rather than getting all your information from some random woman on twitter who just reads a lot and has some relevant firsthand experience. But you know, for the sake of people who wouldn't even think to do that without hearing this from me first:

BASICALLY EVERYTHING which is different for men and women in the field of medicine (and also just like what your body looks/feels/smells/tastes/reacts like for that matter) comes down to either the relative levels of various hormones in your bloodstream or the way various other cells have responded (or failed to respond due to some rare condition) to those hormone levels. No really. Basically everything. Whatever it is you're thinking of that you think is some exception to that? It almost certainly isn't. As a general rule of thumb, all the really outwardly observable stuff is more a matter of long term exposure, because it can take a while for cells to shift gears, especially if it's something where a bunch have to move around or divide more or divide less or whatever to hit whatever target, years sometimes, and for actually medically relevant stuff, it's more what ratio of hormones are currently floating around and how does that interact with anything else?

Like... any time you have ever read anything about how messed up it is that basically all medical testing is done on men, and women have to just hope it works out for us too?

Please note that I, a trans woman who has been on HRT for years now, am saying "us" there, because yeah, ALL THOSE ARTICLES are talking about hormone balance stuff. The super sexist framing on it is that estrogens are way more complicated than androgens and harder to account for because testosterone is just so special that when you have a lot of it, it kinda shoves all the other hormones out of the picture and you don't have to worry about them interacting with whatever else you're throwing in the mix so much (please keep in mind too that I am both being super broad and vague and also paraphrasing sexist BS there, so huge grain of salt). When testosterone is relatively low though, and the whole gang of estradiol and progesterone and friends are riding relatively high those can interact in seriously different ways with other drugs and cause problems that weren't caught when they tested those drugs on dudes. And hey, guess what? If you're trans-feminine and on HRT, you are dropping your testosterone down even lower than it is for cis women, and cranking those relatively high ones in most women up to like, double or triple the cis average. So not only are you a woman as far as any of those drug interactions might go, you're like, a double woman. If there's a hormone based issue to worry about, you're WAY more likely to be dealing with it than like anybody else. And if you're taking testosterone supplements, again, that's getting boosted way over the average for cis men and suppressing other hormones more (GENERALLY! I seem to recall this being something where if you're self-medicating you can actually screw up and it's like an int overflowing in programming where your body goes "woah this is way too high, convert some of this extra T into E already!" so, endos are important) than tada, you're some kind of super man, medically speaking.

And you know, it's not just a drug thing. Do you know the symptoms to watch out for in terms of a heart attack? Are you sure you really do? Because, hey, the last time I went to a doctor, there was a big ol' poster on the wall listing heart attack symptoms for women, and even as someone who has known for some time it's a totally different list than the one for men, which is the list I guarantee you are familiar with, since for decades it was the only one anyone ever bothered to popularize, turns out I was actually really hazy on the specifics. Also turns out it was a perfect list of every single thing I had going on that one day at the gym where I ended up pushing myself way way too hard and almost passed out so uh... I really need to work way harder on my cardiovascular help and be careful about that in the future I guess. But also, again, as a trans woman on HRT, yeah turns out the women's symptoms are, in fact, the ones I personally should be more worried about (and I mean, do please note I'm saying "more worried about," because if ANYONE is showing the symptoms on EITHER list, that's bad, react appropriately).

And this keeps being the general rule of thumb as you go down the list. Any sort of potential neurochemical thing? Not only do those not care if you're cis or trans, people are always pointing at such studies when they feel the need to like medically prove that being trans is a real thing.

Anything that cares how thick or thin your blood is? Bleeding risks, or clotting risks, whatever? Yeah you start HRT, you're switching teams and becoming a star player. Think that's why the heart attack differences exist, even.

Skin thickness? Less likely to come up in a crisis, but yeah, HRT REALLY changes it. And casually it comes up a lot, too.

If you're starting HRT femme-wise, expect to see more random cuts and bruises and have a greater need for sweaters. It's a thing.

Really, the ONLY medical concerns I'm personally aware of where going on HRT WON'T switch how you should be counted are:
Your ability to get pregnant or get others pregnant (accidentally anyway, if it's something you're actively trying to do, ask your endo whether you should go off your HRT to help things along or what).

And LOSING the risk of cancer with regard to certain anatomical features. This being the closest medicine ever comes to having bigots side, they of course do a lot of misrepresentation and scaremongering here to make sure it's just as distorted as all the other public perceptions go, but, really this is pretty common sense. Women have a higher risk of breast cancer than men because you know, women kinda tend to have more breast mass for cancer to develop somewhere in than men do. Trans men who went through the wrong puberty also tend to end up with more cells to potentially become cancerous in that whole area than cis men, and if they don't get top surgery, those keep hanging out. The same thing applies to prostates/skene's glands, which is worth a little more emphasis because you don't tend to see or think about those, so trans masc types might not think about them growing nor trans femme types think about them not shrinking. And if you don't ever bother with any sort of surgery where your gonads get tossed in the medical waste bin, any sort of medical issue focused on those can obviously crop up still (I mean, it's possible that testicular/ovarian cancer rates drop with HRT since your whole reproductive system kinda gets orders to chill out and tone things down in general? And the rates kinda drop to zero if you get bottom surgery because again, the bin).

The practical upshot of all this is just that if you're trans just kinda err on the side of caution with the recommended frequency of shoving cameras up your butt and sticking your boobs in a big vice, assuming you can afford those little luxuries like preventative medicine via routine checkups.

Otherwise, as far as any doctor should be concerned, your effective gender should be whatever your hormone balance is most consistent with, and you should be aware that being trans is rare enough odds are good your doctor won't actually know that if you don't bring it up, so, do try to have that awkward conversation any time you're starting HRT or seeing someone new.

Also I apologize profusely to anyone who just read this thread and started freaking out. Not trying to make anyone paranoid and it's really not at all true that HRT makes you like, less healthy or more medically risky at all. In the most practical terms, it's quite the opposite, because any check-ins with anyone you might have in relation to how HRT is going can catch any health problems you otherwise wouldn't notice. For instance, I have some rare scary blood clot disorder I absolutely would never have learned I had if screening for it weren't part of my endo's pre-screening process. I get free updates on my blood sugar and such while checking hormone levels regularly. Just a general pattern of checking mirrors and other people's opinions on whether rad HRT changes are happening or not is a great way to spot anything worrying weird lump or mole wise (and extra incentive to be more healthy in general, fat only where I want it, toning muscles for where I don't, etc.) and that's before even getting into all of the staggering health benefits that HRT provides. The whole proper brain functioning and liking your own body and not dealing with the constant horror of dysphoria and all that are definitely going to outweigh, like, anything else you could ever think of.

And seriously, any sort of "trans cancer risk" anyone shrieks about is one or more of several massive lies. Don't worry

edit: oh deargod, that asexual thing was part of its own two hour Googleshng:
Violet Cassandra Ocean said:
Adding to this little topic:
"I don't date men." Sexual orientation.
"I don't date men with beards." Totally valid preference.
"I don't date men who are willing to date trans women." This is a confession of massive bigotry with a side order of actively trying to recruit radicals.


If we had someone saying "I don't date trans women," there would be the POTENTIAL to have some sort of actual nuanced discussion with someone who was speaking in good faith to the same extent that if someone said "I don't date black women" we could dig into that person's personal history and work out some weird circumstance that makes them a weird edge case rather than the racist that phrase would be spoken by 99% of the time, but, even with the edge cases, it's never appropriate to volunteer that sort of fun fact completely unprompted. Like, yeah, it's super tragic that you were cursed by Oberon that should you share a meal with a black or trans woman you will be transformed into a squirrel, but if someone else is discussing their dinner plans and had no intention of inviting you along, don't butt in with that.

Again though, the people who usually offer up such sentiments not only lack the sort of personal background that would mitigate the implied bigotry, it's usually pretty safe to assume that, particularly as they advertise that hate unprompted they're preemptively rejecting offers to go on dates that were never going to be made in the first place, from hypothetical dates they've never even met. Since, like I said the other day, bigotry thrives best in environments where the hated group has no actual visible presence.

BUT, we're not even talking about that. We're talking about someone whose exact words expressing disqualifying conditions were that she (and the large hypothetical crowd she claims to be speaking for of course) "won't date a man who dates trans women."

Let's really take a moment to analyze that statement, shall we? Because really, there's four ways we can read it.

The first of course is to just be silly and ultra literal with it. "I will not go on a date where a man, one or more trans women, and I all go out together at once." Here, everything I just covered about declaring you won't date someone applies, plus the specificity gets real real questionable. This is proposed often enough to make it a policy? You're down for group dates involving trans women so long as no men are present and vice versa? But again, this is the joke scenario.

Next possibility, we have the sincere belief that the act of a man dating a trans woman somehow permanently taints him in some supernatural fashion or makes him the carrier for some sort of disease. And uh... OK, there is A BIT OF A HISTORY to that one that it's really worth taking the time to parse through, so bear with me

Like literally all other forms of BS people spout off to rationalize transphobia, this is a reheated bit of BS people spouted off decades ago to rationalize homophobia, before general acceptance there hit a point where it wouldn't fly anymore. Specifically "AIDS is a gay disease"

The folklore of the day was that basically every gay man on the planet had AIDS (I'll spare you the grostesquery of why people thought THAT was a reasonable premise) and therefore the only possible way for a woman to ever catch it was if she slept with one of those rare legendary bi men. And of course, naturally, every woman being as "rational and logical" as whoever is expressing this vulgar thought, the assumption carries forward that "all women" maintain this same quarantine procedure that the moment any man sleeps with any other man, they are tainted, and shall never be allowed to sleep with any woman again. Therefore it remains true that no women anywhere are infected and all straight men are safe, and there's no reason for anyone to listen to any of this "safe sex" talk or to NOT stone all gay and bi men to death for safety.

It's also worth noting that while the specific justifications of this have been dropped in the face of the world at large no longer being that horridly ignorant about AIDS in terms of demographics and infection risk, a vaguer, half-articulated form remains popular to this day and we have established all other women must surely do (because even a single breach of protocol anywhere lets The Gay Disease infect the whole straight population and destroys the whole house of cards and all) and never sleeps with any bi men, it doesn't make any more sense to shun men who have slept with trans women than it does men who have slept with other cis women. Hell, if you stop and remember that women who sleep with other women also exist it would actually be a safer personal policy to ONLY date men whose past dates have been primarily or entirely been trans, because it's way more common for trans women to be bi than it is for cis women, and thus when we go one more degree of seperetion out, odds are much lower of us having rolled the dice as often on having risked sex with one of those evil bisexual shapeshifters. Right?

And of course the real screwed up bit here is that odds are pretty good that if someone IS using this logic to justify a "totally not transphobic" stance of never dating anyone who has dated a trans woman, it still makes sense because in their mind, trans women are, somehow, a subset of "gay men" despite being women, and for the purpose of their argument, straight. And this too is somehow not at all transphobic.

Anyway, moving on to our third opton! The possibility that a woman, while not being at all a bigot herself, just has this weird real specific fetish where she just can't get that spark of passion going unless she knows the guy sitting across from her is a massive bigot. Not because she is. No, no. It's just the whole "I like bad boys" thing, you see. And this is totally a plausible sort of person to exist, because hey, if we're granting the veracity of the statement than this premise totally has no roots in bigotry at all and by extension we shouldn't assume any other clear cases of bigotry are real without passing that standard everyone seems to agree must exist but that nobody can ever define in a way that applies to a specific situation they might be involved in, it would just be nonsensical to assume all those women married to klansmen and neo-nazis are racist. Clearly they're not, they're just turned on by racism, right?

And then finally we have the most cynical and most grounded possibility- That this woman actually DOES actively hate trans women (or at the very least is jealous of us for having men that she is into be into us more than her (maybe the bigotry is a turnoff?)) and is actively encouraging people to publicly denounce us and anyone who treats us with any sort of basic dignity or kindness, and is low-key using her own potential availability (as well as this whole hypothetical crowd of women she's claiming to speak for, who wouldn't be worth mentioning otherwise) as a bargaining chip, in the hope that NON-bigoted men will jump over to team bigotry out of the fear of losing access to a dating pool of however many women this radical bigot is actually speaking for.

My money's kind of on that last possibility. Probably with a healthy side order of #2 to go with it. Also fairly confident that she does not, in fact, actually practice what she preaches, and pre-screen anyone who asks her out with this whole "are you now or have you ever been a member of the trans-woman-dating party?" before even arranging a first date, because unless you're using mumsnet as a dating site, there's no way any dude wouldn't see that question as the biggest, reddest flag, regardless of what their answer is.

Plus I have to stress again that the verb being used here is "dating." Not even about who you sleep with, or who she sleeps with, just dating.

Like, hey, I'm asexual. I fully intend to go to my grave a virgin. But like, if someone wants to just like, take me out to have dinner and see a movie or whatever, I'm pretty sure the only disqualifying factors would be if they make me feel personally unsafe, or it's likely they are going to behave in a way that makes me look like a huge asshole for even being willing to sit next to them. There is no combination of physical features, dating history or personal taste that's going to be a dealbreaker, nor are my sexual preferences (which are again, "nope") going to enter into it. It's just a freakin' date. Like to paraphrase Flea from Chrono Trigger, "Man, woman, non-binary, whatever. Free food is what matters, and you're treating." You know?

No bigots though. Gotta draw a line there.

edit edit: because dear god nooooo
1585365981027.png

1585365995645.png
 
Last edited:
Nearly 39 year old man who has never worked has strong opinion on establishing workers rights:
View attachment 1205527

He spent two hours writing about hormones and science and shit that someone could screencap if they wanted but I just copy/pasted because dear god: https://twitter.com/SecretGamerGrrl/status/1243708112030199808
archive needed two parts to get it: https://archive.ph/GF7nz https://archive.ph/5zvQA


edit: oh deargod, that asexual thing was part of its own two hour Googleshng:


edit edit: because dear god nooooo
View attachment 1205530
View attachment 1205532

I guess the spills on the bench which he didn't bother to wipe up make it rustic or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jewin' MacEwan
Back