Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[DumbDude42]

People disagreeing with you and scrutinizing your belief system is not authoritarianism, even if it makes you feel bad. In fact, the right to do so is the very core of democracy. If that's enough to subvert your values, they are worthless

you can try to dress it up as "scrutinizing your belief system" all you want, but at the end of the day the 'trans women are women' position is just straight up reality denial, nothing else.

 

[Sped Xing]

Are we getting into epistemology now?

 

[francesco]

Are you saying politicians, largely made up of people from the upper class all over the globe, couldn't possibly have different opinions then the populace their suppose to serve? That seems totally deluded from reality, many incumbents candidates have a few opinions people don't like.

Once again, if democratic politicians repeatedly do things their voter base doesn't like, they tend to lose elections regardless of what they personally believe. Why is this so hard for you to grasp?

It's the exact same implication?

It isn't. It's possible to be authoritarian without being a full-blown dictator. Orban has repeatedly shown authoritarian tendencies (see: using a virus as an excuse to give himself absolute power). And the EU is and has been warning Hungary for some time about Orban's escapades.

What is your definition of "democracy" then? According to the OSCE it is a democracy.

Do us both a favour and don't play stupider than you actually are.
BTW, the OSCE has widely criticized elections in Russia as unfair and heavily weighed in you-know-who's favour.

Do you support child genital mutilation?

Nice deflection bro.
Of course I don't. But there are democratic ways to fight this. Many activists are working against it right as we speak and they have had considerable success (recent legislation in Australia, UK, some US states and Nordic countries). Trans kids are not an excuse to end democracy.
Also, you still haven't answered my question: you're saying I put words in you mouth and here you flat out admit you'd rather live in a dictatorship. Which one is it?

you can try to dress it up as "scrutinizing your belief system" all you want, but at the end of the day the 'trans women are women' position is just straight up reality denial, nothing else.

It is reality denial. And it's their right to deny reality. My point still stands: if a handfull of looney troons are enough to endanger your values, they are worthless

 

[tuscangarder]

So because people can voice opinions different from those of the majority, democracy is wrong? ok
As for "neoliberal shock", the economic crash of eastern Europe in the 90's was caused by the collapse of socialism, not by democracy. Even if these countries transitioned from communist autocracy to conservative autocracy, the result would be the same.

If you hate troons so much you'd rather live in a dictatorship than a democracy that tolerates them, you are either mentally ill or severely stupid.

Communism caused lolberts to destroy Hungary? Lol

Bokros package - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[It's HK-47]

This was originally in its own thread and when it was merged into Tranny News it kind of devolved into a bit of a mess, but now it's in Deep Thots so everyone can have fun and not have to worry about staying on topic.

Edit: And now it's back in Tranny News, somehow.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

I’m not sure I still understand politics after all these years, but I do have this classic H.L. Mencken quote that I wish to share with you, if you’re interested:

“Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance. No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

― H.L. Mencken, Notes on Democracy

 

[Rice Is Ready]

Everything is literally Hitler. LMFAO XD JAJAJA



Then what is the small minority of people living non-traditionally trying to subvert traditional cultural lifestyles and taboos of a population that still adheres to that lifestyle and those taboos called? Bastions of anti-authoritarianism obviously

If you think only a small minority of people live a non-traditional life style you're retarded. Most people watch porn, lie, cheat, steal, do drugs, drink, use foul language, and have sex out of wedlock. Only fags who don't get any nookie are pushing >muh trad values

 

[tuscangarder]

Trad just means not homo

 

[Get_your_kicks_with_30-06]

People disagreeing with you and scrutinizing your belief system is not authoritarianism, even if it makes you feel bad. In fact, the right to do so is the very core of democracy. If that's enough to subvert your values, they are worthless

Good to know gun rights, free speech, privacy, state rights, and the list goes on are worthless. Because they have been under attack for a long time.

And if something is being subverted that means its being done so in a way that is opposite to "the very core of democracy". I deliberately used subvert and not disagree.

If you think only a small minority of people live a non-traditional life style you're exceptional. Most people watch porn, lie, cheat, steal, do drugs, drink, use foul language, and have sex out of wedlock. Only fags who don't get any nookie are pushing >muh trad values

There is a difference between doing all those things and making an entire culture that promotes those as good and acceptable.

No shit a lot of people do stuff that has been traditionally looked down upon, the whole point is too make it shameful not celebrated.

 

[ConfederateIrishman]

Good to know gun rights, free speech, privacy, state rights, and the list goes on are worthless. Because they have been under attack for a long time.

Yes, they are worthless at this point. None of those things exist anymore de facto.

 

[francesco]

And if something is being subverted that means its being done so in a way that is opposite to "the very core of democracy". I deliberately used subvert and not disagree.

If you can't make a case for them in a democratic way, they very clearly are worthless.
And they are being "subverted in a way that is opposite to democracy" how exactly again? Is it a communist plot? Do we need to revive old Joe McCarthy?

 

[ConfederateIrishman]

If you can't make a case for them in a democratic way, they very clearly are worthless.
And they are being "subverted in a way that is opposite to democracy" how exactly again? Is it a communist plot? Do we need to revive old Joe McCarthy?

McCarthy was right to be honest

 

[Liber Pater]

Is a "democracy" where a small elite manufactures consensus, dictates policy, determines elections, and sets the boundaries of public discussion really better than a benevolent dictatorship with strong popular? Given that history is littered with examples of failed democracies and benevolent dictators, it seems necessary to appreciate the unique aspects of individual societies and take a case-by-case view when evaluating their political situations.
Given his country's situation as an EU member state and economic partner of Western Europe, it's ridiculous to say that Orban has NO checks on his power or that he is going to turn into Hitler or Stalin. There are definitely limits to how far he can go, and how long he can retain his ability to rule by decree.
Have you seen what kind of powers Lincoln arrogated for himself during his generation's period of crisis? But do people call him an illegitimate dictator? What about Cincinnatus?

 

[Arm Pit Cream]

Once again, if democratic politicians repeatedly do things their voter base doesn't like, they tend to lose elections regardless of what they personally believe. Why is this so hard for you to grasp?

This is like the most simplified view of democracy there is. There's lobby groups, companies with specific lobby organizations, billionaires, NGOs, what your voterbase wants versus this other group you're trying to appeal to and so many more factors that can alter political movements or elections.
If democracy worked as simply as you argue it then every single person running for election would just take all of the most popular positions and run with it.
For example, you might come from an industrial nation, however the county you represent is rural, you're going to be arguing for your farmers even if nationally that's an unpopular position.

It isn't. It's possible to be authoritarian without being a full-blown dictator. Orban has repeatedly shown authoritarian tendencies (see: using a virus as an excuse to give himself absolute power). And the EU is and has been warning Hungary for some time about Orban's escapades.

Almost every world leader has expanded their powers as a result of coronavirus, although in many cases it wasn't as big of a step as Orban, I would argue those countries already had the same provisions in place to allow an expansion of powers.
The only time the EU has issued a direct warning to Hungary was this incident.

Nice deflection bro.
Of course I don't. But there are democratic ways to fight this. Many activists are working against it right as we speak and they have had considerable success (recent legislation in Australia, UK, some US states and Nordic countries). Trans kids are not an excuse to end democracy.
Also, you still haven't answered my question: you're saying I put words in you mouth and here you flat out admit you'd rather live in a dictatorship. Which one is it?

It's a pretty reasonable response to your question. I don't agree to how you're using the word but yes, I wouldn't be opposed the my country's leader taking full power during a time of crisis if it's needed to prevent further tyranny. There needs to be checks and balances, but I don't know why you act like taking the necessary steps to support your country is bad.

This is my problem, this is addressing a symptom rather then the flawed system itself. How do you get to a society that has to argue over child genital mutilation? It clearly speaks to a larger aspect of the degradation of western society when such things aren't apparent to people.
Considerable success? C'mon, Orban actually does something and you complain, the countries you mention do nothing. How is the UK not into transgender kids? If you have to go to a high court to figure out these issues your appeal system is clearly broken.
I tried looking into this other legislation you've brought up and can't find any examples, can you please cite any of those countries besides the US which I know has Alabama.

It is reality denial. And it's their right to deny reality. My point still stands: if a handfull of looney troons are enough to endanger your values, they are worthless

Trannies are not the deal breaker but the system to get there is. In the end a small minority of people who hold no influence are irrelevant, I have no problem admitting that. However to ignore the larger structural impacts, the transgender and homosexual lobbies, the disillusion of those not in the cities and the role they've come to represent as harbingers of radical progressivism is simply ignorant.

So what happens when those groups you're talking about win? Do the restrict transgender rights? Isn't that dictatorial by your definition? What happens to those LGBT lobby groups?

Having any genitals not mutilated is actually a value of mine, I think it really harms the person as does most maiming. I care about the security of the individual and believe there's many options before life altering surgeries or pills. I don't know why human rights apply for you up until "right to life, liberty and security of person", then suddenly it's dictatorial.
I don't understand if you believe in freedoms why you would weigh them so differently, well ignoring possibly larger impacts.

These issues do not disappear over night and when you take stances like yours, you might as well just be full on pro-trans. Acceptance isn't just acceptance, it actively enables and legitimizes transgender organizations.

If you can't make a case for them in a democratic way, they very clearly are worthless.
And they are being "subverted in a way that is opposite to democracy" how exactly again? Is it a communist plot? Do we need to revive old Joe McCarthy?

Why do you think that bad democracy doesn't exist? 90% of muslims in Egypt believe that non-believers should get capital punishment, according to your principles that would be justified?

 

[tuscangarder]

If you can't make a case for them in a democratic way, they very clearly are worthless.
And they are being "subverted in a way that is opposite to democracy" how exactly again? Is it a communist plot? Do we need to revive old Joe McCarthy?

Most democractic governments do not have free speech. Is that then totalitarian or democratic? Your idea of freedom is small brained. A democratic society can be just as totalitarian or more than a state with a dictator.

You got re-tarded leafs that think like this. I wouldnt want this type of person in my country. And this is why we must place troops on our boarders.

 

[LargeChoonger]

Only fags who don't get any nookie are pushing >muh trad values

Because a guy's value should be measured in how much he fucks. Cope harder faggot

 

[Rice Is Ready]

Because a guy's value should be measured in how much he fucks. Cope harder faggot

Literally didn't say that, incel. I said only you fags who get no ass are wanting to change society to satisfy your fee fees.

 

[DidYouJustSayThat]

Can't spell fascism without the cis.

Wow, I never thought I'd like a post by @tuscangarder, but I have been proven wrong

 

[pwnest injun]

you rather he be a globalist shill sucking EU cock?

"edit" you know what, am a idiot. he should form a government that supports democracy of course. dictatorship is an awful form of government. should still tell the EU too fuck off.

Well, too bad because I'm going to like and support him double hard.

Dictatorship is great! Stealing is good! My internet opinion matters!
Pow. That Hungry guy whose name I don't know or care about is now the most respected man in history thanks to this post on the weirdo stalker shitpost forum.

 

[Maggots on a Train v2]

> In 2012, she and activist Chase Strangio co-founded the Lorena Borjas Community Fund, which helped cover bail and pay legal fees for for LGBTQ immigrants.
Won't somebody think of the gay criminals from other countries??? Should have just covered a bus ticket back where they came from.