Science The FDA would rather let people die from coronavirus than take blood from gay men


By Graham Gremore

The FDA just cleared the way for hospitals to begin using blood plasma to treat patients with coronavirus. Patients who have recovered from COVID-19 and who now carry the antibody for the virus are being encouraged to donate blood to help others.

There’s just one caveat.

Sexually active gay and bisexual men need not bother donating.

The FDA says it’s upholding its 12-month restriction on blood donations from gay and bisexual men, despite a nationwide blood shortage and a letter signed by 17 Democratic senators urging the agency to revisit its discriminatory deferral policy.

“As such, it is imperative that we move away from discriminatory donor deferral policies that prohibit many healthy individuals from contributing much-needed blood and blood products,” the letter states.

GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis called for the “antiquated ban” to be “immediately lifted.”

“The FDA cannot let an outdated and discriminatory ban on blood donations from gay and bi men get in the way of potentially life-saving treatment for the country’s painful current health crisis,” she says.

“Gay and bi men who have recovered from COVID-19 and want to donate plasma, or who want to help contribute to a nationwide shortage of blood, are banned from doing so as a result of the FDA. Continuing to enforce this antiquated policy is dangerous, irresponsible, and flies in the face of recommendations from medical experts.”

A spokesperson for the FDA says the agency “is aware there has been a significant reduction in blood and plasma donations around the country” and that its “working with the blood banking and source plasma industries” to find a solution.

It’s still not lifting the restriction though. Meanwhile, the U.S. coronavirus death toll just surpassed 4,000 today.
 
its discriminatory deferral policy.
Discrimination is the essence of rational thought and its never more clear than in situations like this; everyone with a functioning brain knows exactly why this is a prudent course of action but the lunatics that comprise the elite in our societies (and their duped lackeys) refuse to think rationally.

If there's one thing they hate above all others it's man's ability to think for himself, because they know it's the greatest threat to their loveless, soulless machinations.
 
>tfw if chocolate nıgger was still president the corona chan k/d would be greater
*sigh* why did drumpffft end up being so competent, i wanted to go looting the dead bodies like in my stalker games
This is happening in some communities.

Ultra orthodox are still holding mass gatherings in spite of the stay at home order. There was a situation with a wedding with 700 people the other week and over 50 now have been known to have come down with corona and 5 rabbis who were there are already dead.

And the sick and infected are still not taking precautions and are going out into other areas now like stores because their local shopping areas are not stocked.
 
Is it actually against gay and bi men specifically? What's different about gay and bi women that leave them exempt from it?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: A Useless Fish
Oh come on, this complaint? Again? Now?

GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis called for the “antiquated ban” to be “immediately lifted.”

It'll stop being antiquated when gays stop having the highest incidence of AIDS cases and transmission rates, or when they stop engaging in the most risky forms of AIDS transmission.

Where's the "hurr durr we are the party of SCIENCE" crowd when this shit pops up?

Lower chances of teh aids.

Not according to the CDC, they're lumped in with the gays. But maybe there's a data gathering issue that shows a difference, which isn't reflected here.
 
Back