StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

???
Huh?
Wut?????
Right, so if the Nazi isn't contradictory, he should shake hands with the feminist?
How exactly does it make their side look better? Or feminists are crypto-nazis?
It's not a symbol for feminism. It's a symbol for intersex, for the rare 0.0001% with genitals of both sexes. The assumption is made that nazi's would reauire every transgender to cut their genitals so they're only one sex. This would then expose their inconsistancy of saying they're against genital mutiliation and therefor their stance against male circumcision is jew hatred and their stance against female circumcision is muslim hatred.

I probably put more thought in it than they did collectively, though.
 
IMG_20200404_085253.png

IMG_20200404_085329.png


IMG_20200404_085734.png

What comic edit could this be about? Ah yes...


IMG_20200404_085404.png
 
Last edited:
This is why these people can't fathom jokes when they try their hands at it. You can't be short and sweet, because then you get ambiguity. When there's room for interpretation, these knuckle-draggers will assume the worst possible perception of it then complain it's abhorrent to their values as a self-fulfilling prophecy. The fact that they need to go into a multi-paragraph elaboration debating why it's offensive shows that they're filling in the blanks themselves, even with this innocuous edit which is comprised of three words and essentially reuses the joke. To avoid things like this, they'll turn what should be one-liners into overly verbose novels so only the most direct and meaningful understanding of the punch line can be interpreted, with zero room for a person to miss the joke or read too deeply into it.

What makes people laugh at jokes is that they figure it out on their own to some degree and piece together what's funny. When you remove that, you get jokes that aren't funny. In bitter irony, them arguing whether or not an edit implying gay man ravaging each others' buttholes is homophobic is funnier than their attempt at making an actual joke.
 
This is why these people can't fathom jokes when they try their hands at it. You can't be short and sweet, because then you get ambiguity. When there's room for interpretation, these knuckle-draggers will assume the worst possible perception of it then complain it's abhorrent to their values as a self-fulfilling prophecy. The fact that they need to go into a multi-paragraph elaboration debating why it's offensive shows that they're filling in the blanks themselves, even with this innocuous edit which is comprised of three words and essentially reuses the joke. To avoid things like this, they'll turn what should be one-liners into overly verbose novels so only the most direct and meaningful understanding of the punch line can be interpreted, with zero room for a person to miss the joke or read too deeply into it.

What makes people laugh at jokes is that they figure it out on their own to some degree and piece together what's funny. When you remove that, you get jokes that aren't funny. In bitter irony, them arguing whether or not an edit implying gay man ravaging each others' buttholes is homophobic is funnier than their attempt at making an actual joke.
That, and their beliefs are so fundamentally at odds with truth, that any joke that potentially exposes that truth needs long paragraphs of propaganda to silence the voice of logic inside their heads, and reaffirm themselves that they're always right, everyone they don't like is a nazi, nazi's are always wrong and if an antifa does the same thing as a nazi, only the latter is wrong. But it would probably still be better for the antifa to write a couple of grovelling paragraphs about their internalized wrongness and asking what the least homophobic synonym for buttchucker is.
 

As a lolcow there's not much known about him and I have yet to see him get into any big embarrassing Twitter drama. So as an internet personality there isn't much to go on to begin with unless he is doxed or there's some big leak. But even the antifa types don't seem to hate him enough to really go after him, they get too much content doing shitty parodies.
 
But even the antifa types don't seem to hate him enough to really go after him, they get too much content doing shitty parodies.
probably a lot more e-peen mileage for just rehashing the guy's stuff
if you bike lock him then he doesn't draw comics and you'd have to think of something for yourself
 
probably a lot more e-peen mileage for just rehashing the guy's stuff
if you bike lock him then he doesn't draw comics and you'd have to think of something for yourself
Plus, you need people to hate to justify your movement.

If they got rid of him, there's one less reason for them to fight nazis.
 
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Mike Stoklasa
As a lolcow there's not much known about him and I have yet to see him get into any big embarrassing Twitter drama. So as an internet personality there isn't much to go on to begin with unless he is doxed or there's some big leak. But even the antifa types don't seem to hate him enough to really go after him, they get too much content doing shitty parodies.
Why Stonetoss is a fascinating “cow” is not just him, it’s that he is quite possibly the single greatest sperg-out magnet we’ve seen in a while.
 
Why Stonetoss is a fascinating “cow” is not just him, it’s that he is quite possibly the single greatest sperg-out magnet we’ve seen in a while.

imo he's win far more often than he's a sperg. Some of his comics are retarded but I think he has super solid comedic abilities that get dismissed because "white nationalist comics",
 
Back