Zoosadist Zoosadism Megathread - Joshua "Kero the Wolf" Hoffman & Friends.

[gracious bobbly bits]

java/wild__life has unlocked her account and made a statement.

𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖉𝖑𝖎𝖋𝖊 on Twitter: "Today's events have shaken me to my cor…

archived 9 Apr 2020 08:08:17 UTC

archive.is

𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖉𝖑𝖎𝖋𝖊 on Twitter

“Today's events have shaken me to my core and filled me with shame and regret. I am stepping away from twitter while I get professional help. I am sorry to everyone who has been hurt by my actions and failures, and I take full responsibility for them.”

twitter.com

 

[Just Another Furgag Alog]

java/wild__life has unlocked her account and made a statement.

View attachment 1221917

http://archive.li/leknb

𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖉𝖑𝖎𝖋𝖊 on Twitter

“Today's events have shaken me to my core and filled me with shame and regret. I am stepping away from twitter while I get professional help. I am sorry to everyone who has been hurt by my actions and failures, and I take full responsibility for them.”

twitter.com

All it took was for people to find out she's a lying shit.

That apology still reads like a celebrity going to rehab.

 

[Niggerlicious]

java/wild__life has unlocked her account and made a statement.

View attachment 1221917

http://archive.li/leknb

𝖜𝖎𝖑𝖉𝖑𝖎𝖋𝖊 on Twitter

“Today's events have shaken me to my core and filled me with shame and regret. I am stepping away from twitter while I get professional help. I am sorry to everyone who has been hurt by my actions and failures, and I take full responsibility for them.”

twitter.com

So... it only took her getting caught lying to actually feel some fucking semblance of poorly described remorse?

She's definitely never coming back from this no matter what "help" she gets. She's branded herself as not only a dogfucker, but as a terrible, manipulative liar. I find it incredibly hard to believe she's going to go out of her way to get help at all. Her apology just sounds like what she thinks this mob wants to hear.

All forgiveness went flying out the window the moment she lied about not fucking her current dog. This bitch is fucking repugnant and a blight on the human race.

What pisses me off the most is knowing this bitch is going to come crawling back like a skeevy little termite, just like nothing happened, just like she did the past 2 or 3 times this occurred. Wait for it.

 

[hambulocetus]

she finally dropped below 10k followers too, damn. i hope this dog rapist is never able to show her ugly bloated face again

 

[Zoinks_Puma]

The bottledmilk1 twitter thread was already nuked. Twitter user moonshours archived the thread but didn't get the profile.
Bottledmilk1 Evidence Thread Archive.
Moonshours Twitter Profile
Moonshours Twitter Thread


Archive isn't working for me for some reason, any help archiving this twitter shit would be appreciated.
If what they're saying is true then the proper authorities have been informed, however I'm not taking any chances, all of this info has been forwarded to my local connection.

Informed local is working on contacting the various animal shelters and rescues in the county, when I showed Allison making face masks for local hospitals they informed me that the 2 closest hospitals to the dox locations would be Mad River Community Hospital, located in Arcata, CA, and St. Joeseph's Hospital in Eureka, CA, both locations are neighboring cities. They're going to ask around about the mask donations.

Given the info from the ole Vivisector article, it seems her old workplace, Sequoia Humane Society, turned a blind eye to the abuse after firing Allison, so I don't have much faith they'll take the new allegations seriously, but we're working on informing everyone anyways.

Local is having a hard time finding the proper avenue to report the evidence in the area, they want to make it count but are skeptical law enforcement will take it seriously with everything being online only.
Currently looking into public events in the area that Allison or her husband, Brian Curtis, were directly involved in, in order to establish the dox better for skeptical readers.

Keep on truckin' you beautiful bastards, hopefully all this is the nail in the coffin for wild__life, bet she's really regretting that callout "response" now.

 

[potato in mah painus]

Holy shit, that is some seriously damning evidence. Nice job.

I'm getting back in touch with the local that helped me get the dox before.
Now that there's undeniable proof I have no doubt they'll do everything they can to help put Allison away, or at least shed some light in the local county and prevent her from ever being able to obtain an animal again, or sell any of her chicken obsessive art.

She wants to appeal to the other zoos then let that be the only "community" that welcomes her ever again.

I'm taking the supposed ex-boyfriend testimony with a grain of salt, but if it's true I have a feeling we'll be seeing some more evidence against her soon.

Beyond the evidence threads focused on Allison, other furries are taking note of all the accounts that are sucking up and showing support for wild__life, many of which already overlap with zoophile blocklists across twitter and the zoos outed here in the various zoosadist threads, like Thylasaur. I'm gonna see if I can find more sus frequent flyers.

In the meantime, hubby Brian Curtis is promoting wild__life murrsuits on his twitter with pics included. (Knoxapoppin on Twitter)
K9cassius - NSFW islamic murrsuit content. - Account for the second suit shown in the wild__life murrsuit thread,

Spoiler: murrsuit tweets

View attachment 1221872

Regarding the archive, I'm reading that the photos were taken in 2017. Post-facto in the constitution means the federal charges won't stick unless evidence can be found that is timestamped after the new laws were put in effect.

 

[wopirish]

right now the cops and courts won't care enough to do anything about it. In other news the chinese flu can go from human to animal and back to human.

 

[Spoonomancer]

semi off-topic and probably asked before, but why is it that every person with a dog fursona that's the same breed of their dog, usually a German Shepard or Husky, turns out to be some sort of dogfucker?

 

[break these cuffs]

semi off-topic and probably asked before, but why is it that every person with a dog fursona that's the same breed of their dog, usually a German Shepard or Husky, turns out to be some sort of dogfucker?

Because furries want to fuck animals.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

semi off-topic and probably asked before, but why is it that every person with a dog fursona that's the same breed of their dog, usually a German Shepard or Husky, turns out to be some sort of dogfucker?

There's a psychological word for it but I forget. It's like when you're trying to live out a dream vicariously. For furries, it's through their sonas. RPing having " feral sex " is pretty much the tell-tale sign they're a zoo.

 

[Pukebucket]

There's a psychological word for it but I forget. It's like when you're trying to live out a dream vicariously. For furries, it's through their sonas. RPing having " feral sex " is pretty much the tell-tale sign they're a zoo.

I'd argue that not everyone into feral wants to necessarily fuck IRL animals, as feral implies there is some human capacity for intelligence; as opposed to just drawn bestiality (which furries often denote as "different" for some reason even if on the surface it looks like the same thing). However, if their "feral" animals are based off their IRL pets' breed or a specific type of pet that they want to get later, then definitely take that with a grain of salt for sure.

It's not far off from babyfurs having children and living vicariously through them in a similar fashion; even if they aren't molesting their kids, you're still going to see them encouraging weird behaviors a lot of the time due to the way they skew an otherwise normal relationship to feed their interests in, as you've said, a vicarious fashion; for babyfurs, you should keep an eye out for shit where delayed development in toilet training is concerned, or weaning off boob juice and puree's much later than they should. These could be signs of overt signs of general neglect, but they could also be symptoms of hands-off parental fetishization. It's still a form of sexual exploitation, to clarify, it just doesn't involve direct molestation.

Here is an update on the horsefucker that was defending Wild Life in her recent tweet threads.

Several people contacted his employer/where he volunteered with all of the tweets that had been screencapped/archived. Here is the response they gave.
View attachment 1224418

Not sure if anything has come of it in real life, but the guy changed his his handle and layout in an attempt to lay low.

View attachment 1224422
https://twitter.com/Stnicolastesla (archive)

I'm not remotely surprised that 3qual3quine was lying about his bosses accepting his relationship. A lot of zoos, pedophiles, incest fetishists, etc. like to claim that people in their direct vicinity are knowing and complicit in their interests, especially while posturing about how legalizing such things should be a priority for the LGBTAQ+. Their partners and parents might not give a shit (if they don't participate in the same sort of garbage themselves), but honestly thinking that your boss or local community or therapist is going to be a-ok with you claiming that they not only condone but encourage your sexually abusive behaviors is a raving delusion. Even if your therapist or boss just goes "mm, well, you do you", they are not going to risk their careers or reputation to defend your public interest in kiddy diddling and sheep buggery.

Edit: Had to change "m i l k" to "boob juice" since this is the single conversation where "milk" doesn't apply.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

It's not far off from babyfurs having children and living vicariously through them in a similar fashion; even if they aren't molesting their kids, you're still going to see them encouraging weird behaviors a lot of the time due to the way they skew an otherwise normal relationship to feed their interests in, as you've said, a vicarious fashion; for babyfurs, you should keep an eye out for shit where delayed development in toilet training is concerned, or weaning off tard cum and puree's much later than they should. These could be signs of overt signs of general neglect, but they could also be symptoms of hands-off parental fertilization. It's still a form of sexual exploitation, to clarify, it just doesn't involve direct molestation.

Yeah I think we've already seen a pretty good example of this recently

 

[FukuMuku]

 

[Calamity]

View attachment 1225328
View attachment 1225329

... Or it's the result of an animal acting on instinct and humping things for dominance and a symptom of energy release after being too excited (eg. after playing), not necessarily because it enjoys sexual contact with someone. Female dogs are well known for humping things too.
Orrrr it's because it got groomed and trained into doing so on command. Fuck these people.

 

[Papa Adolfo's Take'n'Bake]

View attachment 1225328
View attachment 1225329

There's a difference between instinct and informed consent. Something that has the sapience of a 2 year old child is NOT capable of conceptualizing the possible physical and psychological consequences of their actions and is thus NOT able to give informed, and thus full consent.

Who the fuck am I kidding, these sick fucks will sooner do humanity a solid and jump into a woodchipper before actually trying to think this shit through.

 

[Pukebucket]

View attachment 1225328
View attachment 1225329

I always hated this argument because it's the same one bogstandard rapists love to use in order to justify their actions. This is basically just the zoophile version of "I didn't rape them! They were wet/had a boner so that means they wanted it!" Just because someone or something knows what sex is and has a physical reaction to stimuli does not mean that they necessarily want to do it, or that their reasons for doing it couldn't be something other than sexual desire.

Edit:

Going to start using this every time someone comes in here with "someone has feral porn in their account, so they must be a dogfucker IRL".

 

[camopattern]

I always hated this argument because it's the same one bogstandard rapists love to use in order to justify their actions. This is basically just the zoophile version of "I didn't rape them! They were wet/had a boner so that means they wanted it!" Just because someone or something knows what sex is and has a physical reaction to stimuli does not mean that they necessarily want to do it, or that their reasons for doing it couldn't be something other than sexual desire.

Edit:

Going to start using this every time someone comes in here with "someone has feral porn in their account, so they must be a dogfucker IRL".

Sorry but if a dog dick is what turns you on then you're already on that slope to being said dogfucker.

 

[Just Another Furgag Alog]

I always hated this argument because it's the same one bogstandard rapists love to use in order to justify their actions. This is basically just the zoophile version of "I didn't rape them! They were wet/had a boner so that means they wanted it!" Just because someone or something knows what sex is and has a physical reaction to stimuli does not mean that they necessarily want to do it, or that their reasons for doing it couldn't be something other than sexual desire.

Edit:

Going to start using this every time someone comes in here with "someone has feral porn in their account, so they must be a dogfucker IRL".

I don't personally like that image

Spoiler: Sperging

because it's used to excuse loads of people who want to fuck pokemon. It gets passed around a lot when it comes to "well X isn't a problem because all of their animals satisfy, and that means there's nothing wrong with the fact that I exclusively jerk off to the porn involving animals where communication of signs of intelligence aren't part of the images at all even when they're fucking people."

I can't think of any artist names off the top of my head but I know I've seen shit like that. Jerking it to animals is still jerking it to animals. The artists are enabling it, the consumers are jerking to it. It's like when that cub-artist was contacted by a pedophile who said they used the artist's porn to groom their niece. Shit rolls downhill. Even if there's a moral reason for feral art to be okay, it should still be avoided because people are fucking idiots.

And also because a mentally ill or mentally deficient person can pass that test and still not actually be consenting.

 

[sad cowboy cat]

It's like when that cub-artist was contacted by a pedophile who said they used the artist's porn to groom their niece.

excuse me what

 

[Pukebucket]

Sorry but if a dog dick is what turns you on then you're already on that slope to being said dogfucker.

There are literally thousands of normies (not even normie furs, just regular-ass people) who buy "exotic" and "novelty" animal-shaped dicks from Bad Dragon and other sites who don't fuck their animals. Even within the furry fandom, the couple hundred zoos I've listed so far are maybe less than 1% of the fandom. That's an awful lot of people who are horny about dogs who haven't actually fucked them.

Given how dumb furries and zoophiles tend to be, it's not like they hide themselves very well. Even if there are more in hiding odds are it's maybe 3% maximum, and that's just of the current active fandom (not including those who just post bad furry porn to FA, of which there are quite literally millions).

The problem isn't people getting horny over cartoon critters, even four-legged ones. The problem is the handful who have weaseled their way into positions of power in order to cover for their fuckbuddies while pretending that the furry fandom is completely clean and clear of any issues whatsoever.

I don't personally like that image

Spoiler: Sperging

because it's used to excuse loads of people who want to fuck pokemon. It gets passed around a lot when it comes to "well X isn't a problem because all of their animals satisfy, and that means there's nothing wrong with the fact that I exclusively jerk off to the porn involving animals where communication of signs of intelligence aren't part of the images at all even when they're fucking people."

I can't think of any artist names off the top of my head but I know I've seen shit like that. Jerking it to animals is still jerking it to animals. The artists are enabling it, the consumers are jerking to it. It's like when that cub-artist was contacted by a pedophile who said they used the artist's porn to groom their niece. Shit rolls downhill. Even if there's a moral reason for feral art to be okay, it should still be avoided because people are fucking idiots.

And also because a mentally ill or mentally deficient person can pass that test and still not actually be consenting.

I mean, yeah, of course. It's hardly a flawless system and there are without a doubt zoophiles using feral porn for their own purposes. I'm just trying to keep people from coming into the thread like "hey this person favorited a pic of his fursona fucking Nala from the Lion King, he must be a zoo".