I would like to point something out I recently noticed.
to my recollection, the "hypocrisy" thing is a new and suspect problem, as evidenced by the fact that
1. a kf containing wrong information that was unnecessary to begin with
was actually deleted with the correction added, because it was a valid point to do so. Following this event you would expect that further requests of the same type would be discussed and made freely, but they were not (adding onto this, requests to explain further posts were made, and fulfilled consistently, so this cannot be blamed on shyness regarding requests).
2. the hypocrisy thing is a new development, as evidenced by the fact that previous conversation regarding the topic made no mention of it:
(anyone with access to the server can search for these phrases and obtain more information. I am also willing to dump the entirety of the conversation between glitchedpuppet and hare should there be a need for it, but right now I feel that this topic doesn't warrant it.)
I feel like this inconsistency is suspect because it highlights a tendency I've been observing with glip in particular, that is, that they seem fond of rewriting their own feelings in order to absolve themselves however they feel it is necessary.
as an example, I want to think back to the pedophile art drawn by glip. it's been stated multiple times that glip drew it as a way to cope with trauma from CSA, yet there is absolutely no proof of it in the archived portion of the blog. healing trauma from csa through art had never once come up in the entire run of the blog, there are reblogs of pk/rhodes content with approving commentary:
and the closest thing I could find regarding that sort of material that wasn't short of an outright endorsement... still is?
(I remember in the blog, there was also an ask where an user aired out their concerns over this sort of content and was met by glip with a shadmanesque "i draw what i want none of this is real noone is forcing you to look at this" however i could find no evidence of it through the archived pages and i throw this out in hopes that someone remembers too, if I am mistaken however please feel free to ignore this)
I'd also like to point out the story I shared earlier of glip and the N drawing. we know that the picture was not a commission, but it was drawn out of actual interest as evidenced by this post:
Long time lurker blah blah blah, just want to get some stuff I remember from back when PK did PMDE and earlier art out.
The N Childrape sketches and drawings were NOT commissions, at least I don't remember them being commissions. They were actually fanart for a fan-fiction writer friend named Ginnypants (on tumblr) and Ginny-Perry everywhere else. Ginny's work specialized in the daddy/son rape duo, so PK instantly took a shine to her. Ginny was usually tagged into PKs posts with N lewd subjects, because a lot of the art was based on the fan-fiction. They even talked about cosplaying as N and Ghetsis at a con together.
Anyway, Ginny specialized in the rape stories, but it seems like she's removed alot of her older ones from her fanfiction.net due to "young children" reading things they shouldn't. Except, she kept a pretty gross one up featuring Ghetsis raping his son, thinking about how the last time he had sex was when he fathered N 7 years ago. So that would make N, what, 6 or 7? Hey kids, don't read that consensual man hump, lets read some mental-abusing,controlling father rape!
From what I remember, Ginny was a weird chick. It seemed like every few weeks she was in the hospital for a suicide attempt or mental episode. She vented on tumblr alot how it seemed noone ever saw the signs, like when she constantlyburned herself with the hairstraightner/curling iron or how many pills she took. Also she really liked Guinea pigs? She had two, Spoonie
and Nunchuk, and I always felt bad for them. Like once she uploaded holding them in a blender, and when she was questioned on why she had the guinea pigs in a blender, she said "they like it in there." She was also obsessed with educating women on masturbation. She bragged about not wearing underwear EVER, but in her HOW TO JERK OFF GUIDE, she discusses how wearing panties during can make the experience better.
View attachment 493636
It looks like shes abandoned her ginnypants tumblr though, but she must have been called out on stuff before as her whole tumblr already has an archive!
Anyway enjoy some child rape stories and creepy cosplay from Ginny:
https://archive.li/bxn2E
Glip and Ginny Father/Son Bonding Moment
View attachment 493634
https://archive.li/Mlgvh
Ginny Fanfiction account
https://archive.fo/ErbhI
And Child rape Fanfic (NSFW duh)
the N story (where marl tells glip that drawing child rape is bad because of personal experience) seems incredibly suspect in this scenario because it implies that glip felt bad after posting it and gained some understanding about the harm surrounding the scenario, yet there is ample evidence to suggest the opposite. for example: why keep the post up? why continue to draw scenarios where children are being sexually exploited? I'm not saying the story is fake, I'm saying that the conclusions you're supposed to draw from it (that glip felt bad after drawing it and that this affected their relationship with this type of media) are false.
(another more stark example is the constant statements of glip only ever taking gross commissions out of a dire financial necessity, when there's multiple blogposts about them bragging of being financially stable enough to purchase several designer breed cats and dining at gordon ramsey's burger place, you can't really claim you're destitute enough to desperately fulfill any commission including things that clash against your personal beliefs, while also having multiple posts both flaunting your wealth, being extremely picky with what you're willing to be commissioned for and outright saying that you had the liberty to only be commissioned things that you were explicitely into,
as someone who has actually been through abject poverty, I find this point really insulting)
an explanation they might offer to these types of inconsistencies could be that "they didn't know their own feelings, and through further exploration they managed to divine the REAL feelings that they only had hints of previously" which is as valid as it is worthless of an explanation, because it simply establishes that you're deciding to be unable to be held accountable for anything and everything you did, even with proof, because you didn't know yourself. using this excuse you could decide to recontextualize anything and everything you've done, for example, I can decide that I never meant any of my kf posts, or indeed that anyone here is not responsible for their posts because: they were dealing with trauma unproductively/they were venting out anger/they were coerced by the Great Kiwi Hivemind/etc. and that now they have clarity and that they are in whatever form is most pleasing to the current situation. How much of this is a genuine attempt to let feelings in your mind solidify and how much of it is a (intentional or unintentional) way to retcon what happened in order to absolve yourself of any hints that you were the person you were.
note that this explanation is never brought up for any misdeeds the other party has done, rather they're content to equate them with marl, call them a black hole of a person or hopeless or otherwise accuse them of having some indelible moral failing that not only are they completely free of, but makes the other party into an unreasonable monster they shouldn't be expected to deal with in a mature human manner.
