War Canadian Armed Forces requires all personnel to stop using gendered pronouns - Leafy lunacy


In a new policy change, the Canadian Armed Forces will no longer be using gendered pronouns in official reports.

Documents obtained by conservative commentator Aaron Gunn and presented to The Post Millennial reveal that military personnel are no longer allowed to write he or she, but must replace it with they/them pronouns, regardless of an individual’s preferred pronouns.

Issued via Canadian Forces General Message, these changes that deprive a person of their sex based identity in writing are meant to encourage gender diversity. In reports on personnel, no superior will be allowed to use pronouns that designate or refer to a person’s biological sex. The notice reads:

“Based on a recent CAF cultural and normative shift to promote gender diversity and associated inclusiveness, CFPAS [Canadian Forces Personnel Appraisal System] writing policy and guide will also reflect this new reality where sex, gender identity, and gender expression are prohibited grounds of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act. Forthwith the use of gender pronouns such as quote he/his and she/her unquote are not to be used when drafting pers. Members will be referred to by rank and name or by using gender-neutral pronouns such as they/their.”

“Based on a recent CAF cultural and normative shift to promote gender diversity and associated inclusiveness, CFPAS [Canadian Forces Personnel Appraisal System] writing policy and guide will also reflect this new reality where sex, gender identity, and gender expression are prohibited grounds of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act. Forthwith the use of gender pronouns such as quote he/his and she/her unquote are not to be used when drafting pers. Members will be referred to by rank and name or by using gender-neutral pronouns such as they/their.”

In 2016, Bill C-16 was passed amending the Canadian Human Rights Act. It added gender expression to the list of groups that are protected from discrimination, as well as adjusting hate speech and hate crime laws to include protections for gender expression.

While use of preferred pronouns have been considered a necessary element of the promotion and inclusion of gender diversity, this change by the CAF is the first time that preferred pronouns are being officially discounted in favour of a catch-all, gender neutral pronoun system.
--------------------------
Isn't this just an unnecessary step in complicating the job of the army since now they can't even accidentally refer to somebody as a he/she in documents? I get it's for legal reason but just don't get involved with this stuff in the first place.
 
The communists are responsible for a far higher death toll than the Nazis holocaust.

Or are they?

When were comparing lethality we need to consider scale and potential. Usually the comparison is made to Mao and Stalin. Both were in command of much larger countries over much longer periods of time. I’d have to look up the specifics again to make sure, but I believe that in the past I calculated it and found that the lethality (and this is assuming that we can treat deaths from government incompetence, like Communist famines, as morally equivalent to executions) is the exact reverse: Mao less lethal than Stalin, Stalin less lethal than hitler when accounting for reign length and population difference.

And if Generalplan Ost was real then Hitlers intended death toll would have been much higher than a worst case scenario under Stalin.
 
They should be allowed if they pass the tests. Problem is that they get easier treatment.
Military in general is more suitable for men but there are physically exceptional women and military jobs where physical side isn't that important. There are reasonable accommodations to women like better fitting uniforms (too mismatched clothes can be safety hazard), bras and feminine hygiene products but actual standard of behavior and results should be the same.
 
"I am Gunnery Sergeant Bergeron, your senior drill instructor. From now on you will speak only when spoken to, and the first and last words out of your filthy sewers will be "Sx" Do you maggots understand that?"

"Sx, yes Sx."

"Bullshit, I can't hear you. Sound off like you got a pair! But I'm not implying any specific organ, those with a pair of testes, breasts, or even nipples are still valid!"

"SX, YES SX!"

"If you people leave my island, if you survive recruit training, you will be a weapon. You will be a minister of death praying for war. But until that day, you are pukes. You are the lowest form of life on Earth. You are not even humx fucking beings. You are nothing but unorganized grab-asstic pieces of amphibian shit! Because I am hard, you will not like me. But the more you hate me, the more you will learn. I am hard but I am fair. There is no racial bigotry here. I do not look down on people of color, people lacking color, and people who are a color's soul trapped in a specific color's body. Here you are all equally worthless. And my orders are to weed out all non-hackers who do not pack the gear to serve in my beloved Corps. Do you maggots understand that?"
 
If women should be allowed in the military because of WW2 female conscripts and partisans, why not allow child soldiers? Long history of them.

Also, more to the point, going to be real confusing with all those "they" in the report. "They assaulted the hill", "they attacked them", "they were injured". Only confusing when you conflate singular with plural.
 
This is so tolerant, I can't wait until Canada outlaws using gendered pronouns in both their languages.

You can't just strip gender out of a language like French without rendering it a total mess.

You can't strip gender out of a society without rendering it a total mess, you think Canadians or any of the other fag-activists really care? It's about making them special and giving them special protections under the law because without legal recognition, these people would be viewed as lesser than average human beings. I hope the ant infestation in China helps cull their mind-diseased population some.
 
Or are they?

When were comparing lethality we need to consider scale and potential. Usually the comparison is made to Mao and Stalin. Both were in command of much larger countries over much longer periods of time. I’d have to look up the specifics again to make sure, but I believe that in the past I calculated it and found that the lethality (and this is assuming that we can treat deaths from government incompetence, like Communist famines, as morally equivalent to executions) is the exact reverse: Mao less lethal than Stalin, Stalin less lethal than hitler when accounting for reign length and population difference.

And if Generalplan Ost was real then Hitlers intended death toll would have been much higher than a worst case scenario under Stalin.
History doesnt ask what if. It asks what happened. So from the historical point of view Commies are worse.
 
French to them is just White Spanish.

If they can butcher Latino and Latina with Latinx, then they can butcher le Monsx.
They can try, but I suspect there would be some pushback. I'm a bit hazy on how this applies to a federal institution like the military as opposed to provincial level entities, but iirc the French language "police" is granted wide latitude and can levy heavy penalties against people and organizations that fail to comply with their established linguistic orthodoxy. It's like the Academie Francaise on steroids.
 
butthurt CanComm detected. What's the matter, you don't like it when your plans are called out? Go eat some bats or suck off horses and introduce more diseases to the world.

I'm reducing your maple syrup ration comrade. You should know that 'suck off' is gendered language. You should use 'perform oral sex' instead.

If this happens again I'm sending you to a gulag in Quebec.
 
Just some tin foiling:
If Canada is set on allowing the genderspecials and troons in the military, as well as having people bend to their will, does that mean the Canadian government is trying to kill off the genderspecials and troons? Does this make Trudeau based? Is Trudeau a Farmer?
Seems more like a demoralization tactic than anything. Trans folk in the military's always been a bad idea due to their hormone-induced emotional instability. But now, giving those psychopaths the power to get anyone in trouble who doesn't tiptoe around them? Yeah, that won't cause a shitload of tension and infighting.

Fuck it, let's raid Canada and take their resources.

trudeau if you kill your enemies they win.JPG

Canada's just chomping at the bit to win.
 
Back