Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

You sound like one of those clingy bratty children who thinks mommy always owes them her attention. You clearly have a skewed concept of motherhood because either your mom gave you absolutely zero boundaries as a child or you are a grown adult still throwing a tantrum because your mom didn't let you have all of her attention non-stop all day.

So "everyone makes mistakes" but I'm a narc for triple posting? How do you reconcile that contradiction in your moral philosophy there?

You're also a moron. Obviously Im up at 2 am nursing a newborn. What an idiot.




That's not him dummy. That's a fake profile where someone yanked his photo. Get a life.


"Every human has their failures and mistakes": can you defend that moral theory? Or are you just projecting your own imagination and self onto others by saying that?

To the contrary, Yahushua was not Elohim ("G-d"). That'd idolatry to call Yahushua Elohim ("G-d").





Another Stalker here. Creepy.

Yahushua is not Elohim

This paper answers objections from biblical scholars that state that believing in Yahushua as The Messiah is "idolatry". Critical analysis of the Hebrew names of Elohim and their relation to statements in "The Gospels" is

www.academia.edu

If you were truly up "nursing your child" why waste your time on the farms lmao, stop spewing bullshit, you missed the attention.
Also, that was Marshall lmao, not some sort of fake, it was likely one of the alts mashed back into his main account, you dumb fucking bint.
I think it's fair enough to say that everyone has made failures and mistakes realistically, it's a definite statistical probability, this isn't even a debate of morality.

It's amazing how most of your "arguments" can be defeated with a sentence at most.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

If you were truly up "nursing your child" why waste your time on the farms lmao, stop spewing bullshit, you missed the attention.
Also, that was Marshall lmao, not some sort of fake, it was likely one of the alts mashed back into his main account, you dumb fucking bint.
I think it's fair enough to say that everyone has made failures and mistakes realistically, it's a definite statistical probability, this isn't even a debate of morality.

It's amazing how most of your "arguments" can be defeated with a sentence at most.

Two words is usually enough and those are "you're wrong".

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Two words is usually enough and those are "you're wrong".

Realistically, you could defeat her with silence, but that's not as funny as watching her tard out

 

[A Cardboard Box]

"Every human has their failures and mistakes": can you defend that moral theory? Or are you just projecting your own imagination and self onto others by saying that?

To the contrary, Yahushua was not Elohim ("G-d"). That'd idolatry to call Yahushua Elohim ("G-d").

Yahushua is not Elohim

This paper answers objections from biblical scholars that state that believing in Yahushua as The Messiah is "idolatry". Critical analysis of the Hebrew names of Elohim and their relation to statements in "The Gospels" is

www.academia.edu

Are you aware that there are copious amounts of artifacts covered in Sumerian cuneiform scripts that predate even the oldest hebrew artifacts?

 

[Logical Fallacies]

Just to be clear, I said I never failed at anything.

That's the most ridiculously arrogant thing I ever heard.

You sound like one of those clingy bratty children who thinks mommy always owes them her attention. You clearly have a skewed concept of motherhood because either your mom gave you absolutely zero boundaries as a child or you are a grown adult still throwing a tantrum because your mom didn't let you have all of her attention non-stop all day.

Just because she popped out six kids doesn't make her a good mother and her accusing someone of having a skewed concept of motherhood is absolutely hilarious.

 

[LoverofPi]

"Every human has their failures and mistakes": can you defend that moral theory? Or are you just projecting your own imagination and self onto others by saying that?

It's not a moral theory. Morality is irrelevant to whether or not people make mistakes and fail at tasks. But again, it's very very telling how averse to the very idea of admitting failure you are.

On a very related note, your deflecting away from the hebrew discussion the moment people starting pushing your shit in with facts.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Are you aware that there are copious amounts of artifacts covered in Sumerian cuneiform scripts that predate even the oldest hebrew artifacts?

Hell, the word El/ Elo is used by many Northwest Semitic countries and even that is based on Proto Semitic language. You also have the Canaanite religion referring to El. Elohim, referring to the children of El..Probably one of my favourite mythologies due to gods like Ba'al, Chemosh, Dagon, and Mot. Probably because of the close ties with Mesopotamian mythology who they share many beliefs and gods while also having their own gods like Nergal

 

[White Baby]

To the contrary, Yahushua was not Elohim ("G-d"). That'd idolatry to call Yahushua Elohim ("G-d").

It's in the fucking Torah.

The word elohim or 'elohiym (ʼĕlôhîym) is a grammatically plural noun for "gods" or "deities" or various other words in Biblical Hebrew.

In Hebrew, the ending -im normally indicates a masculine plural. However, when referring to the Jwish God, Elohim is usually understood to be grammatically singular (i.e. it governs a singular verb or adjective). In Modern Hebrew, it is often referred to in the singular despite the -im ending that denotes plural masculine nouns in Hebrew.

 

[Spergichu]

"Every human has their failures and mistakes": can you defend that moral theory? Or are you just projecting your own imagination and self onto others by saying that?

To the contrary, Yahushua was not Elohim ("G-d"). That'd idolatry to call Yahushua Elohim ("G-d").

Yahushua is not Elohim

This paper answers objections from biblical scholars that state that believing in Yahushua as The Messiah is "idolatry". Critical analysis of the Hebrew names of Elohim and their relation to statements in "The Gospels" is

www.academia.edu

Oh wow, 26 pages of absolute dreck. Like your other "academic" papers, it reads like an uninterested high schooler wrote it. All of your sources are just your other papers or your own re.Tarded interpretation of scripture. I know I shouldn't be spending my time analyzing your pile of trash because you'll just respond with "yeah torah" and blow me off because you are physically incapable of accepting you might be incorrect or misinformed.

 

[White Baby]

Oh wow, 26 pages of absolute dreck. Like your other "academic" papers, it reads like an uninterested high schooler wrote it. All of your sources are just your other papers or your own re.Tarded interpretation of scripture. I know I shouldn't be spending my time analyzing your pile of trash because you'll just respond with "yeah torah" and blow me off because you are physically incapable of accepting you might be incorrect or misinformed.

I'm truly exceptional for not seeing that link because she dunks on herself in the first two sentences. Actual theologians would cite the claims that "...some Jewish religious communities that believing in J-sus is a form of idolatry" and "Some Jewish scholars have become more aware of Hebraic variants of “J-sus” being used in other religious sects and simultaneously assert the view that believing in “Yeshua” is also a form of idolatry". This whole thing is full of missing citations and conclusions pulled directly out of her ass.

 

[break these cuffs]

Imagine priding yourself on being a True Blue Mountain Jew Torah scholar and getting schooled on it by a bunch of autistic nazis who you lust after hate.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Guaranteed for all her spew about breastfeeding, that little beaner is failing to thrive right now because it won't take the tit. TBF, I don't blame it one bit. That's why she's sperging on the Farms instead of doing her job as a mother.

 

[redcent]

Guaranteed for all her spew about breastfeeding, that little beaner is failing to thrive right now because it won't take the tit. TBF, I don't blame it one bit. That's why she's sperging on the Farms instead of doing her job as a mother.

That's all she's good for, getting her infected boob sucked by her babbies and getting mi.lked for lols on the farms. No wonder she keeps popping them out, as soon as they reach thinking age and feel the need to get away from ruth her crushing feeling of being a useless waste of oxygen will come crashing down

The only time in her life she's ever needed is when she breastfeed. If she ever got breastcancer and had her tits removed she'd probably have a breakdown

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

THEORY: Melinda just has kids because Marshall has a thing for sucking tiddy mi.lk. Too bad he has no taste, shit must be curdled to hell and back.

 

[Adamska]

Oh wow, 26 pages of absolute dreck. Like your other "academic" papers, it reads like an uninterested high schooler wrote it. All of your sources are just your other papers or your own re.Tarded interpretation of scripture. I know I shouldn't be spending my time analyzing your pile of trash because you'll just respond with "yeah torah" and blow me off because you are physically incapable of accepting you might be incorrect or misinformed.

Amazing how she's so retardedly narcissistic she can't even cite others for her shitshow of a work and only cites herself or makes up other scholars to pretend people agree with her. Very telling of her mindset right there, up there with desperately posting for attention at all hours at the day.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Amazing how she's so retardedly narcissistic she can't even cite others for her shitshow of a work and only cites herself or makes up other scholars to pretend people agree with her. Very telling of her mindset right there, up there with desperately posting for attention at all hours at the day.

Pretty sure that Oliver Smith cited other people in his papers. Hell, people in his chosen field even discussed his papers.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Just to be clear, I said I never failed at anything. I did not say I've never made a mistake. Also, I think you are using "sin" and "mistake" interchangeably when bringing J-sus into the topic. "Mistake" is not the same as "sin". However, The Messiah is not the only person in the scriptures who was sinless.

Your statement is also a contradiction. You say "no human is perfect" but then say that J-sus, who was 100% human, was without error. So which is it?

As far as human ability to be perfect is concerned, I highly disagree. Being perfect (in your soul) is actually commanded in the Scriptures. It *is* humanly possible to be perfect (in your soul).




Not according to Virginia law. Do your research.



All those are ASSUMPTIONS, not actual "failures". Look at the definition of failure again. It is being unsuccessful in achieving ONE'S goal. None of the examples you gave are related to my goals at all.





Did you drink alcohol before making this comment?

Marshall was never on this thread. I've never seen him on this thread.

There were 40 pages of activity without me ever saying anything. There are now an additional 230+/- pages since I arrived about 3 months ago. At one point I did not comment for two weeks, at which point there were an additional 3 to 5 pages (depending on your viewer/browser used) that continued without me being present. Several others times there have been 2 to 3 pages that continued without me present. So you have about 50 pages that happened while I was not present and about 225 pages that were the result of me interacting with anonymous people on this thread.

Point being: my interactions grew the thread, they did not start the thread, neither did the thread stop as a result of me not responding on several occasions.




It was just a standstill, neither agreeing with the other. No place else to take the discussion in my POV



I'm too overloaded with other things right now to file another suit. I could take it back to the Circuit Court of Wise County (fix the pleading and re-file) but I just have too much on my plate right now. Also, this county is not a big fan of pro-se litigants and in my POV, they will just find a way to manipulate the outcome not in my favor. If I lived in another county in Northern or central Virginia, were pro-se litigants are received better, and even encouraged, I believe would have a better outcome.



Still can't find POINT A I see. In case you haven't noticed I'm hitting a REPLY button. (Let's see if you catch that one)






Do you have a single receipt for anything you have paid for for my children?

A little Parsha Torah for you, you silly cunt: Arrogance is akin to idolatry

Parshat Vayishlach: The Idol Within

Beware of the traps of arrogance.

www.aish.com

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

A little Parsha Torah for you, you silly cunt: Arrogance is akin to idolatry

Parshat Vayishlach: The Idol Within

Beware of the traps of arrogance.

www.aish.com

Nice article, but ironically, it acquits me of your accusation

According to the article the definition of arrogant is:

"Arrogance is a person thinking that he is the most important part of this world. Nothing matters more than me and my will"

Well, I certainly cleared that threshold!

And according to that article a humble person is:

"As such, a humble person will stick to his values no matter what the world says"

Cleared that threshold too

Btw -- did you actually read the article before you posted it?

 

[White Baby]

Nice article, but ironically, it acquits me of your accusation

According to the article the definition of arrogant is:

"Arrogance is a person thinking that he is the most important part of this world. Nothing matters more than me and my will"

Well, I certainly cleared that threshold!

And according to that article a humble person is:

"As such, a humble person will stick to his values no matter what the world says"

Cleared that threshold too

Btw -- did you actually read the article before you posted it?

You can't cherrypick definitions to avoid your sin, Melinda.

the quality of being unpleasantly proud and behaving as if you are more important than, or know more than, other people:
He has a self-confidence that is sometimes seen as arrogance.

Sounds exactly like you if I do say so myself.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

The more emoticons you use, the more it shows how not-bothered and totally secure you are, Melinda. Much like your habit of revenge-rating posts.