She has other mad rules about no water between meals
Night wetting is developmental - the brain needs to mature and produce a certain hormone. They will be dry at night when they are dry and that’s that. She needs to give them free access to water - kids dehydrate fast in hot weather and she’s asking for kidney issues.
The Queen must be sickened inside to see what her country has become. The service and sacrifice of millions of British and Commonwealth people, in two wars, has, in the end, gone for naught.
Believe me, a huge proportion of british society feels this way. It’s frustrating and maddening.
Get this ... his solution is to open schools to infect children, and those with parents over 45 would get some kind of magic pass, to keep their kids at home.
That’s pretty much what sweden is doing. Daycares and junior schools or whatever the equivalent is are open. The elderly and vulnerable are told to stay home and everyone else is told to distance. The effect will be infection among the section of the population least likely to be badly affected - sweden will end this way sooner than the Uk. I reckon probably 15-20% of Stockholm is infected now. Doubling every week to be conservative. That’s the worst over before autumn. Because don’t forget in autumn flu comes back, and flu stretches the health service anyway. We do NOT want another peak of infection to coincide with flu season.
This is probably the way to go outside of major population centres. Cocoon the vulnerable, get everyone else infected. Cities may need short sharp lockdowns but even they cannot stay locked down forever - we need society to operate, or we are headed back to the dark ages. If the bulk of the infected are young, the pressure on heath is lower anyway, and the work for herd immunity is further along. When the elderly and vulnerable get infected, the peak has passed. It’s a sensible strategy.
I keep thinking there won't be a vaccine, because we already have "3 strains" with "dozens of sub-clusters" which means we have hundreds of strains, and uh, a vaccine won't be one size catch all.
But apparently that's doomerposting:
Experts say it's likely too early to worry
www.medpagetoday.com
archived 14 Apr 2020 03:13:00 UTC
archive.vn
A vaccine is highly unlikely. Everyone thinks a vaccine will solve all, but the flu vaccine is never 100% effective, hardly close to that number. SARS and MERS never received vaccines.
We don’t need a vaccine. The Virus will naturally mutate to it’s lowest possible symptomatic state by then.
We do need a vaccine. The existence of different strains doesn’t mean that they won’t be covered by a single vaccine. A strain is not always different enough and it isn’t always Clinically more or less severe. What the articles about strains and mutations aren’t making clear to the public is that those sturdiest are done to look at evolution and spread routes. It’s looking at how the virus has moved, not at how it’s changing clinically.
Flu mutates in a very specific way that means it can have very different antigens on its surface - that’s why there nonjniversalnflu vaccine yet. SARS we have no vaccine because the funding was all pulled rapidly, and they’d only got to the point of early development. The vaccine they had also had issues with immune enhancement and needed scrapping and restarting. MERS I’m not as familiar with, but after the outbreak was stopped, funding dried up fast.
The corona vaccine seems to be to a conserved bit of spike protein, and it should work. But it needs testing and it’s months away.
Why do you think we haven’t had “second waves” of swine flu?
We have. A new pandemic strain of flu is devastating, but after that initial antigenic shift (see sperging earlier in thread) the form of the virus echoes around the world for years after. It tends to get milder, other strains pop up, and replace it, but echoes of each pandemic flu went round for decades.
That’s a slow process though - we still need a vaccine because the mutation to milder happens reliably only in decades plus.
I also noticed that recovery rates aren’t being mentioned. I know why tptb won’t tell the general public but it would reduce the doomer narrative and bring some optimism.
Recovery tends to have specific parameters and takes ages, plus it’s dependent on testing negative and a lot of places aren’t testing.
Here's a link to the article.
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/soc...uld-target-immune-system-targeting-protective Can't seem to find the study. Makes me wonder though, people who are "immune" to aids aren't actually immune just the receptors that the virus attaches too are too short meaning the virus can't attack them. I wonder if their might be another genetic mutation that would allow people to be immune to the most damaging effect of covid19.
The T cell stuff isn’t at all like HIV. HIV is a retrovirus and patches it’s DNA into T cells. The COVID spike protein seems to have a furin cleavage domain which aids fusion to some cell membranes as well as the usual attachment via the spike itself. It’s not the same mechanism as HIV. Will it nuke some people’s immune systems? Well lots of stuff can. It does seem to have an appetite for blood cells and I suspect we will see that in some people it’s taking out red cells and white cells as well. That’s acute though, there’s no sign of it Living long term in those cells. This research is oddly reported. Also Chinese. I wouldn’t line the lab mice cages with anything out of China right now.
k it's something but it will go away
