Lucy Teale / Suzy Lu / SuzyLuGME & Justin Slater / Steejo - Thin skinned weeb thot, her business major boyfriend who LARPs as a copyright lawyer, serial false flaggers, trying to sue TV Tokyo over Naruto reaction videos, Youtube's favorite forehead

Rock 'n' Roll Martian said:
Serious question: What's the appeal of a reaction video? Why would you want to watch someone reacting to a show instead of just watching the show yourself?
Click to expand...

The ONLY thing I can think of that makes some sort of sense is that it gives the viewer a feeling that they have actual company when watching the same video the "reactors/reactionists" are "reacting" to (like if said "reactionist" was IRL in your room watching the same show).

It's kind of like the same feeling where some people watch lets plays (like oney plays) to give them the feeling of "when i laugh at their jokes and agree with their points, it's like I'm actually with them in person and like i have friends too"

It sounds dumb, I know.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: KirbyGripp, Trig.Point, uncleShitHeel and 9 others
Privacy complaint now:


1586881119524.png


1586881128133.png


1586881140797.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Nguyen Van Phuoc, Uncanny Valley, Nigero and 5 others
  • Like
Reactions: Slimy Time, Nguyen Van Phuoc, Rondo Richter Belmont and 3 others
Rock 'n' Roll Martian said:
Serious question: What's the appeal of a reaction video? Why would you want to watch someone reacting to a show instead of just watching the show yourself?
Click to expand...

It’s kind of like sitting down with someone playing a game or watching a movie for the first time and waiting for their reaction to a big plot twist you already know about.

You know how’s it gonna go down, but they don’t and there’s a sense of catharsis and hilarity over seeing how they react.

It doesn’t really translate as well through videos I feel because you aren’t actually with the other person and there’s a chance they’re faking for views. A lot of people don’t realize that though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nguyen Van Phuoc, Uncanny Valley, Yotsubaaa and 2 others
Overcast said:
It’s kind of like sitting down with someone playing a game or watching a movie for the first time and waiting for their reaction to a big plot twist you already know about.

You know how’s it gonna go down, but they don’t and there’s a sense of catharsis and hilarity over seeing how they react.

It doesn’t really translate as well through videos I feel because you aren’t actually with the other person and there’s a chance they’re faking for views. A lot of people don’t realize that though.
Click to expand...
Lonely people also probably use it as a way to easily pirate anime without going to a shady website or downloading torrents while pretending to have female company.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Uncanny Valley, Trombonista and Overcast
How long do you think it will take for Suzy or Youtube to be sued by various anime companies?
 
Buer said:
How long do you think it will take for Suzy or Youtube to be sued by various anime companies?
Click to expand...

TOKYOTV has already tried to get her on multiple DMCA claims. The one's on YouTube magically disappeared due to her simp there, and she blocked her website in Japan when they went after her there.

With the amount of people reporting her to other companies and getting emails confirming they are sending the info to their legal teams, it's only a matter of time. Whenever they strike, she's going to take the platform down with her.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Nigero and You
Remove Goat said:
I'm surprised no one has brought up the fact she's started to host her shitty reviews on her own personal site (meaning not mirrored from YouTube, they're actually physically hosted on her own slice of whoever's server she rents from), meaning she's completely unprotected from DMCA safe harbor laws.
Click to expand...
I covered some of this in the OP but it would help to explain who does and doesn't qualify for Safe Harbor protection.

In order to qualify for Safe Harbor, you have to be considered a platform and not a publisher. A platform (referred to as "online service provider" in the law's text but people use "platform" to avoid confusing ISPs with OSPs) allows users to post content without editorial oversight, and the platform does not own the copyright to works hosted on their service. Publishers do have editorial oversight on what content they show, and they typically own the copyright to works they host. A platform is not held legally liable for content posted to their service (provided they follow the provisions in Safe Harbor law) because the content is owned by the user. A publisher is held legally liable for content they post because they own the content.

Safe Harbor also gives users some cushioning from lawsuits. When a copyright holder files a DMCA takedown request with a platform, the platform is obligated by law to remove the infringing content. This is enough for most copyright holders since the cost of a lawsuit against the infringing user would easily overshadow whatever market share they lost by having their content shared illegally. Disney isn't going to lose out on millions if I post the entirety of The Lion King to Youtube or Vimeo, but they would still want it down to minimize financial loss.

Suzy's site is curated by her alone, only featuring content she creates and oversees. She owns the copyright to the entire site, visible at the bottom of her webpages. Therefore she's a publisher. She has no middle man like Youtube to absorb the blows of DMCAs and take down videos to appease the angry anime lawyers. Now they'll just come straight for her.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Uncanny Valley, Nigero, The Last Stand and 2 others
Wazzupnerds said:
She has now flagged John Swan, privacy complaint:


View attachment 1230714

View attachment 1230715
View attachment 1230716
Click to expand...
Filing false privacy complaints is grounds for suspension. Even if she's complaining about the video of hers in the background, that's footage from her website launch announcement video. It's the featured video on her channel.
youtube_suzylu_frontpage.png

Nick's getting more privacy complaints. Now it's on the section of his video which features the David Hinkle clip she's trying to flag John Swan for.
twitter_nickdeorio_privacycomplaint2.pngtwitter_nickdeorio_privacycomplaint2email01.jpgtwitter_nickdeorio_privacycomplaint2footage.jpg
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: TheRetardKing, Uncanny Valley, Nigero and 3 others
nonnewtonian said:
Filing false privacy complaints is grounds for suspension. Even if she's complaining about the video of hers in the background, that's footage from her website launch announcement video. It's the featured video on her channel.
View attachment 1230744

Nick's getting more privacy complaints. Now it's on the section of his video which features the David Hinkle clip she's trying to flag John Swan for.
View attachment 1230760View attachment 1230761View attachment 1230762
Click to expand...

Like I said before, she's going to take down the platform with her if she goes down.
 
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Nigero, You, Army Burger and 1 other person
ωσкє вℓυє мυѕℓιм qυєєη said:
Based on what has heppened so far I'm concerned she is willing to keep weaponizing the copyright system further to the point we have a third adpocalyse. The copyright system is already exploitable enough but the case can be made it can get worse based on how she got away with her operation.
Pray kiwis, pray harder.
Click to expand...

She's not really on YouTube anymore. She's made her own website to try to get around the copyright strikes coming her way from Tokyo, which makes it funnier because NOW she has no defense when the Japs actually hit her with lawsuits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slimy Time, Shield Breaker, Rondo Richter Belmont and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back