I don't think there's anything wrong with actually trying to destigmatize mental illness and spreading awareness. (With the caveat that you know what you're talking about and you've read more than a Wikipedia article and a couple of studies you found through Google.) It's just that these people making itemized lists of everything even slightly wrong with them are so loud and proud about being oppressed they drown out the voices of people actually struggling, people who have a few major and very real problems rather than a dozen self-diagnosed imagined ones.
There's honestly another layer of this, too.
At surface value, I can appreciate the idea of sharing one's struggles. It's cathartic to let it go and be validated by people who have experienced what you have. At the same time, it's irresponsible the way it is generally done. I have not seen a single mental health advocate who actually struggles with anything other than recovering addicts who are knowledgable about their issues and also actively seeking help and sharing what they've been learning with their audience. That doesn't mean they aren't out there, obviously, but there's this wallowing or even celebrating debilitating issues that I find to be outright dangerous. It can't just be about relating to others and finding a sense of belonging. It has to be about helping those you relate to manage their symptoms and getting help.
It is a random 90s popular culture questionnaire thing and she isn't even American. What's the big deal? Lord.
She wasn't even born for half of the crap in it on top of it.
-----
It really annoys me that there's this group of teenagers and early 20-somethings selling this idea that if you have childhood amnesia it
must be due to trauma. It just isn't true. They attribute forgetting what they did a few days prior to a dissociative amnesiac event, and again, this isn't true. They fundamentally have no idea how this disorder might work, and that's mainly because every public example of it uses the same retired symptoms.
Recent Canadian research has shown that around age 7, the hippocampus can be easily and often is overloaded, causing a disconnection to memories formed between ages 3-7. It's common knowledge that prior to age 3, the hippocampus is not developed enough and overloads often, but no one is running around saying "I can't remember being an infant, must be abuse!", despite that it is the same cause. In fact, it's unusual when people can remember things prior to the age of 3. Childhood amnesia to some degree is actually quite common, just like not recalling what you had for breakfast 3 days ago.
These kids are just so desperate to be unique and traumatized that a lack of information to them must mean they suffered HORRIBLY and that MUST MEAN THEY HAVE DID.