Legitimate criticisms of Kiwi Farms

[Neko GF]

Tooter still has a subforum.

 

[Exigent Circumcisions]

Most of you faggots aren't funny, even though you're absolutely sure that you are.

 

[Y2K Baby]

Bad.

 

[CivilianOfTheFandomWars]

We have legitimate learning disabilities.

 

[MuuMuu Bunnylips]

People still aren't being slapped for posting reaction images.

 

[An Account]

• The search feature kind of sucks. Not the worst in the world, but it could be way better.
• The word filter has conditioned me to automatically equate the word 'exceptional' with reetard. I swear Null is trying to transition this site into speaking some kind of strange pidgin language via the word filter.
• Someone gave me a meanie sticker once and that's literal violence. I should be compensated for this gross violation of my human rights.

 

[Stephanie Bustcakes]

The Chris subforum is filled with morons who just repeat the same handful of insults about Chris over and over.

 

[Diabeetus]

Occasionally something interesting happens with (or to) one of the internet's more well-known users, but the lion's share of Kiwifarms "content" is just banal ridicule. It's the virtual equivalent of fat housewives huddling together, reading tabloids and gossiping about famous people. Replace Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman with Darksydephil and that one grotesquely-obese woman who is so fat her forehead sticks out.

I understand the other half of Kiwifarms is arguing politics, which is just as much of a waste of time, but I also don't see our resident neonazis, lolbertarians and "real liberals" insisting Lolcow threads be forcibly removed from the site.

Once those fat housewives start going into your A&H threads and sperging out over Christian Weston Chandler for no reason whatsoever, then you can criticize Kiwi Farms users for talking about lolcows.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

All y'alls have beauty standards for women that are so sky high they reach the Andromeda galaxy, and so uncharitable that Ebenezer Scrooge would have seen you and learned his lesson without having to be scared straight by otherworldly forces. It's not apparent most of the time given the lack of self-care of much of the female subjects, but when you get to people that could be mistaken for taking care of themselves, it's ends up looking like a front-- either for your raging primal sexual desires despite your words about the subjects or for your failure to find any lady attractive.

In those cases, it's not even you claiming that their inner ugly radiates and taints your perception of their outer looks, or claiming that they're not that pretty-- you just flat out call them ugly and assert their only alibi implicates their entire lineage.

 

[Nephi]

All y'alls have beauty standards for women that are so sky high they reach the Andromeda galaxy, and so uncharitable that Ebenezer Scrooge would have seen you and learned his lesson without having to be scared straight by otherworldly forces. It's not apparent most of the time given the lack of self-care of much of the female subjects, but when you get to people that could be mistaken for taking care of themselves, it's ends up looking like a front-- either for your raging primal sexual desires despite your words about the subjects or for your failure to find any lady attractive.

In those cases, it's not even you claiming that their inner ugly radiates and taints your perception of their outer looks, or claiming that they're not that pretty-- you just flat out call them ugly and assert their only alibi implicates their entire lineage.

My dude, is this a copypasta? It should be.

 

[The Fool]

The word filter has conditioned me to automatically equate the word 'exceptional' with reetard. I swear Null is trying to transition this site into speaking some kind of strange pidgin language via the word filter.

Personally I love how this site ruined me.

 

[The Fool]

Now this, I can say is a change that definitely needs to happen that doesn't cross any of Null's (very inconsistent principles). Language and communication is so important that even crazy easily offended "progressives" have figured out how to change it by using buzz words or applying specific words in context that doesn't meet the definition, or outright trying to change the definitions of words if they can't just make one up. Often, to ostracise, gatekeep, manipulate, destroy, and target people, not even for the petty excuse of "wrong" politics or difference of opinions, but really just for the pettiest reason of "I just don't like them." Creates a circus of popularity contest for whoever is the least popular has the least credibility.

Too much gay internet lingo, trendy words, and even deliberate misuse of words for the same purpose happens here, but people are too autistic, too prideful, or too malicious to admit it's something they have in common with the people they criticize, or the most extreme cases used to prey upon anybody they just don't like. Have some malicious intent? Throw a nonsense label on them that the popular kids associate with "problematic" or exceptionally deserving of bad treatment, sometimes harm or just turning a blind eye to others creating/doing harm.

No more made-up words, lingo, trendy"language", and wrong context. That shit is fake, gay, and actually degenerate.

relax retard it's just null making funny word filters to poke at people who can't stop using the same word for everything

 

[Army Burger]

The Chris subforum is filled with morons who just repeat the same handful of insults about Chris over and over.

DAE think that Chris is fat and unworthy of having sex with?

 

[Twinkie]

Did I use too many books to describe one detail? There's more than just one little root of a larger problem besides a word filter, I did't know what half the reactions mean, then see the usual effects of enabling the autism when somebody finds a way to use a trendy word as much as possible, to be gay about somebody else. Sometimes have to ask if that person is ok, sane, or is there a reason I'm confused looking at the google results for that word(s)? What sane people want to keep up with that shit, or be reminded of how "terf" "terf" "terf" is the trend for the current year on twitter's end what's the equivalent of that here I'll have to run through somebody's mental gymnasium to understand and avoid using?

sounds like you could use some coke zero

 

[Synthetic Smug]

Like Something Awful, it will ultimately become what

Way too many women.

"Women."

All forums have a sell by date. Nothing lasts forever, and that's just as well.

 

[The Fool]

Did I use too many books to describe one detail? There's more than just one little root of a larger problem besides a word filter, I did't know what half the reactions mean, then see the usual effects of enabling the autism when somebody finds a way to use a trendy word as much as possible, to be gay about somebody else. Sometimes have to ask if that person is ok, sane, or is there a reason I'm confused looking at the google results for that word(s)? What sane people want to keep up with that shit, or be reminded of how "terf" "terf" "terf" is the trend for the current year on twitter's end what's the equivalent of that here I'll have to run through somebody's mental gymnasium to understand and avoid using?

online communities have their own injokes and culture. more at 11.

literally just lurk more. I didn't have to ask any of these questions because I lurked. You see my sign-up date? It wasn't day one. I had to figure out everything too, it's kind of the bare minimum requirement for joining a community. otherwise if there's no mutual understand of each other then there isn't a community to begin with.
Is this like your first internet community? How is this news to you? Surprise, this isn't facebook.

 

[voodoovenom]

online communities have their own injokes and culture. more at 11.

literally just lurk more. I didn't have to ask any of these questions because I lurked. You see my sign-up date? It wasn't day one. I had to figure out everything too, it's kind of the bare minimum requirement for joining a community. otherwise if there's no mutual understand of each other then there isn't a community to begin with.
Is this like your first internet community? How is this news to you? Surprise, this isn't facebook.

Yes rt5e

 

[Kacho]

Way too many women.

Agreed. All female users should be required to verify their sex with Null via photographic or video evidence and to use a picture of their tits as an avatar. We need to get these hos under control.

 

[Zero Day Defense]

Agreed. All female users should be required to verify their sex with Null via photographic or video evidence and to use a picture of their tits as an avatar. We need to get these hos under control.

Let's make Thot Control a reality.

Spoiler

...that wasn't a typo.

 

[Celebrate Nite]

All y'alls have beauty standards for women that are so sky high they reach the Andromeda galaxy,

Not true for me

i would give proof, but last time i did that i got banned from a thread for "coomposting", so you're just going to have to take my word for it