Snowflake Chloe Wilkinson / DissociaDID and Nanette Zuniga / Nan / TeamPinata

[comrade666]

I'd say both. Or if only one, screencaps. We need it to be provable.

That was my concern. Text makes it readable but caps make it credible. The source has already been verified by Twinkie so that isn't such a problem. I think I'll stick to both and format as I have in the example then. I'll take another look through this evening starting with the lake dates as I think they're the most relevant at the moment.

Thanks!

 

[Lurk]

This thread is an absolute gold mine. Especially these bits right here:

Spoiler: Chloe Knows She's A Liar

View attachment 1238388View attachment 1238389View attachment 1238390

I've archived this twitter thread: http://archive.li/S3Qd6

edit: Actually I just noticed you can't click on the images in that archive to view them bigger (or at least I can't). So here they all are as well

Spoiler: loads of images

 

[themostdefectivedetective]

View attachment 1238424

So much symbolism. One comment said Non-Abrahamic ritual abuse because of the sun motif.

As with her alleged-burning (as I mentioned before), I believe this may be something 'inspired' by Helen Jamieson/Alice's book. She was having flashback memories of ritual type abuse and her father taking her to a castle for it to happen.

Spoiler: The Truth

She discovered in later life that it was actually an abandoned factory, but as she was little more than a toddler at the time it is understandable that she didn't realise that back then.

 

[comrade666]

I've archived this twitter thread: http://archive.li/S3Qd6

I still find it hilarious to think she was trapped in ego death for five years. That's quite the trip.

 

[Bananasaurus]

On her channel, the bigger her audience is getting, the more she's drifting from the 'I don't remember my trauma' plotline, and instead heavily implies that it's just too awful to talk about. I'd say that adds to the intrigue from a fan's perspective; she knows that telling people not to speculate won't make a blind bit of difference. And leaving it open means that people make up their own stories to fill the gaps, about the worst possible things that could happen to a child, which is probably worse than something she could make up and stick to.

You're absolutely right. Even if she had any "legit" trauma, putting that stuff on the internet would be tasteless anyway. Nevertheless, you'd think that if you started a channel about DID, you would either
a) say that you have trauma and just not go into any detail
b) take the stance that DID can manifest later in life and childhood trauma is not a requirement

If you turn yourself into a webseries, you might as well spin a narrative that is consistent.

This is something that is sooo easy to lie about, and nobody will find out unless you contradict yourself. Friends and family may come forward claiming that they have no knowledge of any trauma, but you could always say that they just didn't know about it.

 

[comrade666]

How exactly is this girl essentially claiming she was the victim of SRA in Colchester? I've just read through those tweets properly and I truly can't decide whether I want to laugh or not. And she claims in videos that her parents are just as clueless as her?

Alright, I'll humour her for a second. She suffered SRA. In Colchester. At the hands of her parents. She now has DID. She herself doesn't remember the trauma. Why are the alters who do remember the trauma allowing her to hang out with high priestess Mother Kay? Why does she still live in the same area as her family? Why are the cult allowing her to post across social media alluding to her trauma and her knowledge of, as Chloe puts it, 'organised' child abuse?

 

[Enoby Way]

For any lurkers, I don't think this has been said outright before in this thread. While it might not be polite to question someone's disability in everyday life, if they are:

* making money from talking about their disability
* framing themselves as an informed educator on this issue
* acting as an influencer and/or role model for a vulnerable population
* appearing on journalistic shows as a representative for people with their disability
* organising events about this disability and otherwise acting as an activist

then it is your duty to yourself to question their disability and do your research. You don't have to be an asshole about it if you don't want to--but you need to make sure they have what they say they have. Chloe forfeited this right to privacy about her disability when she started making money off of it and positioning herself as an authority. If you have a mental illness or are in a vulnerable place in your life, you have a right to know whether or not you are being scammed.

It is a painful experience for people who genuinely have problems, but that is the cost of being a public figure. If she wants to be an activist and mental health educator, becoming those will make her a public figure. You would expect that someone in Chloe's position would be committed to transparency and acknowledge that it is understandable that people are going to want to investigate her.

The fact that people in this thread have not been polite about her has nothing to do with the fact that if she was legitimate, she would be handling this whole situation very differently than she is. Instead of acting professionally in a tough situation, she is acting unprofessionally. What does that say about her qualities as an activist and educator?

This thread isn't really about publically calling her out or going after her, it's on a site that watches and comments on peoples' self-created drama for entertainment. But it doesn't mean you can't use it as a resource in your own quest to protect yourself from being influenced by people out for their own gain.

to the mods: if you think this isn't relevant enough to the thread/too hand-holdy please feel free to delete this

 

[Lurk]

How exactly is this girl essentially claiming she was the victim of SRA in Colchester? I've just read through those tweets properly and I truly can't decide whether I want to laugh or not. And she claims in videos that her parents are just as clueless as her?

Alright, I'll humour her for a second. She suffered SRA. In Colchester. At the hands of her parents. She now has DID. She herself doesn't remember the trauma. Why are the alters who do remember the trauma allowing her to hang out with high priestess Mother Kay? Why does she still live in the same area as her family? Why are the cult allowing her to post across social media alluding to her trauma and her knowledge of, as Chloe puts it, 'organised' child abuse?

It sounds like she googled DID and read all the schizo conspiracy theories on MK Ultra tbh. Or as someone said above, she watched the documentary on Helen and latched on to her talking about SRA (which as was said, turned out to be a pedo ring, of which her father was a member, abusing children in an abandoned warehouse but being a child it became a big scary dungeon in a castle in her toddler's mind). I'm paranoid posting that since it will probably just give her ideas - don't even think about it Chloe. I could quite easily believe there being a pedo ring in Colchester - nonces are fucking everywhere like the filthy parasites they are - but SRA? I think not.

Can you imagine her mum explaining to her circle of old lady friends that her daughter has DID, they go away and look at what this is and the implications of CSA that come with it, and now all her friends think she and her husband are diddlers? This kind of lie is insidious, I can't imagine the shame they probably feel when they have to explain why their daughter is such a sped.

 

[tampax pearl]

It sounds like she googled DID and read all the schizo conspiracy theories on MK Ultra tbh. Or as someone said above, she watched the documentary on Helen and latched on to her talking about SRA (which as was said, turned out to be a pedo ring, of which her father was a member, abusing children in an abandoned warehouse but being a child it became a big scary dungeon in a castle in her toddler's mind). I'm paranoid posting that since it will probably just give her ideas - don't even think about it Chloe. I could quite easily believe there being a pedo ring in Colchester - nonces are fucking everywhere like the filthy parasites they are - but SRA? I think not.

Can you imagine her mum explaining to her circle of old lady friends that her daughter has DID, they go away and look at what this is and the implications of CSA that come with it, and now all her friends think she and her husband are diddlers? This kind of lie is insidious, I can't imagine the shame they probably feel when they have to explain why their daughter is such a sped.

I'm surprised they haven't cut her off entirely. She's basically accusing them of torture.

 

[pd2jzutg2]

Regarding the lake incident:

I'm pretty sure she was missing for like 2 hours maximum. Nothing serious happened to her and she was joking about it with friends the very next day. I doubt the police even got involved (missing persons case etc.) Chloe made a huge deal out of it because it is not like she has any other trauma she could m*lk for sympathy, but I find it pretty obvious that fucking nothing happened.

It has been confirmed the police were involved. Was it the real police or just the campus police (is that a thing in the UK?), we don’t know. But they were involved, as proven by the chat log with other students

Anyway, daily nanin update:
- Chloe has removed the pic of her with Nan from her Facebook page
- Chloe is still following Nan’s twitter account

i think it’s over boys

 

[comrade666]

It sounds like she googled DID and read all the schizo conspiracy theories on MK Ultra tbh. Or as someone said above, she watched the documentary on Helen and latched on to her talking about SRA (which as was said, turned out to be a pedo ring, of which her father was a member, abusing children in an abandoned warehouse but being a child it became a big scary dungeon in a castle in her toddler's mind). I'm paranoid posting that since it will probably just give her ideas - don't even think about it Chloe. I could quite easily believe there being a pedo ring in Colchester - nonces are fucking everywhere like the filthy parasites they are - but SRA? I think not.

Can you imagine her mum explaining to her circle of old lady friends that her daughter has DID, they go away and look at what this is and the implications of CSA that come with it, and now all her friends think she and her husband are diddlers? This kind of lie is insidious, I can't imagine the shame they probably feel when they have to explain why their daughter is such a sped.

That's the kind of thing I can see happening in a child's mind. I know they use the whole kids wish they could be a dragon so that's why they have dragon alters excuse a lot but it doesn't make sense that the kid would actually believe they were a dragon. But believing they had been taken to castle because a toddler doesn't have the frame of reference to know what an abandoned warehouse is? Sure. That's a logical thought process.

I can't see her parents even wanting to explain it to their friends. You've only got to google Chloe's name to find her dropping hints that her parents are into some evil shit. At this point, she should just come out and say yes my parents were involved or no they weren't to at least clear up the ambiguity. Her conflicting statements are doing them no favours.

- Chloe has removed the pic of her with Nan from her Facebook page

And people insist she's not lurking here. Still, if she's single that's good news for you PD. You're finally in with a chance.

 

[AmbiTron]

If she does lurk here, I'd say I'm glad we've probably hurt her feelings... then I realize she's a manipulative narcissistic probably-sociopath and likely doesn't have people feelings so much as seething rage that we've damaged her grift.

 

[pd2jzutg2]

Regarding the DissociaDID Instagram: Chloe’s deleted all pictures with Nan in it except for one where there’s a fan with them, so makes sense she wouldn’t delete that, don’t want to turn the fans against her any more than they already are. There is still one or two posts that mention Nan (a pic of a coffee shop saying how she was there with her fiancé). Also that animal crossing post is still up, but again, she was with her dear friends fragmented psyche and the entropy system so yeah can’t delete that either. I think all signs are pointing towards break up. Even the pic of her ring is gone.

 

[Dubricius]

I don't think she lurks. We know she deleted all negative comments on her channel and any that didn't get deleted got jihad'd by her fans. I bet you if she lurked here she would have posted about it by now, and we'd have an influx of whiteknights, and she'd likely turn up herself and make videos about it for the drama points. If Trisha made her split... imagine our impact. It's like a TV show; always needs new plot arcs.
Though, she has to play damage control w/ the Nan issue, so it's possible she may not want to agitate what she sees as a hornet's nest of evidence against her in regards to being aware of Nan's disgusting BS & her own general fakery and manipulation.


To TLDR and reword my point here; I don't think she lurks, because knowing her she would be using this thread's existence to take heat off of the Nan issue while she quietly huddles all that off to the side, and make it seems like Nazi KiwiFarms are coming to Kill Her for having DID.

 

[Twinkie]

Who cares, whatever it is, Chloe is faking it.

 

[rot]

Who cares, whatever it is, Chloe is faking it.

Well I never disputed that.

 

[tinybip]

Regarding the DissociaDID Instagram: Chloe’s deleted all pictures with Nan in it except for one where there’s a fan with them, so makes sense she wouldn’t delete that, don’t want to turn the fans against her any more than they already are. There is still one or two posts that mention Nan (a pic of a coffee shop saying how she was there with her fiancé). Also that animal crossing post is still up, but again, she was with her dear friends fragmented psyche and the entropy system so yeah can’t delete that either. I think all signs are pointing towards break up. Even the pic of her ring is gone.

I notice she's left up the s*********uicide post though... couldn't have anyone forgetting about that...

 

[felix el gato]

Well I never disputed that.

we aren't here to talk about if DID is real, we don't care if it is or isn't! we care that Chloe doesn't have it and we want to talk about how much of a dumbass bitch Chloe is like it's not that hard.

 

[Malingering&Me]

I’m convinced Chloe must be lurking in here, considering how quickly her tumblr account was deleted and her moms social media made private after being mentioned on here. If she’s not lurking herself, someone is reporting back to her. Plus, she wouldn’t want to draw too much attention to this site in case people read the thread and come to their own conclusions

 

[Carlos the Scientist]

Though, she has to play damage control w/ the Nan issue, so it's possible she may not want to agitate what she sees as a hornet's nest of evidence against her in regards to being aware of Nan's disgusting BS & her own general fakery and manipulation.

See, that's the thing. In between all the powerlevelling and bullshittery, there's a lot of evidence that does not paint her and Nan in a good light. She's hoping most people will dismiss KF as a horrible disgusting site that literally murders people; once you actually read the OP, it shows that she's not the all-knowing poor traumatised saint that she paints herself as, and pointing out these inconsistencies that she's trying to hide is the opposite of what she wants.