Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

I'm going to guess she's going to sneer at your cousins (or more likely cousin's wife) being less fertile due to sin or not being Torah worshippers or something. Not ruth though, just look at how many babies she has, so blessed!!!1!

I wonder if Ruth ever read this little fable:

I'm trying to find a way to put up a vid of Geoff singing to Maizey without doxing us all! Yes, her name is Maizey. One child is likely all they will have. Amber only had two. I don't know anything about she and her husband's family planning as it is none of my. But I do find it bizarre that our pet monkey would assume that it's not possible for a woman to only have 2 children without abortions or hormonal birth control pills. For starters not every woman gets pregnant once a year. There are a million complications that can happen. Plus it goes without saying that there are non surgical or hormonal means of birth control. Like I said, my cousin Geoff and his wife struggled for years. I assumed they were childfree. I never asked, because not my business.
Of course the megabitch would say that they would be pregnant every 91/2 months if they followed her book, exactly the way she followed it, even though they probably really wouldn't have liked that much. Them wanting to space out their kids to be able to better provide for them and be present as parents would be " patriarchy", whereas expecting women to do nothing but get pregnant, give birth, nurse, play with children, stay home, in the schoolroom, the nursery and the kitchen, or maybe sometimes church if she's lucky is something not patriarchy.
Beats the fuck out if me. She's so fucking backwards.
 
I'm trying to find a way to put up a vid of Geoff singing to Maizey without doxing us all! Yes, her name is Maizey. One child is likely all they will have. AOnly had two. I don't know anything about she and her husband's family planning as it is none of my. But I do find it bizarre that our pet monkey would assume that it's not possible for a woman to only have 2 children without abortions or hormonal birth control pills. For starters not every woman gets pregnant once a year. There are a million complications that can happen. Plus it goes without saying that there are non surgical or hormonal means of birth control. Like I said, my cousin Geoff and his wife struggled for years. I assumed they were childfree. I never asked, because not my business.
Of course the megabitch would say that they would be pregnant every 91/2 months if they followed her book, exactly the way she followed it, even though they probably really wouldn't have liked that much. Them wanting to space out their kids to be able to better provide for them and be present as parents would be " patriarchy", whereas expecting women to do nothing but get pregnant, give birth, nurse, play with children, stay home, in the schoolroom, the nursery and the kitchen, or maybe sometimes church if she's lucky is something not patriarchy.
Beats the fuck out if me. She's so fucking backwards.
I don't know much about parenting personally but there was this big 8 year gap between me and my siblings when I was born. My parents didn't have any abortions or take pills or anything and had me because my sibling asked for a younger sibling. I think it was mostly because they were both working parents who were busy.

In contrast I'm guessing ruth and marshal boff like bunnies, probably because they have little else to do with their lives. Or at least ruth does, she did have a whole line of exes she went through to make her collection of kids. Marshal afaik only had like one or two exes, maybe more. (one with Bradley and another he put in headlock. I forget which one had the kid he threw a snake at)

I saw some doco a while ago, falling pregnant isn't that easy. There's the whole timining thing, complications, and so on. There was a couple on it that needed ivf. Sometimes life is like that.


But yeah, she cray cray
 
Last edited:
Just because someone doesn't do it the same way you do it, doesn't make it made up. I have another male cousin, who's wife and he have been struggling to conceive for decades, and he is now a stay at home dad to a 5 month old, while his younger sister's eldest is 22.
Anyway some people only have 2 children. Abortions, or " popping those pills" are certainly not the only means of birth control lol. You are so limited in your mentality.
In fact I asked Amber about breastfeeding at work, and if it was an issue, as she worked in a male dominated field. She said no, she kept them in a sling, just like our great grandmother's in the fields did. Unlike you, some women can work and carry babies.we don't expect some man or the government to pay us to sit around. That sounds like patriarchy to me. I'd rather gather grain to make my own flour with my baby nursing in a sling than wait for some man to maybe get something out hunting.

That's a completely made up story. There is no way an infant would be allowed in a lab. It's a major liability and cross contamination issue. Also, it would be dangerous for the baby to be around lab equipment. I'm not buying it.

Also, I know you are lying because ecological breastfeeding is about nursing on demand. There is absolutely no way you can nurse on demand while in the middle of wearing a suit geared for a lab.
Your story is full of shit, not buying it.

And yes, if you have sex on an almost daily basis with your husband (which is a healthy frequency), there is NO WAY you are not getting pregnant without popping pills or other forms of birth control like sponges, or whatever evil shit they make out there. You think out of 365 days a healthy sexually active married couple (having sex at least 5 times a week/1 to 2 times a day/that's several hundred times a year) is going to use the pull out method every time? I don't know what kind of men you have been with but Marshall ain't that kind of guy, thank goodness. I'm not going to have a crappy sex life by using the pull out method with Marshall. The sex would suck if he kept pulling out in the moment. Especially when you are really fucking hard. Pa-lease, get a life. AND IF THAT'S TMI FOR YOU, OH WELL, its contextually relevant.


I don't know much about parenting personally but there was this big 8 year gap between me and my siblings when I was born. My parents didn't have any abortions or take pills or anything and had me because my sibling asked for a younger sibling. I think it was mostly because they were both working parents who were busy.

In contrast I'm guessing ruth and marshal boff like bunnies, probably because they have little else to do with their lives. Or at least ruth does, she did have a whole line of exes she went through to make her collection of kids. Marshal afaik only had like one or two exes, maybe more. (one with Bradley and another he put in headlock. I forget which one had the kid he threw a snake at)

I saw some doco a while ago, falling pregnant isn't that easy. There's the whole timining thing, complications, and so on. There was a couple on it that needed ivf. Sometimes life is like that.


But yeah, she cray cray

We have a healthy sex life, and that helps keep our marriage together. Truth be told, men need frequent sex. Truth be told, so do women.

You misspelled blatantly obvious retard.

Dude, I'm living off of 4 to 5 hours sleep a day for about 3 weeks now and living off of energy drinks and chocolate trying to keep my children well fed, as usual. My REM cycles are fucked up. If I make a typo oh well. I feel like a zombie some days and I can barely even read sleep deprived like this.


I'm trying to find a way to put up a vid of Geoff singing to Maizey without doxing us all! Yes, her name is Maizey. One child is likely all they will have. AOnly had two. I don't know anything about she and her husband's family planning as it is none of my. But I do find it bizarre that our pet monkey would assume that it's not possible for a woman to only have 2 children without abortions or hormonal birth control pills. For starters not every woman gets pregnant once a year. There are a million complications that can happen. Plus it goes without saying that there are non surgical or hormonal means of birth control. Like I said, my cousin Geoff and his wife struggled for years. I assumed they were childfree. I never asked, because not my business.
Of course the megabitch would say that they would be pregnant every 91/2 months if they followed her book, exactly the way she followed it, even though they probably really wouldn't have liked that much. Them wanting to space out their kids to be able to better provide for them and be present as parents would be " patriarchy", whereas expecting women to do nothing but get pregnant, give birth, nurse, play with children, stay home, in the schoolroom, the nursery and the kitchen, or maybe sometimes church if she's lucky is something not patriarchy.
Beats the fuck out if me. She's so fucking backwards.

My children are on average 2.5 years apart, due to ecological breastfeeding. The last 2 weaned faster than the older ones, for whatever reason and are closer. It's dangerous for a woman to birth any closer than 2 year intervals too often.

Ok. I have an exercise for you. You clearly believe that you don’t deserve a thread here. Lots of other cows feel the same way, so let’s dig deeper.

Find me one other person who is the subject of a thread that you feel doesn’t deserve one (Marshall doesn’t count). Someone who you feel really doesn’t deserve one. Go ahead. I’d love to hear your selection.

Cant find any? That’s because you’re as insane, twisted, and — most importantly— hilarious as all the other human waste that earns threads here.

Well, you didn't even give me time to answer before answering for me.

"To answer someone before hearing him out is both stupid and embarrassing." (Prov. 18:3)

You are a fucking nut job, Melinda.


Well, I've had a crazy life. Of course I'm a little wierd! But "normal" is way over rated.
Anyways, that's why Marshall loves me. I'm not boring LOL


What am I even reading anymore....


Can someone on this thread enlighten me ihow easy/ hard it is to fall pregnant, if it happens that often. Also do parents need pills or do they just get the snip/ practice not screwing during ovulation

Also, maternity leave. How does that work?
why?

Lemme guess: the torah told me to do it


Physical abuse should not be tolerated in a marriage, period

And, read with me now, Ruth, this is important:

Sexual abuse aka rape should not be tolerated in a marriage, period

Unless you have a rape fetish haha 🤪



That doesn't answer my question, Melinda. Do you think verbal abuse is comparable to a spouse snapping after being beaten for years on end?

Yes, I think that verbal abuse is just as bad as hitting someone physically repeatedly, if not worse actually. A physical bruise can heal. A verbal wound injures the soul, sometimes very deeply. I think it is harder to heal the soul than to heal the body, IMHO. Also, verbal abuse leads to emotional disorders and mental issues (if you don't cut the person off or are trapped in the situation, like with a boss or parent or whatever) which can take years to correct.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, I think that verbal abuse is just as bad as hitting someone physically repeatedly, if not worse actually. A physical bruise can heal. A verbal wound injures the soul, sometimes very deeply. I think it is harder to heal the soul than to heal the body, IMHO. Also, verbal abuse leads to emotional disorders and mental issues (if you don't cut the person off or are trapped in the situation, like with a boss or parent or whatever) which can take years to correct.
Are you implying physical abuse can't also lead to mental issues and "soul injuries"? Because if you are, you're actually fucking re.Tarded.
 
And yes, if you have sex on an almost daily basis with your husband (which is a healthy frequency), there is NO WAY you are not getting pregnant without popping pills or other forms of birth control like sponges, or whatever evil shit they make out there. You think out of 365 days a healthy sexually active married couple (having sex at least 5 times a week/1 to 2 times a day/that's several hundred times a year) is going to use the pull out method every time?
okay, anybody in this thread who is married, is this a healthy amount if sex, because it sure looks like a lot to me. And it doesn't look appealing at all. Ruth, don't you ever get sore down there? Or do you just gush that much?

I don't know what kind of men you have been with but Marshall ain't that kind of guy, thank goodness.
Thank goodness I am a spinster and not married to such a horror. It sounds like a nightmare. Imagine if you're tired, not up for it, or on the bleed. Or sick, or just don't feel like it.


Like, okay, maybe I as an individual have a lower sex drive, but I reckon from the looks of it ruth has a hyperactive sex drive. She's a nymph. Am I alone in this? Maybe she thinks this is a healthy sex life because she's in denial how much of a sex crazed nymph she is

Aren't most people's sex drive usually getting off about 2 or 3 times a week max?


We have a healthy sex life, and that helps keep our marriage together. Truth be told, men need frequent sex. Truth be told, so do women.
No

Dude, I'm living off of 4 to 5 hours sleep a day for about 3 weeks now and living off of energy drinks and chocolate trying to keep my children well fed, as usual. My REM cycles are fucked up. If I make a typo oh well. I feel like a zombie some days and I can barely even read sleep deprived like this.
this sounds unhealthy. A bit of chocolate now and then is cool but if you want energy you should stick to cereals, fruit or vegies and lean meat







Unless you have a rape fetish haha 🤪
ruth confirmed for rape fetishist. What is sick fuck. You actually get turned on by other people getting raped and hurt. You're a threat to others especially your children. You deserve institutionalisation. Seriously. That's beyond fucked up. To you get off to Seeing your neighbours raped? Someone should warn the people around you.

Yes, I think that verbal abuse is just as bad as hitting someone physically repeatedly, if not worse actually. A physical bruise can heal. A verbal wound injures the soul, sometimes very deeply. I think it is harder to heal the soul than to heal the body, IMHO. Also, verbal abuse leads to emotional disorders and mental issues (if you don't cut the person off or are trapped in the situation, like with a boss or parent or whatever) which can take years to correct.
I think you say all this because you have thin skin and a weak soul
 
Can confirm. Some of us men either don't like it and/ or don't have the time. Same goes with women. Hell look at South Korea and Japan. The women there are too busy being successful to bother with sex let alone having a family.
Yeah, but according to Ruth if you spend your time being constructive and don't instead spend your time getting a painful chafe having sex you don't want that's evil and against the torah.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: xtamarlover
And yes, if you have sex on an almost daily basis with your husband (which is a healthy frequency), there is NO WAY you are not getting pregnant without popping pills or other forms of birth control like sponges, or whatever evil shit they make out there. You think out of 365 days a healthy sexually active married couple (having sex at least 5 times a week/1 to 2 times a day/that's several hundred times a year) is going to use the pull out method every time?
Have you never heard of a condom in your life? Or one of those subcutaneous copper IUDs they put under your arm? Hell, not to powerlevel but I was on birth control at 13 to control the cystic acne I'd inherited and it's really not that bad if you take it with your everyday vitamins.

Also, not to encourage further 'I'm the ultimate feminist because I'm a perfect servant to my husband' sperging, but that is an insane amount of sex for the parents of six homeschooled children to be having. That is not normal. Marshall needs to get a hobby other than throwing things at his children and putting his girlfriends in headlocks.
 
Yeah, this stupid hole's just reeeing for attention since she's so incurably desperate for acknowledgement as a crippling narcissist and moron.

Have fun with me forgetting you exist you future death by starvation or beatings. May your kids be free from your malignant ass and safely in a foster home.
 
Also, look at the GIANT HOLE in your story. "MOM OF TWO". That can only be accomplished with birth control and abortion in order to return to the workforce. No woman can be a "mom of two" without popping those pills.
Or twins. Multi-births are a thing in humans, dumbass. (Might not have been the case in Amber's case, but hey.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
Are you implying physical abuse can't also lead to mental issues and "soul injuries"? Because if you are, you're actually fucking re.Tarded.

I did not imply that, no.


okay, anybody in this thread who is married, is this a healthy amount if sex, because it sure looks like a lot to me. And it doesn't look appealing at all. Ruth, don't you ever get sore down there? Or do you just gush that much?

Thank goodness I am a spinster and not married to such a horror. It sounds like a nightmare. Imagine if you're tired, not up for it, or on the bleed. Or sick, or just don't feel like it.


Like, okay, maybe I as an individual have a lower sex drive, but I reckon from the looks of it ruth has a hyperactive sex drive. She's a nymph. Am I alone in this? Maybe she thinks this is a healthy sex life because she's in denial how much of a sex crazed nymph she is

Aren't most people's sex drive usually getting off about 2 or 3 times a week max?



No

this sounds unhealthy. A bit of chocolate now and then is cool but if you want energy you should stick to cereals, fruit or vegies and lean meat







ruth confirmed for rape fetishist. What is sick fuck. You actually get turned on by other people getting raped and hurt. You're a threat to others especially your children. You deserve institutionalisation. Seriously. That's beyond fucked up. To you get off to Seeing your neighbours raped? Someone should warn the people around you.

I think you say all this because you have thin skin and a weak soul

You're taking my statement out of context. I never said that I enjoy other people getting raped. We were speaking of the context of spouses.


okay, anybody in this thread who is married, is this a healthy amount if sex, because it sure looks like a lot to me. And it doesn't look appealing at all. Ruth, don't you ever get sore down there? Or do you just gush that much?

Thank goodness I am a spinster and not married to such a horror. It sounds like a nightmare. Imagine if you're tired, not up for it, or on the bleed. Or sick, or just don't feel like it.


Like, okay, maybe I as an individual have a lower sex drive, but I reckon from the looks of it ruth has a hyperactive sex drive. She's a nymph. Am I alone in this? Maybe she thinks this is a healthy sex life because she's in denial how much of a sex crazed nymph she is

Aren't most people's sex drive usually getting off about 2 or 3 times a week max?



No

this sounds unhealthy. A bit of chocolate now and then is cool but if you want energy you should stick to cereals, fruit or vegies and lean meat







ruth confirmed for rape fetishist. What is sick fuck. You actually get turned on by other people getting raped and hurt. You're a threat to others especially your children. You deserve institutionalisation. Seriously. That's beyond fucked up. To you get off to Seeing your neighbours raped? Someone should warn the people around you.

I think you say all this because you have thin skin and a weak soul

Many people's libido is lowered by pharma drugs, emotional disorders, bad diets, etc. Depression can lower it too.
But if you are physically, emotionally and mentally healthy, a higher libido is the byproduct of it. Calling women "nymphomaniacs" because they have higher libidos is just a by product of sexism, rooted in the idea that women should be sexually repressed. It's not true that only men want frequent sex. A lot of times women's ideas about their own gender represses their sexuality too. Women have not historically been encouraged to be enthusiastic about sex. They have historically been conditioned to believe that they exist for a man's pleasure only. If women start thinking more about their owns needs and wants when it comes to sex, their thinking changes.

I disagree about daily sex being odd. Almost daily sex is healthy. Sure, take a break if you are sick, sad, on the rag, whatever. But it's a good way to end the day. I never Googled this before, but just did now and well, I guess there are others that do the same...




Have you never heard of a condom in your life? Or one of those subcutaneous copper IUDs they put under your arm? Hell, not to powerlevel but I was on birth control at 13 to control the cystic acne I'd inherited and it's really not that bad if you take it with your everyday vitamins.

Also, not to encourage further 'I'm the ultimate feminist because I'm a perfect servant to my husband' sperging, but that is an insane amount of sex for the parents of six homeschooled children to be having. That is not normal. Marshall needs to get a hobby other than throwing things at his children and putting his girlfriends in headlocks.

It's really not unreasonable for people with many children. If you get your house in order and put your children to bed on time, there is plenty of adult time after they go to bed.

Yes, I've heard of condoms but they are expensive when you have nearly daily sex and they also decrease pleasure. I can see using it now and then but really, you are creating a crappy sex life using condoms all the time. That's not good for a marriage. It also takes away from spontaneity. Not trying to be TMI, but the reality is that sex is a gift from Elohim and it should be experienced properly in a marriage. It shouldn't be hindered to accommodate capitalism at the expense of the marriage.

I also read somewhere once that frequent sex is good for women too and lowers their risk of depression.

The point? You just can't avoid having lots of children without birth control, abortions or some dysfunction in a marital relationship.
 
You're taking my statement out of context. I never said that I enjoy other people getting raped. We were speaking of the context of spouses.
So you enjoy watching some poor women getting raped by her husband? Still sickfuckery



Many people's libido is lowered by pharma drugs, emotional disorders, bad diets, etc. Depression can lower it too.
But if you are physically, emotionally and mentally healthy, a higher libido is the byproduct of it. Calling women "nymphomaniacs" because they have higher libidos is just a by product of sexism, rooted in the idea that women should be sexually repressed. It's not true that only men want frequent sex. A lot of times women's ideas about their own gender represses their sexuality too. Women have not historically been encouraged to be enthusiastic about sex.
while I agree women have not had the best of time expressing sexuality, I still reckon you have a bigger than average libido, and people who have lower libidos should not be shamed
They have historically been conditioned to believe that they exist for a man's pleasure only.
kinda like how you go off at women who have careers instead of popping out kids
 
  • Winner
Reactions: xtamarlover
kinda like how you go off at women who have careers instead of popping out kids

By this comment you are saying that pregnancy is something that happens TO a woman, instead of her being a part of the process. That is a theory that goes back to Aristotle, that woman is the material on which a man acts. You have some kind of internalized misogyny that you see carrying a baby as something a man does to a woman.

I don't see pregnancy like that.
 
By this comment you are saying that pregnancy is something that happens TO a woman, instead of her being a part of the process. That is a theory that goes back to Aristotle, that woman is the material on which a man acts. You have some kind of internalized misogyny that you see carrying a baby as something a man does to a woman.

I don't see pregnancy like that.
What.
 
Back