Opinion Dune's Paul Atreides should be non-binary - Troon spergs about Dune

Dune’s Paul Atreides Should Be Non-Binary
Emmet Asher-Perrin
Thu Apr 16, 2020 12:00pm
If you have read Dune or watched any of its on-screen iterations, then you know all about Paul Atreides. The son of Duke Leto and Lady Jessica, trained in the Bene Gesserit ways, adopted by the fremen of Arrakis to become the legendary Muad’Dib. Paul is the culmination of a deeply unsettling eugenics program to create something called the Kwisatz Haderach, a being who can see into the future and project himself backwards and forwards in time.
And he could have been science fiction’s best known non-binary protagonist.

According to the plot of Dune, the Kwisatz Haderach had to be created via millennia of special breeding directives from the Bene Gesserit sisterhood. The all-female organization was working toward what all great shadowy organizations work toward—absolute power, namely their own puppet on the throne as emperor. Wrapped up in this desire was also a long-standing problem; spice offered the sisterhood some prescience and race memory, with the Reverend Mothers capable of looking back in time through the line of other sisters… but they could not access the male knowledge and experience in their past. It was believed that the Kwisatz Haderach would be able to look into their full history, both sides of their race memory, and also to see far into the future.
This figure was meant to arrive a generation after Paul—his mother was supposed to have a daughter who would wed the Harkonnen male heir, producing the Kwisatz Haderach. But Jessica went against the sisterhood, giving her partner Duke Leto the son he wanted, and somehow, this resulted in the fated figure appearing ahead of schedule. Paul took the water of life, a poison from the sandworms that the Reverend Mother is capable of changing, and learned of his destiny, saying:
“There is in each of us an ancient force that takes and an ancient force that gives. A man finds little difficulty facing that place within himself where the taking force dwells, but it’s almost impossible for him to see into the giving force without changing into something other than man. For a woman, the situation is reversed.”
According to Paul, he is the fulcrum between those two points, able to give without taking and take without giving. That is what makes him the Kwisatz Here’s the thing: The world of Dune is bound by an essentialist gender binary that doesn’t do the story many favors, despite its careful and often inspired worldbuilding. Aside from the fact that gender isn’t a binary, the insistence upon it isn’t a clever story juxtaposition that makes for great themes and plot. It’s an antiquated perspective that reads as out of place, especially in such a far-flung future. This is especially true when you couch maleness as a “taking” force and femaleness as a “giving” force. Men and women are not naturally those things because people overall are not that easily categorized—they are expected to be those things by society. Stating it as some form of spiritual truth, as Dune does, is an awkward declaration that only gets more awkward as time passes.
In addition, Dune is a story that spends much of its narrative currency on battles between binaries. They crop up everywhere in the book: the tension between the Bene Gesserit and the Mentats; the age-old feud between Houses Harkonnen and Atreides; the conditioning of Arrakis’ fremen forces against the conditioning of the Emperor’s sardaukar; the struggle between the ruling houses and the spacing guild. While there are countless groups vying for power, and the political complexities of that do not go unnoticed, Dune still dwells on that ‘A vs B’ dynamic in all the places where it really counts. Without these binary antagonisms, the tale wouldn’t function.
For a story so taken with binaries, there is something arresting about Paul balancing male and female aspects as an implicit factor to being the Kwisatz Haderach. The real confusion lies in the idea that the Kwisatz Haderach always had to be male, as though counterbalancing generations of Bene Gesserit sisters; if the figure is meant to be a fulcrum between those two specific genders, then their own gender should be insignificant. More importantly, if that is the nature of being the Kwisatz Haderach, then coming into that power should ultimately change one’s perception and person entirely. If you’re going to be the balancing point between dual genders, then why would you be solely either of those genders? Paul literally says that being able to do what he does changes him into “something other than man.” It doesn’t make him a woman, clearly, so what’s the alternative here?
It would have been a sharper assertion for Paul to have awoken into a different gender entirely, perhaps genderfluidity or even a lack of gender altogether. This wouldn’t have altered his key actions within the narrative, but it would have added another dimension to his journey. A non-binary protagonist for a story that obsesses over binary thinking would have been a stunning wrench to throw into the works. In many ways, it would have made more thematic sense than what Dune currently offers its readers.
While the upcoming film is unlikely to go that route, it’s tantalizing to think of the story that might have been, of all the possibilities contained therein. A story set in the future that accounted for the complexities of gender identity and how it might pertain to an awakening of consciousness and purpose. Even if Paul was the first person in their time period to consider non-binary gender, that would be a powerful statement that would shape their reality for centuries to come. Perhaps others would embrace non-binary identities to honor Muad’Dib, or it would become a sacred way of being, looked upon with religious fervor due to Paul’s importance. And there are further questions as to how that would have affected the sequels as well—would Leto II also have gone that route? He turns into a sandworm, you can’t tell me they’ve got clear and separated binary genders. They’re worms. In the sand. Try again.
In a story that turns on binaries, particularly as they pertain to gender, it would have changed the whole scheme to consider Paul as a non-binary protagonist. Moreover, it would have been fascinating to see how his perspective changed as a result of being that fulcrum, not just as it related to time, but as it related to people. While the story is quick to zero in on what Paul sees in the flow of time, his “terrible purpose” in putting humanity on the Golden Path, there is no consideration for how this shift in state might effect how he sees other humans. It’s a missed opportunity to really explore what absolute power would look like in a being who can project himself into the experiences of men and women equally. Would he understand his mother better than before? His sister?
It’s not the story that we have, but there will always be a part of my mind preoccupied with these possibilities. Because it’s fun, and because it’s intriguing, and because I will always wonder about what the world would look like if more people didn’t take the concept of binaries for granted.

Emmet Asher-Perrin will be stuck on this point for forever. You can bug them on Twitter, and read more of their work here and elsewhere.
 
The moment I saw the virtue signaling of casting a nig nog to play Liet Kynes, I have been waiting for something like this to pop up in the script as well. I was really excited for this movie, as Dune is my favorite sci-fi franchise, but the closer we get to it releasing I'm afraid it's going to be woke dogshit. If you have a good reason to make a gender/race swap of a character then fine, but there is no reason at all here except the obvious.

A lot of the ideas in Dune are way ahead of their time. Frank Herbert gave women a lot of power when he constructed the universe of Dune. Herbert didn't intend to make Paul sound like he wasn't a man still, he is. He just taps into a power only select women can usually wield. He "looks into the dark place the Sisterhood cannot."

I kind of wish people would just give up on making films or TV shows about Dune. It's just far too complicated and intricate for the average retarded American to understand. There's a reason why Herbert repeats phrases like this throughout the entire series, "Plots within plots, patterns within patterns," etc. It goes so deep, especially when you get to God Emperor of Dune. Which is basically just a huge collection of philosophical musings and gems of wisdom that Leto II is constantly making.

I'm not sure whether I should be excited for this movie anymore, or dread it's release. Probably the latter.
 
I was worried this might happen. Dune is no dense and convoluted that most people (especially the YA crowd) can't ever get into it. The only other option was the 1984 film by David Lynch, which is a weird, ugly, mess of a film (totally worth it though, I think it gets way more shit than it deserves). However, now we've got a fresh new film that's accessible to a lot of people, the SJW vultures had swooped down to declare it their own and force anyone who disagrees with them out.

I'm still looking forward to Dune (2020), a little less now that I've seen the set photos but you should always take those with a grain of salt, but it's going to be a long slog through lots more of this shit before and after the release. We already had that one cretinous idiot declare that internet incels were mad because the lead character was a black woman, apparently not knowing that the black-washed character this time was actually a fairly minor side character. But anything that makes your imaginary enemy angry, I suppose...
 
I was worried this might happen. Dune is no dense and convoluted that most people (especially the YA crowd) can't ever get into it. The only other option was the 1984 film by David Lynch, which is a weird, ugly, mess of a film (totally worth it though, I think it gets way more shit than it deserves). However, now we've got a fresh new film that's accessible to a lot of people, the SJW vultures had swooped down to declare it their own and force anyone who disagrees with them out.

I'm still looking forward to Dune (2020), a little less now that I've seen the set photos but you should always take those with a grain of salt, but it's going to be a long slog through lots more of this shit before and after the release. We already had that one cretinous idiot declare that internet incels were mad because the lead character was a black woman, apparently not knowing that the black-washed character this time was actually a fairly minor side character. But anything that makes your imaginary enemy angry, I suppose...

I think an alarming amount of young people nowadays are creatively bankrupt. Their only possible source of inspiration stems from overly-comfortable lives, bereft of meaningful change or suffering. They crave meaning yet exist in a capitalist miasma of shallow causes and expert salesmen, all shamelessly competing for their attention. The closest they ever come to this desired epiphany are messages they're given rather than anything learned; "gays/minorities/trannies are marginalized" is a recurring one. So they take that and run with it, endlessly, slapping it like a paintbrush across everything they find in the contrived hope that it gives them insight on anything at all.

That's why I think we keep seeing this "is X character actually gay/trans?" nonsense, and similarly shallow interpretations, over and over. Too few young people are traveling the world like Hemingway, suffering through war like Solzhenitsyn or engaging in meaningful discussion like Theophrastus. Pop culture and the pursuit of profit have salted the fields of our zeitgeist. Hopefully we kick off another world war so people are enticed to develop personal character again.
 
Want those enbies and genderfluids on the Big Screen, wokesters? How about adapting Ursula K. Le Guin's Hainish cycle instead? Though even the Gethenians weren't non-binary or genderfluid. If anything, they were genderless hermaphrodites, being able to become either sex during their Kemmer period (when they were in "heat". But I digress. Nah, that won't do, they need to latch on to something like the useless parasites they are, they can't seek out other works by themselves! Fucking hell.

I'm sure this will go very well, and totally won't end up confirming what we already knew: "enbies" are a bunch of attention whore faggot drama queens.
 
Back