Here are the ones I found just on your webpage:
View attachment 1245041
Your title is using a singular noun in a plural phrase. There are two corrections you could make:
-Is a Woman an “Object” in The Torah?
-Are Women “Objects” in The Torah?
View attachment 1245044
The second phrase in your description uses the wrong conjugation of “to include.”
The correct way to write this would be:
”Hebraic Scriptures include The Torah ... and New Testament writings.” You don’t need to add the “some” in front of New Testament, it’s redundant and can be inferred.
View attachment 1245050
Hebraic Scriptures is a plural noun, so “is” is the wrong conjugation to use. You need to use “are.”
Again, the “some” is unnecessary.
That last sentence is atrocious, too.
The grammatically correct way to write it would be:
“The survey defines who is considered blessed, and what blessed looks like by the Scripture.”
Even better:
“The survey defines who and what is considered blessed regarding the Scripture.”
View attachment 1245055
First, you’re ALWAYS supposed to put a comma, semicolon, or colon before adding a quotation, whether it be an actual quote or a book title.
Here’s a correct way:
“A discussion of the Daniels’ paper, “Plural Marriagein which the claims of polygyny being beneficial and part of a lifestyle are incorrect.”
“A part of a set apart lifestyle” is confusing to the reader, as well as
redundant.
View attachment 1245061
What did I say about adding punctuation before a quotation?
You’ve already addressed the title of Scacewater’s article in your own title, so you don’t need to continue repeating that phrase every time you say his name. The best way to end the first sentence is:
“...specifically the claims reiterated by Scacewater in his paper.”
Those two sentences in the middle are completely useless. By keeping them there, you clog up your speech and give the reader a conclusion before they’ve even read your article.
All you had to write was “This paper is a rebuttal and analysis...reiterated by Todd Scacewater. Here it is demonstrated that Mr. Scacewater’s analysis is primarily influenced...The Torah.”
Simple and sweet.
I’ll do an in-depth analysis of your articles when I have the time. I’m curious as to whether or not you made the same mistakes.
If you correct these mistakes, I require being cited as a peer reviewer.