StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

[Tasty Tatty]

If you look closely, it says "slightly", not "highly".

Lol, true.

That doesn't help the case either.

 

[Robert James]

Now you have fucked up.

View attachment 1234771

Ah referencing G fighter gundam, you are a man of both class and distinction.

 

[0 0]

> highly more advanced biology.

That's the comic version of the "you wouldn't understand it" argument. These morons actually think that something someone made up is gonna override discoveries made centuries ago only because it's more modern... and sadly, that's their approach to everything in life: "no, this movie can't be good because it was made 20 years ago, remake it!".

Basic biology (or basic maths or basic physics or whatever) is still pretty much the same because the core of it was well researched and founded. What we're discovering now it's accessory and complementary. Nobody has discovered a new sex, we still work with the both we have, only we discover new patterns of behavior or whatever. Fucking morons, lol.

When these kinds of people pull out the stock "it's modern science, you're just still thinking of middle school biology," they're either repeating a mantra or referring to social (or "soft") sciences and studies which were peer reviewed by social scientists. I've seen perhaps two or three people throw up a study instead of doing the cop-out "it's not my job to educate you" excuse, and each were social science studies that severely fall apart when cross referenced. Well, when they were actual studies and not blogs or opinion pieces.

You know the Bogdanovs? Yeah, they look funny and are a meme now, but they actually (and debatably unintentionally) made an important point that it's easy get a crap study successfully peer reviewed if you submit it to the right people. There's been multiple fake studies before and since which proved it again, the most notable of which claimed gravity was racist and sexist, written to intentionally test the academic rigor required to have a study published (which he achieved just through including enough difficult-to-understand ideas and buzzwords).

 

[Lemmingwise]

the most notable of which claimed gravity was racist and sexist

But gravity IS racist. Why do you think white men can't jump?

 

[Robert James]

When these kinds of people pull out the stock "it's modern science, you're just still thinking of middle school biology," they're either repeating a mantra or referring to social (or "soft") sciences and studies which were peer reviewed by social scientists. I've seen perhaps two or three people throw up a study instead of doing the cop-out "it's not my job to educate you" excuse, and each were social science studies that severely fall apart when cross referenced. Well, when they were actual studies and not blogs or opinion pieces.

You know the Bogdanovs? Yeah, they look funny and are a meme now, but they actually (and debatably unintentionally) made an important point that it's easy get a crap study successfully peer reviewed if you submit it to the right people. There's been multiple fake studies before and since which proved it again, the most notable of which claimed gravity was racist and sexist, written to intentionally test the academic rigor requires to have a study published (which he achieved just through including enough difficult-to-understand ideas and buzzwords).

I mean, people got hitlers mein compf published in a peer review journal by replacing jueden with white men. So you know peer reviewed means shit.

 

[Harvey Danger]

I mean, people got hitlers mein compf published in a peer review journal by replacing jueden with white men. So you know peer reviewed means shit.

Considering the politics of the academics involved, I considered that one "working as designed". Why would you assume they disagree with the ideas outlined there?

 

[Sug Benis]

I mean, people got hitlers mein compf published in a peer review journal by replacing jueden with white men. So you know peer reviewed means shit.

Wait, what? When did this happen? I gotta see this shit!

 

[AnOminous]

Wait, what? When did this happen? I gotta see this shit!

Duped academic journal publishes rewrite of ‘Mein Kampf’ as feminist manifesto

To highlight alleged intellectual bias in university 'grievance studies' programs, three scholars write 20 absurd papers; seven are accepted to top publications

www.timesofisrael.com

It has become a sort of sport among academics to see what level of absolute lunacy can be published in "retard studies" kinds of journals. And yes, Hitler's Mein Kampf is the kind of thing that can be published in them just by making it about whitey.

 

[Sug Benis]

Duped academic journal publishes rewrite of ‘Mein Kampf’ as feminist manifesto

To highlight alleged intellectual bias in university 'grievance studies' programs, three scholars write 20 absurd papers; seven are accepted to top publications

www.timesofisrael.com

It has become a sort of sport among academics to see what level of absolute lunacy can be published in "exceptional individual studies" kinds of journals. And yes, Hitler's Mein Kampf is the kind of thing that can be published in them just by making it about whitey.

That's some quality shitposting right there. I'd heard there was a bit of a sport with that, but not that specific example. Which is really dumb, because that's about the greatest goddamned example ever.

 

[bippu_as_fuck_ls400]

Since we're on the (off)topic of peer review:

New Real Peer Review (@RealPeerReview) | Twitter

The latest Tweets from New Real Peer Review (@RealPeerReview). New @real_peerreview, with blackjack and intelligent, evidence-respecting academic peers. Complaints should be filed with Machine Priestess @0K_ultra (use fax). Online, reading your abstract

twitter.com

 

[Adam The Ticket Seller]

Joke-her

Honk honk.

stonetoss.com

(archive)

 

[The Pink Panther]

View attachment 1245352

Joke-her

Honk honk.

stonetoss.com

(archive)

That's stupidly funny.

 

[Rekkington]

> highly more advanced biology.

That's the comic version of the "you wouldn't understand it" argument. These morons actually think that something someone made up is gonna override discoveries made centuries ago only because it's more modern... and sadly, that's their approach to everything in life: "no, this movie can't be good because it was made 20 years ago, remake it!".

Basic biology (or basic maths or basic physics or whatever) is still pretty much the same because the core of it was well researched and founded. What we're discovering now it's accessory and complementary. Nobody has discovered a new sex, we still work with the both we have, only we discover new patterns of behavior or whatever. Fucking morons, lol.

The funny thing is the basics would be more valid than the advanced. The advanced science in any area is where things get muddy, conflicted, and weighing unknowns against each other. Basic physics would be about gravity, the advanced stuff speculating on how it might affect time is not "more better" than the shit that is so fundamentally basic and proven we teach it in high school.

 

[Lemmingwise]

I have an unhealthy like for the shit the trannies at reddit like.

 

[Adam The Ticket Seller]

I have an unhealthy like for the shit the trannies at reddit like.

View attachment 1246191

View attachment 1246197

Imagine being deluded enough to enjoy an unintentionally extremely low effort comic with zero self awareness, then again troons have next to no standards so long as the artist says "trans rights!".

 

[Tasty Tatty]

You know the punchline's gonna be good when they first give you a trigger warning about what the joke's gonna be.

 

[Fluoxetine Man]

When these kinds of people pull out the stock "it's modern science, you're just still thinking of middle school biology," they're either repeating a mantra or referring to social (or "soft") sciences and studies which were peer reviewed by social scientists. I've seen perhaps two or three people throw up a study instead of doing the cop-out "it's not my job to educate you" excuse, and each were social science studies that severely fall apart when cross referenced. Well, when they were actual studies and not blogs or opinion pieces.

You know the Bogdanovs? Yeah, they look funny and are a meme now, but they actually (and debatably unintentionally) made an important point that it's easy get a crap study successfully peer reviewed if you submit it to the right people. There's been multiple fake studies before and since which proved it again, the most notable of which claimed gravity was racist and sexist, written to intentionally test the academic rigor required to have a study published (which he achieved just through including enough difficult-to-understand ideas and buzzwords).

WTF, I love the Bogs now!

 

[Lemmingwise]

Sometimes antifastonetoss makes me sick

 

[The Pink Panther]

Sometimes antifastonetoss makes me sick

View attachment 1249250
View attachment 1249251

This made me gayer than Charlie Kirk and Nick Fuentes combined.

 

[JimmyNugget]

Sometimes antifastonetoss makes me sick

View attachment 1249250
View attachment 1249251

I despise that not only is this shit unfunny, the rest of Reddit bans the original on sight. And of course the thread gets filled with the the old "Rocktrhow is a Notsee" 34 times over. Even places like cringetopia no longer allow it.