Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Logical Fallacies]

Funny she's acting all bold letters at you but doesn't give a fuck about someone calling the torah toilet paper.

Not that her "defending the torah" was all that impressive but I guess this shows where her priorities lie: it's more important to hate some ex of her husband than focus on her religion. Then again her rambling about the torah was getting old.

I think I touched a nerve there, tbh. But I'm not sure which one. One about her past or about her relationship with Marshal.

I think this Torah fantasy (calling herself Ruth and shit) is all about abut her fucked up relationship with other women, her own womanhood and childhood issues. Probably trying to justify her own "internalized misogyny" and attitudes she retained from her (probably) abusive/traumatic childhood.

She just really wants to be the most virtuous, most pure and most morally superior woman, but she can't because of her past and her own shortcomings. The result is all this haughty verbal diarrhea and this weird fantasy.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

I think I touched a nerve there, tbh. But I'm not sure which one. One about her past or about her relationship with Marshal.

I think this Torah fantasy (calling herself Ruth and shit) is all about abut her fucked up relationship with other women, her own womanhood and childhood issues. Probably trying to justify her own "internalized misogyny" and attitudes she retained from her (probably) abusive/traumatic childhood.

She just really wants to be the most virtuous, most pure and most morally superior woman, but she can't because of her past and her own shortcomings. The result is all this haughty verbal diarrhea and this weird fantasy.

One thing I noticed, among many, is the following: She demands that "I would never say I'm never wrong, but not THIS time. This applies to 100% of things she says. Thus, she can never be wrong, but also gets the benefit of faux-humility. It's a classic and impenetrable tactic that every single malignant narcissist has in their narcbox.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Women aren't technically allowed to divorce by Torah law though so that'd be adultery, but you're already guilty of that so who would care I guess

That's The Talmud you are talking about, not The Torah

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

One thing I noticed, among many, is the following: She demands that "I would never say I'm never wrong, but not THIS time. This applies to 100% of things she says. Thus, she can never be wrong, but also gets the benefit of faux-humility. It's a classic and impenetrable tactic that every single malignant narcissist has in their narcbox.

Sorry for the double post. @TamarYaelBatYah , you marked my comment 'tistic. Care to share an incident where you were wtong, in any disagreement?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

okay, that's informative. But just for the sake of argument, say you haven't yet able to go sign the divorce papers. He just told you, he has cornered you and overpowered you. You can't get away from him even as he says he's changed his mind and renounced the torah, then forces himself on you taking sex by force

Would this not be spousal rape, as you did not get a chance to legally divorce him? Would that not upset you, being forced to have sex with a man that is against the torah?

Trouble with you Linda, is that you seem to take everything as provocation. Maybe your sister was, maybe she wasn't, but your actions here getting all worked up gives me reason to disbelieve she was that provocative.

Take what you say about this thread, for example. You say its verbal abuse, but if you threw away your phone or laptop away you would have no knowledge of us talking about you. By this lack of knowledge of what we say you will no longer be able to be "verbally abused"

If you can't hear what a person is saying or read what they type, how can it affect you? Unless someone is forcing you at gunpoint to read these threads, you don't have to be here.

Legal marriage isn't what makes a marriage spiritually. So that part wouldn't matter.

If Marshall abandoned The Torah he wouldn't be anywhere near my house so it wouldn't even happen

Your theory about verbally abusive threads falls a little short. Yes, I choose to be here to debate but I also said that I'm not affected by your verbal abuse. So while I do believe that the majority of you ARE verbally abusive it doesn't affect me emotionally or mentally because I'm not in covenant with you

"Everything as provocation" is somewhat grandiose. You've not seen everything I do in my life.
But it sounds like your real issue is with the fact that I'm not the type of person who instigates

Sorry for the double post. @TamarYaelBatYah , you marked my comment 'tistic. Care to share an incident where you were wtong, in any disagreement?

It's autistic rating (ie no deep thinking) because you can't conceive the fact that a person can actually be 100% correct in everything they say or do.
You can't understand the idea of perfection in the soul.

One time recently I was wrong in a discussion with Marshall about who invented the automobile.

But it's very rare that I'm wrong because I spend most of my life in silence observing and minimal time speaking.

Yelling is rude, Melinda. Nobody taught you any manners when you were a child?

Please stop projecting your own feelings on me in such a loud and crude manner. I already know your hatred for other women and your pathological need for being a subservient slave to your owner, so no need to yell it at me. Just so you know, when you talk to the women in this thread you project like crazy every damn time. Get therapy.

Also, did you not finish reading before this embarrassing spergout? Please read again after engaging brain.




Oh, and I asked for proof not for your questionable opinion. You didn't provide any. Dismissed.



Saying someone provoked the violence is a common term people use to blame victims for what happened to them. You're victim blaming, Melinda.



Again the word provoked. Victim blaming.

Of course it's always because you were provoked and it's never your fault. All other women are bad, except Melinda Leigh Scott. You get upset when other people think women are "untouchable angels" but you so badly want to be a virtuous, untouchable angel yourself. Typical narc behavior towards other women.

And verbal abuse does not have to be long-term. Calling someone an asshole in a discussion/argument is already verbal abuse, Melinda. (Hitting someone once is already physical abuse. It's a behavior not a process.) Everybody can be verbally abusive.

I wasn't yelling. I put it in bold letters because I m tired of repeating myself

You are mis-using the terms projection and provocation. Learn what provocation is.

Where did I say every other woman was bad?

I think I touched a nerve there, tbh. But I'm not sure which one. One about her past or about her relationship with Marshal.

I think this Torah fantasy (calling herself Ruth and shit) is all about abut her fucked up relationship with other women, her own womanhood and childhood issues. Probably trying to justify her own "internalized misogyny" and attitudes she retained from her (probably) abusive/traumatic childhood.

She just really wants to be the most virtuous, most pure and most morally superior woman, but she can't because of her past and her own shortcomings. The result is all this haughty verbal diarrhea and this weird fantasy.

There's nothing about my past that would disqualify me from being a morally superior woman.
For one, most women have committed adultery by cheating on their husbands and had abortions and I've never cheated on anyone nor murdered.

ive

for two, considering King Solomon, and Abraham engaged in serial Monogamy and yet were called YHWH's servant and righteous, you clearly lack and understanding of sexuality in The Torah

I've also not defiled my body with drugs, pharma and birth control

It makes complete sense that I would be annointed by YHWH

 

[redcent]

Legal marriage isn't what makes a marriage spiritually. So that part wouldn't matter.

If Marshall abandoned The Torah he wouldn't be anywhere near my house so it wouldn't even happen

how would you get far away from him when he's in front of you just starting to say he's renouncing the Torah? Do you think you have super human speed or something? What if he corners you first? What if he sat you down to dinner, told you he hates the torah, but as you get up to leave he points a gun at you?

And no, you can't back out now. In the situation I'm describing, you're still legally married. You have supported spousal rape. If he's raping you while legally married that's spousal rape.

Your theory about verbally abusive threads falls a little short. Yes, I choose to be here to debate but I also said that I'm not affected by your verbal abuse. So while I do believe that the majority of you ARE verbally abusive it doesn't affect me emotionally or mentally because I'm not in covenant with you

So why the big bold letters then? Why the lawsuits then? Why did you bother filing lawsuits if you're not bothered by anyone talking about you?

"Everything as provocation" is somewhat grandiose. You've not seen everything I do in my life.
But it sounds like your real issue is with the fact that I'm not the type of person who instigates

clearly, as you seem fine and dandy having someone call the holy text you worship toilet paper yet heaven help some random person point out you go through more men than underwear.

but it's ver rare I'm wrong because I spend most of my time in silence..

I highly doubt that. If you spent most of your time in silence you wouldn't be commenting so much on this thread, and it would never have exploded

A person who is blameless and perfect is reserved for God. You do not deserve that honour.

for one most women have committed adultery by cheating on their husbands and had abortions..

And this is where your hatred of women shows. This is something an incel or a mgtow would say. Or someone with internalised misogyny. I know it's a buzzword but you are the very definition of that. How can you claim to be against a "patriarchy" if you believe that all women are having all these abortions and do all this cheating? I think you've been brainwashed

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

There's nothing about my past that would disqualify me from being a morally superior woman.
For one, most women have committed adultery by cheating on their husbands and had abortions and I've never cheated on anyone nor murdered.

ive

for two, considering King Solomon, and Abraham engaged in serial Monogamy and yet were called YHWH's servant and righteous, you clearly lack and understanding of sexuality in The Torah

I've also not defiled my body with drugs, pharma and birth control

It makes complete sense that I would be annointed by YHWH

Oh geesh, that comment sent before I was finished.
Didn't mean for everyone there to be bolded.

And the missing sentence is: I've never committed any sin for which the capital punishment or excommunication is decreed

The sins I committed before coming to Torah were very minimal

how would you get far away from him when he's in front of you just starting to say he's renouncing the Torah? Do you think you have super human speed or something? What if he corners you first? What if he sat you down to dinner, told you he hates the torah, but as you get up to leave he points a gun at you?

And no, you can't back out now. In the situation I'm describing, you're still legally married. You have supported spousal rape. If he's raping you while legally married that's spousal rape.
So why the big bold letters then? Why the lawsuits then? Why did you bother filing lawsuits if you're not bothered by anyone talking about you?
clearly, as you seem fine and dandy having someone call the holy text you worship toilet paper yet heaven help some random person point out you go through more men than underwear.

The reason I filed the lawsuits, even though I'm not bothered by what is said here, is because I reason that it's better to try and be told "no" than not try at all. Instead of waking up years down the road and say "I should have sued him go remove the threads" I take care of business now. Even if the courts say "no" it's better that I at least tried instead of having regrets of not taking action.

In this potential scenario....he's pointing the gun to force me to have sex?

 

[cjöcker]

The reason I filed the lawsuits, even though I'm not bothered by what is said here, is because I reason that it's better to try and be told "no" than not try at all. Instead of waking up years down the road and say "I should have sued him go remove the threads" I take care of business now. Even if the courts say "no" it's better that I at least tried instead of having regrets of not taking action.

You threatened jersh while he was planning to tell you that Andrew was violating his restraining order and you were being a massive cunt to him, why were you so hellbent on getting them taken down when people felt sympathy for you?

 

[redcent]

The reason I filed the lawsuits, even though I'm not bothered by what is said here, is because I reason that it's better to try and be told "no" than not try at all. Instead of waking up years down the road and say "I should have sued him go remove the threads" I take care of business now. Even if the courts say "no" it's better that I at least tried instead of having regrets of not taking action.

who in the world worries what would happen if they didn't sue someone over petty nonsense?

In this potential scenario....he's pointing the gun to force me to have sex?

yes.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You threatened jersh while he was planning to tell you that Andrew was violating his restraining order and you were being a massive cunt to him, why were you so hellbent on getting them taken down when people felt sympathy for you?

Enabling a stalker is not empathy

who in the world worries what would happen if they didn't sue someone over petty nonsense?
yes.

In that situation I think the right thing to do would be to consent to sex with Marshall.

The reason is, his actions may be a momentary lapse in judgement.
I would need more days to be certain he really meant it. Also to be sure it's not a demon that needs to be expelled from him or that he's not going to repent. I'd have to be 100% sure there was no chance of healing or reconciliation

The second reason is because no divorce is final in Torah until they are sent out of your house permanently. In that scenario he's still standing in the house.

 

[redcent]

Enabling a stalker is not empathy





In that situation I think the right thing to do would be to consent to sex with Marshall.

The reason is, his actions may be a momentary lapse in judgement.
I would need more days to be certain he really meant it. Also to be sure it's not a demon that needs to be expelled from him or that he's not going to repent. I'd have to be 100% sure there was no chance of healing or reconciliation

The second reason is because no divorce is final in Torah until they are sent out of your house permanently. In that scenario he's still standing in the house.

So you'd be okay having sex with a demon

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

So you'd be okay having sex with a demon

That's not having sex with a demon

how would you get far away from him when he's in front of you just starting to say he's renouncing the Torah? Do you think you have super human speed or something? What if he corners you first? What if he sat you down to dinner, told you he hates the torah, but as you get up to leave he points a gun at you?

And no, you can't back out now. In the situation I'm describing, you're still legally married. You have supported spousal rape. If he's raping you while legally married that's spousal rape.
So why the big bold letters then? Why the lawsuits then? Why did you bother filing lawsuits if you're not bothered by anyone talking about you?
clearly, as you seem fine and dandy having someone call the holy text you worship toilet paper yet heaven help some random person point out you go through more men than underwear.

I highly doubt that. If you spent most of your time in silence you wouldn't be commenting so much on this thread, and it would never have exploded

A person who is blameless and perfect is reserved for God. You do not deserve that honour.

And this is where your hatred of women shows. This is something an incel or a mgtow would say. Or someone with internalised misogyny. I know it's a buzzword but you are the very definition of that. How can you claim to be against a "patriarchy" if you believe that all women are having all these abortions and do all this cheating? I think you've been brainwashed

You are using the name of a pagan elohim and then want to tell me what the definition of "blameless" is?
Pa---lease. Go learn the basics and then you can try to correct others.

You are trying to mimic and copy words I'm using like "internalized misogyny" but then you are even using it correctly.
I've done enough research and listening to know that YES, most women have had an abortion and/or cheated on their husbands.

Abortions and cheating (adultery) are worthy of being mentioned as dividers between the righteous and the unrighteous because the scriptures clearly say that adulterers and murderers are the worst of sinners. It has nothing to do with hating women.



EDIT: you are *NOT using it correctly

 

[PomegranateKing]

EDIT: you are *NOT using it correctly

Hey Melinda, just wanted to let you know I was thinking about you.

Cause I saw a comic where a samurai developed the ability to speak with his butt using farts and I remembered you.

... Still sperging? Well, glad to see some things never change.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

Things Melinda could be doing rather than picking fights all day every day on kiwi farms: teaching her children, getting a job, actually learning Hebrew, jilling herself while writing her fuckfuck book, looking for a new apartment to rent after she's evicted, looking for a higher quality mate than a mouth-breathing abusive dullard...

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Things Melinda could be doing rather than picking fights all day every day on kiwi farms: teaching her children, getting a job, actually learning Hebrew, jilling herself while writing her fuckfuck book, looking for a new apartment to rent after she's evicted, looking for a higher quality mate than a mouth-breathing abusive dullard...

I have a job, you're a moron.

I'm on maternity leave, I don't need to be running school right now. Once again, you're a moron.

I already know Biblical Hebrew, I've been studying it on and off for 15 years. Oh look, you're a moron three times over.

Oh, this is fun, let's keep going....

My family doesn't fit in apartments anymore. You're a moron 4 times over.

I don't need to look for new housing. You're a moron 5 times over.

I enjoy fucking Marshall, no need for a new spouse either. 6 times now you're a moron.

AND THE GRAND FINALE: I DON'T OWE YOU AN EXPLANATION FOR WHAT I DO WITH MY TIME OR WHY I'M ON THE INTERNET

 

[lamp]

I already know Biblical Hebrew, I've been studying it on and off for 15 years. Oh look, you're a moron three times over

Then why don’t you use it properly

Also, why would you continue to use this website knowing your stalker uses it too? You could’ve easily pressed charges for him violating his restraining order (sorry Andrew) but instead you continue to participate and use the website. You’re the only one here enabling him.

Also, Null isn’t “enabling” anyone, and co-conspiracy to stalk isn’t a thing.

 

[White Baby]

That's The Talmud you are talking about, not The Torah

I'm talking about the Torah because you don't follow the Talmud. A Torah master like you ought to know that divorce is treated very narrowly by Torah law.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I'm talking about the Torah because you don't follow the Talmud. A Torah master like you ought to know that divorce is treated very narrowly by Torah law.

The Torah does not forbid a woman from issuing a divorce decree. The Torah is actually silent about prohibiting a person, male or female, from issuing divorce paperwork.

Deuteronomy 24:1-4 uses only the word "IF". The Rabbis have added words to that clause and said then that only men have permission to issue divorce decrees. That's not what the text actually says

As a Torah master I'm more liberal than Christianity on what The Torah allows as far as divorce. But I'm much more conservative than the Rabbis because I don't believe "burnt toast" is a valid cause for divorce

 

[White Baby]

The Torah does not forbid a woman from issuing a divorce decree. The Torah is actually silent about prohibiting a person, male or female, from issuing divorce paperwork.

Deuteronomy 24:1-4 uses only the word "IF". The Rabbis have added words to that clause and said then that only men have permission to issue divorce decrees. That's not what the text actually says

As a Torah master I'm more liberal than Christianity on what The Torah allows as far as divorce. But I'm much more conservative than the Rabbis because I don't believe "burnt toast" is a valid cause for divorce

OK but you're still an adulteress

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Then why don’t you use it properly

Also, why would you continue to use this website knowing your stalker uses it too? You could’ve easily pressed charges for him violating his restraining order (sorry Andrew) but instead you continue to participate and use the website. You’re the only one here enabling him.

Also, Null isn’t “enabling” anyone, and co-conspiracy to stalk isn’t a thing.

I did press charges for him violating it. They won't extradite him.

But I continue to use this site for debate because all he can do on this thread is show reactions. Not a big deal. I don't read his thread except twice in the last 3 months when other anti-KF people alerted me to a certain comment or two, I read only the specific comment.

I haven't said anything here he hasn't already read while lurking on my Academia page.

I've shared some personal information about my relationship with Marshall and a picture of my homeschooling classroom but what I've shared isn't confidential.
There's parts of me that can be public and I'm okay with that. It's when certain boundaries are crossed that it becomes stalking


I don't feel the need to hide from society to avoid him. A lot of people think that the victims of stalking should leave the internet but it's actually the other way around

OK but you're still an adulteress

According to who?