Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[redcent]

A bunch of people who are adamwnt that Narcissim is an issue but wjeews


Because drug dealers bring problems onto entire families, not just the people buying from them




Because he took bad advice from a Paul follower who told Marshall not to leave her and ignored good advice from a man who told him to leave her because she didn't submit to The Torah.

"An evil wife is a yoke shaken to and fro: he that hath hold of her is as though he held a scorpion" (Ecclesiasticus 26:7)




Blind trust is foolish





Just because someone does not express their anger in a passive aggressive manner does not mean they are mentally cooky

A bunch of people who are adament that Narcissim is an issue but where is the empathy for Marshall and the stress he must've have been under dealing with a druggie for a spouse?

Please, do explain this contradiction in your moral philosophy!

So this "Paul follower" who gave bad advice did he hold a gun up to marshal and force him to make a bad choice?
Is marshal an infantile child unable to be responsible for his stupid choices?

Or are you going to blame someone else for the actions your husband had under his own free will?

I'm guessing the latter because you think marshal is an untouchable angel

Putting someone in a headlock isnt physical abuse. It's a one time act and so I would classify that as "striking" a person.

By your logic the police are physically abusing people because they use physical violence all the time. So really I think you are just brainwashed to believe that violence is only a privilege of the Government and the common person should be a pacifist

Breaking someone's property may be justified too. Its not always wrong.

Cops are trained to deal with violent people. They are trained when not to use violence and know the law when to use it in extreme circumstances which us part of their job

Unless marshal or you work in a job with proper training where danger is the norm you have mo excuse

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

When did I say I had unconditional empathy?
I do, however, have morals. Those morals prevent me from siding with an abusive rat.



Self defense is the only (legal) exception. Marshall was unprovoked and attacked first. He’s in the wrong.

I have to add: if I didn’t like Marshall and put him in headlock and broke his phone, that’s justified under your own views, right? I believe it’s ‘righteous violence’ because he goes against what I believe!

You may believe it is "righteous violence" but in a world where secular laws aren't trying to outlaw violence, the Righteous man who follows YHWH wins. This restores the order of the righteous ruling over the evil.

Take The Stalker for example. If it wasn't illegal for my husband to jump his ass on the sidewalk, he'd have shut his mouth a long time ago. Instead we live a world governed by paperwork and those who need to be corrected by violence persist in their evil

No you're a narc because you're so far up your own ass that you can't admit your flaws despite them being blatantly, glaringly, obvious to anyone with two braincells.

You're a CUNT because you don't have empathy torwards humanity except for others in your retarded little cult. This can be shown by you trying to take credit for covid. I lack empathy for sacks of pig shit like you and @Marshall Castersen.

No one is required by any moral law to look at themself as having flaws. If you think you can prove otherwise, I'm all ears.

You know, with the amount of injecting words into people's mouths that you do, one would think you're getting paid for it. No one here on this board has said that striking a person physically is never justified, only that simple words don't justify it. If the woman had been attacking Marshall with a weapon I would've been all for him putting her in as many headlocks as it took to subdue her. And any idiot with more than two brain cells to rub together understands that women are capable of abuse in any relationship-- it's just that none of us believe that convicted felon and noted "bitch discipliner" Marshall Castersen is the abused partner here.



Proverbs 20:3-13.

"3 Foolish people are always fighting, but avoiding quarrels will bring you honor."

"7 The good people who live honest lives will be a blessing to their children. 8 When a king sits on his throne to judge, he knows evil when he sees it. 9 No one can say, "I am innocent; I have never done anything wrong.""

Firstly, I put NO words into your mouth. You said it yourself that a person who was "beaten" deserved empathy (ie not physical striking allowed). You also said he was a "wife beater" out of the range of "normal" because she is the "wife" (ie woman). ....and you are saying it now TWICE. RIGHT THERE above again you just accused the situation of being "SIMPLE WORDS" trying to make her look innocent and "if she had this object or that object than it was oK" trying to make her look innocent.

You say you have the brain cells to understand women are capable of abuse yet you are completely blind to the effects of mental and verbal abuse on men.

So read what you wrote again and THINK HARDER

You really need to pick a better version of the Scriptures because your translation butchers and hides the Hebrew

Here is what Proverbs 20:3 really says:

"It is an honour for a man to cease from strife: but every fool will be meddling."

"Strife" in the Hebraic Scriptures is tension between people who don't follow The Torah and those who do. So this verse is telling you not to get involved personally with people who don't believe

Your Proverbs 20:7(9 in my translation) is translated incorrectly as well.

Here is is in another version.

"Who can say, “I have made my heart clean,
I am cleansed from my sin”?"

Here is the Hebrew to prove your translation is a farse:

More evidence that she's not Trump's Chosen.
"A fool’s mouth is his destruction, and his lips are the snare of his soul"
In other words a man should control what he says. You constantly say stupid shit in this very thread Melinda, should we physically beat you for it?

A foo

So this "Paul follower" who face bad advice did he hold a gun up to marshal and force him to make a bad choice?
Is marshal an infantile child unable to be responsible for his stupid choices?

Or are you going to blame someone else for the actions your husband had under his own free will?

I'm guessing the latter because you think marshal is an untouchable angel

Cops are trained to deal with violent people. They are trained when not to use violence and know the law when to use it in extreme circumstances which us part of their job

Unless marshal or you work in a job with proper training where danger is the norm you have mo excuse

Yes, he had a choice to be a doormat and a pacifist. Is he wrong for not being that though? NO

That is not the correct use of "untouchable angel". "Untouchable angel" means you can't ever lay hands on a woman physically out of provocation, not attacking. No one has a right to attack Marshall, no.

I mean, it isn't blind. If you're married you should know well enough your partner's character.

If they are going to be dishonest they're going to find a way. I trust her not to be a duplicitous cunt. Your husband trusts you to turn over all your activities. I'm sure if you really set your mind to it you could cheat pretty fucking easily.

I just happen to not be so incredibly insecure to demand my wife hand over her daily log of activities. I married her because I love and trust her. If I can't trust her then who can I trust? Why am I with her if I can't trust her? The absurdly controlling dynamic of demanding literally every account login is abusive imo. Especially considering you're with a violent deranged lion that might wake up one day and decide the stuff that used to be okay isn't anymore, so he feeds you one. But that's okay, right? Because know you know that sets you off and you shouldn't be doing that.

My evidence that he's guilty is that he was found guilty. I'd be willing to bet he admitted his guilt in a court of law. He's guilty. That's why you had to have a meeting with his PO to get approval for him to move to VA. He's literally guilty as in he's being punished right now for something. He either admitted to his guilt, or the evidence was so damning that 12 random people he's never seen in his life were convinced beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT that he's guilty. Pretty fucking damning if you ask me. Also he can't own guns. I just like reminding you and him of this, that if he owns guns it's a felony. If you straw purchased them that's also a felony.

And those who lie about what they do BEFORE you get married?

I already discussed his plea bargain, I'm not up for repeating myself

 

[Baguette Child]

No one is required by any moral law to look at themself as having flaws.

Wow, okay. That's a whole new level of narcissism that I haven't seen before. I mean, inward reflection is kind of a basic part of the human condition, so... How do you even function as a person, let alone improve yourself, if you are completely incapable of assessing your own shortcomings?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Since @TamarYaelBatYah feels like quoting Proverbs at me as if it supports Marshall being a violent wife-beating lunatic, here's some more verses that her and him can ponder deeply--

Proverbs 15:18-- 18 A hot-tempered person stirs up conflict, but the one who is patient calms a quarrel.

KEYWORD THERE: "hot-tempered" and "stirs up" --- I'm pretty sure having a drug problem and refusing to be accountable to your spouse is the reason for things being "stired up". Dealing with your spouses drug problem for years and years and then snapping is far from being "hot tempered".

Proverbs 16:32-- 32 Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one who takes a city.

Striking someone doesn't mean you don't have "self control". Moses struck a man and killed him and was called righteous for that. You going to say he didn't have self control either?

Proverbs 20:3-- 3 It is to one’s honor to avoid strife, but every fool is quick to quarrel.

Dealing with your spouses drug problem for years and years and then snapping is far from being quick to quarrel

Proverbs 29:22-- 22 An angry person stirs up conflict, and a hot-tempered person commits many sins.

Yea, who stirred up the problem? the druggie who wouldnt hand over her passwords
Dealing with your spouses drug problem for years and years and then snapping is far from being "hot tempered".


So you just failed miserably to connect any of these to being relevant to the situation. Read before you just post a bunch of verses without actually reading them first

Wow, okay. That's a whole new level of narcissism that I haven't seen before. I mean, inward reflection is kind of a basic part of the human condition, so... How do you even function as a person, let alone improve yourself, if you are completely incapable of assessing your own shortcomings?

"Shortcomings" is not "flaws". So which word is it that you are trying to speak about?

 

[redcent]

A foo


Yes, he had a choice to be a doormat and a pacifist. Is he wrong for not being that though? NO

yes he is wrong. You decry pacifism and "being a doormat" but that is the way of this world. If you want to survive, behave. If you don't behave or be a "pacifist" get the fuck out, enjoy getting sued or thrown in prison while your kids get taken away, or kill yourself. There is no ifs or buts. This is a world where you have to get along.

That is not the correct use of "untouchable angel". "Untouchable angel" means you can't ever lay hands on a woman physically out of provocaion, not attacking. No one has a right to attack Marshall, no.

you don't get to decide what a word means

Either live with how everyone else defines things or get out. You dont like how we think? No one is keeping you here. Live with it or get out. Nobody is ever going to cater to you. If you don't like it leave

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Proverbs 15:18-- 18 A hot-tempered person stirs up conflict, but the one who is patient calms a quarrel.

KEYWORD THERE: "hot-tempered" and "stirs up" --- I'm pretty sure having a drug problem and refusing to be accountable to your spouse is the reason for things being "stired up". Dealing with your spouses drug problem for years and years and then snapping is far from being "hot tempered".

Proverbs 16:32-- 32 Better a patient person than a warrior, one with self-control than one who takes a city.

Striking someone doesn't mean you don't have "self control". Moses struck a man and killed him and was called righteous for that. You going to say he didn't have self control either?

Proverbs 20:3-- 3 It is to one’s honor to avoid strife, but every fool is quick to quarrel.

Dealing with your spouses drug problem for years and years and then snapping is far from being quick to quarrel

Proverbs 29:22-- 22 An angry person stirs up conflict, and a hot-tempered person commits many sins.

Yea, who stirred up the problem? the druggie who wouldnt hand over her passwords
Dealing with your spouses drug problem for years and years and then snapping is far from being "hot tempered".


So you just failed miserably to connect any of these to being relevant to the situation. Read before you just post a bunch of verses without actually reading them first

*spouse's

damn autocorrect

 

[Deadpool]

No one is required by any moral law to look at themself as having flaws. If you think you can prove otherwise, I'm all ears.

"Shortcomings" is not "flaws". So which word is it that you are trying to speak about?

This is why you are a miserable piece of shit with no hope of growth or improvement. You will continue to stagnate until you die hopeless and alone screeching about your false perfection into the void.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

yes he is wrong. You decry pacifism and "being a doormat" but that is the way of this world. If you want to survive, behave. If you don't behave or be a "pacifist" get the fuck out, enjoy getting sued or thrown in prison while your kids get taken away, or kill yourself. There is no ifs or buts. This is a world where you have to get along.
you don't get to decide what a word means

Either live with how everyone else defines things or get out. You dont like how we think? No one is keeping you here. Live with it or get out. Nobody is ever going to cater to you. If you don't like it leave

There is no universal defintion of all words in the English language. You, like Deadpool over there, doesn't understand language concepts like sland, idiomatic expression and creative license when using language. You seem to have this pre-occupation with conformity to the majority. Yucky.

There is no universal defintion of all words in the English language. You, like Deadpool over there, doesn't understand language concepts like sland, idiomatic expression and creative license when using language. You seem to have this pre-occupation with conformity to the majority. Yucky.

*don't and *slang

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

A foo

I didn't know you knew ebonics!

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Since @TamarYaelBatYah feels like quoting Proverbs at me as if it supports Marshall being a violent wife-beating lunatic, here's some more verses that her and him can ponder deeply--

The first time I clicked this it had a list of about 15 verses. Now I only see 4.
Did you edit it?

 

[Baguette Child]

"Shortcomings" is not "flaws".

Thesaurus disagrees with you. Pretty sure I see flaws on that list.

 

[Deadpool]

There is no universal defintion of all words in the English language. You, like Deadpool over there, doesn't understand language concepts like sland, idiomatic expression and creative license when using language. You seem to have this pre-occupation with conformity to the majority. Yucky.

No we're just smart enough to realize words have meaning, and using them appropriately is important for conversation. It's clear to everyone here that your vocabulary and grasp on the english language in general is weak, but you're a narc. So instead of facing that fact and improving yourself you deflect it and make it about how the flaw lies in us. Also anyone using the word "yucky" above the age of 8 is probably severely mentally retarded.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Since @TamarYaelBatYah feels like quoting Proverbs at me as if it supports Marshall being a violent wife-beating lunatic, here's some more verses that her and him can ponder deeply--

Thesaurus disagrees with you. Pretty sure I see flaws on that list.

Thesaurus means SIMILAR words. Not the SAME word.

No we're just smart enough to realize words have meaning, and using them appropriately is important for conversation. It's clear to everyone here that your vocabulary and grasp on the english language in general is weak, but you're a narc. So instead of facing that fact and improving yourself you deflect it and make it about how the flaw lies in us. Also anyone using the word "yucky" above the age of 8 is probably severely mentally exceptional.

Clearly you don't know what creative license is, proving my point here once again.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

A foo


Yes, he had a choice to be a doormat and a pacifist. Is he wrong for not being that though? NO

That is not the correct use of "untouchable angel". "Untouchable angel" means you can't ever lay hands on a woman physically out of provocation, not attacking. No one has a right to attack Marshall, no.



And those who lie about what they do BEFORE you get married?

I already discussed his plea bargain, I'm not up for repeating myself

If you marry someone you don't know that's on you. No amount of surveillance is going to make an untruthful person truthful.

Also legally he had several options. He could've left her, taken his kid, and used her alleged drug habit as grounds for full custody. There's no reason to beat the shit out of someone and smash their phone when they try to get help. That's not legal and there was no rational reason to do this. There was no imminent danger.

 

[White Baby]

You said it yourself that a person who was "beaten" deserved empathy (ie not physical striking allowed). You also said he was a "wife beater" out of the range of "normal" because she is the "wife" (ie woman).

Let's be super duper simple and clear so that you understand: if the sexes had been reversed in this, I would be referring to the wife, or whatever she was (Marshall continues to be an adulterer BTW) in this situation with the same pejoratives as I am for Marshall. I have an especial anger for wifebeaters, as most people do, because so many women are thoroughly physically outmatched by the men who abuse them, as I'm sure the mother of Marshall's child was too.

....and you are saying it now TWICE. RIGHT THERE above again you just accused the situation of being "SIMPLE WORDS" trying to make her look innocent and "if she had this object or that object than it was oK" trying to make her look innocent.

You say you have the brain cells to understand women are capable of abuse yet you are completely blind to the effects of mental and verbal abuse on men.

I don't give a single flying shit if Marshall was supposedly being verbally abused. I do not, for a single second, believe that a man who has no problem with smacking "bitches" around (his word, not mine) could ever be cowed by a "bitch" hurting his tender little fee fees. If, and that is a very generous *if*, he was being verbally abused, then he still does not get to strike someone by the laws of your own fucking Torah and the country that you both fucking live in, unless she had escalated that abuse to brandishing a weapon. At which point, it would be self defense to put her in a headlock, by both the Torah and the laws of this country.

You really need to pick a better version of the Scriptures because your translation butchers and hides the Hebrew

Here is what Proverbs 20:3 really says:

I'm not going to entertain the gibberings of a woman who doesn't understand the difference between ancient and modern Hebrew, who can't even read or speak either form of Hebrew, and who doesn't understand that one of the most dire sins in the entire fucking book is reading meanings into verses that aren't there. If you don't like the version I used, suggest one that actually exists, because the NIV is the default for the website I used to correlate those verses.

Do you understand how much of a serious undertaking translating Scripture is? People study their entire lives, under mentors who've also studied their entire lives, absolutely throwing themselves into their work in order to do the best justice possible to the spirit of the words they're transcribing. You, meanwhile, are a stupid little schizo bint in Unclefucker, Virginia who lives on welfare and is raising six children. You are not a trustworthy source. Suck a dick.

The first time I clicked this it had a list of about 15 verses. Now I only see 4.
Did you edit it?

Click where it says 'click to expand', you walnut.

Striking someone doesn't mean you don't have "self control". Moses struck a man and killed him and was called righteous for that. You going to say he didn't have self control either?

Moses and Marshall are in no way comparable and I'm frankly insulted that you would even try. The rest of this post is feeble weaseling out of my points and you only took a look at about half of them, i.e. the ones you could come up with a paper-thin rebuttal for in 15 minutes. You know I'm right, Linda. Admit it. Not only are they all applicable to Marshall, they're for you as well.

Editing to add: Proverbs 29:11 (KJVA) A fool uttereth all his mind: but a wise man keepeth it in till afterwards.

Read it, Linda. Read it to yourself, read it to your kids, read it to that wild dog you call a partner.

 

[Deadpool]

Clearly you don't know what creative license is, proving my point here once again.

There's creative license and there's mangling the English language because you're retarded. You do the latter.

 

[Baguette Child]

a stupid little schizo bint in Unclefucker, Virginia

Virginia is way over quota for fucked up weirdos. What is wrong with this place?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Since @TamarYaelBatYah feels like quoting Proverbs at me as if it supports Marshall being a violent wife-beating lunatic, here's some more verses that her and him can ponder deeply--

Ok, got them now, let's continue...


Proverbs 30:33-- 33 For as churning cream produces butter, and as twisting the nose produces blood, so stirring up anger produces strife.”

KEYWORD: "Stiring up anger"---yup, having a drug problem and not being accountable to your spouse sure is going to stir up some anger

Proverbs 13:10-- 10 Where there is strife, there is pride, but wisdom is found in those who take advice.

KEYWORD: Strife. Strife is caused by pagan spouses who don't follow The Torah.

Matthew 5:22-- 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’ is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.

KEYWORD: "brother" or "sister" -- a pagan wife is not a "sister"

James 1:19-20-- 19 My dear brothers and sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, 20 because human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.

KEYWORD: "slow" -- Marshall was definitely slow to get angry when he had been dealing with the problem for years before he snapped

Proverbs 29:11-- 11 Fools give full vent to their rage, but the wise bring calm in the end.

KEYWORD: Your translation is a farse. Check the original Hebrew which reads:

"A fool uttereth all his mind: but a wise man keepeth it in till afterwards."

Proverbs 19:11-- 11 A person’s wisdom yields patience; it is to one’s glory to overlook an offense.

KEYWORD: "offense" --- offense, not major drug problem endangering your family and draining your finances

James 4:1-2-- 1 What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you? 2 You desire but do not have, so you kill. You covet but you cannot get what you want, so you quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God.

KEYWORD: "covet" and "desire" --- Marshall wasn't coveting anything

Psalm 37:8-9-- 8 Refrain from anger and turn from wrath; do not fret—it leads only to evil. 9 For those who are evil will be destroyed, but those who hope in the LORD will inherit the land.

KEYWORD: "refrain from anger" and "turn from wrath" -- whose wrath? ELOHIM's. refrain from being angry about WHAT? "those who are evil will be destroyed".

Proverbs 14:29-- 29 Whoever is patient has great understanding, but one who is quick-tempered displays folly.

KEYWORD: "QUICK-tempered" --- dealing with a problem for years and years and then snapping is not QUICK


So again you fail miserably to actually think about what you are posting and to post anything relevant to the situation

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Ok, got them now, let's continue...


Proverbs 30:33-- 33 For as churning cream produces butter, and as twisting the nose produces blood, so stirring up anger produces strife.”

KEYWORD: "Stiring up anger"---yup, having a drug problem and not being accountable to your spouse sure is going to stir up some anger

Proverbs 13:10-- 10 Where there is strife, there is pride, but wisdom is found in those who take advice.

KEYWORD: Strife. Strife is caused by pagan spouses who don't follow The Torah.

Matthew 5:22-- 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with a brother or sister will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to a brother or sister, ‘Raca,’ is answerable to the court. And anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.

KEYWORD: "brother" or "sister" -- a pagan wife is not a "sister"

James 1:19-20-- 19 My dear brothers and sisters, take note of this: Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, 20 because human anger does not produce the righteousness that God desires.

KEYWORD: "slow" -- Marshall was definitely slow to get angry when he had been dealing with the problem for years before he snapped

Proverbs 29:11-- 11 Fools give full vent to their rage, but the wise bring calm in the end.

KEYWORD: Your translation is a farse. Check the original Hebrew which reads:

"A fool uttereth all his mind: but a wise man keepeth it in till afterwards."

Proverbs 19:11-- 11 A person’s wisdom yields patience; it is to one’s glory to overlook an offense.

KEYWORD: "offense" --- offense, not major drug problem endangering your family and draining your finances

James 4:1-2-- 1 What causes fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you? 2 You desire but do not have, so you kill. You covet but you cannot get what you want, so you quarrel and fight. You do not have because you do not ask God.

KEYWORD: "covet" and "desire" --- Marshall wasn't coveting anything

Psalm 37:8-9-- 8 Refrain from anger and turn from wrath; do not fret—it leads only to evil. 9 For those who are evil will be destroyed, but those who hope in the LORD will inherit the land.

KEYWORD: "refrain from anger" and "turn from wrath" -- whose wrath? ELOHIM's. refrain from being angry about WHAT? "those who are evil will be destroyed".

Proverbs 14:29-- 29 Whoever is patient has great understanding, but one who is quick-tempered displays folly.

KEYWORD: "QUICK-tempered" --- dealing with a problem for years and years and then snapping is not QUICK


So again you fail miserably to actually think about what you are posting and to post anything relevant to the situation

This is just kinda grasping at straws with representations you're skewing to fit your ideas of Marshall. While you could still argue these were used in a skewed manner as well, we know much less than this situation than you claim to and therefore hold less bias.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

There's creative license and there's mangling the English language because you're retarded. You do the latter.

All a matter of scholastic opinion

If you marry someone you don't know that's on you. No amount of surveillance is going to make an untruthful person truthful.

Also legally he had several options. He could've left her, taken his kid, and used her alleged drug habit as grounds for full custody. There's no reason to beat the shit out of someone and smash their phone when they try to get help. That's not legal and there was no rational reason to do this. There was no imminent danger.

I couldn't disagree more. If you are lied to, the fault is on the LIAR, not the victim of the lie.

Yes, he could have left her and taken the child the moment he found out she was driving in the car high on drugs. He chose not to. And in return for his compassion toward her he got fucked over. That's the heart of a goy -- they will fuck you over after you gave them mercy.

So lesson learned for Marshall: HIS IS A CHERISHED SON OF YHWH, DON'T EVER MARRY A PAGAN WOMAN. This is nothing I haven't said to him directly.

This is just kinda grasping at straws with representations you're skewing to fit your ideas of Marshall. While you could still argue these were used in a skewed manner as well, we know much less than this situation than you claim to and therefore hold less bias.

No, it's me actually reading what the Proverbs are saying by counting EVERY WORD in each sentence