Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

What the fuck is this montrosity?
View attachment 1261702

You missed a bunch, you fucking tard -
View attachment 1261707
View attachment 1261710
Anything after "transgender" isn't a thing, and I'm pretty iffy on "transgender" being a thing, after all the dumbfuckery you assholes have been up to.
Points for trying to call out the insanity at least, even though I’m still on the fence about asexuals, call bullshit on non binary and genderfluid, and still don’t what queer entails exactly.
Intersex is real but it’s a rare genetic condition that affects something like 1 in 2000 people. How it constitutes as a gender or sexuality is a mystery.
 
Pretending ancient american civilizations were, somehow, living in the garden of eden is super racist. These were complex human groups that dealt in war, technology and trading, like any other complex human civilization.
Mesoamerican civs are interesting due to their religious aspects, economy, societal structure and arquitecture. Outside of that, they were as savage as european cavemen were. And no matter how much "Muh natives" they scream, it will not change it a bit.
Besides, you ever wondered why creative projects by SJWs tend to be either really quick and dirty, or drag on forever? It's because they have to either do it really quick so they can go back to social posturing, or because they lose interest in a longer project and procrastinate so they can spend more time on Twitter. For proof, Just look at all those "woke" programmers who post more photos of their dinner or their brand new Patreon-funded motorcycle or whatever, instead of new builds of whatever project they advertise themselves as carrying out.

Being on social media that much and maintaining that constant "fight or flight" response has got to be exhausting, too. So that's even less time and effort they can put into being actually creative. You see that a lot with woke artists: as a rule of thumb the more they post about SocJus or being transgender or whatever their current obsession is, the lower their output. So what do you get out of them? Either a single "quality" item a month, or a lot of low-effort "transformative" art every day. Characters getting genderbent, raceflipped, crippled, shipped, plastered over with political statements, etc. Very little original content, and even that tends to be very barebones: characters are reduced to their bare functional minimum, with irrelevant details tacked on to fulfill the creator's kinks or aesthetics. They lack any depth outside of the political statement the creator wants to make.
For me, it is amazing that i know plenty of artists that are very unconfident about their ideas due to their lack of pratical skills, mainly because they are new or very hard on themselves while SJW artists shit out a turd and make a decent amount of cash for something that will not amount to anything while they discard valid criticism as harassment and oppression. Just look at Dobson and his constant tirades and horrible artwork. You would eventually guess that they would tank sooner or later with people either not wanting to support a dickhead or not being pleased with what they pay, but you gotta remember these people are kept afloat by other people like them: sad and angry people that nod at every chance to whatever their dear artist says. Not because they like him, or their art, or because they are his friends... Because of his political alignment in those bullshit identity culture crap.

Thankfully, there are still honest to god artists out there that care about their works and not about politics. Praise the people that make silly comics about half naked women and murderous robots.
How the fuck is heterosexuality harmful when it's human reproduction and how every living being is with another one of the opposite sex?
For many, every type of heterosexual sex is rape because it perpetuates the superiority of man over women because primes the pleasure of the male over the pleasure of the woman. I'm not kidding about this.
 
What the fuck is this montrosity?
View attachment 1261702

You missed a bunch, you fucking tard -
View attachment 1261707
View attachment 1261710
Anything after "transgender" isn't a thing, and I'm pretty iffy on "transgender" being a thing, after all the dumbfuckery you assholes have been up to.
Actually "Intersex" is also a thing, it's just a very rare birth defect and I'm unsure if it really belongs under the LGBT label. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex)

Gender dysphoria is a thing, again, it's just very rare and most of the "trans" people you see on Twatter are LARPing. It's why they flip their shit when you tell them you need dysphoria to be trans.

As for Asexuality/Aromantic, yeah, there are people with really low sex drives but I don't see why "I'm a girl who likes boys, but only the ones I'm super close to" is now being stuffed into the LGBT community with anyone who points out that being straight means you aren't gay being slammed as bigots. Non-Binary/Genderfluid is nonsense with no actual research to back it up, and pansexuality is just bisexuality with a different colored flag for some reason. Unsure why "queer" has become its own label now, considering it's a slur, but whatever.

Everything else that was crossed out there by OP is lunacy, except for maybe "questioning", I guess.
 
Asexuality belongs as well. How is androgyne lgbt though? It's a way to present yourself (or sometimes a natural thing). Not about your gender.

EDIT: also, homoromantic/biromantic etc are terms that are supposedly reserved for asexual people. So while the terms exist and are actively used by members of the ace community, they don't have flags per say and are mostly sub-orientations rather than full-on sexualities.
 
Asexuality belongs as well. How is androgyne lgbt though? It's a way to present yourself (or sometimes a natural thing). Not about your gender.

EDIT: also, homoromantic/biromantic etc are terms that are supposedly reserved for asexual people. So while the terms exist and are actively used by members of the ace community, they don't have flags per say and are mostly sub-orientations rather than full-on sexualities.
There's been a weird push to expand the "trans umbrella" to include things like gender non-conforming men and women. So, if you're a woman with a vagina that is totally comfortable having said vagina, but you cut your hair short, congrats you're trans now.
 
There's been a weird push to expand the "trans umbrella" to include things like gender non-conforming men and women. So, if you're a woman with a vagina that is totally comfortable having said vagina, but you cut your hair short, congrats you're trans now.
That's really dumb. Which reminds me of a conversation I had on a Discord server yesterday where I mentioned that the stereotypical Tumblr trans user would call a tomboy a trans guy. Of course, they called me a transmed :lit:
 
Points for trying to call out the insanity at least, even though I’m still on the fence about asexuals, call bullshit on non binary and genderfluid, and still don’t what queer entails exactly.
Intersex is real but it’s a rare genetic condition that affects something like 1 in 2000 people. How it constitutes as a gender or sexuality is a mystery.
It's reasonable that someone might not like sex, it's just that the term's been extended to mean "not constantly thinking about sex with every other person."
 
If I go scalp some fuckers, I can just claim I was participating in "native religious ceremonies", right?
No, that is something the redskins learned from european mercs which was originally a method to claim a bounty.
If you want to participate in a proper religious ceremony, rip someone's heart out of their chest, burn it, and then have the body butchered by your congregation.
 
No, that is something the redskins learned from european mercs which was originally a method to claim a bounty.
If you want to participate in a proper religious ceremony, rip someone's heart out of their chest, burn it, and then have the body butchered by your congregation.

Binding them and throwing them over a cliff to die of thirst while the birds peck them is still okay, right?
 
No, you'd be arrested.

For cultural appropriation.
Can we bicker at native american people for cultural appropiation of scalping? After all, it was european mercenaries who taught them to do it.
Binding them and throwing them over a cliff to die of thirst while the birds peck them is still okay, right?
You can also throw their kids into a furnace. After all, Moloch is back in style.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™
All I'm seeing when I read these tweets is "orcs are niggas." It's a very good look from the woke crowd for sure.
I believe the correct syntax is "orcs is niggas"

All this D&D nonsense makes me want to run a game where you play as the most ridiculous over the top stereotypes of each race. Choose your character race between Honky, Nigga, Chink, Spic, Sand-Nigga, Indigenous

Choose your subrace...

Whites: the vicious and aggressive Colonizer, methed up Redneck, rich preppy white privileged Oppressor, alt-right Neo-Nazi

Blacks: noble and ferocious Zula Warrior, African American saggy pants Thug, Jamaican Druglord, 70s Black Panther

Could also play as an infectious Chinaman who has the ability to infect others around him, border jumpin Mexican, classic Muslim terrorist, Gas Huffer... You guys get the idea
 
Back