- Joined
- Aug 10, 2016
I read several of the stories. None of them involved putting babies on futile life support, something I do have a problem with, and with two exceptions, and just in passing, they didn't mention any religious beliefs at all. My observation about parents who choose to do this boils down to one thing: They wanted to have their baby for as long as possible, and it's a decision nobody else can make.
When the McCaughey septuplets were born in 1997, some people criticized the parents for not reducing the pregnancy. Yes, they're devout Christians, but that's not why they kept them all. They just plain old wanted all of those kids! At that time, a local TV station did an interview with a couple in my region who had a septuplet pregnancy a few years earlier. They said, "We are not religious people, and we both have very strong pro-choice beliefs. We just didn't want to do that." Even though she miscarried the entire pregnancy within a few weeks of its discovery, they still had no regrets.
Selective reduction isn't the same as having a criptato on purpose, I can see how someone might have a problem with picking and choosing fetuses if they're all healthy, especially since I'd think people who get IVF are likely to experience more inner conflict about that then the average person. Octomom is still a cow in her own right but was smart enough to keep her life private for the most part if only to keep the tugboat coming.