Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

[Marche]

Behold! The horrors of having a troon child!!:
View attachment 1273490
https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/gdy0hi/my_mom_doesnt_want_me_to_be_trans/ (Archive)

Having your mentally unstable son screech at you about how he wants to cut off his dick sound absolutely horrifying and sad. I feel sorry for the mom and am actually quite concerned about the chance of him moving to suicide baiting and worst-case scenario doing something that everyone involved will regret.

Gotta love child grooming replies.
Went through his posts and its all just that super TRAAAAANS reddit and his first post like 5 months ago basically amounts to "I am a loser and have no friends now I am trans because feelings"

 

[Captain Fitzbattleaxe]

View attachment 1273306

I don't have the crayons to explain to these 2 exceptional individuals how wrong they truly are.

Fun fact: In Viking societies you were expected to literally duel anyone who called you a nīðing. If you didn't it was taken as proof that you were one and you would become an outlaw, meaning that you would lose all your rights and could be killed without consequences.

Nīðing for those who don't know means (among other things) the bottom in a homosexual relationships. Why was being a bottom so bad? Because you were giving up your masculinity. So I doubt that they would be thrilled about someone literally giving up their masculinity in order to become a woman.

 

[Comrade Autogynephilia]

poor dad

"we wuz trannies n shiet"

 

[0 0]

Noticed him around here a few times. I guess he noticed too.
View attachment 1273066
https://twitter.com/FaithNaff/status/1257501376348925952?s=20

http://archive.li/MjGxX

That's Jess down at the bottom comment, best known for their "New Guy" comic and a follow-up depicting his self insert shoplifting.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

man i thought looking at 4chan from age 15 was detrimental to my development, but seeing this type of shit makes me think mainstream social media is WAY more damaging to kids than the edgy weeb sites i used to hang around at that age
at this point i'm seriously considering putting up a strict no-internet policy when i have kids of my own

public school system is going to force it on them

Suddenly Christian based homeschooling doesn't seem so crazy now does it?

 

[knightlautrec]

poor dad
View attachment 1273902
View attachment 1273904




"we wuz trannies n shiet"

'Are yah winning son?'

man i thought looking at 4chan from age 15 was detrimental to my development, but seeing this type of shit makes me think mainstream social media is WAY more damaging to kids than the edgy weeb sites i used to hang around at that age
at this point i'm seriously considering putting up a strict no-internet policy when i have kids of my own

It just gives them an echo chamber. This 14 year old boy looks for the right answers he wants online and basically falls into the troon lions den so they can validate and pull him deeper into the miasma of troonery. Hopefully his mother pulls the chord on the internet and makes him go outside for a bit to have some perspective.

At least 4chan teaches you a valuable lesson when it comes to anonymity in terms of realising 'nobody gives a shit about your opinion and that's fine' and learning to just brush off hostility and criticism because who gives a fuck?

 

[Next Task]

He's known he's trans for all of nine months! He's sure! He wants to stop taking one medication altering his body so he can start on other medications altering his body! MOOOOOOOOM! I do hope it's a troll, as it's the most stereotypical stupid-ass teenager reaction I could imagine, hitting every single point on the petulant teenager response chart. Including that he thinks he's old enough to permanently change his body but not old enough to use any actual swear words.

If it's real, considering he was likely 13 when this grand realisation hit him, I suppose it's informative that it's not just girls going through puberty whose reaction to their changing body makes them want to be the other gender. But I'm hoping it's just a honeypot for grooming troons rather than an actual confused kid doing the completely wrong thing at every turn. And if it's not a honeypot, it definitely should be.

 

[Ceci]

Behold! The horrors of having a troon child!!:
View attachment 1273490
https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/gdy0hi/my_mom_doesnt_want_me_to_be_trans/ (Archive)

Having your mentally unstable son screech at you about how he wants to cut off his dick sound absolutely horrifying and sad. I feel sorry for the mom and am actually quite concerned about the chance of him moving to suicide baiting and worst-case scenario doing something that everyone involved will regret.

Honestly the idea of a 14 year old TiM is straight up horrifying to me. That kid is going to be so fucked up, his breakdowns already give them impression he doesn't do great in irl social interactions, and trooning out surely isn't going to win him any friends at school (besides a few virtue-signallers at best). He'll probably be pushed further and further into internet hugboxes like Reddit for validation, and online troon culture is so hyper-sexualized he might just fall ass-first into getting groomed, or feel encouraged to share nudes.

 

[Bani]

Behold! The horrors of having a troon child!!:
View attachment 1273490
https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/gdy0hi/my_mom_doesnt_want_me_to_be_trans/ (Archive)

Having your mentally unstable son screech at you about how he wants to cut off his dick sound absolutely horrifying and sad. I feel sorry for the mom and am actually quite concerned about the chance of him moving to suicide baiting and worst-case scenario doing something that everyone involved will regret.

Jesus Christ, he has shoulder hair at fourteen? How much testosterone does this kid have? That's a sign from the universe that you were not even remotely meant to be female.

Honestly, if this happened to my son, I would just say something along the lines of, "You don't have to literally be a girl to enjoy girly things. You can enjoy all those things without changing your name or medically altering your body."

It's a paraphilia: a weird, out-of-nowhere kink that doesn't necessarily define the person's broader sexuality. Same thing as if you have, for example, a guy who's normally straight and attracted to women in general, but who's also sexually attracted to chairs. He's not suddenly chairsexual or bisexual for it. He's a straight guy with a paraphilia.

IMO, chasers fall into two categories:

1. Heavily closeted gay guys. Those are the ones who chase shemales to suck and get fucked by them. They're attracted to men but can't/won't accept it so they go for the closest thing to a man that they deluded themselves into thinking is not a man. Those often don't really care about appearances and so end up as bottom feeders picking up those who gave up trying to get a woman to fuck them. Those guys are gay and will always be gay.
2. Otherwise straight guys with a paraphilia towards dicks. Not men, just the dicks. Otherwise still fans of round asses, tits, delicate and feminine features, all that. Those are usually the ones with the dominating streak who chase after the really girly-looking troons out there. Once the troon in question gets the snip, though? These guys lose interest and go find another girlyboy, or go back to women.

You could absolutely call the second group bisexuals, but the range of attraction on the male side is so limited that it feels weird to me to use such a broad label on them. It's like calling bisexual a guy who likes most types of women all the time but also sometimes feels a mild attraction to... let's say... the guy who played lead on The Witcher. No other man, just that specific guy.

You basically just listed closeted bisexual guys twice.

Also, being attracted mostly to women and only a few men is still considered bisexual. Google "Kinsey Scale." It's pretty common for bisexuals to favor one sex more than the other while still being interested in both.

If you have a cock and like the idea of sexually interacting with someone else's, you're not straight. At the very least, you're bi-curious.

 

[Corn Flakes]

Fun fact: In Viking societies you were expected to literally duel anyone who called you a nīðing. If you didn't it was taken as proof that you were one and you would become an outlaw, meaning that you would lose all your rights and could be killed without consequences.

Nīðing for those who don't know means (among other things) the bottom in a homosexual relationships. Why was being a bottom so bad? Because you were giving up your masculinity. So I doubt that they would be thrilled about someone literally giving up their masculinity in order to become a woman.

The really impressive thing is that you can be sure those two would be the first to yell "CULTURAL APPROPRIATION" the moment they saw a white girl with a feather in her hair, but at the same time they're completely ignorant of the culture they're trying to appropriate.

The uncomfortable truth (for them, anyway) is that for a lot of pre-modern cultures a man's masculinity and virility was seen as a gift from the gods, or a representation of one's lifeforce. A man shouldn't squander their seed on another man, or letting it fall to the ground (masturbation). To do so was blasphemy against the gods and people took their gods seriously back then. This also applied to women: their fertility and femininity were their gifts. If a woman refused to attempt to exercise that fertility -- by courting other woman or living alone -- guess what happened? Blasphemy again!

Plus there were the usual societal issues. If you live in a little rural hamlet of 100 people and child mortality rates are upwards of 50%, a single woman not having the usual 8-15 kids could feasily affect the village's whole demographics. And since those societies were usually monogamous they needed a man to help have them all those kids so one bender refusing to have kids was also a problem for them.

And those, kids, are just some of the reasons why your gay/tranny ass wouldn't survive five seconds in the "multicultural and multiracial" society you think your ancestors had.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

I mean, there may have been what they'd call "trans women" being seidhr, but everyone else would have just called them faggots. Seidhrs were both respected and hated. It's funny how AGP vs HSTS seemed to even be reflected in the Sagas; Loki lusted after women in his female witchy form, while the Allfather in his female witchy form went out of his way to drink semen.

 

[Real Mutha For Ya]

Mad, spastic, autistic Troon Amy Petrelli is out and about, braving the Zombie Apocalypse/Archive to get his Troon juice.
He’s decided not to have his cock chopped off/Archive because his groomed “fiancée” is partial to girly-dick.
The multitude of lanyards he wears indicate to the long-suffering residents of Norwich that he’s a disabled tranny. They also carry his pronouns if anyone is in doubt.

 

[Opinion Discarded]

Rogaine Oger had a funny little tantrum a day ago over how TERFs are the same as natzees for having functional eyes (screencaps not mine).

Lesbians/straight men don't want to suck dick? Might as well join the klan, bigot

It's always the least passing troons who assert that you can't tell someone's sex just by looking at them, huh

He made sure to invoke the six bajillion for extra effect, oh gawd:

Canadian elected officials, everyone!

 

[Bani]

The really impressive thing is that you can be sure those two would be the first to yell "CULTURAL APPROPRIATION" the moment they saw a white girl with a feather in her hair, but at the same time they're completely ignorant of the culture they're trying to appropriate.

The uncomfortable truth (for them, anyway) is that for a lot of pre-modern cultures a man's masculinity and virility was seen as a gift from the gods, or a representation of one's lifeforce. A man shouldn't squander their seed on another man, or letting it fall to the ground (masturbation). To do so was blasphemy against the gods and people took their gods seriously back then. This also applied to women: their fertility and femininity were their gifts. If a woman refused to attempt to exercise that fertility -- by courting other woman or living alone -- guess what happened? Blasphemy again!

Plus there were the usual societal issues. If you live in a little rural hamlet of 100 people and child mortality rates are upwards of 50%, a single woman not having the usual 8-15 kids could feasily affect the village's whole demographics. And since those societies were usually monogamous they needed a man to help them all those kids so one bender refusing to have kids was also a problem for them.

And those, kids, are just some of the reasons why your gay/tranny ass wouldn't survive five seconds in the "multicultural and multiracial" society you think your ancestors had.

Most ancient Western cultures had really rigid gender roles, even the ones were same sex relationships were accepted. For a lot of those groups, like the Romans, Greeks, and Celts, gay sex was considered part of how soldiers bonded, and it was typically intercrural (non penetrative.) A lot of cultures that accepted gay relationships still considered being penetrated to be feminine and humiliating, hence the intercrural sex.

Pre-Christian Norse had really rigid gender roles, to the point where men and women had separate "heavens." They believed that women were uniquely capable of practicing magic (traveling Norse medicine women, called völva, are the origin of the "witch" myth.) While he wouldn't be burned at the stake for it, any man who engaged in "feminine" behavior like magic (or bottoming) would be considered the village idiot. A guy receiving anal was a faux-pas, but being romantically involved with the same sex wasn't. Basically, you could be gay, but you couldn't be feminine, so if troons existed in Norway in the middle ages, they would still be considered freaks and social outcasts.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

Most ancient Western cultures had really rigid gender roles, even the ones were same sex relationships were accepted. For a lot of those groups, like the Romans, Greeks, and Celts, gay sex was considered part of how soldiers bonded, and it was typically intercrural (non penetrative.) A lot of cultures that accepted gay relationships still considered being penetrated to be feminine and humiliating, hence the intercrural sex.

Pre-Christian Norse had really rigid gender roles, to the point where men and women had separate "heavens." They believed that women were uniquely capable of practicing magic (traveling Norse medicine women, called völva, are the origin of the "witch" myth.) While he wouldn't be burned at the stake for it, any man who engaged in "feminine" behavior like magic (or bottoming) would be considered the village idiot. A guy receiving anal was a faux-pas, but being romantically involved with the same sex wasn't. Basically, you could be gay, but you couldn't be feminine.

People were executed for homosexuality in the army of the Roman Republic. Homosexuality was considered a Greek vice, which didn't stop every nobleman from doing it anyway.

 

[Syntaxion]

Most ancient Western cultures had really rigid gender roles, even the ones were same sex relationships were accepted. For a lot of those groups, like the Romans, Greeks, and Celts, gay sex was considered part of how soldiers bonded, and it was typically intercrural (non penetrative.) A lot of cultures that accepted gay relationships still considered being penetrated to be feminine and humiliating, hence the intercrural sex.

Pre-Christian Norse had really rigid gender roles, to the point where men and women had separate "heavens." They believed that women were uniquely capable of practicing magic (traveling Norse medicine women, called völva, are the origin of the "witch" myth.) While he wouldn't be burned at the stake for it, any man who engaged in "feminine" behavior like magic (or bottoming) would be considered the village idiot. A guy receiving anal was a faux-pas, but being romantically involved with the same sex wasn't. Basically, you could be gay, but you couldn't be feminine, so if troons existed in Norway in the middle ages, they would still be considered freaks and social outcasts.

Romans and Greeks, maybe, but Germanics? I don't think so.

Ancient Germanic tribes in Germany and Scandinavia outright outlawed homosexuality itself, and the punishment was death by throwing them into a swamp.

See:

Also, Greeks being homosexual is extremely misunderstood, the philospher Sappho was exiled because she was lesbian. See:

Sappho of Lesbos

Sappho of Lesbos (c. 620-570 BCE) was a lyric poet whose work was so popular in ancient Greece, and beyond, that she was honored in statuary and praised by figures such as Solon and Plato. Very...

www.ancient.eu

It depends on which city and in which period. Greece has an extensive ancient history and some cities were okay with homosexuality, while in some cases like with Sappho, it leads to getting exiled.

 

[Corn Flakes]

I mean, there may have been what they'd call "trans women" being seidhr, but everyone else would have just called them faggots. Seidhrs were both respected and hated. It's funny how AGP vs HSTS seemed to even be reflected in the Sagas; Loki lusted after women in his female witchy form, while the Allfather in his female witchy form went out of his way to drink semen.

Gotta keep in mind that while gods had very human aspects, they weren't seen as human the way we see them now. Their canon was incredibly fractured due to cultural traditions being passed orally, so you had those sorts of oddities going around that occasionally got recorded.

One wonders if the storytellers of the time -- the OG fanfiction writers -- also inserted their own kinks into their stories. Old spinster storyteller with too many cats: "oh, yeah. Odin totally powerchugged babybatter when he TF'd into a girl! It was sooooo hot, too".

Most ancient Western cultures had really rigid gender roles, even the ones were same sex relationships were accepted. For a lot of those groups, like the Romans, Greeks, and Celts, gay sex was considered part of how soldiers bonded, and it was typically intercrural (non penetrative.) A lot of cultures that accepted gay relationships still considered being penetrated to be feminine and humiliating, hence the intercrural sex.

Pre-Christian Norse had really rigid gender roles, to the point where men and women had separate "heavens." They believed that women were uniquely capable of practicing magic (traveling Norse medicine women, called völva, are the origin of the "witch" myth.) While he wouldn't be burned at the stake for it, any man who engaged in "feminine" behavior like magic (or bottoming) would be considered the village idiot. A guy receiving anal was a faux-pas, but being romantically involved with the same sex wasn't. Basically, you could be gay, but you couldn't be feminine.

I think the big difference there is homosexual sex being seen as part of a friendship as opposed to part of an exclusive romantic relationship. Bonding experience vs. being exclusively gay. Even Achilles, who had this really intense relationship with Patroclus everybody nowadays loves to assume was full of butt-fucking, had prized female companions. Hell, Briseis is the entire reason he and Agamemnon feud and he spends half the war sulking in his tent.

Standards of relationships were different back then, and how tolerated a taboo/vice was also depended on the culture. Hell, drinking is a vice but we seem to cultivate it just fine culturally. Back in Ancient Roman times engaging in homosexual activity would get your name scrawled in graffiti across town but not really result in anything unless someone powerful decided to make an example out of you.

Not much different from today, if you stop to think about it.

Rogaine Oger had a funny little tantrum a day ago over how TERFs are the same as natzees for having functional eyes (screencaps not mine).

Lesbians/straight men don't want to suck dick? Might as well join the klan, bigot
View attachment 1274235

It's always the least passing troons who assert that you can't tell someone's sex just by looking at them, huh
View attachment 1274236
View attachment 1274237

He made sure to invoke the six bajillion for extra effect, oh gawd:
View attachment 1274238

Canadian elected officials, everyone!

Mhmmmmmmm... let's compare and contrast, shall we?

One is a vague, pre-genetics concept that allows for intermixing and diluting of characteristics to the point some people from one group can be mistaken as people from another group.

The other is having a dick between your legs, or a constantly-healing wound where one once was.

Meanwhile Oger is going,

Seems legit. Newsflash: calling a cunt an "axe wound" isn't meant to be taken literally.

 

[Opinion Discarded]

Mhmmmmmmm... let's compare and contrast, shall we?

One is a vague, pre-genetics concept that allows for intermixing and diluting of characteristics to the point some people from one group can be mistaken as people from another group.

The other is having a dick between your legs, or a constantly-healing wound where one once was.

I wonder if/when transracialism is going to start becoming widely accepted. I never understood why progressives considered the Rachel Dolezals of the world to be persona non grata while the 41ers were universally thought to be Stunning and Brave, considering they're basically the same thing. How is some guy saying he's a woman because he likes wearing skirts and feels a connection to womanhood any different than that white guy who thinks he's Filipino because he likes lumpia and feels a connection to their culture?

Wonder if we'll eventually see hot takes on how cis-black people oppress trans-blacks and how they need to check their privilege.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Transracialism can't be a thing (to the SJWs) because if anybody can "be black" then who do you give reparations to? Who do you affirmative action into various positions? It makes the entire fraud fall apart. Eventually the tranny fraud will reach a point where anybody can claim they are one and reap the benefits, and we're already seeing it.

 

[Corn Flakes]

I wonder if/when transracialism is going to start becoming widely accepted. I never understood why progressives considered the Rachel Dolezals of the world to be persona non grata while the 41ers were universally thought to be Stunning and Brave, considering they're basically the same thing. How is some guy saying he's a woman because he likes wearing skirts and feels a connection to womanhood any different than that white guy who thinks he's Filipino because he likes lumpia and feels a connection to their culture?

Wonder if we'll eventually see hot takes on how cis-black people oppress trans-blacks and how they need to check their privilege.

Transracialism is never going to be widely accepted by SJWs. Why? Because it dilutes the power of oppressed racial minorities by allowing the non-oppressed to claim oppression. If Cracker McWhitey can just say he's black and you must accept his word, then you have to give him the same respect you offer black people even though he's clearly not one. The cognitive dissonance is too great. Plus "transracials" all trip the "cultural appropriation" trigger by "embracing" a culture they weren't born into.

Transgender is "problematic" already for some of them. Just look at how TERFs chuck all their toys out of the pram when they think of people with Y-chromosomes trying to get into their little Lulu's club.