Sluthate.com

Status
Not open for further replies.
Is it even SJW's? My parents are hardcore Christian and cool with the gays. It could be as simple as less people are wack assholes.
I suppose my point is that "SJW" usually refers to people who use social issues as a veil behind which to jerk around unproductively, whereas the history of LGBT rights is filled with figures like, say, Harvey Milk: sincere fighters for minority rights who couldn't reasonably be compared to people like Ahuviya and Vade.
 
Last edited:
@umad, what's "whitemaxing"?

582682_303013959767984_274543662615014_736863_327076619_n.jpg


I am only posting here ultimately to reply to that transexual.
Boyo, this is a wrong way to show your love. No wonder you're loveshy.

Piss who? Cybercops? Angry transexual neckbeards? Goodluck finding anything about me on the interwebz.
If you piss off Cop Dog, He will ensure you a living hell of 0/10 fat chicks.

No-one ever tell @Holden about bonobo society.
Nah in a bonobo society he'd still be cast out of the clan and die alone. Anyhow @Holden fancies himself as some sort of cheating lizard.
 
Last edited:
I am only posting here ultimately to reply to that transexual.

If that was really true you wouldn't have made 369 shitposts in the last 20 days, the majority of which were you responding to us with illegible bullshit directed at many others other than @TM Ambrose. You are lying out of your ass to pretend you actually came here with a purpose when in reality you are here out of boredom and trying to pointlessly provoke a reaction out of us. That is very becoming of a mentally exceptional individual such as yourself in middle school trying to debate like a foolish child that is unable to even understand arguments past the first sentence.

The best part? You did provoke us, but in the best way possible. Everyone else in the Sluthate 'raid' has left. You are the only one left and simultaneously the one that has been here the longest comparatively to other users that came and went.

You are literally our butt monkey. We really find enjoyment in your skewed retellings of history, your flawed reasoning, your incredibly biased worldview you refuse to even question.

You are truly hilarious, so keep posting in this thread so the ride never ends.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeaaaah, see, about those natural laws...

the-ruff-bird.jpg

sneaky-cuttlefish.jpg

bonobos.jpg

All perfectly natural, all very, very queer. And look! It's all explained with pretty pictures, so even @umad can understand it!

h/t to Humon Comics
I'd hate to play devil's advocate, but humans aren't cuttlefish, clown fish or snails. I think that by "nature" he means human biology, but since this is a butthurt loveshy, I don't think he can't word his thoughts correctly.
 
I'd hate to play devil's advocate, but humans aren't cuttlefish, clown fish or snails. I think that by "nature" he means human biology, but since this is a butthurt loveshy, I don't think he can't word his thoughts correctly.

I think the point is that since other animals can think its okay to be gay, assuming that humans are special in this regard is fallacious reasoning. I believe he is using the Genetic Fallacy. By understanding a biological function that is commonly associated with the sexual orientation of most humans as how nature originally intended, he then uses this original point/evidence to make the claim "...whose desire is to defy natural laws and change his sex meanwhile rest of the world has a normal sexuality." or in other words concludes that it is not natural when there are many examples of naturally selected homosexuality in nature which contradicts his premise that homosexuality is not natural or normal whatsoever.

If he is trying to claim humans are different in the sense that homosexuality is not natural or normal as it very well can be with other species, I say [citation needed] and @umad should stop appealing to ignorance.

But humans are apes. Homo sapiens sapiens of the family Hominidae, to be precise. And as such, on a genetic level (99.4% of their genome sequence is identical to human genomes), bonobos are our closest non-human relative.

So yeah, humans aren't cuttlefish, but on a genetic and social level, we're pretty much bonobos. And bonobos are big queer sluts that fuck just about everybody.*

*Except for sluthaters. Not even bonobos would fuck them.

In this study it is found that Bonobos are "98.7% identical to corresponding sequences in the human genome." Slightly less than Chimpanzees.
 
Last edited:
I'd hate to play devil's advocate, but humans aren't cuttlefish, clown fish or snails. I think that by "nature" he means human biology, but since this is a butthurt loveshy, I don't think he can't word his thoughts correctly.
But humans are apes. Homo sapiens sapiens of the family Hominidae, to be precise. And as such, on a genetic level (99.4% of their genome sequence is identical to human genomes), bonobos are our closest non-human relative.

So yeah, humans aren't cuttlefish, but on a genetic and social level, we're pretty much bonobos. And bonobos are big queer sluts that fuck just about everybody.*

*Except for sluthaters. Not even bonobos would fuck them.
 
The diffrence between us and bonobos is that we invented things consent, laws and and other things to occupy ourselves with instead of sex and throwing shit at each other. like porn and throwing shit at each other while on drugs. :ween:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back