Trashfire The Dick Masterson Simp Conspiracy - Dick Masterson & Co cover up of his "Simping"

Who is the third man?

  • tonka

    Votes: 107 15.6%
  • Mister Metokur

    Votes: 126 18.3%
  • Warski

    Votes: 73 10.6%
  • ur mom?

    Votes: 151 21.9%
  • Dear Leader

    Votes: 178 25.9%
  • f-slurs

    Votes: 212 30.8%
  • kraut

    Votes: 179 26.0%

  • Total voters
    688
Status
Not open for further replies.
So what's actually broken?
This is Zoom's narrative, don't shoot the messenger though. I don't know anything going about Dick's site.

  • Godspeed Live@Perspicacity I told dick that I would show him how you can get around authentication with him leaving XMLRPC enabled. He didn't know you can do that and is gonna disable it.
  • Godspeed Live@Perspicacity as long as you have the username of the content producers, from a single link of their content you can view all the files in that folder by changing content dates.
  • Godspeed Live@Perspicacity and if you managed to get access to upload content, you can hide utf encoded javascript commands you can upload files then access them in your content folder and set up shells to load.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Marco Fucko
ok

all my posts are public. dick is the only person with subscriber-only content as far as I know.
basically zoom seems to be pointing out site security problems by pointing out outdated plug ins and some other shit. don't know how true it is but what do you think about zooms claims?
 
Everything he's found comes in what's called a penetration tester. You load the script into python and you get something like this in the console:
[WARNING] Wordpress 5.4.2 is out of date.

If there were actually vulnerabilities, Corey Barnhill (pedophile, liar) would have used them already to deface the site. A lot of what he's saying are just best practices.

He's also using this to associate it with himself more which is objectively untrue.

No FIN ever hits the site though. That's what I've said since the beginning. Your payment goes directly through Authorize.net. It never touches the NP2 server.

The unprotected RSS is dumb but not something I'm concerned about.

I'm pretty sure the actual core of the software is not managed by him. There's another company that does it and applies their own security updates.
 
Can anyone actually replicate accessing paywalled content without being a subscriber? Zoom is a known liar and shit stirrer.
I don't know much about web dev shit but i would assume it is possible to find all of the stuff zoom is talking about through inspect element.

Everything he's found comes in what's called a penetration tester. You load the script into python and you get something like this in the console:
[WARNING] Wordpress 5.4.2 is out of date.

If there were actually vulnerabilities, Corey Barnhill (pedophile, liar) would have used them already to deface the site. A lot of what he's saying are just best practices.

He's also using this to associate it with himself more which is objectively untrue.

No FIN ever hits the site though. That's what I've said since the beginning. Your payment goes directly through Authorize.net. It never touches the NP2 server.

The unprotected RSS is dumb but not something I'm concerned about.
Null you know a good amount about Zoom. Is he nothing more than a script kiddie?
 
Null you know a good amount about Zoom. Is he nothing more than a script kiddie?
Corey Barnhill is a pedophile and a liar and this is an effort to destroy subscriber confidence by associating the product with himself. If he could actually hack the site, it would be hacked. If he could hack the site, he'd get a list of email addresses and payment tokens.
 
Corey Barnhill is a pedophile and a liar and this is an effort to destroy subscriber confidence by associating the product with himself. If he could actually hack the site, it would be hacked. If he could hack the site, he'd get a list of email addresses and payment tokens.

For the record @Disheveled Human was talking about being in a discord server with Zoom and Co, wherein they were talking about hacking in further and that the results would be seen in the next few days. Might be worth alerting your boy Dick about if nothing else.
 
- jim is a hypocrite for previously criticizing monetization of e-fame (see his prior comments on spoony) but eventually doing it himself, but his new position on it is not bad in and of itself and he continues to be entertaining
as Jim said "things change in ten years." Did Jim really need to keep this gay "Getting money for shit you do on the internet is bad" shit?
 
This thing spiraled out of control rather quick. You would think old e-drama people would know better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back