Snowflake Chloe Wilkinson / DissociaDID and Nanette Zuniga / Nan / TeamPinata

I've posted here and there since the beginning of this thread and I've read every single page and comment. I wanted to make sure I had my DSM-V, the updated supplement to it, and other textbooks in front of me to compare data. I work in a combination of forensics and medicine. I obviously can't post proof, so take it as you will.

The "echolalia" she claims to have is actually most likely just Mirroring, which is a completely normal behavior that absolutely everyone does (less frequently if you're autistic or a sociopath). It could be anything from postures, gestures, facial expressions, speech patterns, or attitude . Mirroring often occurs in social situations, particularly in the company of close friends or family, but also in people who hold power over the person who is mirroring. It can sort of be compared to submission as it's a huge component of power dynamics. It's often exhibited in people who are subconsciously trying to gain approval or connect with a person. This is something thats present in infancy, and is an integral part of infants developing empathy and understanding of emotions. It is not the same as imitation, which is concious.

You ever hang out with a friend and then when you hang out with that friend with a group of friends, their behavior changes? Mirroring.

You ever have a significant other who you noticed has started copying memes you spout or things you say often? Mirroring (although in some cases it is imitation).

This is something we use in the criminal justice system to build rapport with a suspect during interviews. Detectives will try to get suspects to mirror them because it leads them into a false sense of companionship and security, leading to higher likelihood of confessions.

If you want my opinion, Chloe most likely has BPD and Bipolar disorder with narcissistic tendencies and malingering behaviors, although cluster B personality disorders can be a motherfucker to diagnose because they're all so similar, sometimes with vague distinguishing features. In fact, they all commonly co-occur with one another. A few notes:

1. Factitous disorder is only diagnosed when there seems to be no inherent gain, and there's clearly a motive here.

2. The DSM-V recommends that physicians avoid diagnosing BPD and BD together if they're basing the diagnosis on cross-sectional presentation without proper documentation that there was an early onset of the pattern of behavior that's pervasive.

3. I don't think HPD is entirely out of the question here, but again, that too can be mistaken for BPD. The main take away here is to determine if the traits associated with HPD cause "clinically significant impairment or distress."

4. I thought Chloe having a meltdown over a professional asking if she remembers her trauma was particularly interesting. Her invariably delicate and fragile sense of self esteem imploded into itself in a reaction that was not at all appropriate for the situation. The fact that she thinks of herself as a "professional" when amongst physicians and researchers who've spent decades on this despite no higher education or degree is laughable. "A sense of entitlement is evident in individuals unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment" - DSM-V, on NPD

5. When faced with criticism or defeat, although they may not show it outwardly, criticism may haunt these individuals and leave them feeling humiliated, degraded, hollow, and empty. Such experiences lead to social withdrawal or an appearance of humility that may mask and protect the grandiosity. - DSM-V, on NPD

6. The most useful feature in discriminating NPD from HPD, ASPD, and BPD in which the interactive styles of are coquettish, callous, and needy, respectively, is the grandiosity characteristic of NPD. The relative stability of self image as well as the lack of self-destructiveness, impulsivity, and abandonment concerns also help distinguish NPD from BPD. Although those with Cluster B personality disorders may require much attention, those with NPD specifically need that attention to be admiring.- DSM-V, on discriminating features.

I think Dr. Grande had it right. Regardless of whats really her diagnosis, she has a much broader mental illness that's going to take much introspection and dedication to commiting to getting the appropriate help needed for herself. One of the most difficult obstacles in doing this is admitting to themselves that they have manipulated, lied, and cheated others, but they are not the evil person they think of themselves as, even considering what they may have done. It's never too late to stop, and I think one of the saddest aspects about this is that those with BPD have a 50/50 shot of their lives greatly improving over 10 years with therapy, and the majority of individuals in their 30s and 40s attain greater stability in their relationships and vocational functioning.

Okay, I have to sleep now. I don't even want to go into Nan even though that shit with her flailing and screaming on the floor of the ER while in front of a dubious physician was fucking hilarious.

Edit: I forgot to mention, it's a damn shame we can't have people like you all as our detectives and police, because you all make some of them look like amateurs. You'd be surprised how much digital evidence is lost because the detectives have no idea how to work social media or electronics.
 
They all show up instantly, for the sender. Right now I'm commenting specific words and they all show up. When I refresh the page, they're gone. When a comment has a blacklisted word, it's sent to a ''Held for Review'' section just like in TheWombSlayer's screenshot. She indeed does blacklist words

Blacklisted words: kill yourself, kys, fake, dumbass, idiot, mentally ill, sick, snowflake, thot, niggеr, faggot, motherfucker, rеtard, rеtarded, suicide, bitch, fuck, pussy, dick, nonce, tranny, rape, rapist, cp, vagina, asshole, shit, poop, barf, twink

I came to the conclusion that Chloe probably found a blacklist words list. I mean, why would she think to ban ''twink''?
Probably used this one: https://www.freewebheaders.com/youtube-blacklist-words-list-youtube-comment-moderation/ It's the first result you get when you search 'blacklist words list'

I highlighted some words that I found amusing and weren't on the list. I'll probably be updating this. but it's rather late right now so I couldn't try everything
Are the words kiwifarms and Nan now blacklisted too? Just something I was wondering but I can't try it out myself atm.
 
Interesting that cp and fake are on her list of blacklisted words. I wonder if stuff like "malingerer" is
Surprisingly not! I tried a lot of words like malingerer, munchie, liar, endogenic... They don't seem to be blacklisted
Are the words kiwifarms and Nan now blacklisted too? Just something I was wondering but I can't try it out myself atm.
Tried both. Doesn't look like it. I even tried her littles' names too. She probably hasn't updated her list in a while
 
Just counted how many of Chloe's videos have been removed by her, I have created a simple list. I have grouped them in the headings they are under in her playlists. While I don't have the titles of the videos, it does give some context to the extent of her regrets, mishaps and content which could be used against her. Some of the deleted content might overlap, it could be that the same video was in two playlists. But even that would mean the minimum number of deleted videos is 27, but we can assume it is much more than then that as many videos would indeed have only been listed in one playlist. Apologies if this has already been done.

Advice & Support
26 Privated

Disphoria & DID
5 Privated

Collabs
27 Privated

My Alters do my Makeup
8 Privated

Meet the Alters
1 Privated

Switiching on Camera
9 Privated

All About the Alters
2 Privated

Debunking DID
1 Privated

Meet our System
27 Privated

A Beginners Guide to Mental Health
1 Privated
 
Does anyone know if these numbers are correct? If they are, I feel like she's trying to backtrack on inconsistencies and start over with a blank slate.
1589388747439.png
1589388790819.png
 
Does anyone know if these numbers are correct? If they are, I feel like she's trying to backtrack on inconsistencies and start over with a blank slate.
View attachment 1290603View attachment 1290604
She has 3 tweets showing up, idk why it says 11. This was mentioned when she deleted everything. Idk who she unfollowed since she’s still following Nan on Twitter, I was expecting that’d be the account she had unfollowed

Here are the tweets. Someone else will need to verify this, but my take on these three showing up is that Bridget had privated her account, which meant her tweets Chloe had retweeted disappeared but still counted towards her total tweet count. Bridget must have made her account public in these past few days
F86BA22B-7F66-44F6-9DE7-086756E042C6.jpeg6CE6D611-4108-4EEC-8EA5-8BA0A56C5AEA.jpeg
 
She has 3 tweets showing up, idk why it says 11. This was mentioned when she deleted everything. Idk who she unfollowed since she’s still following Nan on Twitter, I was expecting that’d be the account she had unfollowed

I've tried mass-deleting my old tweets before, and this is common happening. Twitter has a limit of I think 3,500 tweets to show on your profile, the rest only if you search some keywords and you're lucky.
After some third-party app which does not have access to your full twitter archive (which are 99% of the free to use ones) deletes it "all", those tweets over the 3,500 remain. Edit: they remain, but still won't show up on your profile, only after some time passing I've seen on some of my profiles, but some really old tweets never showed again. Also, on some apps you can select tons of tweets and let some out, doesn't have to be "all".

Anyone with her old tweet count?

Also, can those be replies?
 
Last edited:
I've tried mass-deleting my old tweets before, and this is common happening. Twitter has a limit of I think 3,500 tweets to show on your profile, the rest only if you search some keywords and you're lucky.
After some third-party app which does not have access to your full twitter archive (which are 99% of the free to use ones) deletes it "all", those tweets over the 3,500 remain. Edit: they remain, but still won't show up on your profile, only after some time passing I've seen on some of my profiles, but some really old tweets never showed again. Also, on some apps you can select tons of tweets and let some out, doesn't have to be "all".

Anyone with her old tweet count?

Also, can those be replies?
They’re not replies, even when I go to “tweets and replies” it’s only those three from Bridget. I’m sure there’s a screenshot somewhere earlier in this thread when she put her account on private that shows how many tweets she used to have, but looking through screenshots still saved on my phone (thank u iPhone 30 days retrieval of deleted pics), I notice that she has unliked about 75 tweets.

This screenshot is from April 15
8FC516B4-1F2D-4670-8CA8-0D306A330388.png

this one is from just now (May 13)
17ED76E7-B19B-4371-BDDC-05981DA20265.png
 

Interesting part of this treatment guideline:
Screen Shot 2020-05-13 at 3.16.56 PM.png


Essentially, it's important to note that a person who immediately embraces and displays their identities has a higher likelihood of having pseudo-DID. Real DID patients are often hesitant at first to even accept they had the disorder, but she started that channel weeks after her diagnosis if I remember correctly. She was talking about having it (and potentially about her alters) before getting the diagnosis. That REALLY contrasts with her saying she didn't hear about it until she got diagnosed.

EDIT: This is made by the group that Remy used to actually lead I believe.
 
20200513_173925.jpg20200513_173758.jpg
On Chloe's merch site there are time postings on how long an item is available for. This tactic is used as a marketing tool to get people to think they only have a limited time to purchase. Both of these were taken about a week apart for the same item, needless to say it's still available and this goes for all her merch. It could be how Teespring works but either way shes employing unethical sales tactics. This is mostly harmful to her young fanbase who aren't wise to these tactics
 
Last edited:

Interesting part of this treatment guideline:
View attachment 1291044

Essentially, it's important to note that a person who immediately embraces and displays their identities has a higher likelihood of having pseudo-DID. Real DID patients are often hesitant at first to even accept they had the disorder, but she started that channel weeks after her diagnosis if I remember correctly. She was talking about having it (and potentially about her alters) before getting the diagnosis. That REALLY contrasts with her saying she didn't hear about it until she got diagnosed.

EDIT: This is made by the group that Remy used to actually lead I believe.

The ISSTD? I'm almost positive Remy never was a CEO. But on a fun note most of their heads were involved in malpractice suits for leading patients to believe they had been abused during the Satanic Panic era amongst other things. So I wouldn't be surprised if Remy were involved with them somehow, they are definitely hard-on clout chasers trying to manufacture good case studies on DID. Also it's where Chloe gets that ridiculous 3% prevalence nonsense for DID cases and I'm sure she's cited other works by the organization.
 
Just counted how many of Chloe's videos have been removed by her, I have created a simple list. I have grouped them in the headings they are under in her playlists. While I don't have the titles of the videos, it does give some context to the extent of her regrets, mishaps and content which could be used against her. Some of the deleted content might overlap, it could be that the same video was in two playlists. But even that would mean the minimum number of deleted videos is 27, but we can assume it is much more than then that as many videos would indeed have only been listed in one playlist. Apologies if this has already been done.

Advice & Support
26 Privated

Disphoria & DID
5 Privated

Collabs
27 Privated

My Alters do my Makeup
8 Privated

Meet the Alters
1 Privated

Switiching on Camera
9 Privated

All About the Alters
2 Privated

Debunking DID
1 Privated

Meet our System
27 Privated

A Beginners Guide to Mental Health
1 Privated

She’s down to 89 videos. Last I checked she had 96. A couple of the ones I know she has deleted/made private are:

Meet the Boys (featuring heartthrob Gregory)
The livestream where she mentioned Jewel the unicorn alter
The Crying Doll Makeup Tutorial (I believe Nadia was the one doing the makeup)
Meet the alters-Nadia
Dating and DID (where Nadia talks about being in love with Jamie, and Chloe mentions being in an abusive relationship)
The Day in the Life vlog where Chloe goes to therapy and Nadia shows off her runestones
Two videos featuring Chloe’s childhood best friend, wherein they talk about early symptoms of Chloe’s DID at uni

I always wonder why these videos in particular. Gregory and Jewel were discussed extensively in thread, and then there’s all the fallout with Nadia on tumblr, so maybe she’s deleting anything with statements that are remotely controversial or have been nitpicked here or elsewhere.

Edit: Added two videos I forgot to mention
 
Last edited:
I always wonder why these videos in particular. Gregory and Jewel were discussed extensively in thread, and then there’s all the fallout with Nadia on tumblr, so maybe she’s deleting anything with statements that are remotely controversial or have been nitpicked here or elsewhere.

We've been constantly spotting inconsistencies in very small and inconsequential things that she's said, particularly with respect to the lesser-known alters like Jewel and Gregory. I'd assume she's just trying to prevent people from digging up more and more details that don't add up.
 
Whilst I've got a moment, here are two recently deleted Nadia and Chloe videos. The second video is compressed and split into four parts due to file size. The tutorial is the video where she describes her POC friends rather offensively. I'll get the full list of deleted videos up later - I've just got to double check I'm not missing anything.

ETA - The first video is quite interesting. 'Nadia' is co-conscious with Chloe. Chloe is having a conversation with Nadia. Chloe 'switches' out. Nadia immediately greets the camera. Nadia then asks the camera what they're doing. She reads the notes left by Chloe. She then jumps into the video. She briefly pauses to discuss the reason she knows what she's doing - she states that she was very co-conscious and defends the fact she knew what to do the moment she 'switched in' because she saw the camera.
Firstly, why does she need to defend herself? Secondly, if all that was true, why did she need to ask what she was doing when she switched in? Why did she need to read the notes? Was she not co-conscious? Was she not talking to Chloe before she switched in? She wanted to switch in to be a part of the video, so why the sudden defensiveness over how she knew what she was doing?

As for the second video, part three, she described dark skin and her friends in the following way:

03:03 - Darker skin in general is gorgeous. Honestly. [sigh] So beautiful. So if anybody ever tells you that you're too dark to be beautiful or that you should be ashamed of the colour of your skin you've got enough to worry about if your skin is dark. I'm lucky enough that I have the privilege that I don't need to worry about my skin colour when I go outside. But I do worry about not being pretty enough. So if that's something you worry about because of the colour of your skin, that's ridiculous. Dark skin is beautiful. Beautiful. So damn pretty. One of my friends has - is - is mixed race. Actually two - two of my friends are mixed race, this applies to both of them, one of them is half Japanese, half English. And one of them is like... half Caribbean-y I can't remember specifically where. They have the most gorgeous coffee coloured skin. So pretty. And then the half Japanese girl has um sort of ... it's like a tan colour, like it's not dark, but it's tanned. And she's just so beautiful. And the - the boy who's part Caribbean. Gorgeous. So gorgeous. When I was younger, before I knew about racism and stuff like that - I know, privilege - but I'm talking about like young, young, like six or so, I always wanted to have dark skin because I thought it was really pretty. So if that concerns you don't listen to anybody, you're gorgeous just how you are. Gorgeous, handsome, beautiful. Whatever word fits you best. Don't be ashamed of who you are. Easier said than done, I know, trust me I know. But if everybody did the same, nobody would be beautiful. How boring would that be?

I've said similar in the past, but the tone she uses is very condescending and false. When calling dark skin beautiful, she uses the type of voice you would use when talking to a child. She seems to think that fetishing dark skin is in some way supportive and 'woke'.

Mental Health Guru Chloe also statesI like to contour... um, makes me look slimmer than I am... at 0:35 in part three. It privately amused me as I know she likes to call herself an eating disorder sufferer.


















DID & DATING! Why NADIA Hates ME! - Dissociative Identity Disorder


































































My ALTER Does My Makeup - TUTORIAL! -CHLOE -Self Love And Race
 
Last edited:
Whilst I've got a moment, here are two recently deleted Nadia and Chloe videos. The second video is compressed and split into four parts due to file size. The tutorial is the video where she describes her POC friends rather offensively. I'll get the full list of deleted videos up later - I've just got to double check I'm not missing anything.

ETA - The first video is quite interesting. 'Nadia' is co-conscious with Chloe. Chloe is having a conversation with Nadia. Chloe 'switches' out. Nadia immediately greets the camera. Nadia then asks the camera what they're doing. She reads the notes left by Chloe. She then jumps into the video. She briefly pauses to discuss the reason she knows what she's doing - she states that she was very co-conscious and defends the fact she knew what to do the moment she 'switched in' because she saw the camera.
Firstly, why does she need to defend herself? Secondly, if all that was true, why did she need to ask what she was doing when she switched in? Why did she need to read the notes? Was she not co-conscious? Was she not talking to Chloe before she switched in? She wanted to switch in to be a part of the video, so why the sudden defensiveness over how she knew what she was doing?

As for the second video, part three, she described dark skin and her friends in the following way:

03:03 - Darker skin in general is gorgeous. Honestly. [sigh] So beautiful. So if anybody ever tells you that you're too dark to be beautiful or that you should be ashamed of the colour of your skin you've got enough to worry about if your skin is dark. I'm lucky enough that I have the privilege that I don't need to worry about my skin colour when I go outside. But I do worry about not being pretty enough. So if that's something you worry about because of the colour of your skin, that's ridiculous. Dark skin is beautiful. Beautiful. So damn pretty. One of my friends has - is - is mixed race. Actually two - two of my friends are mixed race, this applies to both of them, one of them is half Japanese, half English. And one of them is like... half Caribbean-y I can't remember specifically where. They have the most gorgeous coffee coloured skin. So pretty. And then the half Japanese girl has um sort of ... it's like a tan colour, like it's not dark, but it's tanned. And she's just so beautiful. And the - the boy who's part Caribbean. Gorgeous. So gorgeous. When I was younger, before I knew about racism and stuff like that - I know, privilege - but I'm talking about like young, young, like six or so, I always wanted to have dark skin because I thought it was really pretty. So if that concerns you don't listen to anybody, you're gorgeous just how you are. Gorgeous, handsome, beautiful. Whatever word fits you best. Don't be ashamed of who you are. Easier said than done, I know, trust me I know. But if everybody did the same, nobody would be beautiful. How boring would that be?

I've said similar in the past, but the tone she uses is very condescending and false. When calling dark skin beautiful, she uses the type of voice you would use when talking to a child. She seems to think that fetishing dark skin is in some way supportive and 'woke'.

Mental Health Guru Chloe also statesI like to contour... um, makes me look slimmer than I am... at 0:35 in part three. It privately amused me as I know she likes to call herself an eating disorder sufferer.

View attachment 1291331
















DID & DATING! Why NADIA Hates ME! - Dissociative Identity Disorder

View attachment 1291468















View attachment 1291515















View attachment 1291544















View attachment 1291569
















My ALTER Does My Makeup - TUTORIAL! -CHLOE -Self Love And Race

I know we've talked about this particular video in the past, but it still kills me that she included "Race" in the title like she had something of value to add to the topic rather than some inane fetishistic truisms and flexing about having two mixed race friends. Who are brown. Not too brown. Still aesthetically pleasing. Like coffee! Because all POC love it when you describe the color of their skin using food as a descriptor.
 
Fell down the rabbit hole and ended up here, 10 days and 228 pages later just wanted to say thanks to everyone (especially mods, comrade, mama). The amount of detail and research that has gone into this is awesome.

She was obviously researching her symptoms before her official diagnosis and thought DID was a more desired disorder than BPD and/or BP and NPD. Her “amnesia” and “dissociation” are good excuses for her instability, unstable relationships, etc… and a DID diagnosis takes a lot of the responsibility off of her and makes her into a victim. Instead of having to grow up and deal with her shitty attitude and lack of responsibility for her life she just plays pretend on the internet with tens of thousands of people making her into a hero. She obviously wasn’t smart enough to think of what would happen if her channel ever got any attention from anyone outside her fanclub (someone else in the thread said something along these lines- want to give credit but I’m not about to search through 228 pages again, tried searching but no luck). Anyone with common sense should be able to see the logic presented on this thread and come to the same conclusion.

On the situation with Nan, I honestly hate to agree with Sam on this one. Chloe obviously knew about the fetish drawings and had accepted it (I don't know how you can accept those drawings but that’s not the point). Everything had been posted on here well before the timeline was compiled for Nan but it was only after that when it got attention from her fanclub that she decided to drop them. That’s a pretty shitty thing to do to another person (supports a BPD diagnosis too).

Everything on this thread has been covered in immense detail and unfortunately I don’t have any great discoveries to add, just wanted to include my thoughts and say thanks.
 

This is the first time I have watched this video and I'm really confused... She titled the video "My ALTER Does My Makeup" even though she clearly states it is Chloe who is putting on the makeup aka the host. She also refers to herself as an alter at the beginning of it and says "This is Chloe, I'm the alter who does the makeup..." even though she literally has a text underneath calling her the host. She probably knows she won't get as many views if she doesn't title it "MY ALTER DOES MY MAKEUP!!" so she had to clickbait like that even go as far as call her own self an alter. Am I wrong to think she never did this before? I literally haven't heard her (as the host) call herself an alter.

Not even gonna go into her whole rant about dark skin. She is overcompensating so much just to make sure everyone thinks she is woke that she borders on fetishizing. It's fascinating to see how white people never seem to realize that they are trying too hard. Can't believe her woke followers haven't called her out on especially this part:

"One of my friends has - is - is mixed race. Actually two - two of my friends are mixed race, this applies to both of them, one of them is half Japanese, half English. And one of them is like... half Caribbean-y I can't remember specifically where. They have the most gorgeous coffee coloured skin. So pretty. And then the half Japanese girl has um sort of ... it's like a tan colour, like it's not dark, but it's tanned."

Coffee colored skin? Is this a fanfiction? Surprised she hasn't called her black alters "my colored friends" yet.
 
I've posted here and there since the beginning of this thread and I've read every single page and comment. I wanted to make sure I had my DSM-V, the updated supplement to it, and other textbooks in front of me to compare data. I work in a combination of forensics and medicine. I obviously can't post proof, so take it as you will.

The "echolalia" she claims to have is actually most likely just Mirroring, which is a completely normal behavior that absolutely everyone does (less frequently if you're autistic or a sociopath). It could be anything from postures, gestures, facial expressions, speech patterns, or attitude . Mirroring often occurs in social situations, particularly in the company of close friends or family, but also in people who hold power over the person who is mirroring. It can sort of be compared to submission as it's a huge component of power dynamics. It's often exhibited in people who are subconsciously trying to gain approval or connect with a person. This is something thats present in infancy, and is an integral part of infants developing empathy and understanding of emotions. It is not the same as imitation, which is concious.

You ever hang out with a friend and then when you hang out with that friend with a group of friends, their behavior changes? Mirroring.

You ever have a significant other who you noticed has started copying memes you spout or things you say often? Mirroring (although in some cases it is imitation).

This is something we use in the criminal justice system to build rapport with a suspect during interviews. Detectives will try to get suspects to mirror them because it leads them into a false sense of companionship and security, leading to higher likelihood of confessions.

If you want my opinion, Chloe most likely has BPD and Bipolar disorder with narcissistic tendencies and malingering behaviors, although cluster B personality disorders can be a motherfucker to diagnose because they're all so similar, sometimes with vague distinguishing features. In fact, they all commonly co-occur with one another. A few notes:

1. Factitous disorder is only diagnosed when there seems to be no inherent gain, and there's clearly a motive here.

2. The DSM-V recommends that physicians avoid diagnosing BPD and BD together if they're basing the diagnosis on cross-sectional presentation without proper documentation that there was an early onset of the pattern of behavior that's pervasive.

3. I don't think HPD is entirely out of the question here, but again, that too can be mistaken for BPD. The main take away here is to determine if the traits associated with HPD cause "clinically significant impairment or distress."

4. I thought Chloe having a meltdown over a professional asking if she remembers her trauma was particularly interesting. Her invariably delicate and fragile sense of self esteem imploded into itself in a reaction that was not at all appropriate for the situation. The fact that she thinks of herself as a "professional" when amongst physicians and researchers who've spent decades on this despite no higher education or degree is laughable. "A sense of entitlement is evident in individuals unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment" - DSM-V, on NPD

5. When faced with criticism or defeat, although they may not show it outwardly, criticism may haunt these individuals and leave them feeling humiliated, degraded, hollow, and empty. Such experiences lead to social withdrawal or an appearance of humility that may mask and protect the grandiosity. - DSM-V, on NPD

6. The most useful feature in discriminating NPD from HPD, ASPD, and BPD in which the interactive styles of are coquettish, callous, and needy, respectively, is the grandiosity characteristic of NPD. The relative stability of self image as well as the lack of self-destructiveness, impulsivity, and abandonment concerns also help distinguish NPD from BPD. Although those with Cluster B personality disorders may require much attention, those with NPD specifically need that attention to be admiring.- DSM-V, on discriminating features.

I think Dr. Grande had it right. Regardless of whats really her diagnosis, she has a much broader mental illness that's going to take much introspection and dedication to commiting to getting the appropriate help needed for herself. One of the most difficult obstacles in doing this is admitting to themselves that they have manipulated, lied, and cheated others, but they are not the evil person they think of themselves as, even considering what they may have done. It's never too late to stop, and I think one of the saddest aspects about this is that those with BPD have a 50/50 shot of their lives greatly improving over 10 years with therapy, and the majority of individuals in their 30s and 40s attain greater stability in their relationships and vocational functioning.

Okay, I have to sleep now. I don't even want to go into Nan even though that shit with her flailing and screaming on the floor of the ER while in front of a dubious physician was fucking hilarious.

Edit: I forgot to mention, it's a damn shame we can't have people like you all as our detectives and police, because you all make some of them look like amateurs. You'd be surprised how much digital evidence is lost because the detectives have no idea how to work social media or electronics.

This was a fascinating read but I have some questions. The evidence/comments you posted heavily support NPD traits. You haven't posted much evidence for BPD. (Not that you're obligated to, but I don't know if that was cause you felt the BPD dx didn't need explaining or some other reason).

And I do question BPD. She doesn't seem to be as chimpy as most BPD, I know it comes in a lot of flavours but normally aren't most, including quiet borderlines, more impulsive and take things more personally? Chloe seems not to take it personally so much as she is manipulating the entire situation. She just feels too careful, calculating, and in control all the time. I know BPD people can be manipulative, but to this level, for this long, without feeling victimised or exploding with rage yet? She has played the victim but she never seems to genuinely feel the victimisation.

The only thing I can see that explains BPD that isn't something else is possible dissociation episodes to the extent of having different ego states--if she isn't lying about the dissociation. But that could be NPD with BPD traits rather than the other way around.

I know all this is speculative but I will also point out that she is also too young to be dx'd with BPD. We know she has told people she had it since 6th form, which is quite young (16-17ish?). So she could well have latched onto DID for the same reasons as all these teenagers and preteens --no proper sense of self-identity at the time.

Hope all that makes sense. I was wondering if you could respond to these points, please? If I'm wrong I would like to learn more.

Apologies for kind of late reply, typed all this out last night and then lost it, couldn't be arsed re-doing it till now.
 
Back