- Joined
- Jan 16, 2020
No, not a drug addict, a pagan.
You don't get the benefits of The Torah if you are not in covenant with Elohim. You can't cherry pick the benefits of The Torah without the responsibilities and commitment to it as well.
It's like when Christians run around demanding forgiveness because they believe they are entitled to it, because it is a concept that they derive from The Torah. The Torah gave birth to the rest of the "Old Testament" they read, which gave birth to Paul's writings, the person who created Christianity. They like to cherry pick the benefits (forgiveness) of The Torah but forget that there are responsibilities in The Torah as well.
If you get hired for a job you can't demand your boss pay you if you don't do the work s/he requires as well. The Torah is the same way.
Yeah. Even if Elohim does not appear to me, I believe He cares enough about me to avenge me.
Marshall was not forced by the state to pay child support. He had a Protective Order in place which prevented him from talking to the person he was ordered to pay support to.
I would not ask for child support from Marshall if we broke up because I don't believe he is morally obligated to pay it under The Torah.
In Hebraic culture a divorced woman and the children she retains custody of are supposed to be housed and financially supported by the divorced woman's parents, primarily the father first, and then the mother. Adulthood does not dissolve a parent's obligation to help their children financially (in The Torah).
In Israelite culture the women went back to the father's house and the bridepice dowry the husband paid her parents would go to her. That was her alimony of sorts. If she has no mother and father it is the responsibility of the community to house and financially lend money to her and support her, also to give her food. If she can earn money through her own small business, she should do that as well, more part time when she is breastfeeding or homeschooling as long as it doesn't interfere with breastfeeding or homeschooling (her other responsibilities in The Torah).
I'm responding to personal aspects of my life that have been thrown in my face here via The Stalker telling others in another thread and also personal aspects of my life publicly disclosed beforehand in a thread written March 13, 2017. I'm not the one initiating it. I think you are trying to corner me into being a pacifist, a doormat and to silence me. If someone attacks me by accusing me and by putting my personal information out for the whole world to see, I have a right to speak in my defense. Speaking in my defense means I have to speak about those personal matters. You still are trying to reorder the sequence of events to make me look like the instigator, when I am not.
Before I joined here in January 2020 there were several threads mentioning me. Mr. Looney Mooney created several threads about the lawsuits. The moment he had to respond to some accountability for his actions, which were clearly unethical, he blew up in a rage. (@Null - yeah, I'm talkin' about you)
I was accused on this thread of being wrong about Scripture (see page #40+/-). Before that there were hundreds of comments on a thread that began March 13, 2017 trashing me. In that thread, it was not just The Stalker that was targeted. I'll attach the screenshots. The OP also mentioned my husband and I. In that thread we were accused of being "Adulterers", said to be "loony" (me), accused (me) of "changing husbands like panties" and accused (my husband) of being "violent" and having a "history of domestic violence" (husband). Although my husband had a charge for a one time charge, the terms "violent" and "history" were written to portray him as a person who just went around beating people. Links to my personal business website were also included, in an attempt to sabotage my business.
Clearly the manner in which we were spoken about was with the intent to disclose private information without our consent (invade our privacy) and to make us look immoral with the intent to socially and financially injure us.
@Jumping Dwarf - yeah bitch, I know it was your drug addicted ass trying to attack my husband and I
Anyways, this isn't being "mad at the internet". People can try to minimize the effects and presence of the Internet in the world, but the truth is, the Internet is the social and financial medium of this generation. It has a lot of weight in this world. It is where people shop, talk to their relatives, do business, and learn about others. It's not "just the Internet". Comments like that are aimed at minimizing the reality of the Internet in people's lives when they socially abuse others and when they are too embarrassed to admit that the Internet is where so many people socially interact. This generation of people lives off of social media, that's just the way it is. People want to put on a front like the Internet is no big deal, but its just a front.
You can laugh at people without socially abusing them. That's where Kiwi Farms falls short. Kiwi Farms is trying to socially abuse people through scapegoating and intentionally trying to sabotage people's lives socially and financially. That's completely unethical. Mr. Looney Mooney could create a better website by putting up better subject material.
Otherwise, I'll tell you honestly, I've never been jealous of anyone in my life, so I think you don't have an actual portrayal of things.
Media is representative of a culture's thoughts. It portrays reality to some degree
I don't think women are the enemy because I clearly said in the thread that I believe there are other good women in the world, "May YHWH bless The Righteous" and I described in comment #6237 which women have treated me kindly.
It's more like I think women in the English speaking world tend to be more proud of heart.
I don't want to talk about my BDSM aspect of my relationship with Marshall anymore. He asked me to stop speaking about it. So out of respect for him I won't comment on it anymore.
Dude stop blaming @xtamarlover for all of your problems. You break a fingernail and "its The Stalkers fault!" Why are you obsessed with him?