Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
Finally, some a) good news which b) have nothing to do with the Wu-flu from Sweden https://www.svt.se/nyheter/granskning/ug/socialstyrelsen-andrar-sig-ej-lampligt-med-konskorrigerande-kirurgi-innan-18
The National Board of Health and Welfare change their mind - not suitable with gender corrective surgery before 18

ASSIGNMENT REVIEW · The National Board of Health and Welfare makes a complete reversal and says no to a lower age limit for sex-corrective surgery. This is after SVT's Mission Review examined the gender-corrected care and the legislative proposal to lower the age limit.
- It is a procedure that is irreversible. Then you should be reasonably sure that it brings lasting and significant benefit to the person, says Thomas Lindén, Head of Department at the National Board of Health, to Assignment Review.


In 2018, the government proposed a new law that would allow sex-corrective abdominal surgery from the age of 15, without the custodian's permission. The bill was heavily criticized by the law council, but the National Board of Health endorsed the proposal.

The authority even wanted to go further than the government - the bill stated that a prerequisite for surgery was that the person must be assumed to live in the same gender identity in the future. But the National Board of Health considered that surgery should not be "linked to whether the gender identity can be assumed to be the same over time".

"Explored this question from the beginning"
Assignments Review has for a long time examined the gender corrective care and the background to the bill on reduced age limit.

One of the reviews showed that factual information in the investigation that formed the basis of the proposal was not correct. In connection with the publication, the Government commissioned the National Board of Health and Welfare to analyze and assess whether the proposed age limit of 15 years is appropriate.

When the report is now presented, the National Board of Health and Welfare makes a complete reversal. They no longer think that the age limit should be lowered.

- I don't really think it matters what we have said before. We have not felt bound by it, but have investigated this question from the beginning and looked at the information we have now, says Thomas Lindén.

Rapid increase in young patients
According to him, the National Board of Health and Welfare's new assessment is based on the rapid increase of young patients in the transplant care system and the fact that many in the group have neuropsychiatric diagnoses.

- We did not really see this rapid increase then and it is something that you have helped to elucidate, says Thomas Lindén.

Assignment review has sought Social Minister Lena Hallengren, but due to the corona crisis she has not had the opportunity to comment.
Although it's quite thunk worthy that the age limit for an intrusive surgery like SRS is "only" 18 when the age limit for normal sterilizations is 25 and the age limit for buying alcohol at Systembolaget is 20. Drinking a glass of wine is apparently more dangerous and intrusive than chopping your penis off or molding your vulva into an arm skin pole. Presumably trans mastectomies for under 18s will also continue to be allowed since the article doesn't mentioned that.

Edit: Looks like I was late, but Uppdrag granskning did a short Tranståget follow-up episode on the subject which hasn't been posted yet (there are no English subtitles so far) https://www.svtplay.se/video/267522...asong-21-transtaget-fortsattningen?start=auto
 
Last edited:
Finally, some a) good news which b) have nothing to do with the Wu-flu from Sweden https://www.svt.se/nyheter/granskning/ug/socialstyrelsen-andrar-sig-ej-lampligt-med-konskorrigerande-kirurgi-innan-18 Although it's quite thunk worthy that the age limit for an intrusive surgery like SRS is "only" 18 when the age limit for normal sterilizations is 25 and the age limit for buying alcohol at Systembolaget is 20. Drinking a glass of wine is apparently more dangerous and intrusive than chopping your penis off or molding your vulva into an arm skin pole. Presumably trans mastectomies for under 18s will also continue to be allowed since the article doesn't mentioned that.

Edit: Looks like I was late, but Uppdrag granskning did a short Tranståget follow-up episode on the subject which hasn't been posted yet (there are no English subtitles so far) https://www.svtplay.se/video/267522...asong-21-transtaget-fortsattningen?start=auto
The original Trans Train is well worth a watch:

YouTube vid with subtitles
 
There's a bit here from ATLU tranny grifter-in-chief hemale lawyer Kate 'Chase' Strangio on why it's literally murder to include basic biographical details in obituaries.
Screenshot_20200514-232507~2.png



It's not really clear why we are supposed to suppress a dead person's previous names. Should we deny that Muhammad Ali was called Cassius Clay? Is it irrelevant to his story?

By even naming him as transgender, it's obvious that he wasn't born Aimee Stephens. And for that matter it's obvious by looking at him. So what's to hide?
When you search my name on Google, the most prominent related searches are usually "Chase Strangio birth name" "Chase Strangio before"; from there, it's easy to find my deadname — the one I was given at birth that does not align with my gender. It does not represent who I am but rather a painful past that I worked hard to move beyond; it is as mean-spirited and useless for you to try to seek this information out as it would be for me to go in search of some painful experience of your childhood to define who you are for others.

But the very fact of my existence triggers in some people an entitlement to uncover something about who I "really" am and to reveal for themselves that I am just putting on this mythic identity of "Chase Strangio." To validate that — especially in news reporting — by referring to me as "Chase Strangio, formerly known as [deadname]" is to ensure that I will never have the authority to claim the truth of who I am; it cedes that authority to a structure of power and discrimination that would rather I never existed at all.

If you Google any well-known trans person, you will see the same related searches. There is, in some circles, a quest to undo the truths that we trans people have worked our lives to claim. And among all the many hate-filled attacks I have experienced as a public trans person, the most painful by far have been the deliberate speaking of my old name — as well as the quest to learn it and remind me of it.


The reality of trans lives is that we struggle against the interpersonal and systemic beliefs that we are only putting on our genders and that beneath them lies some "truth" of who we really are — and that notion fuels violence and discrimination against members of the trans community. It also perpetuates the false notion that women who are trans are not "real" women, that men who are trans are not "real" men and that no one could have a gender that is nonbinary.

To then write about a woman who is trans and remind the reader of her deadname under the pretense that what she was called at birth is important to understanding who she is today actually evokes the image of a man for readers and contributes to the insidious social understanding that "this person claimed to be a woman but was really a man."

The ongoing understanding that our identities are not valid is what every trans person sees and hears whenever someone insists on referring to a trans person by using their deadname.

That is what we all saw this week, when The New York Times did it in the obituary for my client Aimee Stephens.

Aimee, whose legal case is pending before the Supreme Court, died this week and, on the day of her death, The Times and several other publications ran obituaries hat included Aimee's deadname. Because Aimee was my client, I had spoken with the Times reporter writing Aimee's obituary to share my experiences with her, but it somehow didn't occur to me to ask them not to publish Aimee's deadname; I thought the Times' editors would have the forethought to be more respectful. (After public criticism, they did remove it from the piece and added an editor's note. The Associated Press also included and then removed it.)

In my grief, I foolishly forgot to be vigilant against society's constant insistence that we are not really who we know ourselves to be.

Of course, no one will understand Aimee better by knowing the fact of her deadname. It is not relevant to who she was or how anyone will actually remember her — and including it in an obituary is a final act of disrespect so cruel that it undermines whatever respect was meant to come from memorializing a person in an obituary.

It wasn't even the first time The Times had done this recently. On March 30, the trans community lost Lorena Borjas — a dear friend and longtime collaborator — to COVID-19. On the day of her death, a reporter from The New York Times called me to discuss Lorena's obituary; I was grieving and overwhelmed — and then enraged when the reporter asked me what Lorena's name had been at birth. "I am not telling you that, and I don't even know," I responded. "And wait, why do you need to know that?"

"It is customary to include someone's birth name in an obituary," the reporter explained.

What the reporter didn't understand was that my friend had not only died from COVID-19 but also that her death was directly related to the kind of systemic refusal to honor trans existence that causes the paper of record to insist on publicizing our deadnames. Lorena had feared going to the doctor when she first became sick with COVID-19 because, as a trans person, she had faced so much discrimination in the health care system over the years — including the repeated use of her deadname — that it had become hard to endure unless it was a true emergency.

And then, on the day of her death, I was being told that the articles commemorating her life and what she meant to the trans community were apparently going to reinforce the very indignities and discrimination that contributed to that death.

To reporters, I get that it can seem — falsely — like including someone's "old name" is little more than a historical fact to flesh out a story. But a deadname is neither important nor necessary to include in any reporting, and it's particularly disrespectful in an obituary, which is meant to honor and commemorate someone's life.

If you want to know (or write) about someone and then go in search of their deadname or an old picture to use or disseminate, think long and hard about why that's important to use. Your prurient curiosity shouldn't get to trump our right to dignity and respect, and we are going to assume that your self-serving desire is more about hurting and exposing us trans people than accurately describing the people we are.

Bitch , Lorena Borjas died of covid-19 because he was an old man. Men have double the risk of women. If he had been an actual woman, he might not have died....
 
It's not really clear why we are supposed to suppress a dead person's previous names. Should we deny that Muhammad Ali was called Cassius Clay? Is it irrelevant to his story?
i know right?
LL Cool J was recently called "James Smith" on a tv show & used it as opportunity to remind everybody that LL stands for "Ladies Love".
"LL Cool J was my nickname, so i started using it as my stage name"--he bragged explained.

this is standard. most entertainment-ppl change their name to something that sounds better or more memorable. nobody freaks out about it. the famous 60s model Twiggy was "Leslie Hornsby"-- recently somebody joked about that too.
When somebody asked her "why'd you change your name" she joked, "you have to ask?"
Obviously the better career choice.

Troons don't want to be constantly reminded of their pathological lies & fakery. that's all their hysterical 'deadname' bullshit really is.
Dead celebrities are 'outed' with their "dead names" in every single obituary.

who do these assholes think they are, demanding new rules for themselves for everything??

btw, does anybody wonder if hormones (& whatever else they did to themselves) had anything to do with this person's kidney failure? i wonder why no reporters have asked or reported on this fact, one way or the other? if these reporters actually "cared" about the troons, they would.

they truly don't care, but the virtue-signalling never ceases.
 
btw, does anybody wonder if hormones (& whatever else they did to themselves) had anything to do with this person's kidney failure?
If the troon is post-op, everything is up for grabs, from infection to stones to bilateral ureteric stenosis. And not just MtF, FtM are frequently affected too.

If he is pre-op, the only thing that comes to mind is spironolactone, but although the drug can fuck up your electrolytes (it's a potassium-sparing diuretic), frank renal dysfunction is rare. Jonathan "TransEthics" Holiday claims he was unable to take spiro because of worsening renal function; he is almost certainly lying. BTW All steroid hormones affect electrolyte balance in some way but it is rare that they cause renal dysfunction.

Also don't forget HIV.
 
Last edited:
btw, does anybody wonder if hormones (& whatever else they did to themselves) had anything to do with this person's kidney failure? i wonder why no reporters have asked or reported on this fact, one way or the other? if these reporters actually "cared" about the troons, they would.

they truly don't care, but the virtue-signalling never ceases.

an FTM tranny didn't get a kidney transplant because they decided she had the kidneys of a man (working better for a given creatinine count).

The equation is: 186 x (Creatinine/88.4)^(-1.154) x (Age)^(-0.203) x (0.742 if female) x (1.210 if black)

It's like they some statisticians spent a bunch of time with spreadhseets and they figured out that:

blacks have more muscle on average and hence more creatinine
men have more muscle on average and hence more creatinine

In general a shemale who takes titty skittles is going to have less muscle and a hemale who takes T is going to have more muscle than their sex, but not to the same extent as the opposite sex.

Anyway the hemale tranny above fucked her body up with T and a shitty vegan diet such that she needed a transplant at the age of 33, except that they decided she was a man so she her kidneys were actually working just about well enough to get a transplant.

Also she refused hospitalisation because she read non-stop tranny propaganda lies so

The patient refused admission because of discrimination concerns as a transgender man,

i.e. she refused medical treatment because she thought they were going to what? gas the tranny? Or treat her as a woman with kidney failure?

Note that the evil transphobic doctors told her to stop taking T, so she:

transferred to an alternate institution; here testosterone administration was restarted

Also because she was a vegan that double fucked her. Men chowing down on steaks would have got a transplant, she however:

Of note, he is a relatively small person, short stature and thin frame; therefore, his muscle mass is similar to that of an average female. He is also vegan, which would further decrease his endogenous creatinine concentration relative to a person that includes animal protein in their diet. The largest deviations in eGFR to GFR comparisons are a function of muscle mass and diet

So she had a stupid diet, and a stupid delusion that she was a man.

She also claimed

Here, the transgender man had been on testosterone hormone therapy for 15 years, but retained female reproductive organs.

This sounds like a lie, a 33 year old lesbian going on T aged 18 in like 2000? Really? I have my doubts.

(She's still alive btw, her twitter is here


and she got her new kidney from a shemale tranny https://www.dailycamera.com/2016/10...lights-strong-bonds-in-transgender-community/ )

Anyway it's clear that taking hormones will fuck up a whole bunch of medical care and if you are dying of something you should probably stop but even then the doctors won't really know how to treat the body you have fucked with in unstudied ways.

Note also

Moreover, studies on cisgender men show that decreasing testosterone concentration portends worse CKD outcomes

So it might well be that Aimee Stephens' titty skittles are what caused him to die from CKD - it doesn't seem like cutting T would be a good thing at all.

There are also cases of trannies dying of prostate cancer because dumb doctors followed their gender bullshit and didn't check their prostate levels as they should for a man, pregnant 'men' not being treated appropriately for uh pregnant 'women', and so on.
 
Last edited:
Calling it deadnaming is just part of the whole histrionic troon experience. Same as how they're constantly being 'erased' and having their existence denied and so on. They want special dispensation for everything that happens to them to be the worst thing ever, and for their every whim to be accepted or you're literally killing them. Literally.

It needs more pushback. It's not their 'deadname', it's just their old name. Lots of people change their name, and all those people, from actors to wives who take their husband's surname, will get their old name brought up at times, especially in obituaries.

Their lives are permanently stuck on 'thing happens, troons most affected'. You'd think it would be tiring to live that way, because it can certainly be exhausting to have to deal with it.
 
Their lives are permanently stuck on 'thing happens, troons most affected'. You'd think it would be tiring to live that way, because it can certainly be exhausting to have to deal with it.

Troonery is just something the worst malignant narcissists discovered that allowed them to act like complete pieces of shit 24/7 and get away with it.
 
--"To that end, one particular response to Violet’s Instagram Story by a decriminalization supporter stuck out to me. It said something to the effect of “My mom taught me to respect women.” But… isn’t “respecting women” paying them to do their job? It seems that some of these men’s theoretical recognition of women’s ability to make decisions for their own body ends up being overridden by skepticism of a sex worker’s ability to consent."--

Or, you know, maybe most guys like to think they can attract women who are DTF without paying said women to fuck them. There is a huge difference between paying someone to fuck you vs. finding someone who WANTS to fuck you without bribery.

--"But… isn’t “respecting women” paying them to do their job? "--

Omfg, lol. Dear women: any man who refuses to pay money to override a woman's lack of natural interest in him DOESN'T RESPECT WOMEN.
Holy fuck, the blind misogyny is lol worthy. "Their job", omfg
 
Calling it deadnaming is just part of the whole histrionic troon experience. Same as how they're constantly being 'erased' and having their existence denied and so on. They want special dispensation for everything that happens to them to be the worst thing ever, and for their every whim to be accepted or you're literally killing them. Literally.

It needs more pushback. It's not their 'deadname', it's just their old name. Lots of people change their name, and all those people, from actors to wives who take their husband's surname, will get their old name brought up at times, especially in obituaries.

It doesn't make any sense, but it's the same kind of logic that allows other minority groups to be the sole arbiters about what's discrimination etc. (white people can't know what it's like to be black, non-Muslims to be Muslim).

As such if a tranny says that they feel oppressed every day or that dead names must be buried then it is axiomatically true, even if by even calling themselves trans it makes it obvious that they were once called something else.

Plus they love to say that any kind of normal curiosity is in fact evil bigotry. E.g., asking about genital surgery. They get to define everything, and because they have personality disorders and (for most of the shemale trannies) sexual perversions as well, they relish the opportunity to make everyone else a bigot. This doubly applies to white trannies because they get to identify themselves as oppressed minorities, which works for the MTFs who have male pattern behaviour of wanting to define feminism (see people like Jane Fae, Charlotte Clymer, etc.) over and above actual women, and also for the FTMs like Kate 'Chase' Strangio, who already slotted into 'victim' archetypes (despite being, y'know, a fucking lawyer from a middle class family), but are happy to double down on that for extra points.
 
Their lives are permanently stuck on 'thing happens, troons most affected'. You'd think it would be tiring to live that way, because it can certainly be exhausting to have to deal with it.
It is a game to them. They get a high out of it because they know full well it is not real; it is just like a video game.
Imagine you are to infiltrate an army base full of Islamists armed to the teeth, you'll be scared shitless. Not so if you're playing Call of Duty.

People who take their screeching seriously are fools.
 
Last edited:
This sounds like a lie, a 33 year old lesbian going on T aged 18 in like 2000? Really? I have my doubts.

Buck Angel medically transitioned in the early '90s, so it's unusual for a woman to transition that long ago, but not unheard of. That said, a lot of trannies lie about transitioning as teenagers when they actually transitioned much, much later. It's part of their narrative of "always knowing" that they're trans.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/ce...he-set-of-mad-max/ar-BB148dGj?ocid=spartandhp

Mad Max: Fury Road was an important film in Charlize Theron's career as it marked an important time in her life.

On Thursday, she shared a sweet, rare pic of herself on set with her first child, Jackson, lying on her chest.

"I became a mom right before we started shooting," she captioned the touching photo, which features Jackson with a purple heart emoji covering her face. "At least my child will forever have the fun fact of 'I spent most of the first year of my life in a war rig' (special appearance by my incredible costumer Inge Hough)."


Theron has previously opened up about raising Jackson as a girl after she came to her at the age of three saying she was not a boy. Back in March, Theron spoke with theDaily Mail about raising the now 7-year-old as her daughter.

"Yes, I thought she was a boy, too," Theron noted at the time. "Until she looked at me when she was three years old and said: 'I am not a boy!' So there you go! I have two beautiful daughters who, just like any parent, I want to protect and I want to see thrive."

Theron added, "My job as a parent is to celebrate them and to love them and to make sure that they have everything they need in order to be what they want to be. And I will do everything in my power for my kids to have that right and to be protected within that."

As for Mad Max, the cast and director, George Miller, recently gave an oral history of the film to The New York Times, and Miller later revealed that he's working on a prequel film for Theron's character, Furiosa.

Theron will not be reprising her fan favorite role, leaving Miller in search for a younger actress to tell the origin story. The director had been working on the drama Three Thousand Years of Longing, and had been prepared to start on the Mad Max prequel film afterwards when filming was shut down due to the coronavirus pandemic.

“So after we finish it, and hopefully everything settles down with the pandemic, we’ll see what the world allows us to do with Furiosa,” Miller told The New York Times.

The kid "transitioned" at 3. He's currently 7 years old. What the fuck.
 
2.jpeg




This blew up heavily on Lifestreamfails and even posting harmless emotes on this troon's channel will get you banned within seconds. This furry degenerate (yes, he identifies as a deer) is ResetEra encompassed into a single person. @DriveByTrolling

Nuke Twitch
 
Last edited:
Back