StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)

For someone who isn't gay, he sure is obsessed with what penises look like.

Are there any journal articles that supposedly proclaim any benefits to circumcision? I thought that was primarily a religious thing.

People will still try to push the hygiene thing, which can be debunked by anyone who can spend an extra minute or so thoroughly washing their dick. Another angle the pro-circumcision crowd tries to push is that it can reduce births in developing nations, based on the fact that circumcisions are painful and make sex less fun, therefore people in 3rd world shitholes will be having a lot less sex or pumping out babies if they don't enjoy having sex.

I'm proudly uncut, so the whole idea of someone slicing off part of my manhood is just plain asinine. My parents even told me they chose not to have my circumcised as a baby because they considered it barbaric and antiquated, and that they cared for the sake of future sex life as an adult. I thank them for that.
 
Last edited:
People will still try to push the hygiene thing, which can be debunked by anyone who can spend an extra minute or so thoroughly washing their dick. Another angle the pro-circumcision crowd tries to push is that it can reduce births in developing nations, based on the fact that circumcisions are painful and make sex less fun, therefore people in 3rd world shitholes will be having a lot less sex and pumping out babies if they don't enjoy having sex.

I'm proudly uncut, so the whole idea of someone slicing off part of my manhood is just plain asinine. My parents even told me they chose not to have my circumcised as a baby because they considered it barbaric and antiquated, and that they cared for the sake of future sex life as an adult. I thank them for that.
Dumbest reason I've head a parent getting their kid circumcised was because "I do not know about dicks that much because I am not a whore".
 
Dumbest reason I've head a parent getting their kid circumcised was because "I do not know about dicks that much because I am not a whore".

Yep. I've dated a girl whose parents were trashy and uneducated, and the mom was pregnant and gave birth while I was with my GF. She chose to have the son circumcised, and when I asked her why, she looked at me like an idiot and said, "Ew, why wouldn't I remove the foreskin? That's gross! You're supposed to cut it off to make it look like a regular penis!"

A lot of people seriously believe foreskins are tantamount to umbilical cords, in that it's just something you're supposed to remove by default at birth. American doctors still push that fucking bullshit based on outdated teachings from Dr. Kellogg.
 
Yep. I've dated a girl whose parents were trashy and uneducated, and the mom was pregnant and gave birth while I was with my GF. She chose to have the son circumcised, and when I asked her why, she looked at me like an idiot and said, "Ew, why wouldn't I remove the foreskin? That's gross! You're supposed to cut it off to make it look like a regular penis!"

A lot of people seriously believe foreskins are tantamount to umbilical cords, in that it's just something you're supposed to remove by default at birth. American doctors still push that fucking bullshit based on outdated teachings from Dr. Kellogg.
Bitch apparently never saw a real hard dick, I'm uncut and mine fills out fine!
 
I do think that there is room for anti stone toss edits out there. The issue I have always seen is that they end up having no fucking bite, or are so wordy as to be shit. I think I have only seen one good antifa stonetoss meme.

a7lz9bxp1xw41.png
Short simple and to the point. That said not all that political.

The only good political based ones that would shit on stuff stone toss believe or are adjacent beliefs are like the below image. Short, simple, relying on juxtaposition, and a thing many on the far right like to ignore or act like doesn't exist.

The issue is that the below image is from some guy on the right punching right. If antifa stone toss were smart they would do more like the below. But they won't because it would be punching too hard and implying meanie things about trannies. They could make shit of this caliber, and if they were too then maybe they would have a better overall meme game.

But they can't because of meme insecurity (ie having to use a fuck load of words to explain everything to be sure you understand it the correct™ way), and pulling their punches to not appear too mean.
iceland (3).png

/blogpost
 
The issue is that the below image is from some guy on the right punching right. If antifa stone toss were smart they would do more like the below. But they won't because it would be punching too hard and implying meanie things about trannies. They could make shit of this caliber, and if they were too then maybe they would have a better overall meme game.

To punch hard, you need to punch with the truth. If you know the truth of the current situation, it's hard to be a leftie. You need to isolate yourself from the majority of lefties (kinda like Jimmy Dore tried) and try to pull them somewhere else. But then you have a new problem. When on any of the umpteen points of disagreement will get you harassed and unfriended. You have to play ball with a good number of topics where diversity of thought is not tolerated. Being unfriended is not a big deal when you've got a politically diverse friendgroup, but when you're as deep in as being in antifa it usually means losing your entire friend network. It's like being excommunicated as a jehova's witness.

The right had the same problem for years, but the heavy and varied censorship on the right has loosened it up and made people very open to teaming up with very different political views, which requires of each to also be able to enjoy a laugh at their own expense.
 
Last edited:
People will still try to push the hygiene thing, which can be debunked by anyone who can spend an extra minute or so thoroughly washing their dick. Another angle the pro-circumcision crowd tries to push is that it can reduce births in developing nations, based on the fact that circumcisions are painful and make sex less fun, therefore people in 3rd world shitholes will be having a lot less sex or pumping out babies if they don't enjoy having sex.

I'm proudly uncut, so the whole idea of someone slicing off part of my manhood is just plain asinine. My parents even told me they chose not to have my circumcised as a baby because they considered it barbaric and antiquated, and that they cared for the sake of future sex life as an adult. I thank them for that.
It's a hygiene thing in hot climates going back to an era where there wasn't enough clean water available to wash regularly. That's why you see it being fairly common throughout the Middle East and Africa. The Egyptians regularly practiced circumcision for the same reasons,. I wouldn't be surprised if teh jooz took it as a religious symbol probably because a lot of their rivals (probably Greeks and Romans) didn't, and they needed to use it as an identifying symbol of their unique status.
 
Are there any journal articles that supposedly proclaim any benefits to circumcision? I thought that was primarily a religious thing.
The most interesting place I've seen it brought up is in the graphic novel "Even a Money Can Draw Manga!" where the primary argument from a medical standpoint is circumcision lowers your risk of phimosis. It's now the reason I know and remember that word.

If men can't have a say on abortion, women can't have a say on circumcision.
You'll have to make it "male circumcision," since women in the middle east and their refugees still have to deal with mothers taking garden shears to their daughter's clits pre-puberty.
 
The most interesting place I've seen it brought up is in the graphic novel "Even a Money Can Draw Manga!" where the primary argument from a medical standpoint is circumcision lowers your risk of phimosis. It's now the reason I know and remember that word.

The vast majority of people don't get that, though, and if they do, it can be easily rectified anyway. Considering it is useless to the vast majority of people, and can have extravagant, albeit rare consequences when botched, the general balance of harms doesn't seem to favor having it as a universal practice.
 
The vast majority of people don't get that, though, and if they do, it can be easily rectified anyway. Considering it is useless to the vast majority of people, and can have extravagant, albeit rare consequences when botched, the general balance of harms doesn't seem to favor having it as a universal practice.
Much like Stonetoss though, it's a long shitpost of a comic. The discussion takes place in a bar between two men after salaryman-hours and exists because the two protagonists are displaying to each other the best way to fuse manga with medical pamphlets. One is pro-circumcision, the other makes an anti-chopping pamphlet with the same characters.
 
You'll have to make it "male circumcision," since women in the middle east and their refugees still have to deal with mothers taking garden shears to their daughter's clits pre-puberty.

Except that's mutilation, and the meme of implying it's the same is fucking rétarded. They're not cutting off the glands, just skin. It's not the same.

(If anyone wants to argue circumcision is mutilation, by all means, it's your right, but I'm staying out of that discussion.)

What they do in middle eastern shitholes isn't circumcision; calling it so just to avoid offending sandfaggots or avoid calling them out on their backwards bullshit isn't an option.
 
Except that's mutilation, and the meme of implying it's the same is fucking rétarded. They're not cutting off the glands, just skin. It's not the same.

(If anyone wants to argue circumcision is mutilation, by all means, it's your right, but I'm staying out of that discussion.)

What they do in middle eastern shitholes isn't circumcision; calling it so just to avoid offending sandfaggots or avoid calling them out on their backwards bullshit isn't an option.

If someone cut away your eyelids, would it be alright, since it's just skin?

Or is it possible that skin like most things in your body has a function?


For someone who isn't gay, he sure is obsessed with what penises look like.

Are there any journal articles that supposedly proclaim any benefits to circumcision? I thought that was primarily a religious thing.
I remember diving into those studies. Most of em are a good laugh if you're bored.

They're mostly done in Africa under dubious circumstances. In one they gave condoms to the circumcised group and taught them how to use them and not to the non-circumcised group and used that to prove that circumcision reduces STD transmission. In another they gave condoms to both groups, asked them two months later if they liked sex, 97% of both groups said yes, and used that to claim there is no sensation difference between being circumcised or not
 
Last edited:
Too much foreskin talk, not enough laughing at tards

(archive)
1589840558982.png


(archive)
1589840646926.png


(archive)
1589840705761.png


(archive)
1589840790492.png

Yes, this is the actual resolution

(archive)
1589840915794.png


(archive)
1589840952784.png


(archive)
1589841031834.png


(archive)
1589841082641.png


https://www.reddit.com/r/antifastonetoss/comments/gko9hv/rconsumeproduct_be_like/ (Not Stonetoss related, but still goes in here)
(archive)
1589841138903.png


(archive)
1589841172157.png


(archive)
1589841213030.png


(archive)
1589841279497.png


BreadPanes comic

(archive)
1589841373152.png
 
Back