Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[Judge Holden]

Soldier class. Who else is going to go to war?

Even tribal tier wars need either a logistical train or soldiers self sufficient enough to supply/feed/treat themselves. This would make groups entirely/largely consisting of relatively dumb and violent people at a tactical and strategic disadvantage to those who were not relatively dumb and violent.

Wars are not just well muscled chads teleporting to a battleground and punching eachother with rocks before instahealing and teleporting away. Even third world prison wars need a fucktunne of planning, preparation, and busywork to be sustainable in the short term, let alone medium or long term.

And given how ubiquitous tribal war was in prehistory, this would have then spread this "inherently dumb and violent" gene to everyone, including those migrating out of africa to europe/asia/australasia/the americas had it been any advantage.

The answer is that the extreme lack of expression is not extremely prevalent because it -is- a disadvantage in stable times, but the level of MAOA gene activations that's considered "normal" among subsaharans is lower than that of any other race. Increased activation was highly selected for in Europe and Asia, not so much in Subsaharan Africa, where the dominant Bantu-speaking population achieved its prominence through warfare and subjugation in the historically recent past. This is a circumstance where having 5% (or higher in some areas) of your population with high aggression is a huge boon over your neighbors.

The base-line level of MAOA gene activation in "jogger-americans" is, when seen at a similar level in whites, correlated with higher crime rates in those whites than the rest of the white population with a higher level of expression. So obviously there is a difference in behavior that this expression elicits even though it isn't as damaging as the 5% who have the extremely maladjusted version of that gene expression.

And I shouldn't have to tell you how large a group 5% represents when the population is in the tens of millions.

In which case this is a circumstance that has been shared in europe, asia, and the americas for the exact same half million or so years of human existence until debatably the past few centuries, unless I have been misled about the long and glorious history of warfare. Thus this hypothetical "mindless warrior" gene would be ubiquitous if it had any tangible advantageous effect over generations, even if only the most minor statistical trend given how long a span of history we are talking about here.

Remember that agrarian civilisation is only about five thousand years old and homo gays sapiens only emerged from africa about 50k years ago, meaning that 90% of human history consisted of endless low level stone age tribal warfare in africa, with the remaining 9% being endless low level stone age tribal warfare in and outside of africa, and a whopping 1% being anything resembling civilisation.......which until about a hundred years ago featured endless steadily increasing levels of warfare, with it eventually spiking a couple times in the 19th/20th centuries before settling down to a low level modern age warfare.

If this trait is a major advantage and is widely dispersed in modern populations, then it would have to something relatively recent in geneological history to not have spread out with different migration waves

If this trait is a minor advantage and is widely dispersed in modern populations then it would have had to have existed for a longass time to become so widespread despite only offering statistical advantages over thousands of years, in which case it would have followed the different migration groups to europe and asia

In either case if we are going by the studies then its probably fair to say that 5% of a population having a possible genetic predisposition to be on average somewhat more irritable and impulsive when subject to negative environmental stimuli in childhood, which is what pretty much all the studies I have glanced at in the abstract suggest, is not a majorly advantageous trait to have in any society, let alone something to be actively selected for in a subset of an ethnic group over a relatively extremely short period of time.

Also on a historical note, given it took the bantu a thousand years to finish their colonisation of that chunk of southern africa, I somewhat doubt they were any more ultra-aggressive uber conquerers than any other wave of human migration/conquest.

 

[Corn Flakes]

Side note on the whole genetics debate:

A gene that results in statistically higher aggression and lower tolerance for delayed gratification does not in any way necessarily result in criminal behavior. Many professions value aggression and initiative. So while a gene like that would imply a higher percentage of the population engaging in criminal activity, it should also result in over-achievers in other fields.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

Even tribal tier wars need either a logistical train or soldiers self sufficient enough to supply/feed/treat themselves. This would make groups entirely/largely consisting of relatively dumb and violent people at a tactical and strategic disadvantage to those who were not relatively dumb and violent.

Wars are not just well muscled chads teleporting to a battleground and punching eachother with rocks before instahealing and teleporting away. Even third world prison wars need a fucktunne of planning, preparation, and busywork to be sustainable in the short term, let alone medium or long term.

And given how ubiquitous tribal war was in prehistory, this would have then spread this "inherently dumb and violent" gene to everyone, including those migrating out of africa to europe/asia/australasia/the americas had it been any advantage.

Well yeah, which is why historically the upper classes were the officers. Granted not all of them were actually competent, but enough were that militaries were able to function.

 

[Book Thief]

This post links to this Youtube video.

Who the hell talks like this, outside of incels and Muslim men? (Both of whom are equally trash)


And I included this, just because I thought it was funny.

 

[Wulfpack Legend]

 

[Shaka Brah]

View attachment 1308745

Note: not Korra

 

[SiccDicc]

And I included this, just because I thought it was funny.
View attachment 1308632

Every time they actually tried to kill or get rid of Godzilla they just made him angrier and stronger. I want them to realize that.

There was an actual movie where they fuck with the timeline and accidentally made a much more aggressive and outright psychopathic Godzilla instead of the "good natured" hero one.

 

[Corn Flakes]

And I included this, just because I thought it was funny.
View attachment 1308632

So, the Patriarchy is Earth's mightiest defender, who causes the most damage as colateral while fighting enormous threats that would otherwise end all of humankind. Gotcha, thanks.

 

[Positron]

Patriarchy is well-loved and people just keep coming back for more.

 

[Private Pyle]

View attachment 1308745

First off.
1. Forcing kids to do anything is a bad idea, even with a quality show like Avatar. Making your kids watch it will just turn them off from it.
2. If your incentive to introduce kids to ATLA is for bullshit reasons like that rather than good animation, characters, fight scenes and story, I personally don’t want you anywhere near cartoons.

 

[Corn Flakes]

First off.
1. Forcing kids to do anything is a bad idea, even with a quality show like Avatar. Making your kids watch it will just turn them off from it.
2. If your incentive to introduce kids to ATLA is for bullshit reasons like that rather than good animation, characters, fight scenes and story, I personally don’t want you anywhere near cartoons.

God forbid they allow kids to reach their own conclusions, too! What if the child ends up thinking the Fire Nation looks cool as hell and starts doing firebending moves during playtime? Can you imagine the horror? The heartbreak? The massive twitter sperging?

 

[Jarolleon]

The answer is that the extreme lack of expression is not extremely prevalent because it -is- a disadvantage in stable times, but the level of MAOA gene activations that's considered "normal" among subsaharans is lower than that of any other race. Increased activation was highly selected for in Europe and Asia, not so much in Subsaharan Africa, where the dominant Bantu-speaking population achieved its prominence through warfare and subjugation in the historically recent past. This is a circumstance where having 5% (or higher in some areas) of your population with high aggression is a huge boon over your neighbors.

The base-line level of MAOA gene activation in "jogger-americans" is, when seen at a similar level in whites, correlated with higher crime rates in those whites than the rest of the white population with a higher level of expression. So obviously there is a difference in behavior that this expression elicits even though it isn't as damaging as the 5% who have the extremely maladjusted version of that gene expression.

And I shouldn't have to tell you how large a group 5% represents when the population is in the tens of millions.

Edit: One of the most important things you should take away from this is that the phenomenon of genetics influencing behavior among human subspecies exists. Whatever it was that selected for these differences, they can be clearly quantified on the genetic level and their outcomes charted on the sociological level and so we have to at least acknowledge them.

So you recruit the hotheads as grunts, and let the more level-headed guys handle the tactics and logistics, and just send them at the enemy and hope that they don't successfully trick your hotheads into doing something dumb? & having a society with a lot of hotheads means that everyone has to arm themselves and know a bit about fighting, lest they find themselves the target of a chimpout? If so, maybe joggers actually increase America's military might simply by encouraging whites to learn to defend themselves.

 

[Jet Fuel Johnny]

God forbid they allow kids to reach their own conclusions, too! What if the child ends up thinking the Fire Nation looks cool as hell and starts doing firebending moves during playtime? Can you imagine the horror? The heartbreak? The massive twitter sperging?

Funny, my grand-daughter has been watching ATLA the past couple days and she's started dancing around yelling "WOOSH!"

It's hilariously cute.

She could give two shits about politics, colonialism, or faggotry.

She wants to dance around making wooshing noise and yelling "Watch me! I'm a bender!"

So you recruit the hotheads as grunts, and let the more level-headed guys handle the tactics and logistics, and just send them at the enemy and hope that they don't successfully trick your hotheads into doing something dumb? & having a society with a lot of hotheads means that everyone has to arm themselves and know a bit about fighting, lest they find themselves the target of a chimpout? If so, maybe joggers actually increase America's military might simply by encouraging whites to learn to defend themselves.

That would last until the first time they ran into actual disciplined troops who's lines didn't collapse when the aggressive guys all charged like the water-heads they actually are.

Plus, the hot-headed guys inevitably think "Why should I listen to that faggot? I'm bigger and stronger, me should be officer in charge" and kill their officers.

You have to be able to teach the hotheads tactics and logistics or else they'll eat their 4 days of rations on the first day due to lack of self-discipline.

At the very least, look at what happened to the undisciplined forces who encountered the Romans or the Brits, who excelled at discipline, training, and following the officer chain of command while encouraging initiative.

 

[Jarolleon]

Funny, my grand-daughter has been watching ATLA the past couple days and she's started dancing around yelling "WOOSH!"

It's hilariously cute.

She could give two shits about politics, colonialism, or faggotry.

She wants to dance around making wooshing noise and yelling "Watch me! I'm a bender!"


That would last until the first time they ran into actual disciplined troops who's lines didn't collapse when the aggressive guys all charged like the water-heads they actually are.

Plus, the hot-headed guys inevitably think "Why should I listen to that faggot? I'm bigger and stronger, me should be officer in charge" and kill their officers.

You have to be able to teach the hotheads tactics and logistics or else they'll eat their 4 days of rations on the first day due to lack of self-discipline.

At the very least, look at what happened to the undisciplined forces who encountered the Romans or the Brits, who excelled at discipline, training, and following the officer chain of command while encouraging initiative.

I wonder if a user named Shaka is thinking of a certain region that completely lacked disciplined armies for millennia, in which his namesake was considered a military genius for saying "Guys, we can just close in and stab them immediately if you forge the spear a bit differently, they can't javelin us all if we carry big shields" . Or you get lucky and your hotheads are only mildly hotheaded, just rash enough to get into fistfights as a kid and think that being a soldier is way cool, but just smart enough to fight as a unit and not panic when the enemy plays a trick on them.

 

[Krokodil Overdose]

So, the Patriarchy is Earth's mightiest defender, who causes the most damage as colateral while fighting enormous threats that would otherwise end all of humankind. Gotcha, thanks.

It's an inextricable part of the natural order that, while not the most reassuring thing in the world, keeps us safe from legitimately destructive and malevolent forces.

Checks out.

 

[madethistocomment]

View attachment 1308745

At first I was gonna be like "Hell yeah, absolutely introduce kids to that masterpeice!" and then I read the rest of it and immediately rolled my eyes.

 

[TowinKarz]

God forbid they allow kids to reach their own conclusions, too! What if the child ends up thinking the Fire Nation looks cool as hell and starts doing firebending moves during playtime? Can you imagine the horror? The heartbreak? The massive twitter sperging?

Yes, I can, that's basically why lefties think the internet is to blame for every problem in the world, and that review-bombing a woke TV show online should be a Federal Hate Crime . Using imagination the wrong way is the gravest of human offenses. (But it's not WE who are the dictators!)

If you have to invoke a children's TV show to defend your ethos.... you might not have a very solid one.

 

[Muttnik]

God forbid they allow kids to reach their own conclusions, too! What if the child ends up thinking the Fire Nation looks cool as hell and starts doing firebending moves during playtime? Can you imagine the horror? The heartbreak? The massive twitter sperging?

All of the best characters on the show are Firebenders so there's no way this won't happen.

 

[Corn Flakes]

If you have to invoke a children's TV show to defend your ethos.... you might not have a very solid one.

Maybe we need a TV equivalent of Harry Potter's "read another book!" movement. "Watch another show" or something. Some people get really hung up on ATLA.

 

[TowinKarz]

Maybe we need a TV equivalent of Harry Potter's "read another book!" movement. "Watch another show" or something. Some people get really hung up on ATLA.

CONSUME LESS POP CULTURE